EMN FOCUSSED STUDY 2/2013

Samankaltaiset tiedostot
Network to Get Work. Tehtäviä opiskelijoille Assignments for students.

TIEKE Verkottaja Service Tools for electronic data interchange utilizers. Heikki Laaksamo

LUONNOS RT EN AGREEMENT ON BUILDING WORKS 1 THE PARTIES. May (10)

3 Määritelmät. 22) ihmiskaupalla rikoslain (39/1889) 25 luvun 3 ja 3 a :ssä tarkoitettua ihmiskauppaa ja törkeää ihmiskauppaa;

Innovative and responsible public procurement Urban Agenda kumppanuusryhmä. public-procurement

Equality of treatment Public Services

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

Rotarypiiri 1420 Piiriapurahoista myönnettävät stipendit

AYYE 9/ HOUSING POLICY

2017/S Contract notice. Supplies

Capacity Utilization

Efficiency change over time

1. SIT. The handler and dog stop with the dog sitting at heel. When the dog is sitting, the handler cues the dog to heel forward.

The role of 3dr sector in rural -community based- tourism - potentials, challenges

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

Uusi Ajatus Löytyy Luonnosta 4 (käsikirja) (Finnish Edition)

Administrative Guidelines for Asia Programme

Siirtymä maisteriohjelmiin tekniikan korkeakoulujen välillä Transfer to MSc programmes between engineering schools

Olet vastuussa osaamisestasi

ProAgria. Opportunities For Success

On instrument costs in decentralized macroeconomic decision making (Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja ; D-31)

VUOSI 2015 / YEAR 2015

Curriculum. Gym card

Choose Finland-Helsinki Valitse Finland-Helsinki

Supplies

Information on Finnish Language Courses Spring Semester 2018 Päivi Paukku & Jenni Laine Centre for Language and Communication Studies

National Building Code of Finland, Part D1, Building Water Supply and Sewerage Systems, Regulations and guidelines 2007

LYTH-CONS CONSISTENCY TRANSMITTER

BLOCKCHAINS AND ODR: SMART CONTRACTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ENFORCEMENT

Information on Finnish Language Courses Spring Semester 2017 Jenni Laine

Supplies

7562/15 rir/sj/akv 1 DGG 2B

Erasmus Charter for Higher Education Hakukierros kevät 2013 Anne Siltala, CIMO

IFAGG WORLD CUP I, CHALLENGE CUP I and GIRLS OPEN INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION 1 st 2 nd April 2011, Vantaa Finland

Teacher's Professional Role in the Finnish Education System Katriina Maaranen Ph.D. Faculty of Educational Sciences University of Helsinki, Finland

EUROOPAN PARLAMENTTI

Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council

Results on the new polydrug use questions in the Finnish TDI data

EARLY LEARNING PLAN / ENGLANTI VARHAISKASVATUSSUUNNITELMA

Immigration Studying. Studying - University. Stating that you want to enroll. Stating that you want to apply for a course.

Information on preparing Presentation

Welcome to. Finland Lahti Wellamo Community College. 11 December 2007

Pricing policy: The Finnish experience

Benchmarking Controlled Trial - a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies

Aiming at safe performance in traffic. Vastuullinen liikenne. Rohkeasti yhdessä.

Accommodation statistics

Taiteen edistämiskeskus Porin toimipiste c/o Satakunnan ELY-keskus Valtakatu 12 B, Pori

MUSEOT KULTTUURIPALVELUINA

Information on Finnish Courses Autumn Semester 2017 Jenni Laine & Päivi Paukku Centre for Language and Communication Studies

Sisävesidirektiivin soveltamisala poikkeussäännökset. Versio: puheenjohtajan ehdotus , neuvoston asiakirja 8780/16.

Tarua vai totta: sähkön vähittäismarkkina ei toimi? Satu Viljainen Professori, sähkömarkkinat

16. Allocation Models

Supplies

RANTALA SARI: Sairaanhoitajan eettisten ohjeiden tunnettavuus ja niiden käyttö hoitotyön tukena sisätautien vuodeosastolla

WITNESS SUPPORT THE FINNISH EXPERIENCE

Expression of interest

Skene. Games Refueled. Muokkaa perustyyl. for Health, Kuopio

LX 70. Ominaisuuksien mittaustulokset 1-kerroksinen 2-kerroksinen. Fyysiset ominaisuudet, nimellisarvot. Kalvon ominaisuudet

Other approaches to restrict multipliers

Increase of opioid use in Finland when is there enough key indicator data to state a trend?

