TIIVISTELMÄ Amistar + Zenit 575 EC Comet Pro + Juventus Orius + Mirador Elatus Era ElatusPlus + Amustar Xtra Comet Pro + Prosaro Ascra Xpro

Transkriptio

1 2017 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial SUMMARY The trial was located in Jokioinen. Spring wheat cultivar in the trial was Wanamo. Previous crop was barley. The trial was drilled on 22 nd of May. The crop stand was good and even in the trial. Weather during the season differed from the long term average summer. May was dry until the end of the month when there were the first rainy days. May was also quite cold even at the sowing time there was a warm period. In June it rained 101 mm which is almost 40 mm over the long term average. The mean temperature was 12.8 C which is also lower to the 14 C average. In July it rained 44.7 mm which is 30 mm below the average, but the mean temperature was 14.9 C which is 1.8 C below the average. It meant that the soil and also crop stayed wet for long periods. August was again a bit rainier and colder than the long term average. September was then quite normal and it rained a bit less. The effective temperature sum stayed whole summer C below the long term average. At the end of September the temperature sum was 1136 while the average is The trial treatments were done on 18 th of July at growth stage BBCH At application tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) severity was 2.6 % evenly on whole trial area. Sixteen days after application at BBCH 65 the two upper leaves were still healthy. On the lower leaves tan spot severity was 7 % in the untreated control and around 2 3 % with all the treatments. There was no phytotoxicity with any of the treatments. Final disease assessment was made one month after the treatment at milk ripening stage BBCH 75. At that time tan spot severity was already 72.5 % in the untreated control. The efficacy of all products was good, %. The highest efficacy (91 92 %) was with Elatus Era and Comet Pro+Prosaro treatments, in which tan spot severity was 5 6 %. There was no clear difference between other treatments. The number of green leaves was 0.5 in the control, but it was still 2 3 with all treatments. The trial was harvested on 23 rd of October. Spring wheat ripened at the beginning of the month, but harvesting was really late because it rained on almost every day. The trial was almost totally lodged at harvesting. The yield level was low and the yield of untreated control was 4100 kg/ha. All treatments had slightly higher yield, kg/ha (5 9 %). The highest yield, 4650 kg/ha (13 %) in this trial was with Elatus Era treatment. Because of the late harvesting also quality was poor. Hectoliter weight was 67.9 kg in the untreated control and it was 1 3 % higher ( kg) with all treatments. With Amistar+Zenit, Elatus Era, Elatus Plus+Amistar Xtra and Ascra Xpro the increase was significant. Thousand grain weight was 32 g in the untreated control. All treatments had significant increase in TGW in this trial. With Comet Pro+Juventus and Amistar+Zenit the increase was 7 10 %, but with all other treatments % ( g). There were no clearly best treatments in yield and quality, but all treatments had good performance in spring wheat.

