Pohjois-Karjalan ammattikorkeakoulu

Samankaltaiset tiedostot
Nuorisotyöttömyys Euroopassa. Eurooppafoorumi: Työläisten Eurooppa, Tampere, Liisa Larja

Erasmus liikkuvuus Suomesta

LUONNOS RT EN AGREEMENT ON BUILDING WORKS 1 THE PARTIES. May (10)

LX 70. Ominaisuuksien mittaustulokset 1-kerroksinen 2-kerroksinen. Fyysiset ominaisuudet, nimellisarvot. Kalvon ominaisuudet

Oulun seudun ammattikorkeakoulu

Olet vastuussa osaamisestasi

Capacity Utilization

Metsien luonnontuotteet ja luomu. Rainer Peltola, MTT Rovaniemi / LAPPI LUO

Erasmus-liikkuvuus Suomesta

The CCR Model and Production Correspondence

TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers. Heikki Laaksamo

Alternative DEA Models

EU Participant Report feedback Sofia Lähdeniemi & Kiira Noponen

2017/S Contract notice. Supplies

Sisällys. 1. Energiatehokkuudesta. 2. Energiatehokkuusindikaattorit kansantalouden makrotasolla

National Building Code of Finland, Part D1, Building Water Supply and Sewerage Systems, Regulations and guidelines 2007

Rotarypiiri 1420 Piiriapurahoista myönnettävät stipendit

COPYRIGHT SFS. OSITTAINENKIN JULKAISEMINEN TAI KOPIOINTI SALLITTU VAIN SFS:N LUVALLA. TÄTÄ JULKAISUA MYY SUOMEN STANDARDISOIMISLIITTO SFS

Efficiency change over time

Suomen biokapasiteetti ja sen. Prof. Jyri Seppälä Suomen ympäristökeskus

Choose Finland-Helsinki Valitse Finland-Helsinki

*) %-yks. % 2018*)

KVS2008. Pertti Kuronen

COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE DE L'ECLAIRAGE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ILLUMINATION INTERNATIONALE BELEUCHTUNGSKOMMISSION.

KMTK lentoestetyöpaja - Osa 2

Supplies

MITEN KÄY KUSTANNUSTEN EHDOTETUSSA SOTE MALLISSA

SELL Student Games kansainvälinen opiskelijaurheilutapahtuma

muutos *) %-yks. % 2016

Returns to Scale II. S ysteemianalyysin. Laboratorio. Esitelmä 8 Timo Salminen. Teknillinen korkeakoulu

Tutkimuslääkkeiden GMP. Fimea Pirjo Hänninen

Nuorten työttömyys -faktaa ja fiktiota

Kohti uutta normaalia? Pakolaisuus ja muuttoliike lukuina, tänään

muutos *) %-yks. % 2017*)

EUROOPAN PARLAMENTTI

Teollisuustuotannon määrä kuukausittain

16. Allocation Models

IP/09/1064. Bryssel 1. heinäkuuta 2009

SUORITUSTASOILMOITUS. Nro 0016 FI

Vastuullinen liikenne. Yhteinen asia.

SÄÄDÖSKOKOELMAN. Julkaistu Helsingissä päivänä 12 maaliskuuta /2014 (Suomen säädöskokoelman n:o 200/2014) Valtioneuvoston asetus

Infrastruktuurin asemoituminen kansalliseen ja kansainväliseen kenttään Outi Ala-Honkola Tiedeasiantuntija

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)


Eduskunnan tarkastusvaliokunta

SUORITUSTASOILMOITUS. Nro 0005 FI

Ilmailijan lääketiede. Uudet medikaalivaatimukset. Helsinki Fly In, Jukka Terttunen, AME Liikennelääketiedeyksikkö. Yhteinen asia.

