Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2015

Koko: px
Aloita esitys sivulta:

Download "Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2015"

Transkriptio

1 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2015 a-chlorophyll, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Riitta Koivikko, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri, Ritva Väisänen and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment Institute

2

3 a-chlorophyll, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Riitta Koivikko, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri, Ritva Väisänen and Markku Ilmakunnas

4

5 PREFACE Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) is appointed National Reference Laboratory in the environmental sector in Finland. The duties of the reference laboratory include providing interlaboratory proficiency tests and other comparisons for analytical laboratories and other producers of environmental information. The testing and the calibration laboratories as well as the proficiency testing provider (Proftest SYKE) of the SYKE laboratory center have been accredited by the Finnish Accreditation Service (EN ISO/IEC 17025, EN ISO/IEC 1703, This proficiency test has been carried out under the scope of the SYKE reference laboratory and it provides an external quality evaluation between laboratory results, and mutual comparability of analytical reliability. The success of the proficiency test requires confidential co-operation between the provider and participants. Thank you for your participation! ALKUSANAT Suomen ympäristökeskus (SYKE) toimii ympäristönsuojelulain nojalla määrättynä ympäristöalan vertailulaboratoriona Suomessa. Yksi tärkeimmistä vertailulaboratorion tarjoamista palveluista on pätevyyskokeiden ja muiden vertailumittausten järjestäminen. SYKEn laboratoriotoiminnan testaus-, kalibrointi- ja tutkimustoiminta sekä vertailumittausten järjestäminen (Proftest SYKE) ovat FINAS akkreditoituja (SFS-EN ISO/IEC 17025, SFS-EN ISO/IEC 1703, Tämä pätevyyskoe on toteutettu SYKEn vertailulaboratorion toiminta-alueella ja se antaa ulkopuolisen laadunarvion laboratoriotulosten keskinäisestä vertailtavuudesta sekä laboratorioiden määritysten luotettavuudesta. Pätevyyskokeen onnistumisen edellytys on järjestäjän ja osallistujien välinen luottamuksellinen yhteistyö. Lämmin kiitos yhteistyöstä kaikille osallistujille! Helsinki 6. May 2015 / Helsingissä 6 Toukokuuta 2015 Director of Laboratory / Laboratorionjohtaja

6

7 CONTENTS 1 Introduction Organizing the proficiency test Responsibilities s Samples and delivery Homogeneity and stability studies Feedback from the proficiency test Processing the data Pretesting the data Assigned values Standard deviation for proficiency assesment and Results and conclusions Results Analytical methods Uncertainties of the results Evaluation of the results Summary Summary in Finnish References APPENDIX 1 : s in the proficiency test APPENDIX 2 : Preparation of the samples APPENDIX 3 : Homogeneity of the samples APPENDIX : Stability of the samples APPENDIX 5 : Feedback from the proficiency test APPENDIX 6 : Evaluation of the assigned values and their uncertainties APPENDIX 7 : Terms in the results tables APPENDIX 8 : Results of each participant... 2 APPENDIX 9 : Results of participants and their uncertainties... 3 APPENDIX 10 : Summary of the s APPENDIX 11 : s in ascending order APPENDIX 12 : Significant differences in the results reported using different methods APPENDIX 13 : Results grouped according to the methods APPENDIX 1 : Examples of measurement uncertainties reported by the participants DOCUMENTATION PAGE KUVAILULEHTI PRESENTATIONSBLAD Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 5

8 1 Introduction Proftest SYKE carried out the proficiency test (PT) for analysis of a-chlorophyll, colour, conductivity (g25), N NH, N NO2+NO3, N tot, P PO, P tot, ph, and turbidity in natural waters in February 2015 (NW 02/2015). A total of 35 laboratories participated in the PT. In the PT the results of Finnish laboratories providing environmental data for Finnish environmental authorities were evaluated. Additionally, other water and environmental laboratories were welcomed in the proficiency test. The proficiency test was carried out in accordance with the international guidelines ISO/IEC 1703 [1], ISO [2] and IUPAC Technical report [3]. The Proftest SYKE has been accredited by the Finnish Accreditation Service as a proficiency testing provider (PT01, ISO/IEC 1703, This proficiency test has been carried out under the accreditation scope of the Proftest SYKE. 2 Organizing the proficiency test 2.1 Responsibilities Organizer: Proftest SYKE, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Laboratory Centre Hakuninmaantie 6, FI-0030 Helsinki, Finland Phone: , Fax The responsibilities in organizing the proficiency test were as follows: Mirja Leivuori coordinator Katarina Björklöf substitute for coordinator Riitta Koivikko proficiency test trainee Keijo Tervonen technical assistance Markku Ilmakunnas technical assistance Sari Lanteri technical assistance Ritva Väisänen technical assistance Teemu Näykki analytical expert 2.2 s In total 35 laboratories participated in this proficiency test (Appendix 1), 32 from Finland and 3 from other European countries. Altogether 86 % of the participating laboratories used accredited analytical methods at least for a part of the measurements. About 60 % of the Finnish participating laboratories provide data for use of the Finnish environmental authorities. For this proficiency test, the organizing laboratory (T003, has the code 36 (SYKE, Helsinki) in the result tables. 6 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

9 2.3 Samples and delivery Three types of samples were delivered to the participants; synthetic, brackish and river water samples for analysis of a-chlorophyll, colour, conductivity, N NH, N NO2+NO3, N tot, P PO, P tot, ph, and turbidity. The synthetic samples A1H, A1J, A1N, and A1P were prepared by diluting from NIST traceable certified reference materials produced by Merck or by BDH Prolab. NIST traceable certified reference materials were not available for a chlorophyll, turbidity and colour determination. The synthetic sample A1K for a- chlorophyll determination was prepared by dissolving the weighted green pigment (Sigma-Aldrich) in ethanol. The synthetic sample A1S for turbidity determination was prepared by diluting Hach Formatzin Turbidity Standard produced by Hach Company. The synthetic sample A1V for colour measurement was prepared from the colour standard produced by Hazen. The sample preparation is described in details in the Appendix 2. The brackish water was collected in the estuary of Helsinki. The river water was collected from the River Mustio, Southern Finland. When preparing the samples, the purity of the used sample vessels was controlled. The randomly chosen sample vessels were filled with deionized water and the purity of the sample vessels was controlled after three days by measuring conductivity, N NH and P PO. According to the test results all used vessels fulfilled the purity requirements. The samples were delivered to the participants on 10 February The samples arrived to the participants mainly on the following day. 16 received the samples on 12 February Due to postal difficulties, the samples were reposted to the participant 32 and they arrived on 17 February This was taken into account in the assessment of participant s results. The temperature control sample was place into the sample package and the temperature was requested to be measure immediately after opening the package. The temperature of control sample was mainly 11 C, while for participants 2, 3,, 12, 16, 25, 26, 30 and 25 it was at the highest 15.2 C. Additionally, for some participants a temperature logger was included within the sample packages. The loggers were returned to the provider and data evaluated. From the temperature logger data it was noticed that it is crucial to measure the temperature of the control sample rather soon after the sample package has arrived, especially when the package is not stored in refrigerator after the arrival. The warming of samples was taken into account in the evaluation of results. The samples were requested to be measured as follows: a-chlorophyll 12 February 2015 conductivity, ph 12 February 2015 N NH, N NO2+NO3, P PO 12 February 2015 colour, turbidity 12 February 2015 N tot, P tot latest on 23 February 2015 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 7

