FSD2649. Finnish Working Life Barometer Codebook

FSD2649 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2010 Codebook FINNISH SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA ARCHIVE

The bibliographic citation for this codebook: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2010 [codebook]. Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor], 2017. This codebook has been generated from the version 1.2 (15.8.2012) of the data. Finnish Social Science Data Archive FIN-33014 University of Tampere FSD User Services: asiakaspalvelu.fsd@uta.fi +358 40 190 1442 Aila Data Service Portal: https://services.fsd.uta.fi/ Finnish Social Science Data Archive http://www.fsd.uta.fi/en/ $ Koodikirjoitin.py v34 @ 2017-05-12 17:33:17.257000 $

To the reader This codebook is part of the data FSD2649 archived at the FSD (Finnish Social Science Data Archive).The dataset has been described in as much detail as possible in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, variable and value labels, and missing values have been checked. If necessary, the data have been anonymised. The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication. The bibliographic citation suggested by the archive: Ministry of Employment and the Economy & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2010 [dataset]. Version 1.2 (2012-08-15). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:t-fsd2649 The user shall notify the archive of all publications where she or he has used the data. The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data. The codebook contains information on data content, structure and data collection, and includes a list of publications wholly or in part based on the data, according to publication information received by the FSD. The second part of the codebook contains information on variables: question texts, response options, and frequencies. The third part contains indexes. Variable distributions presented in this codebook have been generated from the SPSS files. Distribution tables present variable values, frequencies (n), frequency percentages (%), and valid percentages (v. %) which take into account missing data. All distributions are unweighted. If the data contain weight variables, these will be found at the end of the variables list. In some cases frequency distributions have been substituted by descriptive statistics. Categorised responses to open-ended questions are not always included in the codebook. Distributions may contain missing data. The note "System missing (SYSMIS)" refers to missing observations (e.g. a respondent has not answered all questions) whereas "Missing (User missing)" refers to data the user has defined as missing. For example, the user may decide to code answer alternatives don t want to say or can t say as missing data. The codebook may contain attached files, the most common one being the questionnaire.

Contents 1 Study description 1 1.1 Titles....................................... 1 1.2 Subject description................................ 1 1.3 Structure and collection of the data........................ 3 1.4 Use of data.................................... 4 2 Variables 7 3 Indexes 73 3.1 Variables in the order of occurrence....................... 73 3.2 Variables in alphabetical order.......................... 80 A naire in Finnish 87 i

Chapter 1 Study description 1.1 Titles Titles and data version: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2010 Titles and data version in Finnish: Työolobarometri 2010 This codebook has been generated from the version 1.2 (15.8.2012) of the data. 1.2 Subject description Authoring entity Ministry of Employment and the Economy Statistics Finland Copyright statement for the data According to the agreement between FSD and the depositor. Depositor Siikanen, Antti (Statistics Finland. Interview and Survey Services) Date of deposit 17.6.2011 1

1. Study description Keywords autonomy at work; discrimination; economic recession; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; local bargaining; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; wages; working conditions; working time; workloads Topic Classification Classification by FSD vocabulary: sociology of work; welfare studies Classification by CESSDA vocabulary: employment; equality and inequality; labour relations/conflict; social behaviour and attitudes; working conditions Series description The data belong to the series: Finnish Working Life Barometers Finnish Working Life Barometers are annual surveys investigating employee opinions on changes in working life in Finland. The survey series was launched in 1992 and is conducted by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy. Many questions and themes have remained the same over the years. Main themes include employment, economy, staff numbers, autonomy, organisation and flexibility of work, and psychosocial work environment. Data are collected through telephone interviews in connection with the Labour Force Surveys of Statistics Finland. Abstract The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finland. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay systems, satisfaction with the job, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, and bullying and discrimination at work. The year 2010 survey contained new questions on local bargaining on working hours/time arrangements and pay systems. First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, and what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers, working hours, contracts, and tasks during the past 12 months, and whether people had been transferred to other units. A number of questions pertained to co-operation negotiations, their process and results. Further questions covered team work, whether there had been conflicts at the workplace, between what groups and whether the conflicts had decreased or increased over the past 12 months. Incidents of bullying, harassment and violence were charted. Next set of questions investigated the respondent s autonomy and influence at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, and R s membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload, physical or mental stress, in access to training etc were explored as well as pay 2

1.3. Structure and collection of the data and bonus systems, and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether employees were treated equally, was there support for trying new things and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents participation in job-related training and development was investigated. One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks or working hours would be changed over the next year. Views were probed on the employer s financial situation, effects of the economic recession on the workplace, employment situation in Finland and possible changes in working life. A number of questions investigated how the employees capacity to work and occupational health and safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents sickness absences, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored. Background variables included the respondent s year of birth, age, gender, region, type of municipality, education, economic activity, status in employment, industry of employment, occupational group, employer type, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. The other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2010 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview. 1.3 Structure and collection of the data Country: Finland Geographic coverage: Finland Analysis or observation unit type: Individual Universe: Finnish-speaking employees aged 18-64 who worked at least 10 hours a week Collection date: 6.9.2010 14.10.2010 Data collector(s): Statistics Finland Mode of data collection: Telephone interview Type of research instrument: Structured questionnaire Time period covered: 2010 Time method of the data collection: Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section Response rate: 83% Number of variables and cases: The data contain 144 variables and 1053 cases. Sampling procedure: Probability: Simple random Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2010, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15-74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, Finnish-speaking employees who had responded being em- 3

