FSD1048 Young People and Presidential Elections 2000 Codebook FINNISH SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA ARCHIVE
c Finnish Social Science Data Archive, 2000 The bibliographic citation for this codebook: Young People and Presidential Elections 2000, [codebook]. Tampere : Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor], 2010. This codebook has been generated from the version 2.1 (13.6.2005) of the data. Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, filter variables, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. FSD Finnish Social Science Data Archive FIN-33014 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE tel. +358 3 3551 8519 fax +358 3 3551 8520 email: fsd@uta.fi URI: http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/ Typeset by L A TEX $ Koodikirjoitin.py v26 @ 2010-02-08 09:08:36.531000 $
To the reader This codebook is part of the data FSD1048 archived at the FSD (Finnish Social Science Data Archive). The source must be acknowledged in any publication based wholly or in part on the data. The bibliographic citation may be in the form required by the publication, or in the form suggested by the archive. The bibliographic citation suggested by the archive: Nurmela, Sakari & Pehkonen, Juhani: Young People and Presidential Elections 2000 [computer file]. FSD1048, version 2.1 (2005-06-13). Espoo: Gallup Finland [data collection], 2000. Helsinki: Ministry of Education. Advisory Council for Youth Affairs [producer], 2000. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor], 2005. The depositor and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the secondary use of the data. The archive must be informed of all publications where the data have been used. The beginning of the codebook contains information on data content, structure and collection, and includes a list of publications where the data have been used. The second part of the codebook contains information on variables: question texts, response options, and frequencies. The third part contains indexes. Variable distributions presented in this codebook have been generated from the SPSS files. Distribution tables present variable values, frequencies (n), frequency percents (%), and valid percents (v. %) which take into account missing data. All distributions are unweighted. If the data contain weight variables, these will be found at the end of the variables list. In some cases frequency distributions have been substituted by descriptive statistics. Distributions may contain missing data. The note "missing data (SYSMIS)" refers to a missing observation whereas "missing data" refers to, for example, user missing data. In some cases users of the data have to consider whether it is best to code also other values as missing data (eg. don t want to say or can t say ). This codebook has been produced automatically with Python, L A TEXand dvipdfm software. Source files include data description files in DDI format, and SPSS files.
Contents 1 Study description 1 1.1 Titles....................................... 1 1.2 Subject description................................ 1 1.3 Structure and collection of the data........................ 3 1.4 Use of data.................................... 3 2 Variables 5 3 Indexes 59 3.1 Variables in the order of occurance........................ 59 3.2 Variables in alphabetical order.......................... 65 A naire in Finnish 71 i
Chapter 1 Study description 1.1 Titles Title of the study: Young People and Presidential Elections 2000 Title of the study in Finnish: Nuoret ja presidentinvaalit 2000 This codebook has been generated from the version 2.1 (13.6.2005) of the data. Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, filter variables, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. 1.2 Subject description Extent of collection Data: SPSS portable file. Data available also in other file formats. Other material naire: pdf file in Finnish Authoring entity Nurmela, Sakari (Gallup Finland) Pehkonen, Juhani (Gallup Finland) Copyright statement for the data According to an agreement between FSD and the depositor. 1
1. Study description Depositor Advisory Council for Youth Affairs (Ministry of Education) Date deposited 5.3.2000 Keywords election campaigns; information sources; presidential candidates; presidential elections; values; voting; voting behaviour; youth Topic Classification Classification by FSD vocabulary: political studies; youth studies Classification by CESSDA vocabulary: elections; mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion; youth Series description The data belong to the series: Individual datasets Individual datasets contain those datasets that do not belong to any series. Abstract The data was collected between the first and second round of the Finnish presidential elections in 2000. The object of the survey was to study the interest of young people in politics and in the presidential elections, their opinions on the election campaign, voting, political parties, information sources on the election, and the person and tasks of the president. The respondents were asked how important different factors were when they made their decision to vote, did they vote in the elections, for whom and on what grounds. Those who had abstained were asked if it had been self-evident that they were not going to vote, and why they abstained. All respondents were asked whether they were going to vote in the second round of the elections and for whom. In conclusion, the respondents were asked how important certain things were in their lives: spending time with friends, spending time with family, leisure time hobbies, exercising, good income, etc. Background variables included the respondent s gender, year of birth, vocational education, economic activity, occupational group, household composition, housing tenure, periods of unemployment, Internet use, and whether the respondent was going to vote in the forthcoming municipal elections. 2
