Alliancing in Finnish Transport Agency, Finland

Samankaltaiset tiedostot
Infrastructure IPD in Public Sector. Pekka Petäjäniemi Director Finnish Transport

Lean Construction Report from Finland

Liikenneviraston katsaus

Kimolan kanavahanke. Harri Liikanen, Liikennevirasto

How IPD Projects change Finnish construction industry. Lean in Public Sector Conference LIPS 2017, Santiago, Chile Jani Saarinen

Valtion MAL-työ raideliikenteen edistäjänä

Valoa seminaari : Mistä valoa rakentamiseen ja ylläpitoon?

Skene. Games Refueled. Muokkaa perustyyl. for Health, Kuopio

Talousarvioesitys 2017

Innovative and responsible public procurement Urban Agenda kumppanuusryhmä. public-procurement

ProAgria. Opportunities For Success

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

The role of 3dr sector in rural -community based- tourism - potentials, challenges

Uusi Ajatus Löytyy Luonnosta 4 (käsikirja) (Finnish Edition)

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

AYYE 9/ HOUSING POLICY

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

Hankkeiden vaikuttavuus: Työkaluja hankesuunnittelun tueksi

Liikenneverkko nyt ja tulevaisuudessa. Pohjoinen kilpailukyky ja liikenneyhteydet Ylijohtaja Rami Metsäpelto, Lapin liikennepäivä 2017

Capacity Utilization

1. SIT. The handler and dog stop with the dog sitting at heel. When the dog is sitting, the handler cues the dog to heel forward.

IPT hankkeen esittely Strategia, hanke ja tulokset Pekka Petäjäniemi, Liikennevirasto & Jani Saarinen, Vison Oy

TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers. Heikki Laaksamo

Miehittämätön meriliikenne

Allianssimallin perusteet

Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council

Efficiency change over time

Tekes the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation. Copyright Tekes

Network to Get Work. Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students.

Valtiovarain valiokunnan liikennejaos Tiina Haapasalo

A new model of regional development work in habilitation of children - Good habilitation in functional networks

Supplies

MEETING PEOPLE COMMUNICATIVE QUESTIONS

2017/S Contract notice. Supplies

7. Product-line architectures

Rakentamisen 3D-mallit hyötykäyttöön

TIETEEN PÄIVÄT OULUSSA

7.4 Variability management

Supplies

Allianssimallin menestyksen avaimet infrarakentamisessa. Energiateollisuuden kevätseminaari, Pori Anders Nordström, Vison Oy

Norpe Winning Culture

Allianssihankkeen riskienhallinta tilaajan vinkkelistä

LUONNOS RT EN AGREEMENT ON BUILDING WORKS 1 THE PARTIES. May (10)

16. Allocation Models

NAO- ja ENO-osaamisohjelmien loppuunsaattaminen ajatuksia ja visioita

Building Information Model (BIM) promoting safety in the construction site process. SafetyBIM research project 10/2007 2/2009. (TurvaBIM in Finnish)

Transport and Infrastructure what about the future? Professor Jorma Mäntynen Tampere University of Technology

Hankintailmoitus: Pohjois-Savon sairaanhoitopiirin kuntayhtymä/kiinteistöyksikkö : Puijon sairaalan Pääaula-alueen uudistus, Sähköurakka

Tuloksia ja kokemuksia / results and experiences

Allianssimallien käyttö ja hyödyt? Maanalaisten tilojen rakentamisen reseptit, Helsinki Jani Saarinen, Vison Oy

National Building Code of Finland, Part D1, Building Water Supply and Sewerage Systems, Regulations and guidelines 2007

Ohjelmien kehittämisstudiot varmistavat laadukkaat ja linjakkaat maisteriohjelmat Maire Syrjäkari ja Riikka Rissanen

Suomen 2011 osallistumiskriteerit

Tarua vai totta: sähkön vähittäismarkkina ei toimi? Satu Viljainen Professori, sähkömarkkinat

