Pertti Tamminen, Project Director

Transkriptio

1 Estonian Spatial Planners Studytour to Tampere Pertti Tamminen, Project Director Vuores

2 Vuores Location of the Vuores area

3 Vuores

4 Vuores Topography

5 Vuores: Main goals 13,500 inhabitants, jobs The goal is to build a structurally and functionally harmonious urban district on the territory of two municipalities > small town image, urban village The natural environment and ecology are an essential part of the area identity. The environmentally valuable areas will be protected. Diversity in the housing stock and social structure. Traffic system emphasises public transport, walking and cycling Vuores

6 Vuores Vuores Masterplan

7

8 kaavoitustilanne k-m 2 lahdespohja IKEA HERVANTA vuoreksen puistokatu rimmi Housing Fair 2012 virolainen/ asuntomessut koukkujärvi mäyränmäki vuoreskeskus k-m 2

9 Vuores Current planning situation

10 PROSESSIEN TIEDONHALLINTA Asiakas vaatimukset Tuotteiden ja tuotannon uudistaminen Lisäarvoverkostot BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON DEMAND Tarvelähtöinen rakennettu ympäristö Beyond

11 The traditional process Masterplan Site-specific plan Selling or renting of plots Companies Planning and building Planning partnership Masterplan Site-specific plan Selling or renting of plots Companies Planning and building

12 Guidelines Vuores planning partnership concept developed within the Beyond Vuores R & D project (TEKES funding / VTT) 1 st phase: The Mäyränmäki block-planning competition 2 nd phase: The Vuores centre selection process / planning competition Vuores

13 1 st phase: Mäyränmäki block-planning competition Location of the Mäyränmäki area

14 The aim of the competition to develop innovative and realizable concepts to create high quality living environment and cityscape in the Mäyränmäki area to develop Mäyränmäki into a small scale and cosy residential area as a result the city will choose the organisations to implement the project (Mäyränmäki area) Vuores

15 Framework Each competitor team/group included: Developer / construction company Architect Artist and other specialists Competition area: 14 hectares, 6 residential blocks ( floor-m2) 3 competitors per block Vuores

16 1. 2. Site planning process 1. ALTERNATIVES Dec COMPETITION Dec DRAFT Jun 06 3.

17 Kilpailun kohteena olevat korttelit Competition area: 14 hectares floor-m2 260 dwellings 750 inhabitants 5000 m m m m m2

18 Opening of competition: Companies entry The main stages of the block-planning competition Verification of competence Ranking of the companies Allocation of block areas to the competitors Competition: Vuores Selection of winners ( ) and further planning (2006)

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 Nokka Palmberg Kronlöf Optio 21 Sato Antti Ylinen Lähde Hartela ArttoPaloRossiTikka Tanhua Skanska LSV Viherkiila YIT Vainio&Ekman Gemini VVO Helamaa&Heiskanen

28 Further measures after the competition The winner makes a commitment to implement the winning proposal Planning partnership Further planning of the block areas shall be done in planning partnership co-operation with the Vuores project The competitors must be prepared to revise and adapt their plans in accordance with the plans of other area implementers = the 6 proposals will be fit together The plots will be sold or leased (city owns the land) Vuores

29 Competition entry Planning partnership process Site planning Urban planner Street planner Landscape architect Municipal engineering Etc. Detailed plan for the plot Developer Architect Artist Experts Detailed plan for the plot Vuores

30 Competition entry Kilpailuehdotus Detailed plan for the plot Tontinkäyttösuunnitelmaluonnos

31 Competition entry

32 Detailed plan for the plot

33

34 Summary A new consept no ready-made plan -> room for ideas and creativity 3 competitors per block = reasonable chance of winning Target: planning partnership (PPP) Target: developing concepts for building of urban smallhouses Result: competitors have invested in their proposals = excellent starting point for implementation of a high-quality, cosy residential area Vuores

35 Mäyränmäki residential area Site-specific development plan

36 VUORESKESKUKSEN LÄNSIOSAN KAAVOITUS- JA TOTEUTUSKUMPPANEIDEN VALINTA 2 nd phase: Vuores Vuores centre KILPAILUEHDOTUS Cittá JATKOSUUNNITELMA ASEMKAAVALUONNOS

37 CHALLENGES IN THE SITE PLANNING questions regarding the cityscape and architecture ground floor: use of business and office premises parking solutions implementation of the blocks in stages Vuores

38 VUORESKESKUKSEN LÄNSIOSAN KAAVOITUS- JA TOTEUTUSKUMPPANEIDEN VALINTA KÄYNNISSÄ OLEVAT KILPAILUT

39 Opening of the competition Planning proposals and implementation ideas Questions about the programme, info The main stages of the Vuores centre partner selection process Evaluation of the proposals Pseudonymes Verification of competence Ranking of companies Interviewing the competitors Selection of winners/partners Vuores Planning partnership 2007