1.3 Structure and collection of the data Country: Finland Geographical coverage: Finland Unit of analysis: Person Universe: Young people aged 18-30 living in Finland Collection date: February 2000 Data collector: Gallup Finland (Gallup Finland) 1.3. Structure and collection of the data Data producer: Ministry of Education. Advisory Council for Youth Affairs (Ministry of Education) Mode of data collection: Telephone interview Type of research instrument: Structured questionnaire Time period covered: 2000 Time method of the data collection: Cross-sectional study Number of variables and cases: The data contain 123 variables and 1003 cases. Sampling procedure: Random sample 1.4 Use of data Data appraisal The variable identifying municipality has been removed. The data set does not contain answers to the open-ended question 2. Related publications Nurmela, Sakari & Pehkonen, Juhani (2000). Presidentinvaalit ja nuoret 2000: raportti 18-30- vuotiaiden osallistumisesta vuoden 2000 presidentinvaaleihin. Helsinki: Nuorisoasiain neuvottelukunta. Updated list of publications in the study description at http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/fsd1048/ Related studies FSD1027 Youth and Parliamentary Elections 1999 FSD1028 Young People and European Parliament Elections 1999 3
1. Study description Location of the data collection Finnish Social Science Data Archive Weighting There are no weight variables in the data. Restrictions Access to the data granted for scientific and teaching purposes; FSD s access application procedure. 4
Chapter 2 Variables [FSD_NO] FSD study number FSD study number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1003 minimum 1048.00 maximum 1048.00 mean 1048.00 standard deviation 0.00 [FSD_VR] FSD edition number FSD edition number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1003 minimum 2.10 maximum 2.10 mean 2.10 standard deviation 0.00 5
2. Variables [FSD_PRO] FSD processing level Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, filter variables, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. A (see codebook) 1 B (see codebook) 2 0 0.0 0.0 C (data hasn t been checked at FSD) 3 0 0.0 0.0 [FSD_ID] FSD case id FSD case id Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1003 minimum 1.00 maximum 1003.00 mean 502.00 standard deviation 289.69 [SUKU] Respondent s gender Respondent s gender Female 1 496 49.5 49.5 (continued on next page) 6
K3A_1 (cont. from previous page) Male 2 507 50.5 50.5 [K1] How interested are you in matters related to the presidential elections? How interested are you in matters related to the presidential elections? Very interested 1 239 23.8 23.8 Somewhat interested 2 598 59.6 59.6 Not very interested 3 136 13.6 13.6 Not at all interested 4 30 3.0 3.0 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [K3A_1] During the election campaign of the first round, to what extent do you think issues unrelated to presidential powers or tasks were raised? During the election campaign of the first round, to what extent do you think issues unrelated to presidential powers or tasks were raised? A great deal 1 175 17.4 17.4 Some extent 2 699 69.7 69.7 Not at all 3 66 6.6 6.6 Can t say 4 63 6.3 6.3 7
2. Variables [K3A_2] During the election campaign of the first round, was there public criticism of the candidates political activities? During the election campaign of the first round, was there public criticism of the candidates political activities? A great deal 1 81 8.1 8.1 Some extent 2 647 64.5 64.5 Not at all 3 244 24.3 24.3 Can t say 4 31 3.1 3.1 [K3A_3] During the election campaign of the first round, were any unfavourable aspects of the candidates private lives brought to public attention? During the election campaign of the first round, were any unfavourable aspects of the candidates private lives brought to public attention? A great deal 1 206 20.5 20.5 Some extent 2 514 51.2 51.2 Not at all 3 268 26.7 26.7 Can t say 4 15 1.5 1.5 [K3A_4] During the election campaign of the first round, did the spouses/partners of the candidates participate in the campaign? During the election campaign of the first round, did the spouses/partners of the candidates participate in the campaign? 8
K3B_2 A great deal 1 257 25.6 25.6 Some extent 2 609 60.7 60.7 Not at all 3 125 12.5 12.5 Can t say 4 12 1.2 1.2 [K3B_1] How beneficial do you feel it is that candidates comment on issues unrelated to presidential powers or tasks? How beneficial do you feel it is that candidates comment on issues unrelated to presidential powers or tasks? Beneficial 1 220 21.9 21.9 Not very beneficial 2 496 49.5 49.5 Not at all beneficial 3 271 27.0 27.0 Can t say 4 16 1.6 1.6 [K3B_2] How beneficial do you find public criticism of the candidates political activities? How beneficial do you find public criticism of the candidates political activities? Beneficial 1 463 46.2 46.2 Not very beneficial 2 400 39.9 39.9 Not at all beneficial 3 111 11.1 11.1 Can t say 4 29 2.9 2.9 9
2. Variables [K3B_3] How beneficial do you find that unfavourable aspects of the candidates private lives are exposed How beneficial do you find that unfavourable aspects of the candidates private lives are exposed Beneficial 1 61 6.1 6.1 Not very beneficial 2 282 28.1 28.1 Not at all beneficial 3 645 64.3 64.3 Can t say 4 15 1.5 1.5 [K3B_4] How beneficial do you find that the candidates spouses/partners participate in the election campaign How beneficial do you find that the candidates spouses/partners participate in the election campaign Beneficial 1 426 42.5 42.5 Not very beneficial 2 352 35.1 35.1 Not at all beneficial 3 189 18.8 18.8 Can t say 4 36 3.6 3.6 [K4A] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Work colleagues or fellow students Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Work colleagues or fellow students 10