SFS-EN 1990 EUROKOODI. RAKENTEIDEN SUUNNITTELUPERUSTEET Eurocode. Basis of structural design

FinFamily PostgreSQL installation ( ) FinFamily PostgreSQL

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

MMM/R0/MY Eduskunnan maa- ja metsätalousvaliokunta on pyytänyt tietoa Suomeen ja muihin jäsenvaltioihin kohdistuneista rahoitusoikaisuista.

Other approaches to restrict multipliers

Kauppalehti Tietopalvelut hinnasto

Security server v6 installation requirements

Väestöennuste 2012 mikä muuttui?

MEKIN UUDET HAASTEET. Keski-Suomen matkailuparlamentti Jyväskylä Pirkko Perheentupa Matkailun edistämiskeskus

Tutkimusdata ja julkaiseminen Suomen Akatemian ja EU:n H2020 projekteissa

Broilereiden hyvinvointi ja

Position Position Passengers Percentage Passengers Percentage of all visitors 2013 of all visitors

Curriculum. Gym card

Sisävesidirektiivin soveltamisala poikkeussäännökset. Versio: puheenjohtajan ehdotus , neuvoston asiakirja 8780/16.

7.4 Variability management

Information on preparing Presentation

The Viking Battle - Part Version: Finnish

Network to Get Work. Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students.

OMINAISUUDET SOVELLUS. Technical data sheet C2 - C4 - BULLDOG. Bulldogpuunsitojalevyt

Karkaavatko ylläpitokustannukset miten kustannukset ja tuotot johdetaan hallitusti?

Maksujärjestelmäsimulaattori SUOMEN PANKKI FINLANDS BANK BANK OF FINLAND

Operatioanalyysi 2011, Harjoitus 4, viikko 40

Fingrid uuden edessä. Toimitusjohtaja Jukka Ruusunen. Kantaverkkopäivä

Työsuojelurahaston Tutkimus tutuksi - PalveluPulssi Peter Michelsson Wallstreet Asset Management Oy

Pohjalaismaakuntien väestö ja perheet

Bounds on non-surjective cellular automata

Nordea Bank Abp. Nordea Bank Abp

Supplies

Maatalouden energiankulutus Suomessa ja Euroopassa

Suomi innovaatioympäristönä maailman paras?

Keskittämisrenkaat. Meiltä löytyy ratkaisu jokaiseen putkikokoon, 25 mm ja siitä ylöspäin.

Poistavatko kannustimet ja sanktiot työttömyyttä? Heikki Ervasti

Lapsen oikeudet ulottuvat myös nettiin. Mari Laiho Nettiturvallisuustyön päällikkö

Security server v6 installation requirements

Esityksessäni 10/26/2015. Naiset ja miehet ikääntyvässä Suomessa Markus Rapo, Tilastokeskus. -Vanhus / ikääntynyt määritelmä?

Kansallinen hankintailmoitus: Mikkelin ammattikorkeakoulu Oy : Palvelimet ja kytkin

TEST REPORT Nro VTT-S Air tightness and strength tests for Furanflex exhaust air ducts

Mäntyöljykyllästys vaihtoehto kreosootille?

Elämää PISA:n varjossa

Työttömyysetuuksien vaikutuksesta työmarkkinakäyttäytymiseen - tarkastelussa enimmäiskeston lyhennys

SUORITUSTASOILMOITUS. Nro 0048 FI

Miten varmistaa osaaminen työelämän muutoksessa?

Kuka päättää sote-palveluiden kehittämisestä: asukas, professio vai manageri? Jouko Isolauri

Kysymys 5 Compared to the workload, the number of credits awarded was (1 credits equals 27 working hours): (4)

Mitä annettavaa Tuning-hankkeella on korkeakouluille?

