Yhteiskuntavastuun merkitys yritykselle

Koko: px

Aloita esitys sivulta:

Download "Yhteiskuntavastuun merkitys yritykselle"

Aarno Hiltunen
8 vuotta sitten
Katselukertoja:

1 Yhteiskuntavastuun merkitys yritykselle Kaisu Puumalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology

2 Esityksen rakenne 1. CSR tutkimuksesta yleensä Tutkimuksen volyymi ja suuntaukset Vastuullisuuden vaikutukset 2. CSR Forest -projekti Projektin esittely Esimerkkejä tuloksista

3 CSR (Aguinis & Glavas 2012) context- specific organizational actions and policies that take into account stakeholders expectations and the triple bottom line of economic, social and environmental performance

4 CSR julkaisujen volyymi lähde: TR Web of knowledge, korkealaatuisimmat vertaisarvioidut tieteelliset journalit Artikkelien määrä Viittausten määrä Footer

5 CSR ilmiön kehitys to do as much as possible for everybody concerned, to make money and use it, give employment, and send out the car where people can use it Business is a service not a bonanza Henry Ford 1917, oikeudessa syytettynä voittovarojen liiallisesta sijoittamisesta yrityksen kehittämiseen, sai tuomion we want to find ingenious new ways to delight consumers, provide superior returns to shareholders and make the world a better place for us all William Clay Ford Jr 1999, sai aplodit osakkeenomistajilta Footer

6 CSR tutkimuksen historiaa aika tutkija Keskeisin näkökulma Bowen Social obligation 70 Wallich & McGowan Enlightened self-interest 80 Carroll Corporate social performance, business ethics 90 Freeman Stakeholder approach 00 Hart, Porter Strategic management, shared value, global corporate citizenship, sustainability 10 Social enterprise, responsible Footer investment

7 CSR tutkimussuuntauksia Footer

8 CSR tutkimussuuntauksia Taneja et al., 2011 Footer

9 CSR business case ja merkitys Puolesta ja vastaan -argumenttien esittäminen keskittyi luvuille - Milton Friedman 1962, one responsibility, max shareholder profits - Jos vapaa markkinatalous ei pysty ratkaisemaan jotain sosiaalista ongelmaa niin se on julkisen vallan tehtävä, ei yritysten - Yritysjohtajilla ei ole tarvittavaa osaamista - CSR johtaa todellisen mission unohtumiseen ja epäolennaisiin toimiin - Yrityksillä on muutenkin liikaa valtaa, eivät saisi yhteiskunnallista valtaa - Kilpailukyky heikkenee - Vähenevät rajahyödyt + Hyötyä pitkällä tähtäimellä + Vähentää valtion sääntelyä + Yrityksillä on resursseja ratkaista sosiaalisia ongelmia, antaa yrittää + Parempi olla proaktiivinen kuin vain reagoida ongelmiin + Kansa kannattaa CSR Footer

10 CSR business case ja merkitys Neljä lähestymistapaa (Carroll & Shabana 2010) Kustannusten ja riskien vähentäminen Esim. henkilöstöriskit, ympäristösäädöksiin sopeutuminen proaktiivisesti, oikeudenkäyntien välttäminen Kilpailuedun saavuttaminen Erilaistamisstrategian kautta, auttaa erottumaan kilpailijoista Sidosryhmien tarpeet luovat mahdollisuuksia eikä rajoitteita Maineen ja legitimiteetin parantaminen Auttaa houkuttelemaan asiakkaita, sijoittajia ja työntekijöitä Lisää brandin arvoa Hyväntekeväisyydellä ja avoimella raportoinnilla voi parantaa legitimiteettiä Synergistinen arvonluonti Drucker, 1984: turn a social problem into economic opportunity Footer

11 merkitykset Lähde: Aguinis & Glavas, 2012 Footer

12 CSP CFP tutkimustuloksista Peloza tutkimusta 59% positiivinen, 14% negatiivinen, 27% ei vaikutusta Orlitzky et al 2003 meta-analyysi 52 tutkimusta Positiivinen yhteys keskimäärin r=.18 Margolis et al 2009 meta-analyysi 166 tutkimusta Positiivinen yhteys keskimäärin r=.11 Riippuu käytetyistä mittareista Footer

13 CSR-FOREST Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation Challenges in Global Forest Industry Academy of Finland, funding 470 k Consortium Lappeenranta University of Technology (LUT, School of Business) University of Helsinki (UH, Department of Forest Economics)

14 Project team UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Prof. Anne Toppinen Mikko Tervo Ning Li LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Prof. Kaisu Puumalainen Anni Tuppura Prof. Jaana Sandström Maija Hujala Prof. Ari Jantunen Prof. Satu Pätäri INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS University of Toronto, Prof. Shashi Kant Georgia Institute of Technology, Prof. Patrick McCarthy State University of New York, prof. David Sonnenfeld

15 Project objectives 1. to describe the adoption process and diffusion of socially and environmentally responsible business practices 2. to recognize firm level and business environment level factors that influence on the firms adoption of CSR 3. to model the influence of CSR on the market value and profitability of the firms 4. to model the dynamics of global consumption and international raw material (round wood and pulp) trade at the macro level - taking into account the ongoing development towards stronger customer awareness on sustainable forest products