40 VUORESKESKUKSEN ASEMAKAAVALUONNOS työpaikkakortteli kirkko, srk kulttuuripalvelut terveys- ja sosiaaliasema työpaikkakortteli koulukeskus liikekeskus päivittäistavarakauppa, muu liiketila varaus palvelurakennukselle Vuoreskeskus pohjoisesta katsottuna Vuoreskeskuksen sydän Vuoreskeskus etelästä katsottuna Vuores

41 SRV A3 Pohjola Vainio&Ekman Visura Lasse Kosunen Hartela ArttoPaloRossiTikka YIT,VTS,TOAS Helamaa-Heiskanen Peab Seicon Tilatakomo VVO Sarlin+Sopanen

42 VUORESKESKUKSEN LÄNSIOSAN KAAVOITUS- JA TOTEUTUSKUMPPANNIEN VALINTA E E D C E D D B C A B A

43

44 VUORES Arkkitehdit Sarlin+Sopanen Oy

45

46

47

48

49

50

51 VUORESKESKUKSEN LÄNSIOSA KORTTELI 7624e Katu- ja pihanäkymä A R K K I T E H D I T A 3 O Y Ilmarinkatu TAMPERE p f a3@a3.fi Vuores

52

53 VUORESKESKUKSEN LÄNSIOSA: TONTINKÄYTTÖSUUNNITELMAT A B C Arkkitehdit Sarlin+Sopanen / Marja Sopanen VVO Rakennuttaja Oy Arkkitehtitoimisto Tilatakomo Oy / Taina Jordan Peab Seicon Oy A B C Arkkitehtitoimisto Helamaa ja Heiskanen / Juha Saarijärvi YIT, VTS, TOAS D E F G Arkkitehtikonttori Vainio & Ekman Oy / Sami Ekman Rakennustoimisto Pohjola Oy Arkkitehtityöhuone Artto Palo Rossi Tikka Oy / Aaro Artto - Hartela Oy Arkkitehtitoimisto A3 Oy / Juha Väisänen Rakennusliike Erkki Huhdanpää Oy Arkkitehtitoimisto Kosunen Lasse Oy / Jouni Kulmala Visura Oy D E F G

54

55

56 CENTRAL PARK VUORES - TAMPERE Design Development ATELIER DREISEITL PARK DESIGN STORMWATER

57 MASTER PLAN Site Plan - General Arrangement 10 ATELIER DREISEITL

58 Conceptual Approach 8 ATELIER DREISEITL

59 The Market Plaza

60 Rain Garden - View

61 Aestethic of an artifical shaped landscape The total park area is held together by a distinctive overall landform concept. The landform is worked and crafted as if at the hands of an artist to create spatial tensions and releases. The landform expresses freedom. This is strengthened by a concept of visual clarity. The openness of the current site is a most attractive aspect of the site and is retained in the Park. The new path structures are straight, opening visual pathways and creating visual connectivity throughout the Park. A dramatic example is the view from the Market Place to the landmark on the hill opposite. The landform is artistic and active, creating individual niches, and zones for more intensely used lawn areas and more extensive meadow areas. In polarity to the bold creativity of the new landform, two landscape relicts are sensitively retained - the bolder hill at the Playground and the bedrock at the Central Lake Plaza are reinterpreted as charming archaic elements in the landscape. ATELIER DREISEITL 9

62 Sculptural Earthwork

63 Stormwater Concept Management Elements: Detention Facilities CLEANSING SWALES RETENTION AREA

64 Typical section through stormwater treatment system Street and roof run-off ca m ca m 3.50 m ca. 30 m IL % DN 600 IL max.wl Retention WL WL Stormwater sewer system Settling tank with downflow buffle Cleansing swale Drainage passage Retention lake

65 Crossings with different Functions, Materials and Design

66 Lake and Park Intersections Model

67

68 Beyond Vuores: goals The goals set by Tampere for the block-planning competition (Beyond Vuores): Creation of models of operation for Vuores project development Co-operation with construction industry actors starting in as early a stage as possible Meeting of the quality, cost, and environmental criteria plot allocation competitions within the plan process Vuores

69 Vuores Evaluation criteria in the competition Comprehensive solution - originality - architecture - public space - the relation of the buildings to nature Housing - innovativeness of the solution - flexibility of the residences - versatility of the space solutions - view and lightness - outside recreational spaces Outdoor areas and use of grounds - courtyards, play areas, plants - outdoor areas' hierarchy, safety, and level of shelter - microclimate (e.g., sunshine and winds) - ecological handling of storm water Traffic and parking - parking and services for the plot - pedestrian and bicycle service - internal traffic in the block areas Buildings - life cycle thinking - functionality - solutions facilitating sustainable development - building in stages The goal of an accessible environment applies to all elements