Erillään kaupungissa. Seminaari ja työpajatyöskentely Helsingissä

Transkriptio

1 Erillään kaupungissa Seminaari ja työpajatyöskentely Helsingissä

2 TODAY S PROGRAMME 9.30 Welcome and introduction to the day s programme 9.45 Maarten van Ham & Tiit Tammaru: Increasing Socio-Economic Segregation in European Cities Timo Kauppinen: Preliminary findings from Finland Katja Vilkama: Comments from Helsinki perspective Moderated discussion supported by screen.io Workshop on available policy instruments and key players in segregation prevention Work in groups & pairs Pause Roger Andersson: Refugee immigration to Sweden: national and local challenges Tuomas Martikainen: Comments from the Finnish perspective Moderated discussion and mini-workshop supported by screen.io

3 TILAISUUDEN TAUSTALLA URMI Tutkimme kaupungistumisen ajureita ja ennakoimme mahdollisia kehityskulkuja Suomessa yhdessä hankkeen sidosryhmien kanssa vuorovaikutteisilla menetelmillä. Kestävyys, liikkuvuus ja maahanmuutto ovat tutkimuksen keskeisiä teemoja. STN Suomen Akatemian uusi rahoitusinstrumentti, jolla Strategisen Tutkimuksen Neuvosto lisää tutkimuksen yhteiskunnallista vaikuttavuutta Kaupungistuva yhteiskunta -ohjelmassa käynnissä kolme isoa tutkimushanketta.

4 URMI #urmiproject #strateginentutkimus tutkimuksen-rahoitus2/

5 EXPECTATIONS

6 PARTICIPANTS EXPECTATIONS up-to-date knowledge both on the phenomena and the related policy tools - Uusinta tutkimustietoa eri kaupunkien ja alueiden segregaatiotilanteesta ja analyysiä niistä keinoista, joilla tilanteeseen on pyritty puuttumaan. - Kansainvälistä näkökulmaa ja kokemuksia. - Saada uutta näkökulmaa muuttuneesta pakolaistilanteesta ja sen tuomista haasteista sekä pakolaisten alueelliseen sijoittumiseen liittyen.

7 PARTICIPANTS EXPECTATIONS discussions and networking among those who have agency to find new solutions Pidän tärkeänä asian esillä pitämistä, yhdessä pohtimista ja asiasta kiinnostuneiden ja siihen vaikuttamaan pystyvien verkostoimista. Kuulla muiden kaupunkien kokemuksia segregaatiosta ja sen ehkäisystä; miten eri toimijat voisivat parhaiten tehdä yhteistyötä.

8 WHO ARE HERE? Ministries and other national level administration Regional level administration exercise City level officials and managers NGO representatives Private sector representatives URMI researchers Other researchers or students Other?

9 PRESENTATIONS

10 INCREASING SOCIO-ECONOMIC SEGREGATION IN EUROPEAN CITIES MAARTEN VAN HAM DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TIIT TAMMARU UNIVERSITY OF TARTU

11 TIMO KAUPPINEN PREMILINARY FINDINGS FROM FINLAND THL

12 Comments on Maarten van Ham and Tiit Tammaru s presentation Timo Kauppinen Erillään kaupungissa,

13 Ratio of the median equivalized disposable money income in the households of year-old persons belonging to the highest income quintile to corresponding income in the lowest income quintile Helsinki Turku Tampere Source: URMI data, Own calculations

14 Residential segregation between year-old persons in the lowest and highest quintiles of household s equivalized disposable money income, measured by index of dissimilarity Zipcode areas 250 m * 250 m grid cells Helsinki Turku Tampere Helsinki Turku Tampere Source: URMI data, Own calculations

15 Income segregation & URMI To what extent is the development of ethnic segregation based on socio-economic processes such as the income development among the immigrant-origin population and the development of income segregation? To what extent is the development of income segregation illustrated in these graphs related to immigration?

16 KATJA VILKAMA COMMENTS FROM PERSPECTIVE OF HELSINKI CITY OF HELSINKI URBAN FACTS

17 Moderated discussion supported by screen.io

18 Workshop: Available policy instruments and key players in segregation prevention

19 We can try to avoid detrimental segregation by interventions in the existing/emerging segregation - and/or by getting rid of its root causes, i.e. mechanisms that create disparities.