10 The results were requested to be reported latest on 25 February The participants delivered the results mainly on time. The preliminary results were delivered to the participants via on March Homogeneity and stability studies The homogeneity of the samples was tested by measuring ph, a-chlorophyll, N NH, N tot, P tot and turbidity. More detailed information of homogeneity studies is shown in Appendix 3. According to the homogeneity test results, all samples were considered homogenous. The stability of the samples was carried out by measuring a-chlorophyll, N NH, ph and P PO from the samples stored at the room temperature for one day. The measurement values were checked against the results of the samples stored at C. According to the test all samples were considered as stable. 2.5 Feedback from the proficiency test The feedback from the proficiency test is shown in Appendix 5. The comments from the participants mainly dealt with their reporting errors with the samples. The comments from the provider are mainly focused to the lacking conversancy to the given information with the samples. All the feedback is valuable and is exploited when improving the proficiency test activities. 2.6 Processing the data Pretesting the data The normality of the data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The outliers were rejected according to the Grubbs or Hampel test before calculating the mean. The results which differed more than 50 % or 5 times from the robust mean were rejected before the statistical results handling. More information about the statistical handling of the data is available from the Guide for participant [] Assigned values The assigned values and their uncertainties are presented in Appendix 6. The NIST traceable calculated concentrations were used as the assigned values for measurements of N NO2+NO3, N tot, P PO, and P tot in the synthetic samples. For the calculated assigned values the expanded measurement uncertainty (k=2) was estimated using standard uncertainties associated with individual operations involved in the preparation of the sample. The main individual source of the uncertainty was the uncertainty of the concentration in the stock solution. For the other samples and measurements the robust means or means (Colour-2, n<12) of the results reported by the participants were used as the assigned value. The uncertainty of the 8 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

11 assigned value was calculated using the robust standard deviation or standard deviation of the reported results [2, ]. After reporting the preliminary results no changes have been done for the assigned values. The expanded uncertainty of the calculated assigned values (U pt, k=2) was less or equal than 0.6 %. When using the robust mean or mean of the participant results as the assigned value, the expanded uncertainties of the assigned values were mainly between 1.6 and 9.6 %, while for colour-1 and -2 it was 19 and 22 %, respectively (Appendix 6) Standard deviation for proficiency assessment and The target value for the standard deviation for proficiency assessment was estimated on the basis of the analyte concentration, the results of homogeneity and stability tests, the uncertainty of the assigned value, and the long-term variation in the former proficiency tests. The target value for the standard deviation for proficiency assessment (2 s p at the 95 % confidence level) was set for ph to 0.2 ph units and to % for the other measurements. After reporting the preliminary results no changes have been done for the standard deviations of the proficiency assessment values. When using the robust mean as the assigned value, the reliability was tested according to the criterion u / s p 0.3, where u is the standard uncertainty of the assigned value (the expanded uncertainty of the assigned value (U pt ) divided by 2) and s p is the standard deviation for proficiency assessment [3]. When testing the reliability of the assigned value the criterion was mainly fulfilled and the assigned values were considered reliable. The reliability of the target value of the standard deviation and the corresponding was estimated by comparing the deviation for proficiency assessment (s p ) with the robust standard deviation of the reported results (s rob ) [3]. The criterion s rob / s p < 1.2 was mainly fulfilled. In the following cases, the criterion for the reliability of the assigned value 1 and for the reliability of the target value for the deviation 2 was not met and, therefore, the evaluation of the performance is weakened in this proficiency test: Sample Measurement A1V Colour-1 1,2 B2N N-NH 1,2 B2S Colour-1 1,2, Colour-2 1,2, Turbidity 1,2 B2P P-PO 1,2 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 9

12 3 Results and conclusions 3.1 Results The terms used in the result tables are shown in Appendix 7. The results and the performance of each participant are presented in Appendix 8 and the summary of the results in Table 1. The results with their expanded uncertainties (k=2) are presented in Appendix 9. The summary of the s is shown in Appendix 10 and s in the ascending order in Appendix 11. Table 1. The summary of the results in the proficiency test 02/2015. Analyte Sample Unit Assigned value Mean Rob. mean Median SD rob SD rob % 2*sp % n (all) Acc z % a-chlorophyll A1K abs/cm B2K µg/l N3K µg/l Colour-1 A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S mg/l, Pt Colour-2 A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S mg/l, Pt Conductivity 25 A1J ms/m B2H ms/m N3H ms/m N-NH A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N µg/l N-NO2+NO3 A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N µg/l Ntot A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N µg/l ph A1H B2H N3H P-PO A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P µg/l Ptot A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P µg/l Turbidity A1S FNU B2S FNU N3S FNU Rob. mean: the robust mean, SD rob: the robust standard deviation, SD rob %: the robust standard deviation as percent, 2*s p %: the total standard deviation for proficiency assessment at the 95 % confidence level, Acc z %: the results (%), where ïzï 2, n(all): the total number of the participants. 10 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

13 The robust standard deviations of the colour results varied from 6 to 29 % (Table 1).The robust standard deviations for conductivity, ph and a-chlorophyll and N NO2+NO3 in the synthetic sample were below 3,5 % (Table 1).The robust standard deviation was lower than 10 % for 67 % of the reported results and lower than 20 % for 97 % of the results (Table 1). The robust standard deviations were approximately in the same range as in the previous similar proficiency test Proftest SYKE 02/2013 [5]. For the colour measurements the robust standard deviation was somewhat lower than in the previous similar proficiency test [5]. 3.2 Analytical methods The participants were allowed to use different analytical methods for the measurements in the PT. The statistical comparison of the analytical methods was possible for the data where the number of the results was 5. The significant differences between the methods are presented in Appendix 12. The used analytical methods and results of the participants grouped by methods are shown in more detail in Appendix 13. Colour Colour determination was grouped to two groups: visual method using a comparator (Colour-1) and spectrophotometric method (Colour-2). Depending on the sample 13 or 18 participants used visual method and 6 or 9 participants spectrophotometric method. One participant used an unspecified other method. Based on visual comparison between comparator and spectrophotometric methods no difference between the methods was observed (Appendix 13). Conductivity Most participants measured conductivity using the standard method EN Only two participants used other method. Statistical comparison between the methods was not possible due to low number of the results. Based on the visual evaluation no difference between the methods was observed (Appendix 13). Ammonium nitrogen Most participants ( %) determined ammonium nitrogen using the standard method SFS 3032 (manual indophenol blue spectrophotometric method) and 25 % of the participants used the corresponding automatic standard method EN ISO Depending on the sample 2 or 3 participants used the spectrophotometric salicylate method modified for Aquachem technique and 5-6 participants used some other method. In the statistical comparison between the methods no statistically significant differences were observed. Nitrate + nitrite nitrogen Nitrate + nitrite nitrogen was determined using several methods. Most participants (76 %) used the standard method EN ISO The standard method EN ISO 1030 and the sulfanilamide spectrophotometric method after hydrazine or Cd/Cu reduction modified for Aquachem technique were used by 1-2 participants depending the sample. Depending on the sample some other methods were used by 2 or 3 participants. The other used methods were for example colorimeter vanadium-chloride method with Aquachem technique or ISO 7150 (Hach Lange tube method). The statistical comparison between the methods was not carried out due to low Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 11