1. Study description ployed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer. Data sources: Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2010 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 23 Nov 2011]. 1.4 Use of data Related publications Hartonen, Suvi (2012). Vaikutusvaltainen ja mielekäs työ? Tutkimus palkansaajien työhyvinvoinnista työhön liittyvien vaikutusmahdollisuuksien ja työnteon mielekkyyden osalta. Turku: Turun yliopisto. Taloussosiologian pro gradu -tutkielma. Koivula, Aki (2014). Joustavien työaikajärjestelyjen jakaantuminen Suomessa. Palkansaaja- ja organisaatiotason tarkastelua vuosina 2000 ja 2010. Turku: Turun yliopisto. Taloussosiologian pro gradu -tutkielma. Koivula, Aki (2015): Joustava työaika, parempi työ? Työajan ja työn laadullisten tekijöiden tarkastelua vuosina 2009-2013. Teoksessa: Koivula, Aki & Oksanen, Janna & Räsänen, Pekka (eds) Economic and Sociological Studies in Turbulent Times. Working Papers in Economic Sociology (VII). University of Turku: Turku, 1-26. Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2010. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrin 2010 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2011) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/1982/kunta-alan_tyoolobarometri_2010.pdf [viitattu 13.7.2012]. Laine, P. & Lindberg, M. & Silvennoinen, H. (2016) Työhyvinvoinnista tarvitaan väestötason seurantatietoa. Työhyvinvoinnin käsite ja mittaamisen problematisointia ja kehittelyä. Hallinnon tutkimus 35 (4), 257-273. Laukkanen, E. (2012). Työn laatu Suomessa: Mitä työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrista koostetusta laatuindeksistä jää käteen? Työelämän tutkimus 2/2012, 188-197. Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2012) Ikääntyvien koulutus monimuotoistuvassa työelämässä. Finnish Journal for Adult Education, Aikuiskasvatus 32 (3), 177-189. Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2013). Työelämän koulutuksen etujoukko. Teoksessa: Työelämän tutkimuspäivät 2012. Suomella töissä? Kestämistä ja kestävyyttä (toim. Virkajärvi, Marjukka), 235-252. Työelämän tutkimuspäivien konferenssijulkaisuja 4/2013. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto. Yhteiskunta- ja kulttuuritieteiden yksikkö. Työelämän tutkimuskeskus. http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:978-951-44-9063-7 Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2014) Koulutuksen ja oppimisen marginaalissa. Teoksessa K. Brunila & U. Isopahkala-Bouret (toim.) Marginaalin voima, 102-127. Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura. Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2017) In the Margins of Workplace Learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 29 (3), 185-199. Uronen, Katri (2012). Nuoret aikuiset. Innokkaita työmyyriä vai työelämän uuvuttamia muuleja? Nuorten aikuisten kokemukset työelämän epävarmuudesta ja työhyvinvoinnista Suomessa suh- 4

1.4. Use of data teessa muihin palkansaajiin aikajaksolla 2005-2010. Turku: Turun yliopisto. Sosiaalipolitiikan pro gradu -tutkielma. Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2011). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2010. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 25/2011. Updated list of publications in the study description at https://services.fsd.uta.fi/catalogue/fsd2649?lang=en&study_language=en Related studies FSD2755 Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2010 Related material Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2011). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2010. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 25/2011. http://www.tem.fi/files/3 [viitattu 3.8.2011]. Location of the data collection Finnish Social Science Data Archive Weighting There are no weight variables in the data. Restrictions The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study. 5

Chapter 2 Variables [FSD_NO] FSD Study number FSD Study number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 2649.00 maximum 2649.00 mean 2649.00 standard deviation 0.00 [FSD_VR] FSD edition number FSD edition number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 1.00 maximum 1.00 mean 1.00 standard deviation 0.00 7

2. Variables [FSD_PRO] FSD processing level FSD processing level A (see codebook) 1 B (see codebook) 2 0 0.0 0.0 C (dataset has not been checked at FSD) 3 0 0.0 0.0 [FSD_ID] FSD case id FSD case id Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 1.00 maximum 1053.00 mean 527.00 standard deviation 304.12 [KOHDENRO] Case id Case id Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 1300024.00 maximum 93340478.00 (continued on next page) 8

SUKUP (cont. from previous page) statistic value mean 12665957.40 standard deviation 29428779.11 [SYVU] The respondent s year of birth The respondent s year of birth Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 1945.00 maximum 1992.00 mean 1967.27 standard deviation 12.03 [IKA] The respondent s age The respondent s age Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 18.00 maximum 64.00 mean 42.48 standard deviation 12.03 [SUKUP] The respondent s gender The respondent s gender 9

2. Variables Male 1 568 53.9 53.9 Female 2 485 46.1 46.1 [AVI] Regional State Administrative Agency area (AVI) Regional State Administrative Agency area (AVI) Capital area AVI 0 202 19.2 19.2 Southern Finland ELY Centre 1 215 20.4 20.4 Southwestern Finland AVI 2 163 15.5 15.5 Eastern Finland AVI 3 136 12.9 12.9 Western and Inland Finland AVI 4 223 21.2 21.2 Northern Finland AVI 5 86 8.2 8.2 Lapland AVI 6 27 2.6 2.6 State Department of Åland 7 1 0.1 0.1 [ELY] Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (ELY) Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (ELY) Capital area ELY Centre 0 202 19.2 19.2 Uusimaa ELY Centre 1 86 8.2 8.2 Southwest Finland ELY Centre 2 99 9.4 9.4 Satakunta ELY Centre 3 64 6.1 6.1 Häme ELY Centre 4 65 6.2 6.2 Pirkanmaa ELY Centre 5 84 8.0 8.0 Souteastern Finland ELY Centre 6 64 6.1 6.1 South Savo ELY Centre 7 28 2.7 2.7 (continued on next page) 10