Pääluokka 31 LIIKENNE- JA VIESTINTÄMINISTERIÖN HALLINNONALA

Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data

Information on preparing Presentation

The CCR Model and Production Correspondence

Copernicus, Sentinels, Finland. Erja Ämmälahti Tekes,

Constructive Alignment in Specialisation Studies in Industrial Pharmacy in Finland

Space for work, meetings and events. Expert Services for knowledge intensive and growth oriented SME s

Social and Regional Economic Impacts of Use of Bioenergy and Energy Wood Harvesting in Suomussalmi

LYTH-CONS CONSISTENCY TRANSMITTER

Finland s Journey in Lean Construction. Pekka Petäjäniemi, Kari-Pekka Tampio, Lauri Merikallio

Miksi Suomi on Suomi (Finnish Edition)

MUSEOT KULTTUURIPALVELUINA

Kysymys 5 Compared to the workload, the number of credits awarded was (1 credits equals 27 working hours): (4)

Other approaches to restrict multipliers

Kansainvälisiä tutkimus- ja kehitysprojekteja ekotehokkaan rakennetun ympäristön tuottamiseen, käyttöön ja ylläpitoon

Vertaispalaute. Vertaispalaute, /9

Palvelumuotoilu: Mitä seuraavaksi?

Otsikko tähän Development of the city centre Case Oulu

Railway project Seinäjoki Oulu Finland

Windows Phone. Module Descriptions. Opiframe Oy puh Espoo

Keskeisiä näkökulmia RCE-verkoston rakentamisessa Central viewpoints to consider when constructing RCE

Statistical design. Tuomas Selander

Asiantuntijoiden osaamisen kehittäminen ja sen arviointi. Anne Sundelin Capgemini Finland Oy

CIO muutosjohtajana yli organisaatiorajojen

FIS IMATRAN KYLPYLÄHIIHDOT Team captains meeting

Millaisia mahdollisuuksia kyberturva tarjoaa ja kenelle? Ja mitä on saatu aikaan?

FROM VISION TO CRITERIA: PLANNING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DESTINATIONS Case Ylläs Lapland

Käytännön kokemuksia osallistumisesta EU projekteihin. 7. puiteohjelman uusien hakujen infopäivät 2011

for employers Työvoimaa kuntoutujista ja kaikki voittaa! Projektipäällikkö Kaarina Latostenmaa Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu

HAY GROUPIN PALKKATUTKIMUS

Aalto-yliopiston laatujärjestelmä ja auditointi. Aalto-yliopisto Inkeri Ruuska, Head of Planning & Management Support

Smart specialisation for regions and international collaboration Smart Pilots Seminar

DIH ROBOCOAST. Kari HIETALA Regional Advisor REGIONAL COUNCIL OF SATAKUNTA. Brussels 13 April 2018

RAIN RAKENTAMISEN INTEGRAATIOKYVYKKYYS

Suomalainen koulutusosaaminen vientituotteena

GOOD WORK LONGER CAREER:

Strategiset kyvykkyydet kilpailukyvyn mahdollistajana Autokaupassa Paula Kilpinen, KTT, Tutkija, Aalto Biz Head of Solutions and Impact, Aalto EE

Nuku hyvin, pieni susi -????????????,?????????????????. Kaksikielinen satukirja (suomi - venäjä) ( (Finnish Edition)

Curriculum. Gym card

Sisällysluettelo Table of contents

Ostamisen muutos muutti myynnin. Technopolis Business Breakfast

SELL Student Games kansainvälinen opiskelijaurheilutapahtuma

Choose Finland-Helsinki Valitse Finland-Helsinki

Internet of Things. Ideasta palveluksi IoT:n hyödyntäminen teollisuudessa. Palvelujen digitalisoinnista 4. teolliseen vallankumoukseen

Co-Design Yhteissuunnittelu

Ajettavat luokat: SM: S1 (25 aika-ajon nopeinta)

Transkriptio:

Alliancing in Finnish Transport Agency, Finland Pekka Petäjäniemi, Director, Finnish Transport Agency NETLIPSE Bratislava 9.4.2018