14 number of results. Based on the visual evaluation no difference between the methods was observed (Appendix 13). Total nitrogen Most participants (78 %) determined total nitrogen according to the standard method EN ISO Depending on the sample 5 or 6 participants used other methods (Appendix 13). The other used methods were for example SFS-EN ISO with SFS 3031 (withdrawn), tube method (Merck, Spectroquant), SFS-EN or ISO 291. In the statistical or visual method comparison no significant difference between the methods was observed. Phosphate phosphorus About 7 % of the participants determined phosphate phosphorus using the standard method EN The withdrawn Finnish standard method 3036 was used by 26 % of the participants. The standard method EN ISO 6878 (manual spectrophotometric method) was used by 1-3 participants depending on the sample. The ammonium molybdate spectrophotometric method modified for Aquachem technique was used by 2- participants depending on the sample. One participant used some other method (Appendix 13). In the statistical and visual method comparison no significant difference was observed between the methods. Total phosphorus About 38 % of the participants determined total phosphorus using the standard method EN ISO The withdrawn standard method SFS 3026 was used by 1 % of the participants. The manual standard method EN ISO 6878 was used by 1-3 participants depending on the sample. Ammonium molybdate method modified for Aquachem technique was used by 1-2 participants depending on the sample (Appendix 13). Other methods (e.g. SFS-EN ISO 11885) were used by 1- participants. In the statistical comparison between the methods no statistically significant differences were observed. ph About 9 % of the participants measured ph using universal electrode and 5 % of the participants used an electrode for low ionic waters. Other electrodes (e.g. glass electrode and tris-electrode) were used by two or three participants (Appendix 13). In the statistical method comparison significant difference was observed between the electrode for low ionic waters and universal electrode (Appendix 12). However, the noticed difference is within the typical measurement uncertainty for ph measurement. Turbidity Most participants measured turbidity with an apparatus based on diffused radiation measurement. One participant used some other method (Appendix 13). The statistical comparison between the methods was not possible due to low number of the results. 3.3 Uncertainties of the results Totally 92 % of the participants reported the expanded uncertainties (k=2) for at least some of their results (Table 2, Appendix 13). The range of the reported uncertainties varied between the measurements and the sample types. 12 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

15 Several approaches were used for estimation of measurement uncertainty (Appendix 1). The most used approach was based on the internal quality control data (Meth ) and the internal quality control data together with the proficiency test data (Meth 6). At maximum 7 participants depending on the analyte and the sample used MUkit measurement uncertainty software for the estimation of their uncertainties. The free software is available in the webpage: Generally, the used approach for estimation of measurement uncertainty did not make definite impact on the uncertainty estimates. In order to promote the enhancement of environmental measurements quality standards and traceability, the national quality recommendations for data entered into water quality registers have been published in Finland [6]. The recommendations for measurement uncertainties for tested analytes in natural waters vary from 5 % to 20 % (for ph measurement 0.2 ph units, see Table 2.). In this proficiency test some of the participants had their measurement uncertainties within these limits, while some did not achieve them. Nevertheless, harmonization of the estimation of uncertainties should be continued. Table 2. The range of the expanded measurement uncertainties (k=2) reported by the participants and recommendations for natural waters [6]. Analyte/Water type Synthetic, U% Brackish, U% River, U% The range of the expanded measurement uncertainties, % [6] a-chlorophyll Colour Colour Conductivity N-NH N-NO2+NO Ntot ph ph unit P-PO Ptot Turbidity Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 13

16 Evaluation of the results The evaluation of the participants was based on the s, which were calculated using the assigned and the estimated target values for the total deviation (Appendix 8). The s were interpreted as follows: Criteria Performance z 2 Satisfactory 2 < z < 3 Questionable z ³ 3 Unsatisfactory In total, 89 % of the results were satisfactory when total deviation of 0.2 ph-units for ph and for the others 5 35 % from the assigned values were accepted (Appendix 10). Altogether 89 % of the participating laboratories used accredited analytical methods at least for a part of the measurements and 89 % of their results were satisfactory. The summary of the performance evaluation and comparison to the previous performance is presented in Table 3. In the previous similar proficiency test 2/2013 [5], the performance was satisfactory for 85 % of the all participants. All samples passed the stability test and, thus, no estimation was needed for the effect of increased temperature during the sample transportation. Also there is no influence of the delayed sample delivery for the performance of the participant 32. Table 3. Summary of the performance evaluation in the proficiency test NW 02/2015. Analyte 2 sp, % Satisfactory results, % Assessment a-chlorophyll Difficulties in measurement of the sample B2K: 71 % satisfactory results. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 92 % of the results [5]. Colour The evaluation for the samples A1Vand B2S is only approximate. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 85 % of the results [5]. Colour The evaluation for the samples A1V and B2S is only approximate. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 73 % of the results [5]. Conductivity Some difficulties in measurement of the sample N3H: 79 % satisfactory results.in the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 85 % of the results [5]. N-NH Better performance than in the PT SYKE 2/2013, where the performance was satisfactory for 75 % of the results [5]. N-NO2+NO Good performance. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 78 % of the results [5]. Ntot Good performance. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 95 % of the results [5]. ph Good performance. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 92 % of the results [5]. P-PO 10 8 Better performance than in the PT SYKE 2/2013, where the performance was satisfactory for 79 % of the results [5]. Ptot Good performance. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 86 % of the results [5]. Turbidity Good performance. In the PT SYKE 2/2013 the performance was satisfactory for 89 % of the results [5]. 1 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

17 5 Summary Proftest SYKE carried out the proficiency test (PT) for analysis of a-chlorophyll, colour, conductivity, N NH, N NO2+NO3, N tot, P PO, P tot, ph, and turbidity in natural waters in February 2015 (NW 02/2015). In total, 35 laboratories participated in the PT. Either the theoretical concentration or the robust mean or mean of the results reported by the participants was chosen to be the assigned value for the measurand. The uncertainty for the assigned value was estimated at the 95 % confidence interval and it was generally less or equal than 0.6 % for the calculated assigned values and for assigned values based on the robust mean or mean it was between %. For colour-1 and -2 it was 19 and 22 %, respectively. The evaluation of the performance was based on the s, which were calculated using the standard deviation for proficiency assessment at 95 % confidence level. In this proficiency test 89 % of the data was regarded to be satisfactory when the result was accepted to deviate from the assigned value 0.2 ph-units for ph measurement and 5 to 35 % in the other determinations. 6 Summary in Finnish Proftest SYKE järjesti luonnonvesiä analysoiville laboratorioille pätevyyskokeen helmikuussa Pätevyyskokeessa määritettiin a-klorofylli, väri, sähkönjohtavuus, N NH, N NO2+NO3, N tot, P PO, P tot, ph, ja sameus synteettisestä näytteestä sekä kahdesta vesinäytteestä. Pätevyyskokeessa oli yhteensä 35 osallistujaa. Mittaussuureen vertailuarvona käytettiin laskennallista pitoisuutta tai osallistujien tulosten robustia keskiarvoa tai keskiarvoa. Vertailuarvolle laskettiin mittausepävarmuus 95 % luottamusvälillä. Vertailuarvon laajennettu epävarmuus oli yhtäsuuri tai alle 0,6 % laskennallista pitoisuutta vertailuarvona käytettäessä ja muutoin välillä 1,6 9,6 %. Värin määrityksissä laajennettu epävarmuus vaihteli välillä %. Pätevyyden arviointi tehtiin z-arvon avulla ja tulosten sallittiin poiketa vertailuarvosta ph määrityksissä 0,2 ph-yksikköä ja muilla testisuureilla 5 35 %. Koko aineistossa hyväksyttäviä tuloksia oli 89 %. Proftest SYKE NW 02/15 15