UKASTE (cont. from previous page) North Savo ELY Centre 8 61 5.8 5.8 North Karelia ELY Centre 9 47 4.5 4.5 Central Finland ELY Centre 10 67 6.4 6.4 South Ostrobothnia ELY Centre 11 43 4.1 4.1 Ostrobothnia ELY Centre 12 29 2.8 2.8 North Ostrobothnia ELY Centre 13 66 6.3 6.3 Kainuu ELY Centre 14 20 1.9 1.9 Lapland ELY Centre 15 27 2.6 2.6 Åland 16 1 0.1 0.1 [KUMU] Type of municipality of residence Type of municipality of residence Urban municipality 1 794 75.4 75.4 Non-urban municipality 2 259 24.6 24.6 [UKASTE] The respondent s education The respondent s education Primary or lower secondary education, or not known 0 143 13.6 13.6 Upper secondary education, general or vocational 3 494 46.9 46.9 Lowest-level tertiary education 5 155 14.7 14.7 Lower-degree tertiary education 6 135 12.8 12.8 Higher-degree tertiary education 7 113 10.7 10.7 Doctorate or equivalent tertiary education 8 13 1.2 1.2 (continued on next page) 11

2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [LTOL02] Industry of employment Industry of employment Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 10.00 maximum 999.00 mean 602.45 standard deviation 232.85 [TOIMI] Employer sector Type of organisation Industry/construction/mining 1 254 24.1 24.1 Private services 2 452 42.9 42.9 Central government 3 80 7.6 7.6 Local government 4 237 22.5 22.5 Other 9 30 2.8 2.8 [TYVO] The respondent s employment status The respondent s employment status 12

LSOSEK Employed 1 1031 97.9 97.9 Unemployed 2 4 0.4 0.4 In military or civil service (not employed) 3 0 0.0 0.0 Other non-employed 4 18 1.7 1.7 [LAMMAS] The respondent s status in employment The respondent s status in employment Employee 1 Entrepreneur, self-employed, own-account worker 2 0 0.0 0.0 Unpaid contributing family worker 3 0 0.0 0.0 [LTYTYY] Employer type Employer type State, government agency/department 1 84 8.0 8.0 Municipality, federation of municipalities 2 238 22.6 22.6 Private company 3 728 69.1 69.1 No information 9 3 0.3 0.3 [LSOSEK] The respondent s socio-economic group The respondent s socio-economic group 13

2. Variables Higher managerial employee 31 84 8.0 8.0 Lower management/professional in research and 32 95 9.0 9.0 planning Lower management/professional in teaching 33 45 4.3 4.3 Other lower management/professional employee 34 89 8.5 8.5 Management/professional employee, unspecified 39 0 0.0 0.0 Intermediate level employee with supervisory duties 41 84 8.0 8.0 Clerical, sales, administrative duties, independent 42 128 12.2 12.2 work Clerical, sales, administrative duties, routine work 43 23 2.2 2.2 Other lower-level employee with admin and clerical 44 173 16.4 16.5 duties Other lower-level employee, unspecified 49 0 0.0 0.0 Worker in agriculture, forestry and commercial fishing 51 16 1.5 1.5 Manufacturing worker 52 139 13.2 13.2 Other production worker 53 52 4.9 4.9 Distribution and service worker 54 123 11.7 11.7 Worker, unspecified 59 0 0.0 0.0 No information 99 0 0.0 0.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [TAIKAO] Full-time or part-time work Full-time or part-time work Full-time 1 921 87.5 89.4 Part-time 2 109 10.4 10.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 23 2.2 [SAANAI] Regular working hours per week Regular working hours per week Descriptive statistics 14

STOL02 statistic value number of valid cases 1030 minimum 4.00 maximum 90.00 mean 37.51 standard deviation 7.33 [SIVUTYO] Does the repondent have additional job(s) in addition to his/her main job? Does the repondent have additional job(s) in addition to his/her main job? Yes 1 37 3.5 3.6 No 2 994 94.4 96.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 22 2.1 [SIVUTUNN] Working hours for the additional job (hours per week) Working hours for the additional job (hours per week) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 44 minimum 0.00 maximum 80.00 mean 9.11 standard deviation 13.17 [STOL02] Industry of the respondent s additional job Industry of the respondent s additional job 15