Current major projects 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TIEHANKKEET Mt 101, Kehä I parantaminen Vt 8 Turku-Pori Vt 12 Lahden eteläinen kehätie E 18 Hamina-Vaalimaa (PPP-hanke) Vt 6 Taavetti-Lappeenranta Vt 5 Mikkelin kohta Vt 5 Mikkeli-Juva Äänekosken biotuotetehtaan liikenneyhteydet Vt 19 Seinäjoen itäinen ohikulkutie Vt 3 Tampere-Vaasa, Laihian kohta 1. vaihe Kt 77 Viitasaari-Keitele Vt 8 Pyhäjoen ydinvoimalan tieinvestoinnit Vt 4 Oulu-Kemi Vt 22 Oulu-Kajaani-Vartius Vt 1 Kirkkojärvi Mt 132 Klaukkalan ohikulku E18 Turun kehätie Mt 438 Vekaransalmen lossi Vt 9 Jännevirta Vt 21 Kolari-Kilpisjärvi (Aurora) 29 30 VESIVÄYLÄHANKKEET Rauman meriväylä Savonlinnan syväväylän siirto Uudet 2018 rahoitusta saaneet - Kokkolan meriväylä - Mt101 Kehä I Laajalahden kohta - Kt51 Länsimetron jatkon liityntäliikenne - Vt4 Kirri Tikkakoski - Vuosaaren meriväylä - Hailuodon kiinteä yhteys RATAHANKKEET 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Helsingin ratapiha Keski-Pasilan länsiraide Helsinki-Riihimäki kapasiteetin lisääminen 1. vaihe Riihimäen kolmioraide Luumäki-Imatra Äänekosken biotuotetehtaan liikenneyhteydet Pori-Mäntyluoto sähköistys Pohjanmaan rata AVUSTUKSET - Länsimetro - Raidejokeri - Tampereen raitiotie

The worldwide challenge in Construction 5

FinnTrA s Strategic Targets from 2010 To improve productivity of the entire industry To change the culture into a more open and trusting way of working To improve the customer satisfaction for end products faster, better quality and cheaper To develop innovativeness and knowledge We do believe there is huge potential, which is connected to the way of acquiring services and cooperating during the project 6 Development of Productivity of Construction in Finland

Contractors and Consultants estimate FTA every year Scale (1 6) 17 100 Procurement capability Network skills 69 81 We are not yet in top level Partnership skills 75 The most development areas in FTA: The sharing of risks and benefits in contracts The selection criteria, which are encouraging contractors to develop their expertise and innovations

Short story about Project Alliance in Finland LCI comes to Finland 2008 Lean principles, Integrated project deliveries and Lean Construction tools and methods started to achieve understanding LIPS in Karlsruhe Germany 2009, Jim Ross introduced the Project Alliance EU-legislation challenge in the public sector LIPS in Washington DC 2010 We might be able to challenge the EU-legislation LIPPI in Brisbane Australia 2011 First Project Alliance has been established, several others coming LIPS in Tampere Finland 2012 We have four alliance projects in Finland LIPS in Nottingham, Great Brirain 2013 We have six alliance projects and several hybrids, more coming LCI-Finland has 4,5 M R&D project 2013-2015 LIPS in Berkeley, San Francisco USA 2014 We have 22 alliance projects in Finland LIPS in Barcelona, Spain 2015 Over 34 alliance projects in Finland LIPS in Elsinore Denmark 2016 Over 40 alliance projects in Finland LIPS in Santiago de Chile 2017 Over 50 alliance projects in Finland FTA has been involved all the time

Changing culture is the issue - Building trust, trust, trust Dialogue inside the owners / clients Started in May 2010 Core team started to develop the Finnish approach for Alliancing in June 2010 Wider coaching in two workshops in November 2010 More coaching during the selection process

Changing culture is the issue - Building trust, trust, trust Dialogue with the industry Started in May 2010 (1-day workshop) General Information of the pilot projects in September 2010 Workshop with the industry in November 2010. Focus on commercial framework and selection criteria More workshops during the selection process