OP1. PreDP StudyPlan

Hankintailmoitus: Pohjois-Savon sairaanhoitopiirin kuntayhtymä/kiinteistöyksikkö : Puijon sairaalan Pääaula-alueen uudistus, Sähköurakka

Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data

Innovative and responsible public procurement Urban Agenda kumppanuusryhmä. public-procurement

KUNNAT JA VESIHUOLTO: VAIHTOEHTOJA VAI SUORAVIIVAISUUTTA Pekka Pietilä, TkT TTY/CADWES-ryhmä

Korkeasti koulutettujen työllisyys

Nordea Bank Abp. Nordea Bank Abp

KAAPELIN SUOJAAMINEN SUOJAMATOLLA

Transkriptio:

SUOMEN STANDARDISOIMISLIITTO RY FINNISH STANDARDS ASSOCIATION Pohjois-Karjalan ammattikorkeakoulu Ohessa käyttöönne sähköinen -standardi Suomen Standardisoimisliitto ry Tätä julkaisua ei saa kopioida tai levittää missään muodossa ilman :n erillistä kirjallista lupaa. Julkaisu on tekijänoikeuslain suojaama. Electronic file of the -standard Finnish Standards Association You shall not in any form further distribute this publication without a specific permission by. This publication is protected by the copyright law. SUOMEN STANDARDISOIMISLIITTO PL 130, 00101 HELSINKI (MALMINKATU 34) PUH. 09 1499 3353, FAKSI 09 146 4914 Sähköposti: sales@sfs.fi Internet: www.sfs.fi FINNISH STANDARDS ASSOCIATION P.O.B 130, FI-00101 HELSINKI (MALMINKATU 34) TEL +358 91499 3353, FAX +358 9146 4914 E-mail: sales@sfs.fi Internet: www.sfs.fi

SUOMEN STANDARDISOIMISLIITTO STANDARDI -EN 338 Metsäteollisuus ry Finnish Forest Industries Federation Vahvistettu 2010-01-25 1 (1 + 10) COPYRIGHT. OSITTAINENKIN JULKAISEMINEN TAI KOPIOINTI SALLITTU VAIN :N LUVALLA. TÄTÄ JULKAISUA MYY SUOMEN STANDARDISOIMISLIITTO ICS 79.040 Korvaa: -EN 338:en:2003 Tämä standardi on vahvistettu englanninkielisenä Replaces: -EN 338:en:2003 This standard is approved in English STRUCTURAL TIMBER. STRENGTH CLASSES Tämä standardi sisältää eurooppalaisen standardin EN 338:2009 "Structural timber. Strength classes" englanninkielisen tekstin. Eurooppalainen standardi EN 338:2009 on vahvistettu suomalaiseksi kansalliseksi standardiksi. This standard consists of the English text of the European Standard EN 338:2009 "Structural timber. Strength classes". The European Standard EN 338:2009 has the status of a Finnish national standard.

EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM EN 338 October 2009 ICS 79.040 Supersedes EN 338:2003 English Version Structural timber - Strength classes Bois de structure - Classes de résistance Bauholz für tragende Zwecke - Festigkeitsklassen This European Standard was approved by CEN on 29 September 2009. CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN Management Centre or to any CEN member. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN Management Centre has the same status as the official versions. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2009 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 338:2009: E

Content page Foreword... 3 Introduction... 4 1 Scope... 5 2 Normative references... 5 3 Terms and definitions... 5 4 Symbols and abbreviations... 5 5 Classification of structural timber... 6 6 Allocation of a timber population to a strength class... 8 6.1 Grading... 8 6.1.1 Visually graded timber... 8 6.1.2 Machine graded timber... 8 6.2 Classification... 8 6.2.1 Characteristic values... 8 6.2.2 Allocation to a strength class... 8 Annex A (informative) Determination of values in addition to bending strength, stiffness and density... 9 Bibliography... 10 2

Foreword This document (EN 338:2009) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 124 Timber structures, the secretariat of which is held by. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by April 2010, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by April 2010. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This document supersedes EN 338:2003. According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. 3