2. Variables Agriculture, hunting and related service activities 10 4 0.4 9.1 Forestry, logging and related service activities 20 2 0.2 4.5 Fishing, fish farming and related service activities 50 0 0.0 0.0 Mining of coal and lignite; extraction of peat 100 0 0.0 0.0 Extraction of crude petroleum/natural gas, rel service 110 0 0.0 0.0 activ Mining of uranium and thorium ores 120 0 0.0 0.0 Mining of metal ores 130 0 0.0 0.0 Other mining and quarrying 140 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of food products (151-158) 151 1 0.1 2.3 Manufacture of beverages 159 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of tobacco products 160 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of textiles 170 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing 180 0 0.0 0.0 of fur Manufacture of leather and leather products (191-191 0 0.0 0.0 192) Manufacture of footwear 193 0 0.0 0.0 Sawmilling and planing of wood; impregnation of 201 0 0.0 0.0 wood Manufacture of veneer sheets and other panels and 202 0 0.0 0.0 boards Manufacture of builders carpentry and joinery (203-203 0 0.0 0.0 205) Manufacture of pulp, paper and paperboard 211 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of articles of paper and paperboard 212 0 0.0 0.0 Publishing, printing and reproduction of recorded media 220 2 0.2 4.5 Manufacture of coke/refined petroleum products/nuclear 230 0 0.0 0.0 fuel Manufacture of basic chemicals 241 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of chemical products, man-made fibres 242 0 0.0 0.0 (242-247) Manufacture of rubber products 251 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of plastics products 252 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of non-metallic mineral products (glass, 260 0 0.0 0.0 clay..) Manufacture of basic metals 270 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of fabricated metal products, not machinery 280 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c. 290 1 0.1 2.3 Manufacture of office machinery and computers 300 0 0.0 0.0 (continued on next page) 16

STOL02 (cont. from previous page) Manufacture of electrical machinery and apparatus n.e.c. 310 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of radio/television/communication 320 0 0.0 0.0 equipment Manufacture of medical/precision/optical instruments, 330 0 0.0 0.0 clocks Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers 340 0 0.0 0.0 Building and repairing of ships and boats 351 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacture of other transport equipment n.e.c. (352-352 0 0.0 0.0 355) Manufacture of furniture 361 0 0.0 0.0 Manufacturing n.e.c. (362-366) 362 0 0.0 0.0 Recycling 370 0 0.0 0.0 Electricity, gas, steam and hot water supply 400 0 0.0 0.0 Collection, purification and distribution of water 410 0 0.0 0.0 Construction, civil engineering (451, 45219, 451 0 0.0 0.0 4523,4524) General construction of buildings (45211, 4522) 452 0 0.0 0.0 Building installation, building completion (4525, 453, 453 0 0.0 0.0 454) Renting of construction or demolition equipment with 455 0 0.0 0.0 operator Sale of motor vehicles (501, 503, 504) 501 0 0.0 0.0 Maintenance and repair of motor vehicles 502 0 0.0 0.0 Retail sale of automotive fuel 505 0 0.0 0.0 Wholesale trade and commission trade, not motor vehicles 510 2 0.2 4.5 Retail trade (521-526) 521 1 0.1 2.3 Repair of personal and household goods 527 0 0.0 0.0 Hotels, other provision of short-stay accommodation 551 0 0.0 0.0 (551-552) Restaurants, cafés, bars, food kiosks, catering (553-553 2 0.2 4.5 555) Transport via railways 601 0 0.0 0.0 Other land transport (602-603) 602 2 0.2 4.5 Water transport 610 0 0.0 0.0 Air transport 620 0 0.0 0.0 Travel agency/supporting and auxiliary transport activities 630 0 0.0 0.0 Post and courier activities 641 0 0.0 0.0 Telecommunications 642 0 0.0 0.0 (continued on next page) 17

2. Variables (cont. from previous page) Financial intermediation, not insurance and pension 650 0 0.0 0.0 funding Insurance and pension funding,not compulsory social 660 0 0.0 0.0 security Activities auxiliary to financial intermediation 670 0 0.0 0.0 Real estate activities 700 0 0.0 0.0 Renting of machinery/equipment/personal and household 710 0 0.0 0.0 goods Computer and related activities 720 1 0.1 2.3 Research and development 730 0 0.0 0.0 Legal, accounting, book-keeping and auditing activ; 741 1 0.1 2.3 surveys Technical consultancy, testing and analysis (742-743) 742 0 0.0 0.0 Advertising 744 0 0.0 0.0 Labour recruitment and provision of personnel 745 0 0.0 0.0 Investigation and security activities 746 0 0.0 0.0 Industrial cleaning 747 1 0.1 2.3 Miscellaneous business activities n.e.c. 748 2 0.2 4.5 Admin. of the State; economic/social policy of the 751 0 0.0 0.0 community Provision of services to the community as a whole 752 1 0.1 2.3 Compulsory social security activities 753 0 0.0 0.0 Primary and secondary education (801-802) 801 0 0.0 0.0 Higher education 803 1 0.1 2.3 Adult and other education 804 3 0.3 6.8 Human health activities 851 3 0.3 6.8 Veterinary activities 852 0 0.0 0.0 Child day care (some activities in 853 moved into 853 0 0.0 0.0 854) (85321) Other social work activity (new category) (8531, 854 2 0.2 4.5 85322-85329) Sewage and refuse disposal, sanitation and similar activities 900 0 0.0 0.0 Activities of business/ employer/professional organizations 911 0 0.0 0.0 Activities of religious organizations (9131) 913 0 0.0 0.0 Act. of other membership organizations n.e.c. (new 914 0 0.0 0.0 category) Recreational, cultural and sporting activities 920 11 1.0 25.0 Washing/dry-cleaning of textile/fur products (new 931 0 0.0 0.0 cat) (9301) Other service activities n.e.c. (new category) (9302-9305) 932 0 0.0 0.0 (continued on next page) 18