2 2017 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial TIIVISTELMÄ Markkinoilla olevia viljojen sienitautien torjunta-aineita testattiin kevätvehnällä kenttäkokeessa Jokioisissa. Testatut valmisteet olivat Amistar + Zenit 575 EC l/ha, Comet Pro + Juventus l/ha, Orius + Mirador l/ha, Elatus Era 1.0 l/ha, ElatusPlus + Amustar Xtra l/ha, Comet Pro + Prosaro l/ha ja Ascra Xpro 1.0 l/ha. Kokeeseen sisältyi myös käsittelemätön koejäsen. Koe suunniteltiin yhteistyössä kasvinsuojeluaineyritysten kanssa ja toteutettiin GEP-laatujärjestelmän mukaisesti. Kasvukauden sää oli tavanomaisesta vähän poikkeava. Toukokuussa oli kuivaa ja vasta kuun lopussa tuli enemmän sateita, mutta sademäärä oli vain 13 mm ja alle pitkän ajan keskiarvon joka on 41mm. Toukokuu oli viileä lukuun ottamatta yhtä lämmintä jaksoa. Keskilämpötila oli silti asteen normaalia 9.8 C alhaisempi. Kesäkuussa vettä satoi 101 mm ja se on 40 mm yli pitkäaikaisen keskiarvon. Keskilämpötila oli 12.8 C, kun se normaalisti on 14 C. Heinäkuussa satoi 45 mm eli 30 mm tavallista vähemmän. Myös keskilämpötila oli 14.9 C ollen 1.8 C alle tavanomaisen. Ilmankosteus oli korkea koko kuukauden ja maa ja kasvusto eivät päässeet kuivumaan. Elokuu oli pitkän ajan keskiarvoa vähän viileämpi ja kosteampi. Kesä-, heinä ja elokuussa päivän maksimilämpötilat olivat harvemmin yli 20 C ja hellepäiviä ei ollut. Syyskuussa oli poutaisempaa ja vähän lämpöisempää, joten viljat pääsivät tuleentumaan. Kevätvehnäkoe sijaitsi Jokioisissa. Koe kylvettiin toukokuun 22. päivä ja lajike oli Wanamo. Esikasvina oli ohra. Kasvusto oli tasainen ja melko rehevä. Fungisidikäsittely tehtiin 18. heinäkuuta, kun vehnä oli tähkälle tulon alussa. Käsittelyhetkellä vehnässä oli alalehdillä pistelaikkua noin 2.5 % tasaisesti koko kokeen alalla. Ensimmäinen havainto tehtiin kaksi viikkoa käsittelyn jälkeen vehnän kukkiessa. Kaksi ylintä lehteä olivat vielä terveitä. Käsittelemättömissä ruuduissa oli 7 % pistelaikkua alimmilla lehdillä. Käsittelyillä pistelaikun määrä oli 2 3 % ja käsittelyjen välillä ei ollut selviä eroja. Tautiaineilla ei ollut kevätvehnällä mitään vioituksia. Lopullinen tautihavainto tehtiin kuukausi ruiskutuksen jälkeen maitotuleentumisvaiheessa BBCH 75. Pistelaikun määrä oli lisääntynyt paljon ja oli käsittelemättömässä 72.5 %. Kaikkien käsittelyjen teho oli hyvä, %. Yli 90 % teho oli Elatus Eralla ja Comet Pro+Prosaro seoksella ja niillä pistelaikun määrä oli vain noin 5 %. Muiden käsittelyjen välillä selvää tehoeroa ei ollut. Vihreä lehtiala maitotuleentumisvaiheessa oli käsittelyillä selvästi suurempi. Ilman tautitorjuntaa vain puolet ylälehdestä oli vihreä, mutta käsittelyillä kaksi tai kolme ylintä lehteä olivat vielä hyvin vihreitä. Koe päästiin sateisen lokakuun takia puimaan vasta Koeala oli jo lähes täysin laossa ja se vaikutti osin satoon ja laatuun. Käsittelemätön sato oli 4100 kg/ha. Kaikki käsittelyt lisäsivät satoa ja suurin sato oli Elatus Eralla, 4650 kg/ha (+13 %). Muilla sadonlisäys oli 5 9 % eli kg. Käsittelyillä oli jonkun verran vaikutusta hehtolitrapainoon. Se oli 67.9 kg käsittelemättömänä ja kg (1 3 %) eri käsittelyillä. Tuhannen jyvän paino ilman käsittelyä oli 32 g, mutta kaikki käsittelyt nostivat sitä merkitsevästi g (7 14 %). Parhaiten sadon määrään ja laatuun vaikuttivat Elatus Era, Elatus Plus+Amistar Xtra ja Ascra Xpro, mutta ero muihin käsittelyihin ei ollut suuri.

3 2017 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial FIGURES Figure 1. Tan spot severity two weeks after the treatments. Figure 2. Tan spot severity at milk ripening stage was already high in the untreated control, but all treatments had good efficacy.

4 2017 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat - Advisory fungicide trial Figure 3. The yield increase was 5 13 % with all treatments, but yield level was low. Figure 4. Hectoliter weight was 1 3 % higher with all treatments. Figure 5. All treatments increased thousand grain weight significantly by 7 14 %.