Very important 1 32 3.2 3.2 Rather important 2 154 15.4 15.4 Not very important 3 328 32.7 32.7 Not at all important 4 485 48.4 48.4 Can t say 5 4 0.4 0.4 K4C [K4B] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Home, parents or relatives Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Home, parents or relatives Very important 1 52 5.2 5.2 Rather important 2 296 29.5 29.5 Not very important 3 293 29.2 29.2 Not at all important 4 360 35.9 35.9 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 [K4C] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Other friends Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Other friends Very important 1 22 2.2 2.2 Rather important 2 185 18.4 18.4 Not very important 3 366 36.5 36.5 Not at all important 4 429 42.8 42.8 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 (continued on next page) 11
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [K4D] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs articles in newspapers Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs articles in newspapers Very important 1 175 17.4 17.4 Rather important 2 547 54.5 54.5 Not very important 3 158 15.8 15.8 Not at all important 4 122 12.2 12.2 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 [K4E] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs programmes on the radio Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs programmes on the radio Very important 1 98 9.8 9.8 Rather important 2 334 33.3 33.3 Not very important 3 244 24.3 24.3 Not at all important 4 322 32.1 32.1 Can t say 5 5 0.5 0.5 12
K4H [K4F] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs programmes on TV Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: News and current affairs programmes on TV Very important 1 374 37.3 37.3 Rather important 2 468 46.7 46.7 Not very important 3 84 8.4 8.4 Not at all important 4 76 7.6 7.6 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 [K4G] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Books, magazines and other written sources Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Books, magazines and other written sources Very important 1 34 3.4 3.4 Rather important 2 270 26.9 26.9 Not very important 3 368 36.7 36.7 Not at all important 4 328 32.7 32.7 Can t say 5 3 0.3 0.3 [K4H] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Internet Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Internet 13
2. Variables Very important 1 35 3.5 3.5 Rather important 2 159 15.9 15.9 Not very important 3 172 17.1 17.1 Not at all important 4 632 63.0 63.0 Can t say 5 5 0.5 0.5 [K4I] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Election campaigns in general Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Election campaigns in general Very important 1 86 8.6 8.6 Rather important 2 423 42.2 42.2 Not very important 3 286 28.5 28.5 Not at all important 4 198 19.7 19.7 Can t say 5 10 1.0 1.0 [K4J] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Candidates advertisements in newspapers Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Candidates advertisements in newspapers Very important 1 24 2.4 2.4 Rather important 2 228 22.7 22.7 (continued on next page) 14
K5 (cont. from previous page) Not very important 3 369 36.8 36.8 Not at all important 4 378 37.7 37.7 Can t say 5 4 0.4 0.4 [K4K] Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Candidates advertisements on television and the radio Importance of information sources in relation to voting decision during the first round: Candidates advertisements on television and the radio Very important 1 55 5.5 5.5 Rather important 2 346 34.5 34.5 Not very important 3 311 31.0 31.0 Not at all important 4 290 28.9 28.9 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 [K5] If you think about times when there are no elections, how often do you discuss politics with other people? If you think about times when there are no elections, how often do you discuss politics with other people? Daily or almost daily 1 105 10.5 10.5 Often 2 168 16.7 16.7 Sometimes 3 326 32.5 32.5 Rarely 4 352 35.1 35.1 (continued on next page) 15
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) Never 5 52 5.2 5.2 Cant say 6 0 0.0 0.0 [K6] How often did you discuss issues related to the first round of the recent presidential elections during the election campaign? How often did you discuss issues related to the first round of the recent presidential elections during the election campaign? Daily or almost daily 1 404 40.3 40.3 Often 2 298 29.7 29.7 Sometimes 3 193 19.2 19.2 Rarely 4 99 9.9 9.9 Never 5 9 0.9 0.9 Cant say 6 0 0.0 0.0 [K7A] Voting in presidential elections is a civic duty Voting in presidential elections is a civic duty Strongly agree 1 663 66.1 66.1 Agree 2 253 25.2 25.2 Disagree 3 54 5.4 5.4 Strongly disagree 4 32 3.2 3.2 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 16
K7D [K7B] The decisions and actions of the president have no influence on my life The decisions and actions of the president have no influence on my life Strongly agree 1 62 6.2 6.2 Agree 2 228 22.7 22.7 Disagree 3 431 43.0 43.0 Strongly disagree 4 276 27.5 27.5 Can t say 5 6 0.6 0.6 [K7C] During the first round, there was at least one candidate who I liked During the first round, there was at least one candidate who I liked Strongly agree 1 735 73.3 73.3 Agree 2 148 14.8 14.8 Disagree 3 53 5.3 5.3 Strongly disagree 4 61 6.1 6.1 Can t say 5 6 0.6 0.6 [K7D] You can influence things by voting in presidential elections You can influence things by voting in presidential elections 17
2. Variables Strongly agree 1 494 49.3 49.3 Agree 2 344 34.3 34.3 Disagree 3 123 12.3 12.3 Strongly disagree 4 40 4.0 4.0 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 [K7E] Voting in presidential elections is more interesting than voting in parliamentary elections Voting in presidential elections is more interesting than voting in parliamentary elections Strongly agree 1 486 48.5 48.5 Agree 2 286 28.5 28.5 Disagree 3 139 13.9 13.9 Strongly disagree 4 63 6.3 6.3 Can t say 5 29 2.9 2.9 [K7F] Basically, I think that the president should be a man Basically, I think that the president should be a man Strongly agree 1 112 11.2 11.2 Agree 2 97 9.7 9.7 Disagree 3 162 16.2 16.2 Strongly disagree 4 621 61.9 61.9 Can t say 5 11 1.1 1.1 18
