Arviointi kuuluu kaikille CASE: Meeting the Odyssey Luova Eurooppa -hakemustyöpaja 2017

Transkriptio

1 Arviointi kuuluu kaikille CASE: Meeting the Odyssey Luova Eurooppa -hakemustyöpaja 2017 Leena Björkqvist, Metropolia AMK & Creative and Inclusive Finland

2 Menetelmänä arviointi voi olla: Sisäistä arviointi eli itsearviointia - Projektin tekijät arvioi kriittisesti onnistumisiaan ja epäonnistumisiaan ja miettii miten asioita voisi tehdä paremmin. Vertaisarviointia - Joku toisesta samankaltaisesta projektista tekee arviointia. Ulkoista arviointia - Joku projektista riippumaton taho arvioi projektia. 2

3 Hankehakemuksesta konkreettiseksi suunnitelmaksi Pidetään suunta! Arvioidaan säännöllisesti ja yhdessä! 3

4 Aloitetaan vastuusta ja apujoukoista 4

5 Valmistelu Aikatauluttaminen Arvioinnin tulokset ja muutos - tiedotus Arviointiverstas

6 Meeting the Odyssey An Adventure Beyond Arts, Myths, and Everyday Life Finland Estonia Denmark Germany Poland Czech Republic Russia Italy France Greece Malta Kuva: Meeting the

7 The PARTNERS 1. Viirus Theatre, Finland 2. Scarlattine Teatro, Italy 3. Cada Die Teatro, Italy 4. Teatro della Limonaia, Italy 5. Regione Lombardia, Italy 6. Asterions Hus, Denmark 7. ProFitArt Company, Czech Republic 8. Anapoda Theatro, Greece 9. Skorohod Platform, St Petersburg 10. Réseau en Scène, France 11. Per-Aspera, Germany 12. Opolski Teatr Lalki I Aktora, Poland 13. NO99, Estonia 14. Malta Arts Council, Malta

8 The Route

9 The MONEY EUCulture Programme Grant (50 % of eligible costs) Self financing in own and raised funds

10 HAKEMUSTEKSTIÄ: The External research & The Internal Evaluation The focus for the external research will be intercultural dialogue and mobility between artists. impact of the project. Internal evaluation. The whole project staff and all co-organisers will be evaluating themselves by reporting, counting, producing, planning and implementing the project activities. At the first big meeting in Copenhagen, the plan of the project will be revised and this will also serve as a reminder to every one of the real goals of the project.

11 SISÄINEN ARVIOINTI - TOIMINTA SUHTEESSA TULOKSIIN JA VAIKUTUKSIIN

12 The Intern Evaluation by UAC Metropolia, Finland An ongoing evaluation process during the project. WHY? 1. Finding good and bad practices in good time Learning by evaluating = empowerment for the whole crew, partners and co-workers. 2. Preparation for the main evaluation and reporting.

13 3 x 3 toteutettiin joka vuosi

14 1. LÄHTÖ: Hanko kesäkuu 2014 Miten on mennyt ja onko näin hyvä jatkaa?

15 2. MATKALLA - Tour Manager piti työpajat - Keskustelut dokumentoitiin äänittämällä.

16 3. PERILLÄ: Helsinki elokuu 2014 kyyneliä, naurua ja keskittymistä

17 Evaluation, Helsinki Programme pm 4:00 Welcome! Evaluation today: What? How? Why? 4:15 Introductions 4:30 Did we achieve our goals? 4:45 Tell us your story 5:15 Group discussion and coffee. 6:00 Presentations and discussion 7:45 Conclusions for the future adventures 8:00 Thank You!

18 Did we achieve our project goals so far? 1. To facilitate exchange amongst artists from all over the continent and develop excellency in their skills and motives; 2. To create encounters between artists and non-artistic communities and to unleash the creative potential inherent to all of us; 3. To create high quality international performances that will tour in European theatres and festivals; 4. To raise awareness of issues of Europe today, starting from different community identities to new possible common European identities and the base of a common European citizenship; 5. To highlight the link between myths and modern society; 6. To create links between competences all over Europe and a new network of theatre professionals; 7. To give a voice to the elderly in Europe, like in the Odyssey, in the relationship between Nestor, Odysseus and Telemachus; 8. To tell the stories of young people in Europe and engage them in arts and theatre; 9. To collect pieces of contemporary history and ensure the sustainable development of artistic and human dialogue in Europe.

19 2. MATKALLA: Kreikka kesällä 2016

20 2. MATKALLA: Kreikka kesällä 2016 Oppimisen oivalluksia epämukavuusalueella.

21 TAVOITTEET 3. PERILLÄ: Helsinki syksyllä Valmistelu: kysely, 2. Työpaja, 3. Arviointiraportti

22 Itsearvioinnin merkitys Meeting the Odyssey projektille Knowing what others have done, because during the tour often there were no contacts or opportunities for exchange, meeting with other artists, being there would have been great and vital. To exchange experiences and face problems during the project in a neutral way. To stop for a second and try to put words on the journey we were in. I felt that the evaluation-sessions were really important for the work during the project. Especially as it was an ongoing work for three years!

23 Itsearvioinnin merkitys Meeting the Odyssey projektille Final report: The evaluation procedures have helped the project partners and participants to follow the ideas and objectives of the project and also, to a certain extent, to learn from our mistakes.

24 Itsearvioinnin menetelmistä sanottua: When during an evaluation workshop we split into small groups to discuss how the project had gone and then all the groups shared their comments with the others. It was a big possibility to have a mentor-person from the outside that was able to moderate the conversation. I feel it would have made things easier to have taken more time for evaluation.

25 Hyvän itsearviointiprosessin edellytykset Mukana hankesuunnitelmassa Varattu resurssi budjettiin Aikataulutettu kalenteriin Projektipäällikkö omistaa prosessin ja johtaa sen toteutumista Arviointityöpajoja vetää ulkopuolinen arviointiapu/fasilitaattori

26 Itsearviointi onnistuu kun muistaa Ajoituksen Roolituksen Yhdessä Kun oppimisen ja kehittämisen ideoit, älä arvio ja kun arvioit älä ideoi!

27 KIITOS!