tilojen toimivuuden arviointi Tilat tukemaan oppimista! Luokkahuoneista oppimaisemaksi 13.4.2016 jukka sulonen, arkkitehti, safa
rakennuksen jälkiarviointi toimivuus? tavoitteiden toteutuminen? parantaminen? tiedon hyödyntäminen seuraavissa projekteissa 13.4.2016 Tilat tukemaan oppimista! Jukka Sulonen, arkkitehti SAFA 2
menetelmiä post occupancy evaluation POE design quality indicator DQI building research evaluation BRE service blueprint ym 3
mitä arvioidaan käytettävyys toimivuus estetiikka viihtyisyys tekninen laatu 4
tiedon keruu lomakekyselyt haastattelut käyttäjäkävelyt seurannat mittaukset laadullisia määrällisiä 5
ohjattu käyttäjäkävely - walkthrough käyttäjäryhmät kokemustieto laadullinen systemaattinen 6
The Grammar of a Modern School Building a comparing study of the relationship between users and architecture in contemporary school buildings. jukka sulonen, MSc (arch) safa
the study schools 18 schools in different parts of Finland 14 basic education schools, 2 upper secondary schools, 2 combinations of them 8
methods walk through a user group principal, 1-2 teachers, 2-3 pupils and 1-2 members of maintenance or administrative personnel. 9
methods 5 2 3 1 walk through 4 observation places: 10 12 places in every school 1 2-5 minutes in every place1 10
analysis the structure of the analysis sustainab ility comforta bility usability 11
analysis analysis category 1: comfortability Light, lighting Surfaces, colours, textures Spaces, volumes, forms Acoustics, noises Inside climate, temperatures, smells Atmosphere, feelings Esthetics, art Cleanliness, 12
analysis analysis category 2: usability Functionality in general Flexibility, multi functionality Dimensioning, tightness, looseness Transparency, views Furnishing, equipments Healthiness, safety 13
analysis analysis category 3: sustainability Building services, ventilation, electrification etc Constructions Maintenance Condition of buildings and components Teaching services 14
analysis analysis plus minus - analysis a positive opinion a negative opinion a neutral opinion 15
results plus minus - analysis the percentage of the opinions in categories sustainability 3 % usability 51 % comfortability 46 % 16
results FIGURE 2. The rates of positivity of characteristics, % of all opinions given about each characteristic Spaces, volumes, forms: Flexibility, multi funct : Light, lighting: Transparency: Atmosphere: Spaces, volumes, forms Flexibility, multifunct. Light, lighting Transparency 86,56 81,82 78,59 76,82 73,26 Esthetics, art: Col, texture, surfaces: Furniture, equipments: Functionality, usability: 65,81 62,25 61,35 58,39 Healthiness, safety: 49,04 Dimensioning: Inside climate: Cleanliness: Acoustics, noise: Building components: 17,86 29,34 42,21 41,43 41,3 Inside climate Cleanliness Acoustic, noise Building components 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 17
results FIGURE 4. The rates of positivity of places, % of opinions given in each place Textile crafts: Visual arts: Home economics: Music: Personnel cafeteria: Auditorium: Teachers workspace: Lobby hall KIVA: Sports hall: Technical crafts: Entrance hall: Library: Basic classroom: Dining hall: Physics, chem, nat-sc: Circulation area KIVA: Student welfare: Cluster foyer - KIVA: Team work room - KIVA: Ict: Textile crafts Visual arts Home economics Music 27,83 30,65 38,95 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 46,58 45,87 54,46 57,83 57,59 56,36 56,23 60,68 60,47 59,39 66,34 65,52 69,26 68,5 70,3 68,24 73,56 Student welfare Cluster foyer KIVA Teamwork roomkiva ICT 18
results The most disturbing characteristics for the users of school buildings are tightness of space and problematic sound environments.. 19
results Places of Doing, Workshop the rates were high throughout, at the very least close to 50%. The nature of the subjects is learning by doing and cooperation. The teacher s role in these subjects is more of a guiding one, and most students receive personal attention in the form of guidance and feedback. The work is often group work, and even individual work is done together. The atmosphere is positive enough to overlook disturbing factors such as the sound environment. 20
results A Place of Information, the Library Rate of interest is high and its positivity rate average. In school-specific individual cases the opinions are either very positive or not positive at all 21
results Place of Encountering and Retrieving, KIVA Generally, the rates of positivity and interest were not particularly high The best individual cases received a lot of interest and positivity. 22
the grammar of a modern school building Kuuskorpi M (toim). PERSPECTIVES FOM FINLAND TOWARDS NEW LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. 2014 www.oph.fi/.../154594_perspectives_from_finland.pdf jukka.sulonen@talli.fi 23