18 REFERENCES 1. SFS-EN ISO 1703, Conformity assessment General requirements for Proficiency Testing. 2. ISO 13528, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. 3. Thompson, M., Ellison, S. L. R., Wood, R., The International Harmonized Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 78: , Proftest SYKE Guide for laboratories: Running proficiency test 5. Korhonen-Ylönen, K., Näykki, T., Leivuori, N, Tervonen, K., Lanteri, S. and Ilmakunnas, M Proficiency test SYKE 2/2013 Chlorophyll a, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters. Reports of Finnish Environment Institute 20/ pp Näykki, T., Kyröläinen, H., Witick, A., Mäkinen, I. Pehkonen, R., Väisänen, T., Sainio, P. ja Luotola M Laatusuositukset ympäristöhallinnon vedenlaaturekistereihin vietävälle tiedolle: Vesistä tehtävien analyyttien määritysrajat, mittausepävarmuudet sekä säilytysajat ja tavat. (Quality recommendations for data entered into the environmental administration s water quality registers: Quantification limits, measurement uncertainties, strorage times and methods associated with analytes determined from waters). Ympäristöhallinnon ohjeita /2013. (Environmental administration Guidelines /2013). 5 s Näykki, T., Virtanen, A. and Leito, I., Software support for the Nordtest method of measurement uncertainty evaluation. Accred. Qual. Assur. 17: Mukit website: 8. Magnusson, B. Näykki. T., Hovind, H. and Krysell, M., Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories. NT Technical Report 537. Nordtest. 9. Ellison, S., L., R. and Williams, A. (Eds). (2012) Eurachem/CITAC guide: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Third edition, ISBN ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement -- Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM: 1995). 16 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

19 APPENDIX 1 (1/1) APPENDIX 1: s in the proficiency test Country Estonia Finland Sweden s Estonian Marine Institute University of Tartu Marine Ecology Lab of Marine Systems Institute Ahma ympäristö Oy, Ilmajoki Ahma Ympäristö Oy, Rovaniemi BotniaLab Oy HaKaLab Oy HSY Käyttölaboratorio Pitkäkoski Helsinki HY, Helsingin yliopisto, Lammin biologinen asema HY, Tvärminnen eläintieteellinen asema, Hanko KCL Kymen Laboratorio Oy Kokemäenjoen vesistön vesiensuojeluyhdistys ry, Pori Kokemäenjoen vesistön vesiensuojeluyhdistys ry, Tampere Lounais-Suomen vesi- ja ympäristötukimus Oy, Turku Luonnonvarakeskus Rovaniemi Luonnonvarakeskus, Vantaan toimipaikka Länsi-Uudenmaan vesi ja ympäristö ry, Lohja Metropolilab Oy, Finland Nab Labs Oy / Ambiotica Jyväskylä Neste Oil Oyj, Tutkimus ja kehitys/vesilaboratorio, Kulloo Novalab Oy Oulun seudun elintarvike- ja ympäristölaboratorio, Oulu Ramboll Finland Oy, Ramboll Analytics, Lahti Rauman Vesi Saimaan Vesi- ja Ympäristötutkimus Oy, Lappeenranta Savo-Karjalan Ympäristötutkimus Oy, Joensuu Savo-Karjalan Ympäristötutkimus Oy, Kuopio SGS Inspection Services Oy, Kotka SYKE Joensuun toimipaikka SYKE Oulun toimipaikka SYKE Ympäristökemia Helsinki SYKE/Merikeskus Tampereen Vesi/Viemärilaitoksen laboratorio Yara Suomi Oy, Uusikaupunki ÅMHM laboratoriet, Jomala, Åland ACES, Stockholm University Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 17

20 APPENDIX 2 (1/1) APPENDIX 2: Preparation of the samples Analyte Sample Unit Initial Assigned Addition concentration value A1J ms/m - 8 KCl 9.63 g25 B2H ms/m N3H ms/m A1H ph Na2HPO / KH2PO ph B2H ph N3H ph A1K abs/cm a-chlorophyll 2 mg / 1.6 liters ethanol a-chlorophyll B2K µg/l grown green algae 9.05 N3K µg/l - 1 grown green algae 19.3 A1P µg/l - 11 KH2PO 10.9 P-PO B2P µg/l N3P µg/l Ptot A1P µg/l 0 11 KH2PO 10.9 B2P µg/l N3P µg/l A1S FNU -.78 Hach Formazin turbidity standard Turbidity B2S FNU N3S FNU Colour-1 A1V mg/l Pt - 0/3 Platinum cobalt colour standard (Hazen) Colour-2 B2S mg/l Pt 15-11/12 N3S mg/l Pt 30-33/31 A1N µg/l - 113NaNO3 113 N-NO2+NO3 B2N µg/l N3N µg/l N-NH A1N µg/l - 26 NHCl 27.2 B2N µg/l N3N µg/l A1N µg/l NaNO3. 26 NHCl, 98 Na2EDTA 237 Ntot B2N µg/l N3N µg/l NaNO Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

21 APPENDIX 3 (1/1) APPENDIX 3: Homogeneity of the samples The homogeneity was checked for the selected samples (7-9) and test items as duplicate measurements. Criteria for homogeneity: s a /s p <0.5 and s bb 2 <c, where s p % = standard deviation for proficiency assessment s a = analytical deviation, standard deviation of the results within sub samples s bb = between-sample deviation, standard deviation of the results between sub samples c = F1 x s all 2 + F2 x s a 2, where s all 2 = (0.3 x s p ) 2, F1 and F2 are constant of F distribution derived from the standard statistical tables for the tested number of samples [3]. Analyte/Sample Concentration µg/l or FNU sp,% sp sa sa/sp sa/sp<0,5? sbb sbb 2 c sbb 2 <c? ph/b2h Yes Yes ph/n3h Yes Yes a-chrophyll/b2k Yes Yes a-chrophyll /N3K Yes Yes Ptot/B2P Yes Yes Ptot/N3P Yes Yes Turbidity/B2S Yes Yes Turbidity/N3S Yes Yes N-NH/B2N Yes Yes N-NH/N3N Yes Yes Ntot/B2N Yes Yes Ntot/N3N Yes Yes Conclusion: The criteria were fulfilled for the tested analytes and the samples could be regarded as homogenous. Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 19

22 APPENDIX (1/1) APPENDIX : Stability of the samples The samples were delivered 10 February 2015 and they arrived to the participants mainly on the following day. The samples were requested to be analysed as follows: a-chlorophyll, ph, g25, N NH, N NO2+NO3, P PO, colour, turbidity: 12 February 2015 N tot, P to : before 23 February 2015 Stability of ph-, a-chlorophyll, N NH - and P PO -samples was tested by analyzing the samples stored at the temperatures and 20 ºC. Criteria for stability: D < 0.3 s p, where D = the difference of results measured from the samples stored at the temperatures C and 20 C s p = standard deviation for proficiency assessment a-chlorophyll Sample Result abs/cm Sample Result µg/l Sample Result µg/l Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) A1K B2K N3K D s p D <0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p YES ph Sample Result Sample Result Sample Result Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) A1H B2H N3H D s p D <0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p NO 1) N-NH Sample Result µg/l Sample Result µg/l Sample Result µg/l Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) A1N B2N N3N D s p D <0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p NO 1) D < 0.3 s p NO 1) P-PO Sample Result µg/l Sample Result µg/l Sample Result µg/l Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) Date (20 ºC) ( ºC) A1P B2P N3P D s p D <0.3 s p YES D < 0.3 s p NO 1) D < 0.3 s p YES 1) The difference is within the analytic error Conclusion: The criteria for stability mainly fulfilled. For N NH and P PO the noticed variation of results are within the analytical error. Thus the samples could be regarded as homogenous. 20 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

