EU Participant Report feedback Sofia Lähdeniemi & Kiira Noponen

Transkriptio

1 EU Participant Report feedback Sofia Lähdeniemi & Kiira Noponen

2 1) Tilastollisen tarkastelun taustoja: Vertailua edelliseen raportoituun sopimuskauteen ei tehty, koska 2014-datan osalta vielä suurtra vaihtelua EUSurveyn palautusasteessa Lisäksi komission tarjoaman datan käsiteltävyys paranatunut loppuraporttien 2014 ja 2015 välillä huomattavasti 2014-aineiston tarkastelu antoi arvokasta tietoa, mutta vuosisarjaa kansallisesti alamme tehdä vasta 2015 EUSurvey-datan osalta. Yksivuotiset vs. kaksivuotiset sopimukset vaikuttavat saapuvan liikkujadataan Eri vaihtoehtojen yhdistäminen; esim. good vs. very good vaihtelee komission koonneissa Valmiiksi tuotetussa komission datassa ei ole aina aukottoman selvää, mitä vaihtoehtoja/kenttiä on yhdistetty Datan käsitttely on nykyisessä muodossaan aikaavievää, pohdimme mielekkäintä toteutustapaa 2

3 2) Tilastollisen tarkastelun taustat: Perustuu sopimuskaudella täytettyihin osallistujaraportteihin Bigdata on kerätty MT+ / osittain verrattu korkeakoulujen loppuraporteista generoituun tietoon Korkeakoulut paremmuusjärjestykseen very good/very satisfied %- osuuksien mukaan Liikkuvuumäärät vaihtelevat korkeakouluittain Koko ohjelmahallinnosta esitettävät tilastot perustuvat EACEAn QlickView järjestelmään, johon on koottu eri tietokannoista tietoa (MT+, E+ Link, Eu surveys) 3

4 Satisfaction with E+ experience in different mobility types All the 33 programme countries & Finland Satisfaction with Erasmus+ Programme % Positive Surveys Very NegativeNegative Neutral Positive Very Positive 33 Programme countries Students and Staff 95,7% ,3% 1,1% 2,9% 28,6% 67,1% Finland outgoing Students and Staff 94,8% ,3% 1,4% 3,5% 35,3% 59,5% Finland outgoing Staff (STA+STT) 99,2% ,1% 0,2% 0,6% 21,8% 77,4% Finland outgoing Students (SMS+SMP) 93,3% ,4% 1,8% 4,5% 39,9% 53,4% Finland incoming Staff (STA+STT) 99,1% ,1% 0,2% 0,7% 15,5% 83,6% Finland incoming Students (SMS+SMP) 96,9% ,1% 0,9% 2,0% 27,2% 69,7% Source ClickView EACEA database (2015) 4

5 Satisfaction with Erasmus+ experience in 33 Programme countries and Finland (SMS ) All Programme Countries SMS Finland (outgoing SMS) Action Type KA103 - Higher education student and staff mobility Activity (mob) Student mobility for studies between Programme Countries Call Year 2015 Fund Source Erasmus+ IndicatorTitleAggr General Satisfaction Action Type KA103 - Higher education student and staff mobility Activity (mob) Student mobility for studies between Programme Countries Country Finland Call Year 2015 Fund Source Erasmus+ IndicatorTitleAggr General Satisfaction 5

6 In Finland satisfaction with E+ experience (SMS) 4,8% 2,1% 0,5% 0,9% 2,0% 0,1% 40,2% 52,4% Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative 26,8% 70,2% Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Finland outgoing SMS (4200 surveys) Finland incoming SMS (6700 surveys) 6

7 Impact of the Erasmus+ experience in Finland (outgoing SMS) Outgoing SMS students from FINLAND Positive in FIN Positive 33 countries Negative Neutral Positive Very Positive General Satisfaction 92,6% 94,9% 2,1% 4,8% 40,2% 52,4% Better Skills 90,9% 94,2% 7,5% 1,2% 58,4% 32,5% Language Skills 97,9% 97,4% 2,1% 0,0% 97,9% 0,0% Employability 80,9% 81,7% 2,5% 16,0% 49,4% 31,5% 7

8 Impact of Erasmus+ experience in 33 E+ Programme countries (SMS) Indicator: SMS students 33 programme countries Positive Surveys Very Negative Negative Neutral Positive Very Positive General Satisfaction 94,9% ,4% 1,4% 3,4% 31,1% 63,8% Better Skills 94,2% ,4% 4,7% 0,7% 48,9% 45,3% Language Skills 97,4% ,0% 2,6% 0,0% 97,4% 0,0% Employability 81,7% ,6% 2,7% 14,9% 45,3% 36,4% 8