The Alliance overall process Administrative decisions have been very complicated

Value based Evaluation Criterions Case Tampere Tunnel Project Weight Evaluation criterion Stage2 Stage3 total sub total sub A. Capability 100 % 75 % A1. Project implementation plan and organsation 25 % 10 % A1.1 Project implementation plan and organisation 25,00 % 10,00 % A2. Track Record 35 % 10 % A2.1 Track record in Key Result Areas 25,00 % 10,00 % A2.2 Learning from mistakes 10,00 % no evaluation A3. Value for Money 40 % 30 % A3.1 Setting the target outturn cost 25,00 % 15,00 % A3.2 The budjet critique 15,00 % 15,00 % A4. Alliance ability and leadership 0 % 25 % A5.1 Alliance understanding and demonstrated leadership capabilities no evaluation 25,00 % B Price 25 % B1 Fee % no evaluation 25,00 % A+B Total 100,00 % 100,00 % 2 Full days workshops in Stage 3 with best two Consortiums Workshop evaluation with teamwork specialist

We need price component in EU No price component, pure alliance and Single TOC Full price competition between two NOPs (Dual TOC) Budget critique and quality of pricing methods Fee as a price component Price is made up of unit prices and fee % The price has to be included and two possible selection criteria are: 1. The lowest price or 2. the most economically advantageous tender (quality and price) 13

Establish Alliance European Union procurement legislation According to the EU directives and Finnish legislation: The price should be used, when contracting authority is making comparison of tenders Two possible selection criterias: 1. The lowest price, or 2. the most economically advantageous tender (so-called quality and price) In Alliance, the fee( limb 2) was used as a price element. Contracting entities should write out justifications for every comparison criteria

Alliance selection process characteristics Workshops and interviews in addition to evaluation of documents Procurement of organization; Top-Team Selection process binds momentarily a lot of resources and needs commitment. People need to be familiar with the alliance model A bidder must bind key persons to the project already at the bidding stage and it s not possible to use a separate bidding organization anymore Bidding for an alliance requires from contractors less effort than DB and PPP but new kind of skills are needed Bidding for an alliance requires from consults similar effort than DB and PPP rules with contractor side should be agreed The owner s role changes from a buyer and supervisor to an active project actor and this requires new competence New roles: probity adviser, alliance specialist, independent estimator, financial auditor 2.9.2011 15

Liikennevirasto 16 Experiences of Project Alliance in Finland

Tampere Kokemäki rail renovation project First Public sector Project Alliance Pilot in Europe 2011-2015 Length of railway renovation project 89,6 km Project original budget 91 M Key Result Areas: Accuracy of traffic during construction: Freight Traffic 99,93%, Personal Traffic 99,65% (Avg. In FIN ~82 %) Project Completion half a year ahead of Schedule Safety level has been high level throughout the project delivery Frequency of work accidents 6,2 (avg. In Finland 20 in railway projects) Safety process has been created by alliance and it is part of daily action Awarded the project of the Year 2012 in Construction 17

Awarded the Project of the Year 2016 from Finnish Construction Engineers and year 2017 from IPMA Finland The Tunnel of Tampere 2 pieces of one-way 2,3 km road tunnels in the middle of the Tampere city center Interchange in both ends and provision for one in the middle 4,2 km highway and 4,0 km streets, 7 new bridges

Main Road 6: 30 km from 2 -lanes to 4 -lanes Project Main Rd 6 Taavetti-Lappeenranta -renovation (10 km new alignment & 20 km old) and widening 2015-18 Cost estimation 80 M - target cost 72 M Owner FTA, design consults Pöyry Finland Oy & Ramboll Finland Oy and contractor Skanska Infra Oy Idea Two phase Alliance procurement: 1. First design consults 2. After ½ year Contractor Why Consults completed BIM -model, soil investigations and made preliminary proposals for final solutions. Results so far Target cost will undercut Safety level high Faster delivery Traffic harms have been minimized Lean tools in use