23 APPENDIX 5 (1/1) APPENDIX 5: Feedback from the proficiency test FEEDBACK FROM THE PARTICIPANTS Comments on technical excecution Action / Proftest 31 Bottles for colour and turbidity samples had leaked. The provider will be more careful when tightening of the sample bottles. 32 Due to postal difficulties new samples were sent to the participant and they arrived with two days delay. Comments to the results Action / Proftest 8 The participant informed that they reported result of Colour-1 erroneously. The right values were: A1V 0 mg/l Pt, B2S 7.5 mg/l Pt and N3S 30 mg/l Pt. 2 The participant informed that they reported result of a-chlorophyll erroneously. The right values were: A1K abs/cm, B2K µg/l and N3K µg/l. The situation was clarified with the participant and the new samples delivered. The delay was taken into account in the performance evaluation. The results were outliers in the statistical treatment, and thus it did not affect the performance evaluation. If the results had been reported correctly, they would have been satisfactory. The participant can re-calculate scores according to the guide for participants []. The results were outliers in the statistical treatment, and thus it did not affect the performance evaluation. If the results had been reported correctly, they would have been satisfactory. The participant can re-calculate scores according to the guide for participants []. FEEDBACK TO THE PARTICIPANTS Comments 1 The participant (accredited) did not report the used methods for the test items. The participant should follow up the instructions of the provider. 3 The participant (accredited) did not report the used method for estimation of the measurement uncertainties. The participant should follow up the instructions of the provider. Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 21

24 APPENDIX 6 (1/1) APPENDIX 6: Evaluation of the assigned values and their uncertainties Analyte Sample Unit Assigned value Upt Upt, % Evaluation method of assigned value upt/sp a-chlorophyll A1K abs/cm Robust mean 0.2 B2K µg/l Robust mean 0.3 N3K µg/l Robust mean 0.2 Colour-1 A1V mg/l, Pt Robust mean 0.5 B2S mg/l, Pt Robust mean 0.5 N3S mg/l, Pt Robust mean 0.3 Colour-2 A1V mg/l, Pt 3 2 Mean 0.2 B2S mg/l, Pt Mean 0.6 N3S mg/l, Pt Mean 0.2 Conductivity 25 A1J ms/m Robust mean 0.2 B2H ms/m Robust mean 0.1 N3H ms/m Robust mean 0.2 N-NH A1N µg/l Robust mean 0.2 B2N µg/l Robust mean 0. N3N µg/l Robust mean 0.2 N-NO2+NO3 A1N µg/l Calculated value 0.1 B2N µg/l Robust mean 0.3 N3N µg/l Robust mean 0.3 Ntot A1N µg/l Calculated value 0.02 B2N µg/l Robust mean 0.2 N3N µg/l Robust mean 0.3 ph A1H Robust mean 0.1 B2H Robust mean 0.2 N3H Robust mean 0.2 P-PO A1P µg/l Calculated value 0.03 B2P µg/l Robust mean 0. N3P µg/l Robust mean 0.3 Ptot A1P µg/l Calculated value 0.02 B2P µg/l Robust mean 0.3 N3P µg/l Robust mean 0.2 Turbidity A1S FNU Robust mean 0.3 B2S FNU Robust mean 0. N3S FNU Robust mean 0.2 U pt = Expanded uncertainty of the assigned value Criterion for reliability of the assigned value u pt/s p < 0.3, where s p= target value of the standard deviation for proficiency assessment u pt = standard uncertainty of the assigned value If u pt/s p < 0.3, the assigned value is reliable and the s are qualified. 22 Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

25 APPENDIX 7 (1/1) APPENDIX 7: Terms in the results tables Results of each participant Analyte The tested parameter Sample The code of the sample Calculated as follows: z = (x i - X)/s p, where x i = the result of the individual participant X = the reference value (the assigned value) s p = the target value of the standard deviation for proficiency assessment Assigned value The reference value 2 s p % The target value of total standard deviation for proficiency assessment (s p ) at the 95 % confidence level Lab s result The result reported by the participant (the mean value of the replicates) Md Median Mean Mean SD Standard deviation SD% Standard deviation, % n (stat) Number of results in statistical processing Summary on the s S satisfactory ( -2 z 2) Q questionable ( 2< z < 3), positive error, the result deviates more than 2 s p from the assigned value q questionable ( -3 < z < -2), negative error, the result deviates more than 2 s p from the assigned value U unsatisfactory (z 3), positive error, the result deviates more than 3 s p from the assigned value u unsatisfactory (z -3), negative error, the result deviates more than 3 s p from the assigned value Robust analysis The items of data are sorted into increasing order, x 1, x 2, x i,,x p. Initial values for x * and s * are calculated as: x * = median of x i (i = 1, 2,...,p) s * = 1,83 median of x i x * (i = 1, 2,...,p) The mean x * and s * are updated as follows: Calculate φ = 1.5 s *. A new value is then calculated for each result x i (i = 1, 2 p): { x * - φ, if x i < x * - φ x * i = { x * + φ, if x i > x * + φ, { x i otherwise The new values of x * and s * are calculated from: * * x = å xi / p * * * 2 s = 1.13 å( xi - x ) /( p -1) The robust estimates x * and s * can be derived by an iterative calculation, i.e. by updating the values of x * and s * several times, until the process convergences [2]. Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 23

26 APPENDIX 8 (1/19) APPENDIX 8: Results of each participant 1 Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) Colour-1 mg/l, Pt A1V 0, mg/l, Pt B2S 2, mg/l, Pt N3S 0, Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J -0, ms/m B2H -0, ms/m N3H 2, N-NH µg/l A1N 0, µg/l B2N -0, µg/l N3N 0, ph A1H -0, B2H -0, N3H 0, P-PO µg/l A1P -2, µg/l B2P 0, µg/l N3P 1, Ptot µg/l A1P -1, µg/l B2P 1, µg/l N3P 2, Turbidity FNU A1S -0, FNU B2S -1, FNU N3S -1, Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J ms/m N3H ph A1H N3H Turbidity FNU A1S FNU N3S Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll µg/l B2K 0, N-NH µg/l A1N -0, µg/l B2N -0, N-NO2+NO3 µg/l A1N -0, µg/l B2N 1, Ntot µg/l A1N -0, µg/l B2N 0, ph A1H 0, B2H -1, P-PO µg/l A1P -0, µg/l B2P 0, Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

27 APPENDIX 8 (2/19) 3 Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) Ptot µg/l A1P µg/l B2P Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll abs/cm A1K µg/l B2K µg/l N3K Colour-1 mg/l, Pt A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J ms/m B2H ms/m N3H N-NH µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N N-NO2+NO3 µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N Ntot µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N ph A1H B2H N3H P-PO µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Ptot µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Turbidity FNU A1S FNU B2S FNU N3S Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll abs/cm A1K µg/l B2K µg/l N3K Colour-2 mg/l, Pt A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J ms/m B2H ms/m N3H Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 25

28 APPENDIX 8 (3/19) 5 Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) N-NH µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N N-NO2+NO3 µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N Ntot µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N ph A1H B2H N3H P-PO µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Ptot µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Turbidity FNU A1S FNU B2S FNU N3S Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll abs/cm A1K µg/l B2K µg/l N3K Colour-1 mg/l, Pt A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J ms/m B2H ms/m N3H N-NH µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N N-NO2+NO3 µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N Ntot µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N ph A1H B2H N3H P-PO µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Proftest SYKE NW 02/15