5 18/01/18 (F ) ARM Trial Treatments Page 1 of 1 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Growth Appl Comment No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Stage Code 1 1 Untreated Check 2 Amistar 250 SC 0.4 l/ha A Luke -azoxystrobin g AI Zenit 575 EC 575 EC 0.4 l/ha A Luke -propiconazole g AI -fenpropidin g AI 3 Comet Pro 200 EC 0.4 l/ha A Luke -pyraclostrobin g AI Juventus 90 SL 0.4 l/ha A Luke -metconazole g AI 4 Orius 200 EW 0.8 l/ha A Adama -tebuconazole g AI Mirador 250 SC 0.4 l/ha A Adama -azoxystrobin g AI 5 ElatusEra 225 EC 1 l/ha A Syngenta -solatenol g AI -prothioconazole g AI 6 ElatusPlus 100 EC 0.5 l/ha A Syngenta -solatenol g AI Amistar Xtra 280 SC 0.5 l/ha A Syngenta -azoxystrobin g AI -cyproconazole g AI 7 Comet Pro 200 EC 0.4 l/ha A Bayer -pyraclostrobin g AI Prosaro 250 EC 0.4 l/ha A Bayer -tebuconazole g AI -prothioconazole g AI 8 Ascra Xpro 260 EC 1 l/ha A Bayer -bixafen g AI -fluopyram g AI -prothioconazole g AI Replications: 4, Untreated treatments: 1, Conduct under GLP/GEP: Yes (GEP with no protection), Design: Randomized Complete Block (RCB), Treatment units: Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size, Dry Form. Unit: %, Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Width: 2 meters, Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Length: 8 meters, Application volume: 200 L/ha, Mix size: 2.5 liters, Format definitions: G-All7.def, G-All7.frm

6 18/01/18 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 4 Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke General Trial Information Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Discipline: F fungicide Trial Status: F final (completed) Trial Reliability: GOOD Initiation Date: 22/05/17 Completion Date: 27/11/17 Trial Location City: Jokioinen Country: FIN South Ostrobothnia Postal Code: Latitude of LL Corner : N Longitude of LL Corner : E Conducted Under GLP: No Conducted Under GEP: Yes No. Guideline Description 1. PP 1/26(4) Foliar and ear diseases on cereals 2. PP 1/135(4) phytotoxicity assessment 3. PP 1/152(4) Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials 4. PP 1/181(4) Conduct and reporting of efficacy evaluation trials including GEP Objectives: The efficacy of fungicides on market against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat.

7 18/01/18 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 2 of 4 Conclusions: The trial was located in Jokioinen. Spring wheat cultivar in the trial was Wanamo. Previous crop was barley. The trial was drilled on 22 nd of May. The crop stand was good and even in the trial. Weather during the season differed from the long term average summer. May was dry until the end of the month when there were the first rainy days. May was also quite cold even at the sowing time there was a warm period. In June it rained 101 mm which is almost 40 mm over the long term average. The mean temperature was 12.8 C which is also lower to the 14 C average. In July it rained 44.7 mm which is 30 mm below the average, but the mean temperature was 14.9 C which is 1.8 C below the average. It meant that the soil and also crop stayed wet for long periods. August was again a bit rainier and colder than the long term average. September was then quite normal and it rained a bit less. The effective temperature sum stayed whole summer C below the long term average. At the end of September the temperature sum was 1136 while the average is The trial treatments were done on 18 th of July at growth stage BBCH At application tan spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) severity was 2.6 % evenly on whole trial area. Sixteen days after application at BBCH 65 the two upper leaves were still healthy. On the lower leaves tan spot severity was 7 % in the untreated control and around 2 3 % with all the treatments. There was no phytotoxicity with any of the treatments. Final disease assessment was made one month after the treatment at milk ripening stage BBCH 75. At that time tan spot severity was already 72.5 % in the untreated control. The efficacy of all products was good, %. The highest efficacy (91 92 %) was with Elatus Era and Comet Pro+Prosaro treatments, in which tan spot severity was 5 6 %. There was no clear difference between other treatments. The number of green leaves was 0.5 in the control, but it was still 2 3 with all treatments. The trial was harvested on 23 rd of October. Spring wheat ripened at the beginning of the month, but harvesting was really late because it rained on almost every day. The trial was almost totally lodged at harvesting. The yield level was low and the yield of untreated control was 4100 kg/ha. All treatments had slightly higher yield, kg/ha (5 9 %). The highest yield, 4650 kg/ha (13 %) in this trial was with Elatus Era treatment. Because of the late harvesting also quality was poor. Hectoliter weight was 67.9 kg in the untreated control and it was 1 3 % higher ( kg) with all treatments. With Amistar+Zenit, Elatus Era, Elatus Plus+Amistar Xtra and Ascra Xpro the increase was significant. Thousand grain weight was 32 g in the untreated control. All treatments had significant increase in TGW in this trial. With Comet Pro+Juventus and Amistar+Zenit the increase was 7 10 %, but with all other treatments % ( g). There were no clearly best treatments in yield and quality, but all treatments had good performance in spring wheat. Contacts Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Organization: Address: Laboratorium, Uutetie 2 Phone No.: City+State/Prov: Jokioinen, Finland Postal Code: FI kalle.ohralahti@luke.fi Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Title: Research Scientist Organization: Address: Laboratorium, Uutetie 2 Phone No.: City+State/Prov: Jokioinen, Finland Postal Code: FI kalle.ohralahti@luke.fi