[K7G] The recently elected president should have more powers in domestic affairs than the previous president had The recently elected president should have more powers in domestic affairs than the previous president had K9 Strongly agree 1 149 14.9 14.9 Agree 2 300 29.9 29.9 Disagree 3 317 31.6 31.6 Strongly disagree 4 167 16.7 16.7 Can t say 5 70 7.0 7.0 [K8] Many voters chose not to vote in the first round. What did you do? Many voters chose not to vote in the first round. What did you do? I did not vote 1 140 14.0 14.0 I voted in advance 2 311 31.0 31.0 I voted on the election day 3 549 54.7 54.7 Don t want to say 4 3 0.3 0.3 [K9] (IF VOTED) How self-evident was it for you to vote? (IF VOTED) How self-evident was it for you to vote? 19
2. Variables Self-evident 1 745 74.3 86.6 Thought about not voting, but not seriously 2 96 9.6 11.2 Seriously considered not voting as an option 3 19 1.9 2.2 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K10] When did you decide on the candidate you voted for in the first round? When did you decide on the candidate you voted for in the first round? On the election day 1 84 8.4 9.8 Some days before voting 2 195 19.4 22.7 About a week or two before voting 3 271 27.0 31.5 I made my choice already last year 4 309 30.8 35.9 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K11] Which of the following candidates did you vote for in the first round? Which of the following candidates did you vote for in the first round? Esko Aho (KESK) 1 248 24.7 28.8 Ilkka Hakalehto (PS) 2 4 0.4 0.5 Tarja Halonen (SDP) 3 290 28.9 33.7 Heidi Hautala (VIHR) 4 63 6.3 7.3 Risto Kuisma (REM) 5 6 0.6 0.7 Elisabeth Rehn (RKP) 6 55 5.5 6.4 Riitta Uosukainen (KOK) 7 92 9.2 10.7 (continued on next page) 20
K12B (cont. from previous page) Don t want to say/cast a blank vote 8 102 10.2 11.9 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12A] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s political party To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s political party A great deal 1 101 10.1 11.7 A fair amount 2 270 26.9 31.4 Not very much 3 251 25.0 29.2 Not at all 4 238 23.7 27.7 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12B] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s gender To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s gender A great deal 1 87 8.7 10.1 A fair amount 2 239 23.8 27.8 Not very much 3 227 22.6 26.4 Not at all 4 305 30.4 35.5 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 (continued on next page) 21
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12C] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s age To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s age A great deal 1 33 3.3 3.8 A fair amount 2 196 19.5 22.8 Not very much 3 253 25.2 29.4 Not at all 4 378 37.7 44.0 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12D] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s educational background To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s educational background A great deal 1 63 6.3 7.3 A fair amount 2 391 39.0 45.5 Not very much 3 209 20.8 24.3 Not at all 4 189 18.8 22.0 Can t say 5 8 0.8 0.9 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 (continued on next page) 22
K12F (cont. from previous page) [K12E] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s expertise in foreign affairs To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s expertise in foreign affairs A great deal 1 224 22.3 26.0 A fair amount 2 436 43.5 50.7 Not very much 3 136 13.6 15.8 Not at all 4 59 5.9 6.9 Can t say 5 5 0.5 0.6 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12F] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate had experience of acting and working in the international sphere To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate had experience of acting and working in the international sphere A great deal 1 262 26.1 30.5 A fair amount 2 469 46.8 54.5 Not very much 3 93 9.3 10.8 Not at all 4 32 3.2 3.7 Can t say 5 4 0.4 0.5 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 (continued on next page) 23
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [K12G] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good language skills To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good language skills A great deal 1 134 13.4 15.6 A fair amount 2 374 37.3 43.5 Not very much 3 204 20.3 23.7 Not at all 4 127 12.7 14.8 Can t say 5 21 2.1 2.4 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12H] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate is empathetic To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate is empathetic A great deal 1 126 12.6 14.7 A fair amount 2 435 43.4 50.6 Not very much 3 208 20.7 24.2 Not at all 4 78 7.8 9.1 Can t say 5 13 1.3 1.5 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 24
K12J [K12I] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate is a good public performer To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate is a good public performer A great deal 1 295 29.4 34.3 A fair amount 2 487 48.6 56.6 Not very much 3 66 6.6 7.7 Not at all 4 12 1.2 1.4 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12J] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s stylishness and elegance To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s stylishness and elegance A great deal 1 166 16.6 19.3 A fair amount 2 395 39.4 45.9 Not very much 3 210 20.9 24.4 Not at all 4 87 8.7 10.1 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 25
2. Variables [K12K] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s determination and assertiveness To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s determination and assertiveness A great deal 1 351 35.0 40.8 A fair amount 2 443 44.2 51.5 Not very much 3 50 5.0 5.8 Not at all 4 15 1.5 1.7 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K12L] To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s irreproachable private life To what extent did the following characteristics influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s irreproachable private life A great deal 1 41 4.1 4.8 A fair amount 2 174 17.3 20.2 Not very much 3 306 30.5 35.6 Not at all 4 329 32.8 38.3 Can t say 5 10 1.0 1.2 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 26