29 APPENDIX 8 (/19) 6 Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) Ptot µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Turbidity FNU A1S FNU B2S FNU N3S Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll abs/cm A1K µg/l B2K µg/l N3K Colour-1 mg/l, Pt A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S Conductivity 25 ms/m A1J ms/m B2H ms/m N3H N-NH µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N N-NO2+NO3 µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N Ntot µg/l A1N µg/l B2N µg/l N3N ph A1H B2H N3H P-PO µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Ptot µg/l A1P µg/l B2P µg/l N3P Turbidity FNU A1S FNU B2S FNU N3S Analyte Unit Sample Assigned value 2*sp, % Lab's result Md Mean SD SD% n (stat) a-chlorophyll abs/cm A1K µg/l B2K µg/l N3K Colour-1 mg/l, Pt A1V mg/l, Pt B2S mg/l, Pt N3S Proftest SYKE NW 02 /15 27

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 2/2014

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 2/2014 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 15 2014 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 2/2014 Alkalinity, ph, nutrients and conductivity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 03/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 03/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 11 218 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 3/218 Alkalinity, ph, nutrients and conductivity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 03/2016

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 03/2016 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 18 2016 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 03/2016 Alkalinity, ph, nutrients and conductivity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 4 7 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /7 Chlorophyll a, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2019

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2019 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 23 2019 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 02/2019 Chlorophyll a, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 07/2016

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 07/2016 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 36 016 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 07/016 Chlorophyll a, oxygen, salinity, SiO, TIC and TOC in natural waters Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 1 018 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/018 Cholophyll a, oxygen, salinity, Sio, TIC and TOC in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 4/2014

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 4/2014 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 6 014 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test NW 4/014 Oxygen, a-chlorophyll, salinity, SiO, TIC and TOC in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 11 2017 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2017 Swimming pool water analysis Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Mika Sarkkinen, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2019

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2019 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 14 2019 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2019 Swimming pool water analysis Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Mika Sarkkinen, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2016

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2016 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 16 2016 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2016 Swimming pool water analysis Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Teemu Näykki, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 10 2018 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 01/2018 Swimming pool water analysis Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Mika Sarkkinen, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 2/2013

Proficiency Test SYKE 2/2013 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 13 Proficiency Test SYKE 2/13 Chlorophyll a, colour, conductivity, nutrients, ph and turbidity in natural waters Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Teemu Näykki, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 09/2014

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 09/2014 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 5 2015 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 09/2014 Oil hydrocarbons in water and soil Jari Nuutinen, Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 04/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 04/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 5 7 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /7 Metals in natural waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 22 2017 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2017 Radon in ground water Katarina Björklöf, Reko Simola, Mirja Leivuori, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and Markku

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 6 17 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 8/17 Domestic water measurements Katarina Björklöf, Mirja Leivuori, Mika Sarkkinen, Timo Sara-Aho, Keijo Tervonen, Sari

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2016

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2016 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 6 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 6/6 Metals in water and sediment Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo Sara-Aho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2014

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2014 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 7 5 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 8/ Metals and mercury in waters Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 8 2018 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/2017 Oil hydrocarbons in water and soil Riitta Koivikko, Jari Nuutinen and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2015

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2015 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 33 2015 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2015 Radon in ground water Katarina Björklöf, Reko Simola, Mirja Leivuori, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri, Markku

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 11/2011

Proficiency Test SYKE 11/2011 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 0 Proficiency Test SYKE /0 PCB compounds in soil Jari Nuutinen, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment Institute REPORTS

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 05/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 8 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 5/8 Metals in natural waters and soil Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 16 219 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 13/218 Leaching behavior test for solid waste material: One stage batch leaching test Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 04/2019

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 04/2019 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 5 9 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /9 Metals in natural water and sediment Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo Sara-Aho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari

Lisätiedot

MIKES, Julkaisu J3/2000 MASS COMPARISON M3. Comparison of 1 kg and 10 kg weights between MIKES and three FINAS accredited calibration laboratories

MIKES, Julkaisu J3/2000 MASS COMPARISON M3. Comparison of 1 kg and 10 kg weights between MIKES and three FINAS accredited calibration laboratories MITTATEKNIIKAN KESKUS CENTRE FOR METROLOGY AND ACCREDITATION Julkaisu J3/2000 MASS COMPARISON M3 Comparison of 1 kg and 10 kg weights between MIKES and three FINAS accredited calibration laboratories Kari

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2019

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2019 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 25 2019 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2019 Radon in ground water Katarina Björklöf, Reko Simola, Mirja Leivuori, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and Markku

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 6/2014

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 6/2014 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 1 2015 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 6/2014 Gross and net calorific values in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 10/2011

Proficiency Test SYKE 10/2011 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 11 12 Proficiency Test SYKE /11 Heavy metals in surface waters Mirja Leivuori, Kaija KorhonenYlönen, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2017

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 7 8 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /7 Metals in waste water and sludge Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri,

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 9/2012

Proficiency Test SYKE 9/2012 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 8 2013 Proficiency Test SYKE 9/2012 Oil hydrocarbons in water and soil Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Jari Nuutinen, Mirja Leivuori and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2018

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 9 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /8 Metals in waste water and compost Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Aija Pelkonen, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2015

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2015 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 37 2015 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 06/2015 Gross and net calorific values in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2016

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 10/2016 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 8 7 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test /6 Metals in waste water and recycled material Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2015

Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 08/2015 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 6 Interlaboratory Proficiency Test 8/5 Metals in waste water and sludge Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Timo SaraAho, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri,

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 8/2013

Proficiency Test SYKE 8/2013 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 4 2014 Proficiency Test SYKE 8/2013 Radon in ground water Katarina Björklöf, Reko Simola, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and Markku Ilmakunnas

Lisätiedot

Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 02/2015.

Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 02/2015. 10.2.2015 Pätevyyskokeeseen NW 02/2015 osallistuvat laboratoriot Viite: Kirje 18.12.2014 Pätevyyskoe NW 02/2015 -Luonnonvesi Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 02/2015. 1 Yhteystiedot Yhteyshenkilöt:

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 8/2012

Proficiency Test SYKE 8/2012 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 0 Proficiency Test SYKE 8/0 Volatile organic compounds in water and soil Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Jari Nuutinen, Mirja Leivuori and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 8a/2010

Proficiency Test SYKE 8a/2010 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 0 Proficiency Test SYKE a/0 Volatile organic compounds in water and soil Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Jari Nuutinen, Mirja Leivuori and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish Environment

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 4/2011

Proficiency Test SYKE 4/2011 9 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 2012 Proficiency Test SYKE 4/2011 Cross and net calorific values in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Katarina Björklöf and Markku

Lisätiedot

Asiakaspalautteen merkitys laboratoriovirheiden paljastamisessa. Taustaa

Asiakaspalautteen merkitys laboratoriovirheiden paljastamisessa. Taustaa Asiakaspalautteen merkitys laboratoriovirheiden paljastamisessa Paula Oja, TtT Laboratorio, Oulun yliopistollinen sairaala Potilasturvallisuustutkimuksen päivät 26. 27.1.2011 1 Taustaa Laboratorion tulee