Introduction This European Standard has additional strength classes which are more suitable to the characteristic values of temperate hardwoods. It also has modified characteristic values for the softwood classes for shear strength and tension strength perpendicular to grain. The equations given for these two properties in Annex A have been modified accordingly. Due to variations in the type and quality of timber available, the variety of end uses and the size of production output of the local timber industry, many different combinations of species and strength grade exist with different strength properties, which therefore complicate the design and specification of timber structures. A strength class system groups together grades and species with similar strength properties thus making them interchangeable. This then permits an engineer to specify a chosen strength class and use the characteristic strength values of that class in design calculations. Advantages of the strength class system are: a) Additional species/grades can be incorporated into the system at any time without affecting existing specifications for structural timber. b) At the time of carrying out design calculations, an engineer need not be aware of the costs and availability of alternative species and grades. He can simply design using the strength, stiffness and density values of a particular class and then specify that class; he can then use the tenders to select the most suitable and economic species/grade on offer. Note that, where a particular species is not acceptable (e.g. for reasons of durability) for a project, the specification needs to make this clear. c) Suppliers can offer their material to meet more specifications than would be possible if species and grades were specified. 4

1 Scope This European Standard establishes a system of strength classes for general use in structural codes. It gives characteristic strength and stiffness properties and density values for each class and the rules for the allocation of timber populations (i.e. combinations of species, source and grade) to the classes. This standard is applicable to all softwood and hardwood timber for structural use. 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. EN 384, Structural timber Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density EN 14081 (all parts), Timber structures Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. 3.1 timber population timber for which the characteristic values are relevant NOTE The timber population is defined by parameters such as species or species grouping (combination of species), source and strength grade. 4 Symbols and abbreviations E 0,mean mean characteristic value of modulus of elasticity parallel to grain (in kn/mm 2 ) E 0,05 5-percentile characteristic value of modulus of elasticity parallel to grain (in kn/mm 2 ) E 90,mean mean characteristic value of modulus of elasticity perpendicular to grain (in kn/mm 2 ) f c,0,k characteristic value of compressive strength parallel to grain (in N/mm 2 ) f c,90,k characteristic value of compressive strength perpendicular to grain (in N/mm 2 ) f m,k characteristic value of bending strength (in N/mm 2 ) f t,0,k characteristic value of tensile strength parallel to grain (in N/mm 2 ) f t,90,k characteristic value of tensile strength perpendicular to grain (in N/mm 2 ) f v,k characteristic value of shear strength (in N/mm 2 ) G mean mean characteristic value of shear modulus (in kn/mm 2 ) ρ k characteristic value of density (in kg/m 3 ) ρ mean mean value of density (in kg/m 3 ) 5

5 Classification of structural timber This standard provides for a number of strength classes, each designated by a number indicating the value of bending strength in N/mm². The characteristic values of strength, stiffness and density for the strength classes are given in Table 1. 6