8 18/01/18 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 3 of 4 Crop Description Crop 1: TRZAS Triticum aestivum Spring wheat Variety: Wanamo Planting Date: 22/05/17 Planting Rate, Unit: 650 S/M2 Planting Method: DRILLE drilled Depth, Unit: 5 cm Row Spacing, Unit: 12.5 cm Harvest Date: 23/10/17 Harvested Width, Unit: 1.5 m Harvested Length, Unit: 8 m Harvest Equipment: Wintersteiger % Standard Moisture: 15 Pest Description Pest 1 Type: D Code: PYRNTR Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Common Name: Tan spot of cereals Pest 2 Type: D Code: STAGNO Stagonospora nodorum Common Name: Leaf blotch of wheat Pest 3 Type: D Code: PUCCSP Puccinia sp. Common Name: Puccinia sp. Site and Design Treated Plot Width: 2 m Site Type: FIELD field Treated Plot Length: 8 m Experimental Unit: 1 PLOT plot Treated Plot Area: 16 m2 Treatments: 8 Tillage Type: CONTIL conventional-till Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RC No. Previous Crop Year 1. barley 2016 Maintenance Maintenance Rate Tank No. Date Product Name Rate Unit Mix 1. 22/05/17 BeFert (NPK ) 222 kg/ha 2. 02/07/17 Logran 20 g/ha yes 3. 02/07/17 K-MCPA 1 L/ha yes 4. 10/07/17 Moddus M 0.2 L/ha ph: 6.6 Soil Name: sandy clay Analyzed By: Agroanalyysit Element Quantity Unit Mg 377 mg/l P 11.9 mg/l K 166 mg/l Ca 2370 mg/l Soil Description Additional Measured Elements Moisture and Weather Conditions Closest Weather Station: Ilmala Distance, Unit: 2 km

9 18/01/18 (F ) ARM Site Description Page 4 of 4 Application Description A Application Date: 20/07/17 Appl. Start Time: 10:00 Appl. Stop Time: 10:55 Application Method: SPRAY Application Placement: FOLIAR Applied By: VR AA JA NP Air Temperature, Unit: 14.8 C % Relative Humidity: 70 Wind Velocity, Unit: 2.7 MPS Wind Direction: SE Dew Presence (Y/N): N no Soil Temperature, Unit: 14.2 C Soil Moisture: DRY % Cloud Cover: 40 Crop Stage At Each Application A Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: TRZAS BCER Stage Scale Used: BBCH Stage Majority, Percent: 53 Stage Minimum, Percent: 49 Stage Maximum, Percent: 55 Height, Unit: 80 cm Pest Stage At Each Application A Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale: PYRNTR D Coverage, Unit: 0.5 % Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale: STAGNO D Pest 3 Code, Type, Scale: PUCCSP D A Equipment Type: SPRAYE Nozzle Type: 4110 Nozzle Size: 12 Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 50 cm Nozzles/Row: 4 Boom ID: KSU2 Boom Length, Unit: 2 m Boom Height, Unit: 50 cm Ground Speed, Unit: 1 MPS Carrier: WATER Spray Volume, Unit: 200 L/ha Mix Size, Unit: 2.5 liters Propellant: COMAIR Application Equipment

