TIIVISTELMÄ Elatus Era Amistar Xtra + Folicur Xpert Tilt 250 EC + Mirador Delaro + Folicur Xpert Acanto + Proline Xpert Basso + Mirador

Transkriptio

1 2016 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial SUMMARY The trial was sown on 13 th of May in Jokioinen in Finland. It rained 18 mm just one day after the sowing. The cultivar was Marble and the seed was untreated. At the end of May, wheat suffered from heavy infestation of bird cherry aphids. The aphids were spayed but they still caused BYDV, which caused that the plots were not dense. Also disease assessments were difficult because of BYDV. The weather in May was on average 3 degrees warmer than the long term average. The temperature sum after May was then 100 degrees above normal. Then in June, July and August temperatures were normal to the long term average and there were no long warm periods. The precipitation during the summer was quite normal to the long term average and it rained about 230 mm from sowing to harvest. Between June and August it was raining small amounts on average every second day so humidity was also high during whole summer. The applications were made on 8 th of July at beginning of heading. At application timing the tan spot disease severity was 0.5 % and no other diseases were present. There was no phytotoxicity caused by any of the treatments. First disease assessment was made two weeks after the application. The severity of tan spot was 5 % in the untreated control. All treatments significantly decreased the severity to %. Elatus Era, Proline and Acanto+Proline Expert had the best efficacy, but the difference to other treatments was still small. The next assessment was made on flag leaf and second leaf layer four weeks after application at growth stage BBCH 75. On the untreated flag leaf tan spot covered 6.75 % and on the second leaf 25 % of the leaf area. Elatus Era had the highest efficacy, 92 and 93 % on those two leaf layers. The efficacy of other treatments was % on the flag leaf and on the second leaf. The severity with all treatments was still low, 1 2 % on the flag leaf and 2 6 % on the second leaf. Aphids caused more decrease in green leaf area as about 10 % in each plot was damaged by BYDV and leaves started already to turn yellow. The disease severity started to increase clearly in August. The severity in the flag leaf 38 days after application in control was already 75 %. Elatus Plus+Zenit and Elatus Era had still % efficacy. With other treatments the efficacy was significantly lower, %. The plots treated with Elatus Era lasted longest time green. The trial was harvested on 16 th of September and harvesting moisture was 20 %. The untreated yield was 3732 kg/ha. Yield was low due to BYDV and environmental factors and the yield level was not normal to the area. All treatments increased the yield 3 10 %, but the yield increase was not significant in this trial. The best yield was with Basso+Mirador, 4087 kg/ha, + 10 %. With all other treatments the yield was about kg/ha. Hectoliter weight was 81.6 kg in the control and it was within +- 1 % with all the treatments. Thousand grain weight was 35.7 g in the control and all treatments increased it by 2 9 %. Basso+Mirador and ElatusEra treatments significantly increased TGW by 8 9 % to 38.5 g. With other treatments TGW was between 36.5 and 37.5 grams.

