Ympäristöohjelman päähaut ja vinkkejä hakijoille

Transkriptio

1 Ympäristöohjelman päähaut ja vinkkejä hakijoille Jaana Lehtimäki, NCP 1

2 FP7-ENV -päähaut v Call Call budget million Budget requested million Budget rate Proposals received Proposals evaluated Ineligible Ineligible rate Projects selected Projects rate FP7-ENV , % % % FP7-ENV , % % % FP7-ENV % % % FP7-ENV % % % FP7-ENV % % % FP7-ENV-2012-one-stage % % % FP7-ENV-2012-two-stage (*) % % % 1,178 5, % % % (*) at stage 2 Source: Avelino González, Insights to proposal submission and evaluation, InfoDay on 2013 Environment Calls FP7-11 June /08/2012 2

3 Suomalaiset osallistujat ympäristöohjelmassa (6/2012) Varmistuneet osallistumiset 78 kpl -> onnistumis% 22,03 (suomalaiset ka 22,06%) Koordinaattoreita 5 (THL, TY, 2 x VTT, BONUS EEIG) -> onnistumis% 15,91 (16,62 %) Suomalaisia osallistujia kaikista ympäristöohjelman osallistujista n. 5 % 93% ns. päähauista rahoitetuissa hankkeissa FP7-ENV (15 kpl), FP7-ENV (18 kpl), FP7-ENV (21 kpl), FP7-ENV-2010 (10 kpl), FP7-ENV-2011 (9 kpl) 82 % yhteistutkimushankkeissa (CP) Mukana 60 hankkeessa (1-4 osallistujaa per hanke) Eniten osallistumisia (yht. 65 %): SYKE (17), HY (10), IL (10),THL (6), EFI (4), ISY (4) 3

4 Ympäristöohjelmasta rahoitettujen hankkeiden, joissa suomalaisia osallistujia, rahoitus Project total cost Project EC contribution Participant total cost Participant EC contribution Total Min Max Average n = 78 ja mukana laskelmissa viisi rahoitusmuotoa (n. 82 % CP)

5 Päähakujen rahoituskriteerit Jätä hakemus ennen haun päättymistä Tarkista sopiiko ehdotuksenne aiheen kuvaukseen ja rahoitusmuotoon Tarkista komission rahoitusosuus CP 3, 6, 9, 10 ja 12 milj. CSA 1 ja 3 milj. kahdessa hakuaiheessa ei ole määritelty (ENV & 6.3.2) Tarkista osallistujien lukumäärä 3 osallistujaa eri jäsen- tai liitännäisvaltioista (CP & CSA-CA) Tarkista onko muita kelpoisuusvaatimuksia 11 hakuaiheessa rahoitusosuus P&K yrityksille (6 kpl 15 %, 1 kpl 20 %, 4 kpl 30 %) (tarkistetaan neuvotteluvaiheessa) Hakemuksen täytyy olla täydellinen (osat A ja B), luettavissa, saatavilla ja printattavissa. Lataa B-osasta kopio ja tarkista se. 5

6 FP7-ENV-2013 main calls: evaluation criteria Minimum thresholds FP7-ENV one-stage FP7-ENV two -stage, stage 1 FP7-ENV two -stage, stage 2 FP7-ENV WATER-INNO- DEMO S/T quality 3/5 4/5 4/5 3/5 Implementation 3/5-3/5 3/5 Impact 3/5 3/5 3/5 3/5 Overall threshold 10/15 8/10 11/5 10/15 The evaluation criteria are detailed in the Annex II to the WP2013 (Guide for applicants). The description is adapted to the funding scheme. 6

7 S/T quality Address in this part the relevance to the topic Make it clear, and be objective concept and objectives the current state-of-the-art and the expected progress assess the risks of failure Provide references, including your currently related activities Methodology and integration of activities should be credible Work plan structure and planning shall be realistic overall objectives => work packages specific objectives => tasks => deliverables milestones are associated to relevant objectives and should include criteria for assessment and further decision 7

8 Implementation Present the management structure and how decisions are taken The proposal should explain how partners activities will be integrated to form a robust consortium Role and contributions of every single partner should be well defined and relevant experience explained Stakeholders (end-users, industry, decision makers, general public etc.) shall be involved as appropriated Justify the resources allocated Proposals are not compared in terms of pure costs but the allocation of resources should make sense Avoid calculation mistakes, provide consistent information in both part A and B Reimbursement rates vs. types of activities: from 50% to 100% => BE REALISTIC Management activities does not include scientific coordination 8

9 Impact Explain how the project and its potential outcome(s) will contribute to the impacts listed in the WP2013 Do not hesitate to go beyond the listed impacts Think about European added value Dissemination, exploitation and potential use of projects results is a must Exploitation and use of the generated knowledge goes well beyond pure commercial prospects Stakeholders engagement Specific dissemination strategies Open access policy (OpenAIRE) IPR Innovation impact (introduced already in the previous call) Markets and areas of potential use of projects results, including measures to increase the market uptake: Verification, testing, standardisation Identifying potential users/stakeholders, financial support for development/commercialisation 9

10 FP7-ENV-haut (wp 2013) Call Deadline Env budget (total) M FP7-ENV one stage FP7-ENV two stage FP NMP-ENV-Eeb FP7-Ocean 2013 ERANET RTD FP7-ENV WATER INNO & DEMO 10 No topics / Funding scheme CSA-CA 1) ) ~ CP (116) 1 (yht 7) CP (55) 4 CP (61,1) 1 (yht 15) CSA ERA NET PLUS CP, CSA-CA Total

11 FP7-ENV- päähaut FP7-ENV-2013-one-stage 17 milj. Deadline 16/10/2012, 17:00 Brussels time 4 topics all CA & all 6.5 Mobilising environmental knowledge for policy, industry... FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage 248 milj. 1. Deadline 16/10/2012 (first stage), 2. Deadline ~28/02/2013 (second stage) 22 topics all CP & all challenges FP7-ENV-2013-WATER INNO&DEMO 40 milj. Deadline 4/4/2013, 17:00 Brussels time 2 topics one CP and one CA, both 6.3 Improving resource efficiency 11

12 deadline Planned evaluation process for the one-stage and two-stage calls Info to applicants Info to applicants 3-6 independent experts Submission Eligibility Individual assesment Consensus panel Review panel Finalisation Ranked list Rejection list First week of November Third week of November Rejection list 16/10/2012 First week of December Mid December 12

13 deadline Planned evaluation process for the two-stage call (stage 2) Info to applicants Info to applicants 3-6 independent experts Submission Eligibility Individual assesment Consensus panel Review panel Finalisation Ranked list 28/02/2013 Rejection list Third week of March Rejection list Second week of April Last week of April Mid May 13

14 deadline Planned evaluation process for the water call Info to applicants Info to applicants 3-6 independent experts Submission Eligibility Individual assessment Consensus panel Review panel Finalisation Ranked list Rejection list Last week of April Second week of May Rejection list 4/4/2013 Third week of May End of May 14

15 Lisätietoja Kansalliset yhteyshenkilöt: - Jaana Lehtimäki, Suomen Akatemia - Tuomas Lehtinen, Tekes Komiteajäsen: - Laura Raaska, Suomen Akatemia Komitean asiantuntija: - Mikko Strahlendorff, Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriö Ympäristöohjelman oman sivut: -> 7.puiteohjelma -> Aihealueet -> Ympäristö 15

16