ENTSO-E s Ten Year Network Development Plan. Jussi Jyrinsalo Fingrid Oyj

Koko: px

Aloita esitys sivulta:

Download "ENTSO-E s Ten Year Network Development Plan. Jussi Jyrinsalo Fingrid Oyj"

Kaarlo Hukkanen
7 vuotta sitten
Katselukertoja:

1 ENTSO-E s Ten Year Network Development Plan Jussi Jyrinsalo Fingrid Oyj Neuvottelukunta

2 The Ten-year Network development plan at a glance Identification of all challenges in building the necessary infrastructure Regulation (EC) 714/2009 Regulation (EC) 347/2013

3 What is new in the TYNDP 2014? Exploration up to 2030 New clustering rules for projects of pan-european significance Full quantification of projects assessment according to the CBA (assessment of all PCIs) Target interconnection capacities thanks to an improved interactive process

4 Energy Policy Goals Require significant increase in grid capacity Ensuring the development of a single European grid in line with targets and upcoming 2030 targets EIP Guaranteeing security of supply Completing the internal energy market

The Ten-year Network development plan 2014: main findings 150

for bulk power prices by 2030 50000 km of new or refurbished

8%) of the total TYNDP projects routes Contribution with 20% of

5 The Ten-year Network development plan 2014: main findings 150 billions for projects of pan-e significance by to -5 /MWh for bulk power prices by km of new or refurbished grid investments by 2030: +1%/year An optimised land use: the crossed urbanised (resp. protected) areas account for less than 4% (resp. 8%) of the total TYNDP projects routes Contribution with 20% of the CO2 emissions mitigation for the European power sector by 2030 Integration of RES up to 40-60% of total consumption in 2030

refurbished investments 21000 km of new HVDC

6 Taylor made solutions, adapted to every specific situation km of new or refurbished investments km of new HVDC lines 15% of all investments are upgrade of existing assets

7 Interconnection capacity must on average double by 2030

8 Transmission adequacy by 2030 Integration of iberian peninsula is the main concern Solution concepts must still become tangible projects to meet highest RES development goals (Vision 4)

9 TYNDP 2014 next steps 10 July 20 September 2014 web based stakeholder consultation 4 September TYNDP 2014 stakeholder workshop End October TYNDP 2014 submission to ACER for opinion End 2014 final TYNDP 2014

10 TYNDP 2014: Scenarios

11 Bottom-up scenarios Top-down scenarios

4 contrasting Visions Total X-border Exch. 605 TWh Demand incl. Pumping 4167 TWh RES Penetration 49% CO2 Reduction (1990) 62% Total X-border Exch. 734 TWh Demand incl.

12 4 contrasting Visions Total X-border Exch. 605 TWh Demand incl. Pumping 4167 TWh RES Penetration 49% CO2 Reduction (1990) 62% Total X-border Exch. 734 TWh Demand incl. Pumping 4327 TWh RES Penetration 60% CO2 Reduction (1990) 78% Total X-border Exch. 660 TWh Demand incl. Pumping 3610 TWh RES Penetration 41% CO2 Reduction (1990) 42% Total X-border Exch. 757 TWh Demand incl. Pumping 3712 TWh RES Penetration 40% CO2 Reduction (1990) 36%

13 Regional view Baltic Sea Region

14 Key findings in Baltic Sea Region In studied visions main flow direction North to South. One of the main drivers in the Baltic Sea region is an expected Nordic surplus Interconnections between Nordics and Central Europe highly beneficial, European goal to integrate energy peninsulas; Baltic States integration to European energy markets In total the Regional Investment Plan assesses an investment portfolio of about billion Euros for the countries within the Baltic Sea Region. Germany is having the largest investment portfolio. Delays caused by authorization process a challenge.

Identified areas of interest for 2020-2030 horizon 1. Arctic area new consumption and RES 1 2. North-south flow through Norway/Sweden/Finland 3.

15 Identified areas of interest for horizon 1. Arctic area new consumption and RES 1 2. North-south flow through Norway/Sweden/Finland 3. Increased capacity Nordics Continental Europe/UK 4. North-South through Baltic States 5. Power flow control on Russian border 6. Baltics synchronous operation with Continental Europe December 2014 Page 15

16 Main flows from North to South Main flows in Visions 1&2 Main flows in Visions 3&4 8 December 2014

17 Power, MW Variation of flow btw FI-SE in visions Sweden to Finland Vision 1 Vision 2 Vision 3 Series4 Vision Green hours 8 December 2014

18 Project package mid term & long term Midterm Projects Long term projects 8 December 2014

19 Suunnitelman merkitys Suomelle + Yhteistyö verkkosuunnittelussa + Euroopan tasolla tunnistettu kantaverkon vahvistusten tarve energiapolitiikan toteuttamisessa + Euroopan tasolla tunnistettu sujuvan luvituksen tärkeys + Tukea johtohankkeiden yleiselle hyväksyttävyydelle + Mahdollisuutena tuki tärkeän Suomi-Ruotsi hankkeen eteenpäinviemiseksi + Mahdollisuus myös tärkeiden hankkeiden rahoitukseen ei kuitenkaan todennäköistä Suomen hankkeille - Uhkakuvana regulaatiossa oleva mahdollisuus kustannusten jakamiseen tärkeiksi nimettyjen (PCI) hankkeiden eteenpäin saattamiseksi - Suunnittelun Brysselvetoisuus vie lähtöoletuksia kauemmas suomalaisesta ja pohjoismaisesta todellisuudesta

Samankaltaiset tiedostot

Suurten energiahankkeiden merkitys sähköverkolle. ATS-jäsentilaisuus 12.2.2015 VTT, Otaniemi

Suurten energiahankkeiden merkitys sähköverkolle ATS-jäsentilaisuus 12.2.2015 VTT, Otaniemi Fingrid lyhyesti Eurooppalainen sähköverkon kehitys Sähköverkon kehittäminen Suomessa Fingrid Oyj Suomi toimii