2 2016 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial TIIVISTELMÄ Markkinoilla olevia viljojen sienitautien torjunta-aineita testattiin kenttäkokeessa Jokioisissa. Testatut valmisteet olivat Elatus Era 1.0 l/ha sekä tankkiseoksina Amistar Xtra + Folicur Xpert l/ha, Tilt 250 EC + Mirador l/ha, Delaro + Folicur Xpert l/ha, Acanto + Proline Xpert l/ha, Basso + Mirador l/ha, Amistar + Armure l/ha ja ElatusPlus + Zenit 575 EC l/ha. Verrannekäsittelyt olivat Proline 0.6 l/ha sekä tankkiseos Comet Pro + Juventus l/ha. Kokeeseen sisältyi myös käsittelemätön koejäsen. Koe suunniteltiin yhteistyössä kasvinsuojeluaineyritysten kanssa ja toteutettiin GEP-laatujärjestelmän mukaisesti. Koepaikka oli Jokioinen ja koe kylvettiin toukokuun 13 päivä. Kylvön jälkeen satoi 18 mm vettä ja vehnä orastui hyvin. Lajike oli Marble ja siementä ei ollut peitattu. Vehnäkasvusto oli tasainen, mutta melko harva. Tuomikirvojen määrä kasvustossa oli suuri toukokuun lopussa ja torjunnasta huolimatta ne aiheuttivat viroosia. Viroosia oli noin 10 % ruuduista ja se alensi satoa. Viroosi vaikeutti myös tautihavaintojen tekemistä. Sääolosuhteet kasvukaudella olivat pääosin pitkäaikaisen keskiarvon mukaiset. Ainoastaan toukokuussa lämpötila oli korkeampi ja lämpösumma oli noin 100 astetta keskiarvoa edellä. Loppukesän aikana lämpösumma ei enää kasvanut. Sadesumma oli myös keskimääräinen ja kylvön ja puinnin välillä satoi noin 230 mm. Sade tuli enimmäkseen pieninä määrinä ja vettä satoi keskimäärin joka toinen päivä. Tämä vaikutti korkean tautipaineen syntymiseen. Fungisidikäsittely tehtiin tähkälletulovaiheessa BBCH heinäkuun 8. päivä. Vehnän pistelaikkua oli tuolloin vain 0.5 %, mutta tautimäärä lähti sen jälkeen nopeasti kasvuun. Käsittelyt onnistuivat hyvissä sääoloissa ja ne eivät aiheuttaneet fytotoksisuutta. Ensimmäinen tautihavainto tehtiin kaksi viikkoa ruiskutuksesta. Pistelaikku oli ainoa esiintyvä tauti ja käsittelemättömissä ruuduissa sitä oli 5 % lehtialasta. Kaikilla käsittelyillä oli tässä vaiheessa % teho ja Elatus Era, Proline ja Acanto+Proline Expert erosivat hieman parempina muista käsittelyistä. Toinen tautihavainto tehtiin neljä viikkoa ruiskutuksesta lippulehdeltä ja toiseksi ylimmältä lehdeltä. Ilman käsittelyä lippulehdillä tautimäärä oli 6.75 % ja toisella lehdellä 25 %. Kaikkien käsittelyjen teho pistelaikkua vastaan oli %. Elatus Eran teho oli molemmilla lehdillä yli 90 %. Muillakin käsittelyillä teho oli yhä hyvä ja pistelaikun määrä oli vielä matala. Elokuussa tautipaine alkoi kasvaa selvästi ja kymmenen päivää toisen havainnon jälkeen käsittelemättömillä lippulehdillä tautimäärä oli jo75 %. Elatus Era ja ElatusPlus + Zenit käsittelyillä oli paras teho. Muiden käsittelyjen teho oli matalampi, mutta ne erosivat selvästi käsittelemättömästä. Koe puitiin syyskuun puolivälissä ja lakoutumista ei ollut. Satotaso jäi matalaksi harvan kasvuston ja kirvojen aiheuttaman viroosin takia. Käsittelemätön sato oli 3732 kg/ha ja käsittelyt lisäsivät satoa 3 10 %. Basso + Mirador käsittelyllä oli paras sato, 4087 kg/ha ja muilla käsittelyillä sato oli kg/ha. Hehtolitrapainoon käsittelyillä ei ollut vaikutusta, mutta käsittelyt lisäsivät tuhannen jyvän painoa 2 9 %. Käsittelyt lisäsivät jonkin verran vihreän lehtialan kestoa ja siten edistivät siementen täyttymistä.

3 2016 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial Figure 1. Tan spot severity two weeks after treatment at BBCH 69. Figure 2. Tan spot severity four weeks after treatment on flag leaf and second leaf layer at BBCH 75.

4 2016 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial Figure 3. Tan spot severity on the flag leaf at BBCH 83, five weeks after application. Figure 4. Yield level was low in the trial. Treatments had only slight increase to the yield.