Lisätiedot

SYKE Proficiency Test 5/2009

SYKE Proficiency Test 5/2009 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 2 2010 SYKE Proficiency Test /2009 Gross and net calorific value in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Irma Mäkinen, Minna Rantanen, Minna Salonen, Kaija Korhonen and Markku

Lisätiedot

Efficiency change over time

Efficiency change over time Efficiency change over time Heikki Tikanmäki Optimointiopin seminaari 14.11.2007 Contents Introduction (11.1) Window analysis (11.2) Example, application, analysis Malmquist index (11.3) Dealing with panel

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/2014

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/2014 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 10 2015 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/201 Alkaliniteetti, ravinteet, ph, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Katarina Björklöf,

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory Comparison Test 15/2018

Interlaboratory Comparison Test 15/2018 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 25 218 Interlaboratory Comparison Test 15/218 Soil improver maturity test Liisa Maunuksela, Aija Pelkonen, Katarina Björkjöf, Markku Ilmakunnas, Mirja Kartio

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 01/2015

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 01/2015 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 12 2015 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 01/2015 Uima-allasvesimääritykset Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Teemu Näykki, Katarina Björklöf, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 6/2013

Proficiency Test SYKE 6/2013 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 2 2014 Proficiency Test SYKE 6/2013 Gross and net calorific in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and Markku

Lisätiedot

Capacity Utilization

Capacity Utilization Capacity Utilization Tim Schöneberg 28th November Agenda Introduction Fixed and variable input ressources Technical capacity utilization Price based capacity utilization measure Long run and short run

Lisätiedot

TEST REPORT Nro VTT-S Air tightness and strength tests for Furanflex exhaust air ducts

TEST REPORT Nro VTT-S Air tightness and strength tests for Furanflex exhaust air ducts TEST REPORT Nro VTT-S-04515-08 19.5.008 Air tightness and strength tests for Furanflex exhaust air ducts Requested by: Hormex Oy TEST REPORT NRO VTT-S-04515-08 1 () Requested by Order Hormex Oy Linnanherrankuja

Lisätiedot

SYKE Proficiency Test 3/2010

SYKE Proficiency Test 3/2010 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 1 11 SYKE Proficiency Test 3/ Metals in waters and sediment Mirja Leivuori, Kaija Korhonen,Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Olli Järvinen, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 7/2010

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 7/2010 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 2 2011 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 7/20 Ravinteet, ph ja sähkönjohtavuus jätevesistä sekä happimääritys rannikko- ja jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

SYKE Proficiency Test 6/2012

SYKE Proficiency Test 6/2012 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 4 2013 SYKE Proficiency Test 6/2012 Gross and net calorific values in fuels Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Katarina Björklöf, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/2015

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/2015 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 13 2016 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 12/2015 Ravinteet, kloridi, ph, sulfaatti ja sähkönjohtavuus jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 15/2016

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 15/2016 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 34 2016 Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 15/2016 AOX määritys vesistä Mirja Leivuori, Riitta Koivikko, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri ja Markku Ilmakunnas Suomen

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 02/2016

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 02/2016 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 19 2016 Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus 02/2016 Trihalometaanit vedestä Riitta Koivikko, Jari Nuutinen ja Markku Ilmakunnas Suomen ympäristökeskus TIIVISTELMÄ

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/2013

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/2013 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 23 13 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/13 BOD 7, COD Cr, COD Mn, kiintoaine, Na ja TOC jätevesistä Katarina Björklöf, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Teemu Näykki, Marketta

Lisätiedot

Interlaboratory comparison 11/2017

Interlaboratory comparison 11/2017 REPORTS OF THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 1 2018 Interlaboratory comparison 11/2017 Bacterial toxicity test using bioluminescent bacteria Johanna Järvistö, Katarina Björklöf and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish

Lisätiedot

SYKE Proficiency Test 4/2009

SYKE Proficiency Test 4/2009 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 28 2009 SYKE Proficiency Test 4/2009 Metals in waters and soils Mirja Leivuori, Kaija Korhonen, Olli Järvinen, Teemu Näykki, Timo SaraAho, Keijo Tervonen, Sari

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2018

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2018 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 13 2019 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2018 Alkaliniteetti, ravinteet, ph, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2011

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2011 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 13 11 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/11 a-klorofylli, ph, ravinteet, sameus, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri luonnonveistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Teemu Näykki, Olli

Lisätiedot

Proficiency Test SYKE 3/2011

Proficiency Test SYKE 3/2011 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 22 2011 Proficiency Test SYKE 3/2011 Metals in water and sludge Mirja Leivuori, Kaija KorhonenYlönen, Timo SaraAho, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri and

Lisätiedot

SYKE Proficiency Test 5/2010

SYKE Proficiency Test 5/2010 REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 4 2011 SYKE Proficiency Test 5/2010 Gross and net calorific values in flues Mirja Leivuori, Minna Rantanen, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen and Markku Ilmakunnas Finnish

Lisätiedot

Pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016 osallistuvat laboratoriot. Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016.

Pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016 osallistuvat laboratoriot. Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016. 10.5.2016 Pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016 osallistuvat laboratoriot Viite: Kirje 14.3.2016 Pätevyyskoe NW 07/2016 Luonnonvesi II Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen NW 07/2016. 1 Yhteystiedot Yhteyshenkilöt:

Lisätiedot

Network to Get Work. Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students. www.laurea.fi

Network to Get Work. Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students. www.laurea.fi Network to Get Work Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students www.laurea.fi Ohje henkilöstölle Instructions for Staff Seuraavassa on esitetty joukko tehtäviä, joista voit valita opiskelijaryhmällesi

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2014

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2014 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 13 2014 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2014 Uima-allasvesivertailu Mirja Leivuori, Sami Tyrväinen, Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari

Lisätiedot

Labotatorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 11/2012

Labotatorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 11/2012 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 12 13 Labotatorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 11/12 Alkaliniteetti, ravinteet, ph, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja leivuori, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2016

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2016 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 6 2017 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 14/2016 Alkaliniteetti, ravinteet, ph, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers. Heikki Laaksamo

TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers. Heikki Laaksamo TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers Heikki Laaksamo TIEKE Finnish Information Society Development Centre (TIEKE Tietoyhteiskunnan kehittämiskeskus ry) TIEKE is a neutral,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus

Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 14 2011 Laboratorioiden välinen vertailumittaus AOX-määritys Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Olli Järvinen, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri, Markku Ilmakunnas ja

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 15/2017

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 15/2017 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 4 2018 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 15/2017 Ravinteet, kloridi, ph, sulfaatti, sähkönjohtavuus ja väri jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2013

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2013 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 15 2013 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2013 Uima-allasvesivertailu Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Sami Tyrväinen, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Keijo Tervonen, Sari

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioden välinen pätevyyskoe 08/2018

Laboratorioden välinen pätevyyskoe 08/2018 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 9 Laboratorioden välinen pätevyyskoe 8/8 Talousvesimääritykset Katarina Björklöf, Mirja Leivuori, Timo Sara-Aho, Mika Sarkkinen, Keijo Tervonen, Sari Lanteri, Markku

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/2009

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/2009 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 8 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/09 Ravinteet, ph, sähkönjohtavuus, kloridi ja sulfaatti jätevesistä Mirja Leivuori, Kaija Korhonen, Olli Järvinen, Teemu Näykki,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2012

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2012 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 22 2012 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2012 Happi, a-klorofylli, saliniteetti, SiO 2, TIC ja TOC luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Marketta