10 18/01/18 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Scientific Name Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Crop Name Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Crop Variety Wanamo Wanamo Wanamo Pest Type D Disease D Disease Pest Code PYRNTR PYRNTR Pest Scientific Name Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Pyrenophora tritici-repentis Pest Name Tan spot of cereals Tan spot of cereals Part Rated LEAF - LEAF - LEAF - Rating Date 03/08/17 03/08/17 22/08/17 Description Rating Type DAMDIS PHYGEN DAMDIS Rating Unit % % % Sample Size, Unit 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale BBCH BBCH BBCH Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 33 DA-A ARM Action Codes APC APC Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code Untreated Check 7.00 a 0.0 a 72.5 a (0%) (0%) 2 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A 3.25 b 0.0 a 17.5 b Zenit 575 EC 0.4 l/ha A (54%) (76%) 3 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A 2.50 b 0.0 a 10.3 bc Juventus 0.4 l/ha A (64%) (86%) 4 Orius 0.8 l/ha A 2.50 b 0.0 a 9.8 bc Mirador 0.4 l/ha A (64%) (87%) 5 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 2.63 b 0.0 a 5.5 c (63%) (92%) 6 ElatusPlus 0.5 l/ha A 3.50 b 0.0 a 11.5 bc Amistar Xtra 0.5 l/ha A (50%) (84%) 7 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A 2.00 b 0.0 a 6.3 c Prosaro 0.4 l/ha A (71%) (91%) 8 Ascra Xpro 1 l/ha A 1.75 b 0.0 a 12.0 bc (75%) (83%) LSD P= Standard Deviation CV Levene's F Levene's Prob(F) * Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Means followed by same letter or symbol do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls) Column 10: TY1 = *[C6]*(100-@AVGSUB([C7]))/85 Column 11: T2 = ((100-@AVGSUB([7]))*@AVGSUB([8]))/85 Column 12: T3 = ((100-@AVGSUB([7]))*@AVGSUB([9]))/85 Could not calculate LSD (% mean diff) for columns 2,5 because error mean square = 0.

11 18/01/18 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Scientific Name Crop Name Crop Variety Pest Type Pest Code Pest Scientific Name Pest Name Part Rated Rating Date Description Rating Type Rating Unit Sample Size, Unit Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale Trt-Eval Interval ARM Action Codes Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Check Rate Appl Rate Unit Code 2 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A Zenit 575 EC 0.4 l/ha A 3 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Juventus 0.4 l/ha A 4 Orius 0.8 l/ha A Mirador 0.4 l/ha A 5 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 6 ElatusPlus 0.5 l/ha A Amistar Xtra 0.5 l/ha A 7 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Prosaro 0.4 l/ha A 8 Ascra Xpro 1 l/ha A LSD P=.05 Standard Deviation CV Levene's F Levene's Prob(F) Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Wanamo Wanamo Wanamo LEAF - PLANT - GRAIN - 22/08/17 23/10/17 22/11/17 green leaves GREEN LODGIN YIELD NUMBER % kg 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT BBCH BBCH BBCH 33 DA-A 95 DA-A 125 DA-A APOC APOC APOC b 90.0 a b (100%) (100%) (100%) 1.88 a 90.0 a ab (375%) (100%) (107%) 2.13 a 90.0 a ab (425%) (100%) (109%) 2.50 a 90.0 a ab (500%) (100%) (108%) 2.75 a 90.0 a a (550%) (100%) (114%) 2.50 a 90.0 a ab (500%) (100%) (109%) 2.75 a 90.0 a ab (550%) (100%) (106%) 2.38 a 90.0 a ab (475%) (100%) (109%) *