16 Work packages WP3: Economic impact Raw material trade flows Trade of end products Location of production capacity WP2: Business impact Short and long term market value Market-to-book value Profitability Market share WP1: Adoption and diffusion of CSR innovations Managerial practices sustainability reporting, forest certification Technical innovations Bleaching, waste water treatment, reduction of emissions, recycled fiber Overall CSR indices Business environment Globalization, climate change, consumer values, emission trade Business characteristics and strategies Value chain integration, innovativeness

17 Achievements in numbers 22 publications in scientific refereed journals so far (10 w-i-p) 33 conference presentations 2 doctoral theses and 11 Master s theses Additionally: Numerous interviews, comments, speeches, etc. 3 datasets collected (global + Chinese survey, country data) Conference participations Journal articles Pro Gradus Dissertations

18 Results - adoption of standards 1,00 0,75 Quality Standards and Reporting Practices Diffusion of Selected Standards PEFC FSC ISO ,50 0,25 Nb of respondents ,00 PEFC FSC EMAS ISO ISO SA 8000 OHSAS GRI ISO 14001, FSC and PEFC are the most widely applied quality standards among the companies in this survey. The diffusion of both FSC and ISO has been increasing until today. PEFC shows signs of stagnation.

19 Results - CSR report published 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 integrated separate 0,2 0,

20 Results - environmental manager appointed 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0, % of respondent firms had an environmental manager by 1990, first one 1952, then 1970

21 Results adopter categories 0,5 0,7 0,45 0,4 0,35 0,6 0,5 0,3 0,25 0,2 0,15 0,1 0,05 <2500, N= , N=11 >5000,N=13 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 EUR, N=32 NAM, N=14 SAM,N=8 OTHER,N=4 0 EARLY ADOPTERS EARLY MAJORITY LATE LAGGARDS MAJORITY 0 EARLY ADOPTERS EARLY MAJORITY LATE LAGGARDS MAJORITY Large firms are earlier adopters of CSR management practices than smaller firms South American firms are later adopters than European or North American firms

22 Results - motives for adopting CSR 5 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 PROACTIVE COMPETITION STAKEHOLDER 2 1,5 1 EARLY ADOPTERS EARLY MAJORITY LATE MAJORITY LAGGARDS Proactive motives: central in strategy, pioneering, more than legislation, management, employees take initiative Competition motives: monitoring competitors, imitate best practices, recent emphasis Stakeholder motives: ngo, customers, suppliers, other stakeholders take initiatives

23 Results barriers of adopting CSR Corruption Inadequately defined property rights in some host countries Protectionist (government) policy Reluctance of shareholders to invest in environmental protection Changing laws and practices Unprofitability of environmental investment Mean Legislators' indifference Uncertainty about environment and climate obligations in future Consumers' reluctance to pay 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4

24 Results - report scores

25 Results Firms mentioned as trendsetters

26 Results Firm level proactivity seem to foster corporate social performance (CSP) Proactive firms are forward looking initiators, who anticipate and act on future needs and shape their environments rather than merely adapt reactively to the changes enjoy learning curve effects more likely than non-proactive firms The result indicate, that some organizational structures and practices or routines may foster CSP, therefore: Some firms maybe better capable for CSP than others Some firms maybe better in gaining competitive advantage by investing in CSR

27 Results Corporate social performance seem to have positive influence on financial performance in forest sector firms (subjective CSP, measured with Likert-scale items) Earlier adoption of CSR standards and policies pays off financially CSP CFP

28 Results - KLD data, energy sector: We do not find support bidirectional causality of CSP and CFP Changes in CSP seems to occur earlier than changes in CFP (statistically supported), but not the other way round This means that it is possible that CSP has influence on CFP, whereas it is not likely that CFP influences CSP CSP CFP

29 Results - capacity change geographically Footer

30 Results RISI and FAO data Internet is a substitute for newsprint and possibly for magazine paper ICTs have an impact on the emerging markets as well Ongoing structural changes have clearly affected the bilateral trade flows of chemical pulp and recovered paper Asia, particularly China, is the most important driver of chemical pulp and recovered paper trade Planted forests (eucalyptus especially) and recovered paper have quickly increased their importance as a raw material for paper and paperboard production. Paper recovery rate and use of recovered fiber are driven by environmental conciousness in addition to economic and geographic factors

31 FEELWOOD - jatkoprojekti Vastuullinen liiketoiminta asiakasarvon lähteenä metsäpohjaisten tuotteiden ja palveluiden markkinoilla

Samankaltaiset tiedostot

Yritysvastuu globaalissa metsäteollisuudessa

Yritysvastuu globaalissa metsäteollisuudessa Professori Anne Toppinen 27.5.2013 1 SISÄLTÖ Mitä eri näkökulmia vastuullisuuteen löytyy metsäteollisuudesta? Suomen Akatemian CSR-Forest- tutkimusprojektimme