SVUOKRA (cont. from previous page) Activities of households as employers of domestic 950 0 0.0 0.0 staff Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 970 0 0.0 0.0 Industry unknown 999 1 0.1 2.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1009 95.8 [VUOKRATY] Is the respondent a temporary agency employee (in main job)? Is the respondent a temporary agency employee (in main job)? Yes 1 10 0.9 0.9 No 2 1043 99.1 99.1 [SVUOKRA] Is the respondent a temprorary agency employee (in additional job)? Is the respondent a temprorary agency employee (in additional job)? Yes 1 1 0.1 3.7 No 2 26 2.5 96.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1026 97.4 19

2. Variables [K1] How many years in total have you been working at your current workplace? How many years in total have you been working at this workplace? Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1053 minimum 0.00 maximum 46.00 mean 10.29 standard deviation 10.44 [K1B] Is your job... Is your job... Permanent 1 916 87.0 87.0 Fixed-term 2 133 12.6 12.6 Can t say 3 4 0.4 0.4 [K2] Number of people in the workplace Number of people in the workplace 1-4 1 111 10.5 10.6 5-9 2 164 15.6 15.6 (continued on next page) 20

K4_1 (cont. from previous page) 10-19 3 207 19.7 19.7 20-29 4 100 9.5 9.5 30-49 5 115 10.9 11.0 50-99 6 133 12.6 12.7 100-199 7 80 7.6 7.6 200-249 8 29 2.8 2.8 250-499 9 49 4.7 4.7 500-999 10 33 3.1 3.1 1000 or more 11 29 2.8 2.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [K3] Has the number of people working in the workplace increased, stayed the same or decreased over the past 12 months? Has the number of people working in the workplace increased, stayed the same or decreased over the past 12 months? Has increased 1 256 24.3 24.3 Has stayed the same 2 515 48.9 48.9 Has decreased 3 257 24.4 24.4 Can t say 4 25 2.4 2.4 [K4_1] (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on permanent contracts (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on permanent contracts 21

2. Variables Yes 1 163 15.5 63.7 No 2 78 7.4 30.5 Can t say 3 15 1.4 5.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 797 75.7 [K4_2] (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on fixed-term or temporary contracts (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on fixed-term or temporary contracts Yes 1 161 15.3 62.9 No 2 79 7.5 30.9 Can t say 3 16 1.5 6.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 797 75.7 [K4_3] (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on part-time contracts (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been hired on part-time contracts Yes 1 64 6.1 25.0 No 2 171 16.2 66.8 Can t say 3 21 2.0 8.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 797 75.7 22

K5_1 [K4_4] (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been transferred from other units of the same employer (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People have been transferred from other units of the same employer Yes 1 69 6.6 27.0 No 2 179 17.0 69.9 Can t say 3 8 0.8 3.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 797 75.7 [K4_5] (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People hired are paid from employment subsidies (IF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAS INCREASED): In what way has the number increased: People hired are paid from employment subsidies Yes 1 39 3.7 15.2 No 2 179 17.0 69.9 Can t say 3 38 3.6 14.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 797 75.7 [K5_1] In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been laid off? In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been laid off? 23

2. Variables Yes 1 192 18.2 18.2 No 2 834 79.2 79.2 Can t say 3 27 2.6 2.6 [K5_2] In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been dismissed? In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been dismissed? Yes 1 155 14.7 14.7 No 2 849 80.6 80.6 Can t say 3 49 4.7 4.7 [K5_3] In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been put on short-time working? In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been transferred to shortened working week? Yes 1 112 10.6 10.6 No 2 892 84.7 84.8 Can t say 3 48 4.6 4.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 24

K5_6 [K5_4] In your workplace over the past year: Have any previously full-time employees been transferred to working part-time? In your workplace over the past year: Have any previously full-time employees been transferred to working part-time? Yes 1 36 3.4 3.4 No 2 969 92.0 92.0 Can t say 3 48 4.6 4.6 [K5_5] In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees retired or left their jobs, and not been replaced? In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees retired or left their jobs, and not been replaced? Yes 1 279 26.5 26.5 No 2 711 67.5 67.5 Can t say 3 63 6.0 6.0 [K5_6] In your workplace over the past year: Have employee numbers reduced because fixed-term contracts have not been renewed? In your workplace over the past year: Have employee numbers reduced because fixed-term contracts have not been renewed? 25

2. Variables Yes 1 188 17.9 17.9 No 2 789 74.9 74.9 Can t say 3 76 7.2 7.2 [K5_7] In your workplace over the past year: Have employee numbers reduced because employees on maternity or sick leave or otherwise long-term absent have not been replaced? In your workplace over the past year: Have employee numbers reduced because employees on maternity or sick leave or otherwise long-term absent have not been replaced? Yes 1 150 14.2 14.2 No 2 836 79.4 79.4 Can t say 3 67 6.4 6.4 [K5_8] In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been transferred to other units of the same employer? In your workplace over the past year: Have any employees been transferred to other units of the same employer? Yes 1 196 18.6 18.6 No 2 815 77.4 77.4 Can t say 3 42 4.0 4.0 26