5 2016 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial Figure 5. Hectoliter weight was not affected by the treatments. Picture 6. Thousand grain weight was increased by 2 9 % with the treatments.

6 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Trial Treatments Page 1 of 2 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2016 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Trt Treatment Form Form Lot Rate Growth Comment No. Name Conc Type Code Rate Unit Stage 1 1 Untreated Check 2 Proline 250 EC EM4L l/ha 51 Luke -prothioconazole g AI 3 Comet Pro 200 EC l/ha 51 Luke -pyraclostrobin g AI Juventus 90 SL l/ha 51 Luke -metconazole g AI 4 Delaro 325 FS EV l/ha 51 Bayer -trifloxystrobin g AI -prothioconazole g AI Folicur Xpert 240 EC EM4L l/ha 51 Bayer -tebuconazole g AI -prothioconazole g AI 5 Acanto 250 SC MAR14PH l/ha 51 Bayer, Hankkija, DuPont -picoxystrobin g AI Proline Xpert 240 EC l/ha 51 Bayer, Hankkija, DuPont -prothioconazole g AI -tebuconazole g AI 6 Basso 490 EC / l/ha 51 Adama -propiconazole g AI -prochloraz g AI Mirador 250 SC (131) 0.4 l/ha 51 Adama -azoxystrobin g AI 7 Tilt 250 EC 250 EC /3 0.5 l/ha 51 Adama -propiconazole g AI Mirador 250 SC (131) 0.4 l/ha 51 Adama -azoxystrobin g AI 8 Amistar 250 SC GRA3B052E 0.4 l/ha 51 Hankkija, Syngenta -azoxystrobin g AI Armure 300 EC SMO3B l/ha 51 Hankkija, Syngenta -propiconazole g AI -difenoconazole g AI 9 ElatusEra 225 EC PE-1123SMU6BP002 1 l/ha 51 Hankkija, Syngenta -solatenol g AI -prothioconazole g AI 10 ElatusPlus 100 EC PE-1044SMU5AP004 dev 0.75 l/ha 51 Hankkija, Syngenta -solatenol g AI Zenit 575 EC 575 EC SMO2C l/ha 51 Hankkija, Syngenta -propiconazole g AI -fenpropidin g AI 11 Amistar Xtra 280 SC L l/ha 51 Berner -azoxystrobin g AI -cyproconazole g AI Folicur Xpert 240 EC EM4L l/ha 51 Berner -tebuconazole g AI -prothioconazole g AI

7 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Trial Treatments Page 2 of 2 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2016 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Replications: 4, Untreated treatments: 1, Conduct under GLP/GEP: Yes (GEP with no protection), Design: Randomized Complete Block (RCB), Treatment units: Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size, Dry Form. Unit: %, Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Width: 2 meters, Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Length: 8 meters, Application volume: 200 L/ha, Mix size: 2.5 liters, Format definitions: G-All7.def, G-All7.frm

8 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 4 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2016 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke General Trial Information Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Discipline: F fungicide Trial Status: F final (completed) Trial Reliability: GOOD Initiation Date: 13/05/16 Completion Date: 14/12/16 City: Jokioinen Postal Code: FI Trial Location Country: FIN Climate Zone: EPPONE EPPO North East Latitude of LL Corner : N Longitude of LL Corner : E Map Reference: WGS 84 Conducted Under GLP: No Conducted Under GEP: Yes No. Guideline Description 1. PP 1/26(4) Foliar and ear diseases on cereals 2. PP 1/135(4) phytotoxicity assessment 3. PP 1/152(4) Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials 4. PP 1/181(4) Conduct and reporting of efficacy evaluation trials including GEP Objectives: The efficacy of fungicides on market against rusts and other leaf diseases