K13B [K13A] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s Nato membership To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s Nato membership A great deal 1 88 8.8 10.2 A fair amount 2 290 28.9 33.7 Not very much 3 267 26.6 31.0 Not at all 4 192 19.1 22.3 Can t say 5 23 2.3 2.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13B] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s EU policy To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s EU policy A great deal 1 98 9.8 11.4 A fair amount 2 471 47.0 54.8 Not very much 3 179 17.8 20.8 Not at all 4 92 9.2 10.7 Can t say 5 20 2.0 2.3 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 27
2. Variables [K13C] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s relations to non-eu countries To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on Finland s relations to non-eu countries A great deal 1 79 7.9 9.2 A fair amount 2 431 43.0 50.1 Not very much 3 226 22.5 26.3 Not at all 4 101 10.1 11.7 Can t say 5 23 2.3 2.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13D] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the reduction of unemployment To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the reduction of unemployment A great deal 1 160 16.0 18.6 A fair amount 2 418 41.7 48.6 Not very much 3 187 18.6 21.7 Not at all 4 82 8.2 9.5 Can t say 5 13 1.3 1.5 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 28
K13F [K13E] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the economic policy of Finland To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the economic policy of Finland A great deal 1 113 11.3 13.1 A fair amount 2 434 43.3 50.5 Not very much 3 217 21.6 25.2 Not at all 4 78 7.8 9.1 Can t say 5 18 1.8 2.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13F] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the security and defence policy of Finland To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the security and defence policy of Finland A great deal 1 164 16.4 19.1 A fair amount 2 468 46.7 54.4 Not very much 3 160 16.0 18.6 Not at all 4 60 6.0 7.0 Can t say 5 8 0.8 0.9 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 29
2. Variables [K13G] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on and actions in gender equality issues To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on and actions in gender equality issues A great deal 1 107 10.7 12.4 A fair amount 2 361 36.0 42.0 Not very much 3 248 24.7 28.8 Not at all 4 125 12.5 14.5 Can t say 5 19 1.9 2.2 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13H] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the reduction of poverty and social exclusion To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on the reduction of poverty and social exclusion A great deal 1 172 17.1 20.0 A fair amount 2 451 45.0 52.4 Not very much 3 166 16.6 19.3 Not at all 4 56 5.6 6.5 Can t say 5 15 1.5 1.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 30
K13J [K13I] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on moral and ethical issues To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on moral and ethical issues A great deal 1 166 16.6 19.3 A fair amount 2 406 40.5 47.2 Not very much 3 196 19.5 22.8 Not at all 4 70 7.0 8.1 Can t say 5 22 2.2 2.6 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13J] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on crime reduction To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on crime reduction A great deal 1 108 10.8 12.6 A fair amount 2 337 33.6 39.2 Not very much 3 258 25.7 30.0 Not at all 4 131 13.1 15.2 Can t say 5 26 2.6 3.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 31
2. Variables [K13K] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on regional policy To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on regional policy A great deal 1 91 9.1 10.6 A fair amount 2 345 34.4 40.1 Not very much 3 292 29.1 34.0 Not at all 4 110 11.0 12.8 Can t say 5 22 2.2 2.6 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13L] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s public image in terms of the image of Finland To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s public image in terms of the image of Finland A great deal 1 226 22.5 26.3 A fair amount 2 427 42.6 49.7 Not very much 3 138 13.8 16.0 Not at all 4 58 5.8 6.7 Can t say 5 11 1.1 1.3 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 32
K13N [K13M] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on environmental issues To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s views on environmental issues A great deal 1 110 11.0 12.8 A fair amount 2 417 41.6 48.5 Not very much 3 233 23.2 27.1 Not at all 4 82 8.2 9.5 Can t say 5 18 1.8 2.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K13N] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good election campaign To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good election campaign A great deal 1 54 5.4 6.3 A fair amount 2 265 26.4 30.8 Not very much 3 339 33.8 39.4 Not at all 4 191 19.0 22.2 Can t say 5 11 1.1 1.3 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 33
2. Variables [K13O] To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good rating in opinion polls To what extent did the following things influence your choice of candidate: Candidate s good rating in opinion polls A great deal 1 20 2.0 2.3 A fair amount 2 146 14.6 17.0 Not very much 3 275 27.4 32.0 Not at all 4 412 41.1 47.9 Can t say 5 7 0.7 0.8 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K14A] I wanted to vote for a candidate who had a good chance of winning the second round of the elections I wanted to vote for a candidate who had a good chance of winning the second round of the elections Agree 1 243 24.2 28.3 Disagree 2 608 60.6 70.7 Can t say 3 9 0.9 1.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K14B] The candidate I voted for was not my first choice. Instead, I voted for a candidate who had a good chance of being elected to the second round The candidate I voted for was not my first choice. Instead, I voted for a candidate who had a good chance of being elected to the second round 34