K5_12 [K5_9] In your workplace over the past year: Have any temporary agency employees been used? In your workplace over the past year: Have any temporary agency employees been used? Yes 1 194 18.4 18.4 No 2 807 76.6 76.6 Can t say 3 52 4.9 4.9 [K5_11] In your workplace over the past year: Have any co-operation negotiations been conducted? (Transl. note: Co-op. negot. are required by the law if an employer wants to dismiss or lay off staff or transfer employees to part-time work) In your workplace over the past year: Have any co-operation negotiations been conducted? (Transl. note: Co-op. negot. are required by the law if an employer wants to dismiss or lay off staff or transfer employees to part-time work) Yes, have been conducted/are being conducted at 1 207 19.7 19.7 present No 2 815 77.4 77.5 Can t say, don t know 3 30 2.8 2.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K5_12] (IF CO-OPERATION NEGOTIATIONS CONDUCTED): What was the atmosphere of the negotiations like? Was there an attempt to come to an agreement together? (IF CO-OPERATION NEGOTIATIONS CONDUCTED): What was the atmosphere of the negotiations like? Was there an attempt to come to an agreement together? 27

2. Variables A lot of attempt 1 41 3.9 19.9 Some 2 68 6.5 33.0 Not very much 3 33 3.1 16.0 Not at all 4 30 2.8 14.6 Can t say 5 34 3.2 16.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 847 80.4 [K8] Do people work in groups in your workplace (teams, cells, project groups etc)? Do people work in groups in your workplace (teams, cells, project groups etc)? Yes, for the most part 1 346 32.9 33.0 Yes, part of the time 2 465 44.2 44.3 No, not at all 3 239 22.7 22.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [K9A_01] Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between supervisors/line managers and subordinates? Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between supervisors/line managers and subordinates? Yes, a great deal 1 22 2.1 2.1 Yes, a fair amount 2 51 4.8 4.9 Yes, some 3 603 57.3 58.4 No, none at all 4 356 33.8 34.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 21 2.0 (continued on next page) 28

K9A_03 (cont. from previous page) [K9A_02] Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between co-workers? Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between co-workers? Yes, a great deal 1 7 0.7 0.7 Yes, a fair amount 2 24 2.3 2.3 Yes, some 3 536 50.9 51.8 No, none at all 4 467 44.3 45.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 19 1.8 [K9A_03] Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between different staff groups? Are there in your workplace: Conflicts between different staff groups? Yes, a great deal 1 4 0.4 0.4 Yes, a fair amount 2 22 2.1 2.2 Yes, some 3 361 34.3 36.7 No, none at all 4 597 56.7 60.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 69 6.6 29

2. Variables [K9A_07] Bullying/harassment at work includes exclusion and isolation, unmerited dismissal of work effort, threats, gossip or other pressure. Does any bullying/harassment occur in your workplace, carried out by people from your workplace? Bullying/harassment at work includes exclusion and isolation, unmerited dismissal of work effort, threats, gossip or other pressure. Does any bullying/harassment occur in your workplace, carried out by people from your workplace? Not at all 1 793 75.3 75.5 Sometimes 2 239 22.7 22.8 Constantly 3 18 1.7 1.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [K9A_07B] Bullying/harassment includes exclusion and isolation, unmerited dismissal of work effort, threats, gossip or other pressure. Does any bullying/harassment occur in your workplace, carried out by clients? Bullying/harassment includes exclusion and isolation, unmerited dismissal of work effort, threats, gossip or other pressure. Does any bullying/harassment occur in your workplace, carried out by clients? Not at all 1 787 74.7 75.6 Sometimes 2 227 21.6 21.8 Constantly 3 27 2.6 2.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 12 1.1 30

K9A_10 [K9A_09] Over the past 12 months, have you observed someone in your workplace being subjected to threat of physical violence from a co-worker? Over the past 12 months, have you observed someone in your workplace being subjected to threat of physical violence from a co-worker? Never 1 1026 97.4 97.6 Yes, once 2 19 1.8 1.8 Yes, several times 3 6 0.6 0.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [K9A_09B] Over the past 12 months, have you observed someone in your workplace being subjected to threat of physical violence from clients? Over the past 12 months, have you observed someone in your workplace being subjected to threat of physical violence from clients? Never 1 885 84.0 84.6 Yes, once 2 60 5.7 5.7 Yes, several times 3 101 9.6 9.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.7 [K9A_10] Over the past 12 months, have you personally been subjected to physical violence or threat of violence from people from your workplace? Over the past 12 months, have you personally been subjected to physical violence or threat of violence from people from your workplace? 31

2. Variables Never 1 1045 99.2 99.3 Yes, once 2 4 0.4 0.4 Yes, several times 3 3 0.3 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K9A_10B] Over the past 12 months, have you personally been subjected to physical violence or threat of violence from clients? Over the past 12 months, have you personally been subjected to physical violence or threat of violence from clients? Never 1 982 93.3 93.6 Yes, once 2 32 3.0 3.1 Yes, several times 3 35 3.3 3.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 4 0.4 [K11A_1] How much influence do you have on: What tasks you do in your job? How much influence do you have on: What tasks you do in your job? A great deal 1 135 12.8 12.8 A fair amount 2 266 25.3 25.3 Some 3 499 47.4 47.4 None 4 151 14.3 14.3 Can t say 5 2 0.2 0.2 32

K15_1 [K11A_2] How much influence do you have on: The pace at which you work? How much influence do you have on: The pace at which you work? A great deal 1 201 19.1 19.1 A fair amount 2 282 26.8 26.8 Some 3 422 40.1 40.1 None 4 146 13.9 13.9 Can t say 5 1 0.1 0.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K11A_3] How much influence do you have on: How work is allocated between people in your workplace? How much influence do you have on: How work is allocated between people in your workplace? A great deal 1 105 10.0 10.0 A fair amount 2 215 20.4 20.4 Some 3 463 44.0 44.0 None 4 260 24.7 24.7 Can t say 5 10 0.9 0.9 [K15_1] During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you have been compensated wholly or partly in money? During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you have been compensated wholly or partly in money? 33