9 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 2 of 4 Conclusions: The trial was sown on 13 th of May in Jokioinen in Finland. It rained 18 mm just one day after the sowing. The cultivar was Marble and the seed was untreated. At the end of May, wheat suffered from heavy infestation of bird cherry aphids. The aphids were spayed but they still caused BYDV. Also disease assessments were difficult because of BYDV. The crop stand was not dense, but it was even in all plots. The applications were made on 8 th of July at beginning of heading. At application timing the tan spot disease severity was 0.5 % and no other diseases were present. There was no phytotoxicity caused by any of the treatments. First disease assessment was made two weeks after the application. The severity of tan spot was 5 % in the untreated control. All treatments significantly decreased the severity to %. Elatus Era, Proline and Acanto+Proline Expert had the best efficacy, but the difference to other treatments was still small. The next assessment was made on flag leaf and second leaf layer four weeks after application at growth stage BBCH 75. On the untreated flag leaf tan spot covered 6.75 % and on the second leaf 25 % of the leaf area. Elatus Era had the highest efficacy, 92 and 93 % on those two leaf layers. The efficacy of other treatments was % on the flag leaf and on the second leaf. The severity with all treatments was still low, 1 2 % on the flag leaf and 2 6 % on the second leaf. Aphids caused more decrease in green leaf area as about 10 % in each plot was damaged by BYDV and leaves started already to turn yellow. The disease severity started to increase clearly in August. The severity in the flag leaf 38 days after application in the control was already 75 %. Elatus Plus+Zenit and Elatus Era had still % efficacy. With other treatments the efficacy was significantly lower, %. The plots treated with Elatus Era lasted longest time green. The trial was harvested on 16 th of September and harvesting moisture was 20 %. There was no lodging. The untreated yield was 3732 kg/ha. Yield was low due to BYDV and environmental factors and the yield level was not normal to the area. All treatments increased the yield 3 10 %, but the yield increase was not significant in this trial. The best yield was with Basso+Mirador, 4087 kg/ha, + 10 %. With all other treatments the yield was about kg/ha. Hectoliter weight was 81.6 kg in the control and it was within +- 1 % with all the treatments. Thousand grain weight was 35.7 g in the control and all treatments increased it by 2 9 %. Basso+Mirador and ElatusEra treatments significantly increased TGW by 8 9 % to 38.5 g. With other treatments TGW was between 36.5 and 37.5 grams. Contacts Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Organization: Address: Laboratorium, Uutetie 2 Phone No.: City+State/Prov: Jokioinen, Finland Postal Code: FI kalle.ohralahti@luke.fi Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Organization: Luonnonvarakeskus Crop Description Crop 1: TRZAS Triticum aestivum (spring) Spring wheat Variety: Marble BBCH Scale: BCER Planting Date: 13/05/16 Planting Rate, Unit: 261 KG/HA Planting Method: DRILLE drilled Depth, Unit: 4 cm Row Spacing, Unit: 12.5 cm Harvest Date: 16/09/16 Harvested Width, Unit: 1.5 m Harvested Length, Unit: 8 m Soil Moisture: SLIWET slightly wet, moist Harvest Equipment: Plot harvester Seed Bed: FINE fine % Standard Moisture: 15 Pest Description Pest 1 Type: D Code: PUCCSP Puccinia sp. Common Name: Puccinia sp. Pest 2 Type: D Code: PYRNTR Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Common Name: Tan spot of cereals Pest 3 Type: D Code: STAGNO Stagonospora nodorum Common Name: Leaf blotch of wheat