K15 Agree 1 83 8.3 9.7 Disagree 2 764 76.2 88.8 Can t say 3 13 1.3 1.5 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K14C] I wanted to vote for the candidate, because opinion polls did not promise him/her a good rating in the first round I wanted to vote for the candidate, because opinion polls did not promise him/her a good rating in the first round Agree 1 36 3.6 4.2 Disagree 2 816 81.4 94.9 Can t say 3 8 0.8 0.9 missing data (SYSMIS). 143 14.3 [K15] (IF DID NOT VOTE) How self-evident was it for you not to vote in the first round? (IF DID NOT VOTE) How self-evident was it for you not to vote in the first round? Self-evident 1 35 3.5 25.0 Thought about voting, but not seriously 2 43 4.3 30.7 Seriously considered voting as an option 3 58 5.8 41.4 Can t say 4 4 0.4 2.9 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 35
2. Variables [K16A] Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not find a suitable candidate Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not find a suitable candidate Important 1 37 3.7 26.4 Quite important 2 26 2.6 18.6 Not at all important 3 74 7.4 52.9 Can t say 4 3 0.3 2.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16B] Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not vote due to a trip, an illness, work obligations etc. Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not vote due to a trip, an illness, work obligations etc. Important 1 51 5.1 36.4 Quite important 2 14 1.4 10.0 Not at all important 3 75 7.5 53.6 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16C] Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not be bothered to vote Importance of various factors in not voting: You could not be bothered to vote 36
Important 1 31 3.1 22.1 Quite important 2 28 2.8 20.0 Not at all important 3 81 8.1 57.9 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 K16E [K16D] Importance of various factors in not voting: You did not think voting would benefit you in any way Importance of various factors in not voting: You did not think voting would benefit you in any way Important 1 30 3.0 21.4 Quite important 2 34 3.4 24.3 Not at all important 3 75 7.5 53.6 Can t say 4 1 0.1 0.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16E] Importance of various factors in not voting: You thought one vote would not make a difference to the final outcome of the elections Importance of various factors in not voting: You thought one vote would not make a difference to the final outcome of the elections Important 1 40 4.0 28.6 Quite important 2 29 2.9 20.7 Not at all important 3 68 6.8 48.6 Can t say 4 3 0.3 2.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 (continued on next page) 37
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [K16F] Importance of various factors in not voting: You do not trust politicians and politics in general Importance of various factors in not voting: You do not trust politicians and politics in general Important 1 34 3.4 24.3 Quite important 2 47 4.7 33.6 Not at all important 3 58 5.8 41.4 Can t say 4 1 0.1 0.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16G] Importance of various factors in not voting: You wanted to protest against politics and politicians Importance of various factors in not voting: You wanted to protest against politics and politicians Important 1 9 0.9 6.4 Quite important 2 21 2.1 15.0 Not at all important 3 108 10.8 77.1 Can t say 4 2 0.2 1.4 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 38
K16J [K16H] Importance of various factors in not voting: You did not have enough information about candidates Importance of various factors in not voting: You did not have enough information about candidates Important 1 18 1.8 12.9 Quite important 2 32 3.2 22.9 Not at all important 3 90 9.0 64.3 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16I] Importance of various factors in not voting: Politics does not interest you Importance of various factors in not voting: Politics does not interest you Important 1 37 3.7 26.4 Quite important 2 42 4.2 30.0 Not at all important 3 61 6.1 43.6 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16J] Importance of various factors in not voting: Presidential elections do not interest you Importance of various factors in not voting: Presidential elections do not interest you 39
2. Variables Important 1 19 1.9 13.6 Quite important 2 34 3.4 24.3 Not at all important 3 87 8.7 62.1 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16K] Importance of various factors in not voting: You had other things to do Importance of various factors in not voting: You had other things to do Important 1 38 3.8 27.1 Quite important 2 28 2.8 20.0 Not at all important 3 74 7.4 52.9 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16L] Importance of various factors in not voting: The decisions and actions of the president have no influence on your life Importance of various factors in not voting: The decisions and actions of the president have no influence on your life Important 1 18 1.8 12.9 Quite important 2 29 2.9 20.7 Not at all important 3 93 9.3 66.4 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 40
[K16M] Importance of various factors in not voting: The candidate you preferred had no chance of getting elected to the second round Importance of various factors in not voting: The candidate you preferred had no chance of getting elected to the second round K17 Important 1 14 1.4 10.0 Quite important 2 15 1.5 10.7 Not at all important 3 110 11.0 78.6 Can t say 4 1 0.1 0.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K16N] Importance of various factors in not voting: Because of miserable weather, you just could not manage to drag yourself to the polling station Importance of various factors in not voting: Because of miserable weather, you just could not manage to drag yourself to the polling station Important 1 2 0.2 1.4 Quite important 2 5 0.5 3.6 Not at all important 3 132 13.2 94.3 Can t say 4 1 0.1 0.7 missing data (SYSMIS). 863 86.0 [K17] Will you vote in the second round or not? Will you vote in the second round or not? 41