Jyväskylä - Äänekoski rail renovation Project New Bioproduct Mill (private investment 1,3 Billion) in Äänekoski will start their production in Q4/2017 Invest decision 4/2015 rail renovation design and construction 2015-17 Budjet 80 M Owner FTA service provider VR Track Oy Idea Market dialogue and fast decision about contract model Fast and transparent procurement with one step Competitive Dialogue (3 mnts & 10 days) Why Renovated railway connections (inc. electrification) should be in traffic same time as Biopruduct Mill Results so far Project in schedule Safety level high

Main Road 12 Lahti Southern By-Pass Idea Market dialogue with over 50 service provider participants After that decision about project size and contract model Why Market dialogue is important step of strategic decision Results so far 55 % voted for divide project in two parts 82 % voted for DB model for unpopulated part of project Change of culture: all consults wanted DB! 55 % voted for Alliance in built-up part of project If one huge project DB and Alliance equal Project will start 2017 DB & Alliance Timing for divided project 12,5 km new main road Five interchange and two tunnels: concrete tunnel and rock tunnel Big bridges and soft soil sensitive environment Budget 275 M - City of Lahti will cover 77 M

If you are thinking about to start an Alliance Think carefully, when it is good time to use the Alliance Use the good old way when you can t justify the new way But when you choose it, then make sure you get the whole benefit out of it

Challenges of Leadership and Readiness for Project Alliance Understanding the philosophy Both the owner and the industry Communication Clear messages Fair and simple process Open, honest and straight Strong ambition Understandable reasons for using alliance Trust Fair pain-gain sharing 2.9.2011 24

Cultural change is huge!

Hanke 1 Lielahti-Kokemäki radan peruskorjaus 100 2 Vuolukiventie 1b:n peruskorjaus 18 3 Tampereen Rantatunneli 180 4 Helsinki-Vantaan liikennealueiden päällystystyöt 1) 20 5 Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitoksen päärakennus 2) 18 6 Järvenpään sosiaali- ja terveystalo 51 7 Franzenian peruskorjaus 3) 6 8 Lahden matkakeskus 19 9 Pakilan alueurakka 8 10 As. Oy Helsingin Retkeilijänkatu 3-7 4) 9 11 Jyrkkälän lähiön julkisivuperuskorjaus 28 12 As. Oy Gunillankallio 10 13 13 VTT:n ydinturvallisuustalo 2) 30 14 Joensuun oikeus- ja poliisitalo 2) 30 15 Naantalin voimalaitoksen allianssiurakka 45 16 Yliopistonkatu 4 peruskorjaus 25 17 Kainuun keskussairaalan peruskorjaus ja laajennus 120 18 VT 6 peruskorjaus 76 19 Kempeleen TK 14 20 Hiukkavaaran monitoimitalo 24 21 LaNa (Lasten ja naisten sairaala) 5) 60 22 Kotkan poliisitalo 2) 20 23 Espoonlahden kirkko 6) 8 24 Tampereen raitiotie 250 25 Turun Syvälahden koulun allianssiurakka 28 26 Finavian Asematason allianssiurakka 100 27 Jakomäen keskiosan kehittäminen 50 28 Tampereen Tilakeskus Tammelan stadion 60 29 Pohjankartanon koulusaneerausohjelma 7) 10 30 Pitkäkankaan koulusaneerausohjelma 7) 10 31 Finavian terminaalilaajennus 6) 200 32 Harppuunakortteli 7) 100 33 Äänekosken radan peruskorjaus 80 34 Rataverkon KP2-palveluallianssi 25 35 Tesoman hyvinvointipalvelut 140 36 Leppävaaran koulukeskus 2017-2020 30 37 Suomenlinnan huoltotunneli 7 38 Ylimaarian koulu 22 39 Raide-Jokeri 275 40 Lahden eteläinen kehätie - Allianssi 150 Yhteensä 2459 IPD/Alliance projects in Finland 2016 M 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 26

We believe, when you are developing your culture.. Together we are stronger How the human being survive 70 000 years ago? And became a leading species on the earth?

I do warmly recommend for all participants in Construction!!! 29