10 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 3 of 4 Site and Design Treated Plot Width: 2 m Site Type: FIELD field Treated Plot Length: 8 m Experimental Unit: 1 PLOT plot Treated Plot Area: 16 m2 Treatments: 11 Tillage Type: CONTIL conventional-till Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (R Untreated Arrangement: INCLUDED single control randomized in each block No. Previous Crop Previous Pesticides Year 1. Barley Ariane S 2015 Maintenance Maintenance Rate No. Date Product Name Rate Unit 1. 24/09/15 Slurry 40 m3/ha 2. 12/05/16 Yara Mila NPK (N:27 P:2 K:3) 98 kg/ha 3. 06/06/16 Sekator OD 0.1 L/ha 4. 06/06/16 + MCPA 1.3 L/ha 5. 06/06/16 + Sito 0.1 L/ha 6. 22/06/16 Kestac 0.4 L/ha % OM: 4.73 Texture: CL clay loam ph: 6.11 Element Quantity Unit Ca 2492 mg/l P 3.47 mg/l K mg/l Mg mg/l Soil Description Additional Measured Elements Moisture and Weather Conditions Closest Weather Station: Ilmala Distance, Unit: 7 km Application Description A Application Date: 08/07/16 Appl. Start Time: 12:30 Application Method: spray Application Placement: foliar Applied By: VR, EJ, JA Air Temperature, Unit: 16.3 C % Relative Humidity: 71 Wind Velocity, Unit: 2.5 mps Wind Direction: S Dew Presence (Y/N): N no Soil Temperature, Unit: 17 C Soil Moisture: wet % Cloud Cover: 100 Next Moisture Occurred On: 10/07/16

11 15/12/16 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 4 of 4 Crop Stage At Each Application A Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: TRZAS BCER Stage Scale Used: BBCH Stage Majority, Percent: 51 Stage Minimum, Percent: 49 Stage Maximum, Percent: 55 Height, Unit: 60 cm Pest Stage At Each Application A Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale: PUCCSP D Coverage, Unit: 0 % Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale: PYRNTR D Coverage, Unit: 0.5 % Pest 3 Code, Type, Scale: STAGNO D Coverage, Unit: 0 % A Appl. Equipment: Plot sprayer Equipment Type: SPRAYE Operation Pressure, Unit: 2.0 bar Nozzle Type: Hardi4110 Nozzle Size: 12 Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 50 cm Nozzles/Row: 4 Boom ID: KSU2 Boom Length, Unit: 2 m Boom Height, Unit: 50 cm Ground Speed, Unit: 1 mps Carrier: water Spray Volume, Unit: 200 l/ha Mix Size, Unit: 2.5 liters Propellant: COMAIR Application Equipment

12 15/12/16 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2016 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Name Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Crop Variety Marble Marble Marble Marble Marble Pest Code PYRNTR PYRNTR PYRNTR Pest Name Tan spot of cereals Tan spot of cereals Tan spot of cereals Part Rated LEAF - LEAF - FLAGLE - FLMI1 - LEAF - Rating Date 22/07/16 22/07/16 05/08/16 05/08/16 05/08/16 Rating Type PHYGEN DAMDIS DAMDIS DAMDIS DAMAGE Rating Unit % % % % % Description BYDV Sample Size, Unit 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 28 DA-A 28 DA-A 28 DA-A Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale BBCH BBCH BBCH BBCH BBCH Assessed By KO KO KO KO KO ARM Action Codes APC APC APC APC Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code Untreated Check 0.0 a 5.00 a 6.75 a a 12.5 a (0%) (0%) (0%) (0%) 2 Proline 0.6 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.00 b 1.75 b 4.63 bc 12.0 a (80%) (74%) (82%) (4%) 3 Comet Pro 0.5 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.50 b 1.88 b 6.00 b 11.3 a Juventus 0.5 l/ha A (70%) (72%) (76%) (10%) 4 Delaro 0.4 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.25 b 1.38 b 3.75 bc 11.8 a Folicur Xpert 0.4 l/ha A (75%) (80%) (85%) (6%) 5 Acanto 0.4 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.00 b 1.88 b 5.63 bc 11.0 a Proline Xpert 0.4 l/ha A (80%) (72%) (78%) (12%) 6 Basso 0.8 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.88 b 1.38 b 4.38 bc 10.5 a Mirador 0.4 l/ha A (63%) (80%) (83%) (16%) 7 Tilt 250 EC 0.5 l/ha A 0.0 a 2.00 b 1.13 b 3.88 bc 9.0 a Mirador 0.4 l/ha A (60%) (83%) (85%) (28%) 8 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.50 b 1.25 b 4.63 bc 13.0 a Armure 0.4 l/ha A (70%) (81%) (82%) (-4%) 9 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.75 b 0.50 b 2.13 c 12.3 a (85%) (93%) (92%) (2%) 10 ElatusPlus 0.75 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.88 b 0.75 b 3.00 bc 11.5 a Zenit 575 EC 0.5 l/ha A (63%) (89%) (88%) (8%) 11 Amistar Xtra 0.4 l/ha A 0.0 a 1.75 b 1.63 b 4.25 bc 12.5 a Folicur Xpert 0.4 l/ha A (65%) (76%) (83%) (0%) LSD P= Standard Deviation CV Bartlett's X P(Bartlett's X2) * 0.001* 0.15 Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Means followed by same letter or symbol do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls) Column 11: TY1 = *[C7]*(100-@AVGSUB([C8]))/85 Column 13: T3 = ((100-@AVGSUB([8]))*@AVGSUB([10]))/85 Column 12: T2 = ((100-@AVGSUB([8]))*@AVGSUB([9]))/85 Could not calculate LSD (% mean diff) for columns 2 because error mean square = 0.