2. Variables Yes 1 927 92.4 92.4 No 2 44 4.4 4.4 Don t want to say 3 32 3.2 3.2 [K18] Which one will you vote for in the second round: Esko Aho (KESK, male) or Tarja Halonen (SDP, female) Which one will you vote for in the second round: Esko Aho (KESK, male) or Tarja Halonen (SDP, female) Esko Aho (KESK) 1 316 31.5 34.1 Tarja Halonen (SDP) 2 434 43.3 46.8 Can t say 3 177 17.6 19.1 missing data (SYSMIS). 76 7.6 [K20] Which of the following political parties do you like the most? (If respondent has no preferred party, which party does (s)he dislike the least) Which of the following political parties do you like the most? (If respondent has no preferred party, which party does (s)he dislike the least) Social Democratic Party of Finland (SDP) 1 154 15.4 15.4 Center Party of Finland (KESK) 2 162 16.2 16.2 National Coalition Party (KOK) 3 214 21.3 21.3 Left Alliance (VAS) 4 25 2.5 2.5 Swedish People s Party in Finland (RKP) 5 16 1.6 1.6 Green League (VIHR) 6 153 15.3 15.3 Christian Democrats in Finland (KD) 7 17 1.7 1.7 True Finns (PS) 8 7 0.7 0.7 (continued on next page) 42
K22A (cont. from previous page) Reform Group (REM) 9 8 0.8 0.8 Other party 10 4 0.4 0.4 No party 11 142 14.2 14.2 Can t say 12 101 10.1 10.1 [K21] Which of the following political parties do you like the second most? (If respondent has no preferred party, which does (s)he dislike the second least) Which of the following political parties do you like the second most? (If respondent has no preferred party, which does (s)he dislike the second least) Social Democratic Party of Finland (SDP) 1 138 13.8 18.2 Center Party of Finland (KESK) 2 121 12.1 15.9 National Coalition Party (KOK) 3 132 13.2 17.4 Left Alliance (VAS) 4 25 2.5 3.3 Swedish People s Party in Finland (RKP) 5 24 2.4 3.2 Green League (VIHR) 6 109 10.9 14.3 Christian Democrats in Finland (KD) 7 9 0.9 1.2 True Finns (PS) 8 3 0.3 0.4 Reform Group (REM) 9 12 1.2 1.6 Other party 10 3 0.3 0.4 No party 11 64 6.4 8.4 Can t say 12 120 12.0 15.8 missing data (SYSMIS). 243 24.2 [K22A] Importance in respondent s life: Spending time with friends Importance in respondent s life: Spending time with friends 43
2. Variables Very important 1 657 65.5 65.5 Quite important 2 324 32.3 32.3 Not very important 3 22 2.2 2.2 Not at all important 4 0 0.0 0.0 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [K22B] Importance in respondent s life: Having good manners and following traditions in own life Importance in respondent s life: Having good manners and following traditions in own life Very important 1 463 46.2 46.2 Quite important 2 468 46.7 46.7 Not very important 3 65 6.5 6.5 Not at all important 4 7 0.7 0.7 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [K22C] Importance in respondent s life: Leading enjoyable and exciting life Importance in respondent s life: Leading enjoyable and exciting life Very important 1 285 28.4 28.4 Quite important 2 480 47.9 47.9 Not very important 3 213 21.2 21.2 Not at all important 4 23 2.3 2.3 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 44
K22F [K22D] Importance in respondent s life: Spending time with family Importance in respondent s life: Spending time with family Very important 1 698 69.6 69.6 Quite important 2 269 26.8 26.8 Not very important 3 36 3.6 3.6 Not at all important 4 0 0.0 0.0 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [K22E] Importance in respondent s life: Having plenty of leisure activities Importance in respondent s life: Having plenty of leisure activities Very important 1 216 21.5 21.5 Quite important 2 525 52.3 52.3 Not very important 3 245 24.4 24.4 Not at all important 4 15 1.5 1.5 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 [K22F] Importance in respondent s life: Resting, relaxing, doing nothing Importance in respondent s life: Resting, relaxing, doing nothing Very important 1 223 22.2 22.2 (continued on next page) 45
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) Quite important 2 531 52.9 52.9 Not very important 3 218 21.7 21.7 Not at all important 4 31 3.1 3.1 Can t say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [K22G] Importance in respondent s life: Succeeding in life better than other people Importance in respondent s life: Succeeding in life better than other people Very important 1 94 9.4 9.4 Quite important 2 292 29.1 29.1 Not very important 3 466 46.5 46.5 Not at all important 4 143 14.3 14.3 Can t say 5 8 0.8 0.8 [K22H] Importance in respondent s life: Doing sport, taking exercise Importance in respondent s life: Doing sport, taking exercise Very important 1 375 37.4 37.4 Quite important 2 473 47.2 47.2 Not very important 3 122 12.2 12.2 Not at all important 4 32 3.2 3.2 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 46
K22K [K22I] Importance in respondent s life: Being efficient and productive both in working and private life Importance in respondent s life: Being efficient and productive both in working and private life Very important 1 387 38.6 38.6 Quite important 2 511 50.9 50.9 Not very important 3 90 9.0 9.0 Not at all important 4 13 1.3 1.3 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 [K22J] Importance in respondent s life: Gaining new experiences Importance in respondent s life: Gaining new experiences Very important 1 382 38.1 38.1 Quite important 2 520 51.8 51.8 Not very important 3 91 9.1 9.1 Not at all important 4 8 0.8 0.8 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 [K22K] Importance in respondent s life: Environmentally friendly lifestyle Importance in respondent s life: Environmentally friendly lifestyle 47