Table 1 Strength classes - Characteristic values Softwood species Hardwood species Strength properties (in N/mm 2 ) C14 C16 C18 C20 C22 C24 C27 C30 C35 C40 C45 C50 D18 D24 D30 D35 D40 D50 D60 D70 Bending ƒm,k 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30 35 40 45 50 18 24 30 35 40 50 60 70 Tension parallel ƒt,0,k 8 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 21 24 27 30 11 14 18 21 24 30 36 42 Tension perpendicular ƒt,90,k 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 Compression parallel ƒc,0,k 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 29 18 21 23 25 26 29 32 34 Compression perpendicular ƒc,90,k 2,0 2,2 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 2,9 3,1 3,2 7,5 7,8 8,0 8,1 8,3 9,3 10,5 13,5 Shear ƒv,k 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 3,4 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0 Stiffness properties (in kn/mm 2 ) Mean modulus E0,mean 7 8 9 9,5 10 11 11,5 12 13 14 15 16 9,5 10 11 12 13 14 17 20 of elasticity parallel 5 % modulus of E0,05 4,7 5,4 6,0 6,4 6,7 7,4 7,7 8,0 8,7 9,4 10,0 10,7 8 8,5 9,2 10,1 10,9 11,8 14,3 16,8 elasticity parallel Mean modulus E90,mean 0,23 0,27 0,30 0,32 0,33 0,37 0,38 0,40 0,43 0,47 0,50 0,53 0,63 0,67 0,73 0,80 0,86 0,93 1,13 1,33 of elasticity perpendicular Mean shear modulus Gmean 0,44 0,5 0,56 0,59 0,63 0,69 0,72 0,75 0,81 0,88 0,94 1,00 0,59 0,62 0,69 0,75 0,81 0,88 1,06 1,25 Density (in kg/m 3 ) Density ρk 290 310 320 330 340 350 370 380 400 420 440 460 475 485 530 540 550 620 700 900 Mean density ρmean 350 370 380 390 410 420 450 460 480 500 520 550 570 580 640 650 660 750 840 1080 NOTE 1 Values given above for tension strength, compression strength, shear strength, 5 % modulus of elasticity, mean modulus of elasticity perpendicular to grain and mean shear modulus, have been calculated using the equations given in Annex A. NOTE 2 The tabulated properties are compatible with timber at a moisture content consistent with a temperature of 20 C and a relative humidity of 65 %. NOTE 3 Timber conforming to classes C45 and C50 may not be readily available. NOTE 4 Characteristic values for shear strength are given for timber without fissures, according to EN 408. The effect of fissures should be covered in design codes. 7

6 Allocation of a timber population to a strength class 6.1 Grading 6.1.1 Visually graded timber Visually graded timber shall be to a grading standard that meets the requirements of EN 14081-1. NOTE EN 1912 lists a number of visual grades and species that are allocated to the strength classes of this standard. 6.1.2 Machine graded timber Machine graded timber shall meet the requirements of EN 14081 (all parts). 6.2 Classification 6.2.1 Characteristic values The characteristic values of bending strength, modulus of elasticity in bending (mean) and density for the timber population concerned shall be determined in accordance with EN 384. NOTE Other strength and stiffness properties, as well as mean density values, are determined according to Annex A. 6.2.2 Allocation to a strength class A timber population may be assigned to a strength class if its characteristic values of bending strength and density equal or exceed the values for that strength class given in Table 1, and its characteristic mean modulus of elasticity in bending equals or exceeds 95 % of the value for that strength class given in Table 1. NOTE Provided the settings are available in EN 14081-4, a grading machine may be set to grade directly to the strength class strength, stiffness and density values. Timber graded in this way should be referred to by the strength class number and marked according to EN 14081-1, EN 14081-2 and EN 14081-3. 8

Annex A (informative) Determination of values in addition to bending strength, stiffness and density The following equations were used to determine the characteristic values in Table 1 for properties other than bending strength, mean modulus of elasticity in bending and density. Tensile strength parallel to grain f = 0 f t,0, k, 6 m, k Compression strength parallel to grain ( ) 0, 45 f = 5 f c,0, k Shear strength ƒ v,k shall be taken from Table 1 Tensile strength perpendicular to grain ƒ t,90,k = 0,4 N/mm² for softwoods ƒ t,90,k = 0,6 N/mm² for hardwoods Compressive strength perpendicular to grain f = 0 ρ for softwoods c,90, k, 007 k m,k f = 0 ρ for hardwoods c,90, k, 015 k Modulus of elasticity parallel to grain E = 0 E for softwoods 0,05, 67 0,05, 84 0,mean E = 0 E for hardwoods 0,mean Mean modulus of elasticity perpendicular to grain E = / 30 for softwoods 90,mean E0,mean E = /15 for hardwoods 90,mean E0,mean Mean shear modulus G = E / 16 mean 0,mean Mean density ρ mean = 1, 2 ρ k 9

Bibliography [1] EN 1912, Structural timber - Strength classes - Assignment of visual grades and species [2] EN 408, Timber structures - Structural timber and glued laminated timber - Determination of some physical and mechanical properties 10