2. Variables Yes 1 266 25.3 25.3 No 2 778 73.9 73.9 Can t say 3 9 0.9 0.9 [K15_2] During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you been compensated in part or wholly in leisure time (time-off)? During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you been compensated in part or wholly in leisure time (time-off)? Yes 1 291 27.6 27.6 No 2 755 71.7 71.7 Can t say 3 7 0.7 0.7 [K15_3] During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you not been compensated at all (no extra pay nor time-off)? During August and September, have you personally: Worked hours in excess of the normal working week for which you not been compensated at all (no extra pay nor time-off)? Yes 1 119 11.3 11.3 No 2 922 87.6 87.6 Can t say 3 11 1.0 1.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 (continued on next page) 34

K22_6 (cont. from previous page) [K15_4] In what way are the working hours arrangements negotiated in your workplace? In what way are the working hours arrangements negotiated in your workplace? Local agreement between employer and trade union 1 164 15.6 15.6 reps Agreement between employer and each individual 2 303 28.8 28.8 employee Determined by collective agreements of the industry 3 445 42.3 42.3 Employer decides without consulting employees 4 87 8.3 8.3 Don t know/can t say 5 54 5.1 5.1 [K22_6] Does your workplace have a flexible working time arrangement where the hours worked in excess of regular hours are noted down and can be used later as free time or hours not done in can be done later? Does your workplace have a flexible working time arrangement where the hours worked in excess of regular hours are noted down and can be used later as free time or hours not done in can be done later? Yes 1 694 65.9 66.1 No 2 339 32.2 32.3 Can t say 3 17 1.6 1.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 35

2. Variables [K22_8] (IF THERE IS FLEXIBLE HOURS ARRANGEMENT IN THE WORKPLACE) Can the accrued hours be used to take a full day off? (IF THERE IS FLEXIBLE HOURS ARRANGEMENT IN THE WORKPLACE) Can the accrued hours be used to take a full day off? Yes 1 578 54.9 83.3 No 2 91 8.6 13.1 Can t say 3 25 2.4 3.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 359 34.1 [K13] Are you a member of a trade union or a professional association (or an unemployment fund)? Are you a member of a trade union or a professional association (or an unemployment fund)? Yes 1 887 84.2 84.2 No 2 165 15.7 15.7 Can t say 3 1 0.1 0.1 [K13A] (IF A MEMBER) Are you a member of: (IF A MEMBER) Are you a member of: 36

K18_1 Trade union or professional association 1 755 71.7 85.2 Unemployment fund 2 129 12.3 14.6 Doesn t want to answer 3 2 0.2 0.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 167 15.9 [K13B] (IF A MEMBER) Is there an elected union/employee representative in your workplace? (IF A MEMBER) Is there an elected union/employee representative in your workplace? No 0 208 19.8 23.5 Yes, a trade union/professional association representative 1 564 53.6 63.7 Yes, other employee representative 2 77 7.3 8.7 Don t know/can t say 3 37 3.5 4.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 167 15.9 [K18_1] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Pace of work and work pressure? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Pace of work and work pressure? Increased considerably 1 212 20.1 20.3 Increased to some extent 2 302 28.7 28.9 Stayed at the same level 3 483 45.9 46.2 Decreased to some extent 4 41 3.9 3.9 Decreased considerably 5 8 0.8 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.7 (continued on next page) 37

2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [K18_2] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Occupational safety and health? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Occupational safety and health? Increased considerably 1 35 3.3 3.4 Increased to some extent 2 152 14.4 14.6 Stayed at the same level 3 803 76.3 77.0 Decreased to some extent 4 42 4.0 4.0 Decreased considerably 5 11 1.0 1.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 10 0.9 [K18_3] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Physical demands of the work? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Physical demands of the work? Increased considerably 1 51 4.8 4.9 Increased to some extent 2 144 13.7 13.8 Stayed at the same level 3 826 78.4 79.0 Decreased to some extent 4 22 2.1 2.1 Decreased considerably 5 3 0.3 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.7 38

K18_7 [K18_4] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Mental demands of the work? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Mental demands of the work? Increased considerably 1 111 10.5 10.6 Increased to some extent 2 321 30.5 30.7 Stayed at the same level 3 593 56.3 56.7 Decreased to some extent 4 17 1.6 1.6 Decreased considerably 5 4 0.4 0.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.7 [K18_7] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Encouragement and support from supervisors/line managers? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Encouragement and support from supervisors/line managers? Increased considerably 1 30 2.8 2.9 Increased to some extent 2 130 12.3 12.5 Stayed at the same level 3 792 75.2 76.2 Decreased to some extent 4 68 6.5 6.5 Decreased considerably 5 20 1.9 1.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 13 1.2 39

2. Variables [K18_8] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Encouragement and support from co-workers? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Encouragement and support from co-workers? Increased considerably 1 31 2.9 3.0 Increased to some extent 2 139 13.2 13.4 Stayed at the same level 3 850 80.7 81.8 Decreased to some extent 4 18 1.7 1.7 Decreased considerably 5 1 0.1 0.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 14 1.3 [K18_9] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Employees opportunities to make use of their skills and abilities in the work? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, have the following increased, stayed the same or decreased: Employees opportunities to make use of their skills and abilities in the work? Increased considerably 1 46 4.4 4.4 Increased to some extent 2 225 21.4 21.5 Stayed at the same level 3 757 71.9 72.4 Decreased to some extent 4 14 1.3 1.3 Decreased considerably 5 3 0.3 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 8 0.8 40