9 Country V.Neg. Neg. Neutr. Pos. V.Pos. 1Malta 0,0% 0,9% 1,4% 22,0% 75,7% Satisfaction ranking with the E+ experience (SMS) 2Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 0,6% 0,0% 1,3% 23,8% 74,4% 3Cyprus 0,0% 0,3% 2,3% 23,4% 74,0% 4Croatia 0,3% 0,5% 2,3% 23,6% 73,4% 5Greece 0,3% 0,5% 2,3% 24,9% 72,1% 6Bulgaria 0,3% 0,8% 2,7% 24,5% 71,6% 7Slovenia 0,2% 1,4% 2,1% 25,7% 70,7% 8Romania 0,2% 0,6% 2,5% 26,4% 70,3% 9Italy 0,4% 1,1% 2,4% 27,2% 68,9% 10Spain 0,5% 1,1% 2,8% 27,9% 67,7% 11Poland 0,3% 1,3% 2,7% 28,2% 67,4% 12Slovakia 0,3% 1,0% 2,9% 28,7% 67,1% 13Belgium 0,3% 1,0% 2,9% 28,8% 67,0% 14Czech Republic 0,2% 1,2% 2,9% 28,7% 66,9% 15France 0,3% 1,3% 2,5% 29,5% 66,5% 16Portugal 0,5% 1,6% 3,4% 28,4% 66,1% 17Latvia 0,5% 0,6% 2,5% 31,0% 65,5% 18Austria 0,3% 1,0% 3,2% 31,4% 64,2% 19Iceland 0,4% 0,9% 3,8% 31,5% 63,4% 20Estonia 0,3% 1,1% 2,7% 33,6% 62,3% 21Lithuania 0,4% 1,2% 4,0% 32,2% 62,2% 22Netherlands 0,3% 1,4% 4,0% 33,2% 61,1% 23Turkey 0,5% 1,1% 4,4% 34,3% 59,8% 24Sweden 0,4% 2,1% 4,4% 33,5% 59,6% 25Liechtenstein 0,0% 3,1% 3,1% 34,4% 59,4% 26Hungary 0,3% 1,5% 4,0% 35,2% 58,9% 27Ireland 0,9% 2,8% 5,5% 32,2% 58,6% 28Germany 0,3% 1,5% 3,9% 36,7% 57,7% 29Norway 0,4% 1,6% 5,8% 36,5% 55,7% 30Finland 0,5% 2,1% 4,8% 40,2% 52,4% 31Denmark 0,8% 2,2% 5,3% 39,2% 52,4% 32United Kingdom 1,1% 3,0% 6,0% 38,3% 51,6% 33Luxembourg 4,0% 6,4% 11,9% 41,5% 36,2% 9

10 Best performing HEIs Highest satisfaction with E+ experience (SMS) Outgoing SMS Ingoming SMS OAMK 63% ARCADA 76% TAIDEYLIOPISTO 62% VAASAN AMK 80% KARELIA 81% Taideyliopisto 78% 10

11 Outgoing students (SMS) feedback 11

12 Best performing HEIs at signing Learning Agreement by all parties before the start of the mobility (outgoing SMS) HEIs average 80% Centria 95% Kajaanin amk 97% Arkada 94% 12

13 Best performing HEIs at making information available about grading convertion before the mobility (outgoing SMS) HEIs average 37% 54% 62% 56% 13

14 at having transparent and fair selection process for outgoing students (SMS) HEIs average 74% Best performing HEIs 83% 86% 84% 14

15 with highest satisfaction with administrative support arrangements for outgoing students (SMS) HEIs average 41% Best performing HEIs ARCADA 61% TAIDE- YLIOPISTO 77% VAASAN YLIOPISTO 57% 15

16 To what extent did the Erasmus+ grant (EU funds only) cover your overall expenses related to your mobility period? (Outgoing SMS) OUTGOING MOBILITY FOR STUDIES 3 % 12 % 43 % 42 % 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% % 16

17 Incoming students (SMS) feedback 17

18 Best performing HEIs with most up-to-date, published and available on time and complete course catalogues (incoming SMS) HEIs average 41% JAMK 39% TTY 46% LUT 46% HANKEN 39% 18

19 Best performing HEIs with the highest equal treatment (incoming SMS) HEIs average 76% TAMK 86% DIAK 91% KARELIA 85% 19

20 Best performing HEIs with the highest teaching quality satisfaction (incoming SMS) HEIs average 40% JAMK 56% TAIDEYLIOPISTO 69% VAMK 55% 20

21 Best performing HEIs with the highest course quality satisfaction (incoming SMS) HEIs average 32% VAMK 48% TAIDEYLIOPISTO 75% HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO 45% 21

22 with highest satisfaction with administrative support arrangements (incoming SMS) HEIs average 59% Best performing HEIs TTY 72% VAASAN YLIOPISTO 74% VAMK 71% 22

23 Best performing HEIs Opintojen hyväksiluku full recognition 94 % Karelia, LUT & Aalto 96% Oulun yliopisto & Hanken 91% TUAMK, JAMK, KYAMK 23

24 Kiitos!