2. Variables Very important 1 256 25.5 25.5 Quite important 2 596 59.4 59.4 Not very important 3 133 13.3 13.3 Not at all important 4 15 1.5 1.5 Can t say 5 3 0.3 0.3 [K22L] Importance in respondent s life: Having influence both in working life and outside it Importance in respondent s life: Having influence both in working life and outside it Very important 1 86 8.6 8.6 Quite important 2 333 33.2 33.2 Not very important 3 488 48.7 48.7 Not at all important 4 91 9.1 9.1 Can t say 5 5 0.5 0.5 [K22M] Importance in respondent s life: Healthy lifestyle Importance in respondent s life: Healthy lifestyle Very important 1 380 37.9 37.9 Quite important 2 519 51.7 51.7 Not very important 3 93 9.3 9.3 Not at all important 4 10 1.0 1.0 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 48
K22P [K22N] Importance in respondent s life: Trying to make the world a better place to live in Importance in respondent s life: Trying to make the world a better place to live in Very important 1 355 35.4 35.4 Quite important 2 527 52.5 52.5 Not very important 3 105 10.5 10.5 Not at all important 4 11 1.1 1.1 Can t say 5 5 0.5 0.5 [K22O] Importance in respondent s life: Good income Importance in respondent s life: Good income Very important 1 195 19.4 19.4 Quite important 2 583 58.1 58.1 Not very important 3 204 20.3 20.3 Not at all important 4 20 2.0 2.0 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 [K22P] Importance in respondent s life: Life-long education and self-development also during free time Importance in respondent s life: Life-long education and self-development also during free time 49
2. Variables Very important 1 233 23.2 23.2 Quite important 2 502 50.0 50.0 Not very important 3 220 21.9 21.9 Not at all important 4 47 4.7 4.7 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 [T3] Respondent s vocational education Respondent s vocational education No vocational education 1 324 32.3 32.3 Vocational course, on the job training 2 50 5.0 5.0 Vocational school 3 252 25.1 25.1 Vocational college 4 242 24.1 24.1 University 5 116 11.6 11.6 Other 6 19 1.9 1.9 Don t want to say 7 0 0.0 0.0 [T4] Respondent s present economic activity Respondent s present economic activity Studying 1 395 39.4 39.4 At work full-time 2 403 40.2 40.2 At work part-time 3 50 5.0 5.0 Unemployed or in labour market training for the unemployed 4 84 8.4 8.4 Homemaker 5 47 4.7 4.7 Something else 6 24 2.4 2.4 (continued on next page) 50
T6 (cont. from previous page) Don t want to say 7 0 0.0 0.0 [T5] Respondent s occupational group Respondent s occupational group Higher managerial occupations (salaried) 1 13 1.3 2.9 Lower managerial and professional occupations 2 64 6.4 14.1 Administrative, clerical, secreterial occupations 3 69 6.9 15.2 Worker 4 264 26.3 58.3 Large or small employer, own account worker 5 32 3.2 7.1 Farmer 6 6 0.6 1.3 Student 7 4 0.4 0.9 Homemaker 8 0 0.0 0.0 Unemployed or laid off 9 0 0.0 0.0 Something else 10 0 0.0 0.0 Don t want to or can t say 11 1 0.1 0.2 missing data (SYSMIS). 550 54.8 [T6] Household composition Household composition One-person household 1 215 21.4 21.4 Living with parent(s) 2 217 21.6 21.6 Shared flat (e.g. student housing) 3 64 6.4 6.4 Married/cohabiting, no children 4 299 29.8 29.8 (continued on next page) 51
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) Lone parent with own children 5 9 0.9 0.9 Married/cohabiting with children 6 193 19.2 19.2 Something else 7 6 0.6 0.6 Don t want to say 8 0 0.0 0.0 [T7] Housing tenure Housing tenure Owner occupied 1 428 42.7 42.7 Rented 2 551 54.9 54.9 Right of residence 3 10 1.0 1.0 Something else 4 14 1.4 1.4 Don t want to say 5 0 0.0 0.0 [T8] Have you been unemployed in the past 12 months? Have you been unemployed in the past 12 months? Yes 1 217 21.6 21.6 No 2 785 78.3 78.3 Can t say 3 1 0.1 0.1 [T9] If yes, how many months in total? If yes, how many months in total? 52
T12C1 Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 217 minimum 0.00 maximum 12.00 mean 4.15 standard deviation 3.25 [T10] Have you been unemployed for at least six months in the past three years? Have you been unemployed for at least six months in the past three years? Yes 1 164 16.4 16.4 No 2 838 83.5 83.5 Can t say 3 1 0.1 0.1 [T11] Do you have... Do you have... Fixed-line telephone at home 1 42 4.2 4.2 Only a mobile phone 2 450 44.9 44.9 Both mobile and fixed-line telephone at home 3 511 50.9 50.9 Can t say 4 0 0.0 0.0 [T12C1] Do you use the Internet: At home Do you use the Internet: At home 53
2. Variables Not mentioned 0 675 67.3 67.3 Mentioned 1 328 32.7 32.7 [T12C2] Do you use the Internet: At workplace Do you use the Internet: At workplace Not mentioned 0 759 75.7 75.7 Mentioned 1 244 24.3 24.3 [T12C3] Do you use the Internet: At an educational facility Do you use the Internet: At an educational facility Not mentioned 0 674 67.2 67.2 Mentioned 1 329 32.8 32.8 [T12C4] Do you use the Internet: In the library Do you use the Internet: In the library 54
Not mentioned 0 904 90.1 90.1 Mentioned 1 99 9.9 9.9 T12C7 [T12C5] Do you use the Internet: Somewhere else Do you use the Internet: Somewhere else Not mentioned 0 924 92.1 92.1 Mentioned 1 79 7.9 7.9 [T12C6] Do you use the Internet: Nowhere Do you use the Internet: Nowhere Not mentioned 0 769 76.7 76.7 Mentioned 1 234 23.3 23.3 [T12C7] Do you use the Internet: Can t say Do you use the Internet: Can t say Not mentioned 0 (continued on next page) 55
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) Mentioned 1 0 0.0 0.0 [T13] How often do you use the Internet? How often do you use the Internet? Daily, several times a day 1 210 20.9 27.3 On 5-7 days a week 2 141 14.1 18.3 On 3-4 days a week 3 114 11.4 14.8 On 1-2 days a week 4 167 16.7 21.7 More rarely 5 137 13.7 17.8 Can t say 6 0 0.0 0.0 missing data (SYSMIS). 234 23.3 [T14] Next general election will be the municipal elections. How certain are you that you will vote in them? Next general election will be the municipal elections. How certain are you that you will vote in them? Will certainly vote 1 379 37.8 37.8 Will probably vote 2 413 41.2 41.2 Will probably not vote 3 157 15.7 15.7 Will certainly not vote 4 31 3.1 3.1 Can t say 5 23 2.3 2.3 56