Lisätiedot

LYTH-CONS CONSISTENCY TRANSMITTER

LYTH-CONS CONSISTENCY TRANSMITTER LYTH-CONS CONSISTENCY TRANSMITTER LYTH-INSTRUMENT OY has generate new consistency transmitter with blade-system to meet high technical requirements in Pulp&Paper industries. Insurmountable advantages are

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/2012

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/2012 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 18 12 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 3/12 BOD 7, COD Cr, COD Mn, kiintoaine, Na ja TOC jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Marketta

Lisätiedot

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY LUONNONVARAKESKUS VANTAA, ROVANIEMI

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY LUONNONVARAKESKUS VANTAA, ROVANIEMI T203/M13/2014 Liite 1 / Appendix 1 Sivu / Page 1(5) AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY LUONNONVARAKESKUS VANTAA, ROVANIEMI NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE FINLAND VANTAA, ROVANIEMI

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/2011

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/2011 suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 1 2011 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/2011 BOD 7, COD Cr, COD Mn, kiintoaine, Na ja toc jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Olli

Lisätiedot

Information on preparing Presentation

Information on preparing Presentation Information on preparing Presentation Seminar on big data management Lecturer: Spring 2017 20.1.2017 1 Agenda Hints and tips on giving a good presentation Watch two videos and discussion 22.1.2017 2 Goals

Lisätiedot

Other approaches to restrict multipliers

Other approaches to restrict multipliers Other approaches to restrict multipliers Heikki Tikanmäki Optimointiopin seminaari 10.10.2007 Contents Short revision (6.2) Another Assurance Region Model (6.3) Cone-Ratio Method (6.4) An Application of

Lisätiedot

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY T032/M27/2019 Liite 1 / Appendix 1 Sivu / Page 1(5) AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY SAIMAAN VESI- JA YMPÄRISTÖTUTKIMUS OY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH OF SAIMAA Tunnus Code

Lisätiedot

Pätevyyskokeeseen Proftest SYKE 2/2014 osallistuvat laboratoriot. Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen Proftest SYKE 2/2014.

Pätevyyskokeeseen Proftest SYKE 2/2014 osallistuvat laboratoriot. Oheisena toimitamme näytteet pätevyyskokeeseen Proftest SYKE 2/2014. 17.2.2014 Pätevyyskokeeseen Proftest SYKE 2/2014 osallistuvat laboratoriot Viite Hänvisning Kirje 18.12.2013 Asia Ärende Pätevyyskoe Proftest SYKE 2/2014 näytteet Pätevyyskoe SYKE 2/2014 Oheisena toimitamme

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/2011

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/2011 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 4 2012 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 9/2011 Ravinteet, kloridi, ph, sulfaatti ja sähkönjohtavuus jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Olli Järvinen,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 5/2008

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 5/2008 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 26 08 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe /08 Klorofylli-a, happi, saliniteetti, SiO 2 ja TOC luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen, Teemu Näykki, Olli Järvinen, Keijo Tervonen

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2010

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2010 SYKE SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 11 2010 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 4/2010 Klorofylli a, saliniteetti, SiO2 ja TOC luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen, Olli Järvinen, Teemu Näykki, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data

Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data Multi-drug use, polydrug use and problematic polydrug use Martta Forsell, Finnish Focal Point 28/09/2015 Martta Forsell 1 28/09/2015 Esityksen

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2012

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2012 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 12 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/12 Alkaliniteetti, ph, ravinteet ja sähkönjohtavuus luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Olli

Lisätiedot

Field measurement intercomparison

Field measurement intercomparison REPORTS OF FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE 24 2014 Field measurement intercomparison Field measurements of dissolved oxygen concentration Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Ivo Leito, Irja Helm, Lauri Jalukse,

Lisätiedot

The CCR Model and Production Correspondence

The CCR Model and Production Correspondence The CCR Model and Production Correspondence Tim Schöneberg The 19th of September Agenda Introduction Definitions Production Possiblity Set CCR Model and the Dual Problem Input excesses and output shortfalls

Lisätiedot

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY T032/M24/2016 Liite 1 / Appendix 1 Sivu / Page 1(5) AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY SAIMAAN VESI- JA YMPÄRISTÖTUTKIMUS OY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH OF SAIMAA Tunnus Code

Lisätiedot

EURACHEM / CITAC -ohjeen yleisesittely. Kemiallisten mittausten jäljitettävyys. 1. EURACHEM / CITAC ohje ja esite. 2. LGC VAM -ohjelman ohje

EURACHEM / CITAC -ohjeen yleisesittely. Kemiallisten mittausten jäljitettävyys. 1. EURACHEM / CITAC ohje ja esite. 2. LGC VAM -ohjelman ohje EURACHEM / CITAC -ohjeen yleisesittely Prof., TkT Veikko Komppa, VTT Prosessit PL 1602, 02044 VTT Veikko.Komppa@vtt.fi Kemiallisten mittausten jäljitettävyys 1. EURACHEM / CITAC ohje ja esite 2. LGC VAM

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/2010

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/2010 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 2/,, CODMn, kiintoaine, Na ja TOC jätevesistä Kaija Korhonen, Teemu Näykki, Olli Järvinen, Timo Sara-Aho, Mirja Leivuori, Keijo

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2010

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2010 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 9 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/ Alkaliniteetti, ravinteet, ph ja sähkönjohtavuus luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen, Teemu Näykki, Olli Järvinen, Mirja Leivuori,

Lisätiedot

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY

AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY T073/A16/2016 Liite 1 / Appendix 1 Sivu / Page 1(6) AKKREDITOITU TESTAUSLABORATORIO ACCREDITED TESTING LABORATORY KEMIALLISEN ASEEN KIELTOSOPIMUKSEN INSTITUUTTI FINNISH INSTITUTE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE

Lisätiedot

Returns to Scale II. S ysteemianalyysin. Laboratorio. Esitelmä 8 Timo Salminen. Teknillinen korkeakoulu

Returns to Scale II. S ysteemianalyysin. Laboratorio. Esitelmä 8 Timo Salminen. Teknillinen korkeakoulu Returns to Scale II Contents Most Productive Scale Size Further Considerations Relaxation of the Convexity Condition Useful Reminder Theorem 5.5 A DMU found to be efficient with a CCR model will also be

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 6/2011

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 6/2011 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 1 2012 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 6/2011 Radon pohjavedestä Kaija Korhonen-Ylönen, Ulla-Maija Hanste, Mirja Leivuori ja Markku Ilmakunnas Suomen ympäristökeskus

Lisätiedot

Gap-filling methods for CH 4 data

Gap-filling methods for CH 4 data Gap-filling methods for CH 4 data Sigrid Dengel University of Helsinki Outline - Ecosystems known for CH 4 emissions; - Why is gap-filling of CH 4 data not as easy and straight forward as CO 2 ; - Gap-filling

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2008

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/2008 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 08 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 1/08 Ravinteet, ph ja sähkönjohtavuus luonnonvesistä Kaija Korhonen, Teemu Näykki, Olli Järvinen, Tero Eklin, Keijo Tervonen

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2019

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2019 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 29 2019 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2019 BOD 7, COD Cr, COD Mn, kiintoaine, Na ja TOC jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2015

Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2015 SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUKSEN RAPORTTEJA 24 2015 Laboratorioiden välinen pätevyyskoe 03/2015 BOD 7, COD Cr, COD Mn, kiintoaine, Na ja TOC jätevesistä Riitta Koivikko, Mirja Leivuori, Teemu Näykki, Mika Sarkkinen,

Lisätiedot