K20A_00 [K10B] Over the past 12 months in your workplace, do you think the demands of the work have increased, decreased or stayed the same? Over the past 12 months in your workplace, do you think the demands of the work have increased, decreased or stayed the same? Have increased 1 458 43.5 43.6 Have stayed the same 2 561 53.3 53.4 Have decreased 3 19 1.8 1.8 Can t say 4 12 1.1 1.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [K19] Has your participation in training paid for or organised by your employer increased, decreased or stayed the same over the past 12 months? Has your participation in training paid for or organised by your employer increased, decreased or stayed the same over the past 12 months? Has increased 1 92 8.7 8.8 Has stayed the same 2 742 70.5 71.0 Has decreased 3 42 4.0 4.0 Can t say 4 169 16.0 16.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 8 0.8 [K20A_00] What kind of method is used to negotiate pay issues in your workplace? The question does not refer to the job contract made after recruitment but to negotiations concerning pay issues of all employees. What kind of method is used to negotiate pay issues in your workplace? The question does not refer to the job contract made after recruitment but to negotiations concerning pay issues of all 41

2. Variables employees. Local agreement between employer and trade union 1 161 15.3 15.3 reps Agreement between employer and each individual 2 243 23.1 23.1 employee Determined by collective agreements of the industry 3 546 51.9 51.9 Employer decides without consulting employees 4 46 4.4 4.4 Don t know/can t say 5 56 5.3 5.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K20A_01] Is your pay level considerably affected by the amount of years you have been working (e.g. length-of-service increment/seniority allowance)? Note to interviewers: Small increments below 5 per cent are not taken into account Is your pay level considerably affected by the amount of years you have been working (e.g. length-of-service increment/seniority allowance)? Note to interviewers: Small increments below 5 per cent are not taken into account Yes 1 540 51.3 51.3 No 2 468 44.4 44.5 Can t say 3 44 4.2 4.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K20A_02] Is your work performance and competence systematically evaluated, for instance, in connection with an annual performance appraisal interview/individual development discussion? Is your work performance and competence systematically evaluated, for instance, in connection with an annual performance appraisal interview/individual development discussion? 42

K20A_04 Yes 1 674 64.0 64.1 No 2 339 32.2 32.3 Can t say 3 38 3.6 3.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [K20A_03] Does your personal performance and the quality of your work affect your pay level? Does your personal performance and the quality of your work affect your pay level? Yes 1 416 39.5 39.5 No 2 601 57.1 57.1 Can t say 3 36 3.4 3.4 [K20A_04] Do you have a possibility to earn a performance bonus or other incentive payments based on the performance of the team or unit? Do you have a possibility to earn a performance bonus or other incentive payments based on the performance of the team or unit? Yes 1 394 37.4 37.4 No 2 643 61.1 61.1 Can t say 3 16 1.5 1.5 43

2. Variables [K20A_05] Do you have a possibility to get extra income/compensation/shares based on a bonus scheme or a profit-sharing scheme, stock option programme, personnel fund etc. Do you have a possibility to get extra income/compensation/shares based on a bonus scheme or a profit-sharing scheme, stock option programme, personnel fund etc. Yes 1 108 10.3 10.3 No 2 928 88.1 88.1 Can t say 3 17 1.6 1.6 [K20A_06] Does your workplace have a job classification system where the requirements of each job are evaluated, and this evaluation determines the basic salary of each job? Does your workplace have a job classification system where the requirements of each job are evaluated, and this evaluation determines the basic salary of each job? Yes 1 427 40.6 40.6 No 2 539 51.2 51.2 Can t say 3 87 8.3 8.3 [K20A_07] Do you think your pay is fair? Do you think your pay is fair? 44

K20A_10 Very much so 1 119 11.3 11.4 Fairly so 2 625 59.4 59.8 Not very 3 224 21.3 21.4 Not at all 4 78 7.4 7.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.7 [K20A_09] Do you think your pay is incentive? Do you think your pay is incentive? Very much so 1 76 7.2 7.3 Fairly so 2 472 44.8 45.0 Not very 3 360 34.2 34.4 Not at all 4 140 13.3 13.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 5 0.5 [K20A_10] Do you think your pay is competitive? Do you think your pay is competitive? Very much so 1 89 8.5 8.7 Fairly so 2 453 43.0 44.5 Not very 3 309 29.3 30.4 Not at all 4 167 15.9 16.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 35 3.3 45

2. Variables [K20A_12] Do you think your pay is rewarding the right things? Do you think your pay is rewarding the right things? Very much so 1 80 7.6 7.8 Fairly so 2 471 44.7 45.8 Not very 3 321 30.5 31.2 Not at all 4 157 14.9 15.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 24 2.3 [K20B_1] How well describes your workplace: The relations between employees and management are open and confidential How well describes your workplace: The relations between employees and management are open and confidential Describes very well 1 248 23.6 23.6 Describes fairly well 2 564 53.6 53.6 Describes fairly poorly 3 187 17.8 17.8 Describes very poorly 4 37 3.5 3.5 Can t say 5 16 1.5 1.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [K20B_2] How well describes your workplace: One can constantly learn new skills How well describes your workplace: One can constantly learn new skills 46