12 18/01/18 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Scientific Name Crop Name Crop Variety Pest Type Pest Code Pest Scientific Name Pest Name Part Rated Rating Date Description Rating Type Rating Unit Sample Size, Unit Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale Trt-Eval Interval ARM Action Codes Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Check Rate Appl Rate Unit Code 2 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A Zenit 575 EC 0.4 l/ha A 3 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Juventus 0.4 l/ha A 4 Orius 0.8 l/ha A Mirador 0.4 l/ha A 5 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 6 ElatusPlus 0.5 l/ha A Amistar Xtra 0.5 l/ha A 7 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Prosaro 0.4 l/ha A 8 Ascra Xpro 1 l/ha A LSD P=.05 Standard Deviation CV Levene's F Levene's Prob(F) Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Wanamo Wanamo Wanamo GRAIN - GRAIN - GRAIN - 22/11/17 22/11/17 22/11/17 15 % moisture MOICON YIELD HLW % KG kg 1 PLOT 1 ha 1 PLOT BBCH BBCH BBCH 125 DA-A 125 DA-A 125 DA-A APOC TY1 APOC APOC a 4127 b 62.8 b (100%) (100%) (100%) 8.4 a 4411 ab 65.0 a (106%) (107%) (103%) 7.9 a 4497 ab 63.6 ab (100%) (109%) (101%) 8.0 a 4434 ab 63.8 ab (102%) (107%) (102%) 8.5 a 4652 a 64.7 a (108%) (113%) (103%) 7.8 a 4511 ab 64.2 a (99%) (109%) (102%) 8.4 a 4345 ab 63.9 ab (107%) (105%) (102%) 8.2 a 4482 ab 64.7 a (104%) (109%) (103%)

13 18/01/18 (F ) ARM AOV Means Table Efficacy evaluation of fungicides against rusts and other leaf diseases in spring wheat Trial ID: F Location: Jokioinen Trial Year: 2017 Protocol ID: F Investigator: Kalle Ohralahti Project ID: Advisory Trials Study Director: Kalle Ohralahti Sponsor Contact: Luke Crop Scientific Name Crop Name Crop Variety Pest Type Pest Code Pest Scientific Name Pest Name Part Rated Rating Date Description Rating Type Rating Unit Sample Size, Unit Number of Subsamples Crop Stage Majority Crop Stage Scale Trt-Eval Interval ARM Action Codes Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Check Rate Appl Rate Unit Code 2 Amistar 0.4 l/ha A Zenit 575 EC 0.4 l/ha A 3 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Juventus 0.4 l/ha A 4 Orius 0.8 l/ha A Mirador 0.4 l/ha A 5 ElatusEra 1 l/ha A 6 ElatusPlus 0.5 l/ha A Amistar Xtra 0.5 l/ha A 7 Comet Pro 0.4 l/ha A Prosaro 0.4 l/ha A 8 Ascra Xpro 1 l/ha A LSD P=.05 Standard Deviation CV Levene's F Levene's Prob(F) Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Triticum aestivum Spring wheat Spring wheat Spring wheat Wanamo Wanamo Wanamo GRAIN - GRAIN - GRAIN - 22/11/17 27/11/17 22/11/17 15 % moisture 15 % moisture HLW TKW TKW kg g g 1 PLOT 1 PLOT 1 PLOT BBCH BBCH BBCH 125 DA-A 125 DA-A 125 DA-A T2 APOC APOC T3 APOC b c c (100%) (100%) (100%) 70.0 a a ab (103%) (111%) (110%) 68.9 ab b b (101%) (107%) (107%) 69.0 ab a a (101%) (113%) (113%) 69.6 a a a (102%) (114%) (113%) 69.6 a a a (102%) (113%) (113%) 68.8 ab a a (101%) (115%) (114%) 69.8 a a a (103%) (113%) (112%)