13 15/12/16 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2016 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Name Crop Variety Pest Code Pest Name Part Rated Rating Date Rating Type Rating Unit Description Sample Size, Unit Trt-Eval Interval Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale Assessed By ARM Action Codes Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Check Rate Appl Rate Unit Code 2 Proline 0.6 l/ha A 3 Comet Pro 0.5 l/ha A Juventus 0.5 l/ha A 4 Delaro 0.4 l/ha A Folicur Xpert 0.4 l/ha A 5 Acanto 0.4 l/ha A Proline Xpert 0.4 l/ha A 6 Basso 0.8 l/ha A Mirador 0.4 l/ha A 7 Tilt 250 EC 0.5 l/ha A Mirador 0.4 l/ha A 8 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A Armure 0.4 l/ha A 9 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 10 ElatusPlus 0.75 l/ha A Zenit 575 EC 0.5 l/ha A 11 Amistar Xtra 0.4 l/ha A Folicur Xpert 0.4 l/ha A LSD P=.05 Standard Deviation CV Bartlett's X2 P(Bartlett's X2) Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Marble Marble Marble Marble PYRNTR Tan spot of cereals FLAGLE - GRAIN - GRAIN - GRAIN - 15/08/16 08/11/16 11/11/16 10/11/16 DAMDIS YIELD TKW HLW % KG g kg 1 PLOT 1 ha 1 SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 38 DA-A 123 DA-A 126 DA-A 125 DA-A BBCH BBCH BBCH BBCH KO VR LR LR APC TY1 APOC T3 APOC T2 APOC a 3732 a b 81.6 a (0%) (100%) (100%) (100%) 30.0 b 3884 a ab 81.1 a (60%) (104%) (102%) (99%) 33.8 b 3972 a ab 82.1 a (55%) (106%) (103%) (101%) 27.5 b 3918 a ab 82.2 a (63%) (105%) (105%) (101%) 33.8 b 3829 a ab 81.8 a (55%) (103%) (103%) (100%) 28.8 b 4087 a a 82.7 a (62%) (110%) (109%) (101%) 25.0 b 3953 a ab 81.4 a (67%) (106%) (106%) (100%) 31.3 b 3990 a ab 81.9 a (58%) (107%) (105%) (100%) 8.8 c 3939 a a 82.1 a (88%) (106%) (108%) (101%) 10.0 c 3976 a ab 81.8 a (87%) (107%) (105%) (100%) 32.5 b 3890 a ab 81.3 a (57%) (104%) (102%) (100%)