20 Frame Policy types discussed in the policy brief Time scale

21 POLICIES People-based IHMISET Place-based ALUEET Connectivity based YHTEYDET Income distribution TULONJAKO

22 POLICIES / TIMESCALE People-based IHMISET Place-based ALUEET Connectivity based YHTEYDET Income distribution TULONJAKO Short-term TALVI TULEE Mid-term SOTE TULEE Long-term SUOMI 2039

23 POLICIES / TIMESCALE People-based IHMISET Place-based ALUEET Short-term TALVI TULEE Mid-term SOTE TULEE capabilities of individuals and communities Long-term SUOMI 2039 next generation: equal chances of social mobility? e.g. mixed tenure, upgrading Connectivity based YHTEYDET e.g. access to job interviews and other opportunities Income distribution TULONJAKO national level decisions pulling the rag under local efforts? parallel realities in badly connected suburbs?

24 Task 1 approx 15 min Think of your own work: How does your own work (or the one of your organization) relate with segregation and its prevention/mitigation? What are the central challenges you have confronted? Write on RED post-its, share with your group and attach to the work sheet.

25 Task 2 approx 15 min Try to identify the actors (YELLOW post-its) and measures (GREEN post-its) that are central with the policy instruments we have heard of today. Share with your group. Attach all post-its to the work sheet. Try to locate them according to the policy types and the time scale, together with your group.

26 POLICIES / TIMESCALE People-based IHMISET Place-based ALUEET Connectivity based YHTEYDET Income distribution TULONJAKO Short-term TALVI TULEE Mid-term SOTE TULEE Long-term SUOMI 2039

27 Groups (1-3 in English, others according to participants) Discussion support in each group 1 Maarten van Ham 2 Tiit Tammaru 3 Daniel Hess 4 Timo Kauppinen 5 Katja Vilkama 6 Tuomas Martikainen 7 Jarkko Rasinkangas 8 Sampo Ruoppila 9 Aleksi Neuvonen 10 Iina Koskinen 11 12

28 Delfoiharjoitus (in Finnish) Segregaation tulevaisuus Suomessa Tehtävä 1. Arvioi parisi kanssa asteikolla 1-10, miten todennäköisiä ja toivottavia väitteiden kuvaamat asiantilat ovat. Kirjoittakaa arvioidenne perustelut paperiin. 2. Laadi parisi kanssa 1-2 vastaavaa, mielestänne relevanttia tulevaisuusväitettä.

29 ROGER ANDERSSON REFUGEE IMMIGRATION TO SWEDEN: NATIONAL AND LOCAL CHALLENGES UPPSALA UNIVERSITY

30 TUOMAS MARTIKAINEN COMMENTS FROM THE FINNISH PERSPECTIVE INSTITUTE OF MIGRATION

31 URMI Project Urbanization, Mobilities, and Immigration Partners: Turku University (Leading partner), Åbo Akademi Uni, Tartu Uni, Demos Helsinki, Tampere Tech. Uni., and Migration Ins. Of Finland

32 Urbanisation, Mobilities and Immigration Project at the Migration Insitute of Finland Part 1: Asylum grantee mobility from reception centre to municipality - Research question: Where do asylum grantees move from the reception centres? - Data: Ca. 30 interviews - Researchers: Marko Juntunen, Osama Al Aloulou, Yousif Haddad - Duration 9/2016-/2017 (8 months) Part 2: Finnish cities policies on segration - Research question: How and with which policies do Finnish cities aim to counter ethnic segregation? - Data: Policy documents of selected Finnish cities, interviews - Researcher: Jarkko Rasinkangas - Duration 1-12/2017 (12 months)

33 URMI-MIF timeline Part II: Asylum grantee interviews Part II: Analysis Part III: Publication Sept 2016 Jan 2017 Mar 2017 April 2017 May 2017 Dec 2017 Part 2: City segregation policy documents Part 2: Interviews with key officials Part 2: Publication

34 Founded in 1974 Located in the City Turku, offices also in Seinäjoki and Kronoby Focus: emigration, immigration, country internal migration, ethnicity Major research projects - URMI - Urbanisation, Mobilities and Migration (Academy of Finland Strategic Research Council ) - CAGE Coming of Age in Exile (NordForsk ) Research, Archive, Publisher, Library, Exhibitions Permanent staff 9 persons and temporary personnel 10 Annual budget ca. 1 million Euro Funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture

35 Moderated discussion and mini-workshop

36 Respond via screen.io/demos Discuss with others if you have no screenio-access - or write down on post-its. Questions: What do you anticipate to be the topics 2020 not discussed now? What has been discussed / studied elsewhere but not yet in Finland? Mistä puhutaan vuonna 2020? Mitä muualla käynnissä olevia keskusteluja uskot tulevan Suomeen lähivuosina?

37 Materials and summaries will be available at