Kysymys 5 Compared to the workload, the number of credits awarded was (1 credits equals 27 working hours): (4)

League of Finnish-American Societies Scholarship Foundation

MEETING PEOPLE COMMUNICATIVE QUESTIONS

This notice in TED website:

Sisällysluettelo Table of contents

Constructive Alignment in Specialisation Studies in Industrial Pharmacy in Finland

Alkuperätakuun aamupäivä Kaija Niskala. Uusiutuvan energian direktiivin RED II muutosehdotukset

A new model of regional development work in habilitation of children - Good habilitation in functional networks

EMN FOCUSSED STUDY 3/2013

The CCR Model and Production Correspondence

Social and Regional Economic Impacts of Use of Bioenergy and Energy Wood Harvesting in Suomussalmi

Tutkimusdata ja julkaiseminen Suomen Akatemian ja EU:n H2020 projekteissa

Overview on Finnish Rural network and its objectives. Rural Network Unit, Finland

Improving advisory services through technology. Challenges for agricultural advisory after 2020 Jussi Juhola Warsaw,

Työsuojelurahaston Tutkimus tutuksi - PalveluPulssi Peter Michelsson Wallstreet Asset Management Oy

Hakemus koululaisten iltapäivätoimintaan Application for Pupils' Afternoon Activities

The Use of Detention and Alternatives to Detention in the Context of Immigration Policies

The Use of Detention and Alternatives to Detention in the Context of Immigration Policies

Accommodation statistics

The Finnish healthcare service grid and access in rural Finland

KUOPION KANSALAISOPISTO Kuopio Community College Welcome - Tervetuloa!

Väite Argument "Yhteiskunnan velvollisuus on tarjota virkistysalueita ja -palveluita." "Recreation sites and service

Salasanan vaihto uuteen / How to change password

Use of spatial data in the new production environment and in a data warehouse

Tutkimuslääkkeiden GMP. Fimea Pirjo Hänninen

ETELÄESPLANADI HELSINKI

Smart specialisation for regions and international collaboration Smart Pilots Seminar

Travel Getting Around

Suomen 2011 osallistumiskriteerit

Infrastruktuurin asemoituminen kansalliseen ja kansainväliseen kenttään Outi Ala-Honkola Tiedeasiantuntija

Data protection template

Organisaation kokonaissuorituskyvyn arviointi

Perusoikeusbarometri. Panu Artemjeff Erityisasiantuntija

Hotel Pikku-Syöte: accommodation options and booking

Entry Bans and Readmission Agreements as Guarantees of efficient Return Process

Tork Paperipyyhe. etu. tuotteen ominaisuudet. kuvaus. Väri: Valkoinen Malli: Vetopyyhe

Viite Komission kirje Asia Suomen vastaus komissiolle kansallisten romanistrategioiden toimeenpanon edistymisestä

Miten koulut voivat? Peruskoulujen eriytyminen ja tuki Helsingin metropolialueella

Policies, Practices and Data on unaccompanied Minors in 2014

Dissemination of information on voluntary return: how to reach irregular migrants not in contact with the authorities

Transkriptio:

EMN FOCUSSED STUDY 2/2013 Organisation of Reception Facilities for Asylum Seekers in different Member States Euroopan muuttoliikeverkosto Euroopan unionin osarahoittama

EMN FOCUSSED STUDY 2/2013 Organisation of Reception Facilities for Asylum Seekers in different Member States ISBN 978-952-5920-28-4 (PDF) The EMN has been established by Council Decision 2008/381/EC and is financially supported by the European Union. The objective of the EMN is to meet the information needs of Community institutions and of Member States authorities and institutions by providing up-to-date, objective, reliable and comparable information on migration and asylum, with a view to supporting policymaking in the European Union in these areas. The EMN also serves to provide the general public with such information Overall responsibility: Senior Adviser Riikka Asa (National Contact Point Finland) Head of Section Kielo Brewis (National Contact Point Finland) Available from: European Migration Network Finnish Immigration Service Panimokatu 2a FI-00580 HELSINKI, Finland Tel. + 358 295 430 431 emn@migri.fi www.emn.fi www.emn.europa.eu

Table of Contents The Organisation of Reception Facilities for Asylum Seekers in different Member States 4 Section 1: Different types of Reception Facilities and different Actors 6 Section 2:Take up of Reception Facilities: Factors determining access to the different types of facilities 11 Section 3 Quality: National Legislation on Material Reception Conditions 17 Section 4: Flexibility 23 Section 5: Efficiency 27 Section 6: Conclusions 29 Annex 1 Reception Conditions in different Reception facilities 32

4 EMN FOCUSSED STUDY 2013 The Organisation of Reception Facilities for Asylum Seekers in different Member States op-lin Factsheet INLAND National contribution Overview of the National Contribution introducing the study and drawing out key facts and figures from across all sections of the Focussed Study, with a particular emphasis on elements that will be of relevance to (national) policymakers. In Finland, the body responsible for the practical steering of reception is the Finnish Immigration Service. The Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service is in charge of steering the practical activities in the reception of asylum seekers. This includes, for instance, the steering of the accommodation of asylum seekers. According to the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, reception centre activities in Finland are carried out by municipalities and organisations with which the Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service has signed an agreement on the arrangement of these activities. In addition, the state has two reception centres: the Joutseno reception centre and the Oulu reception centre. The National Assistance System for Victims of Trafficking in Human Beings (IHKA) has been centralised to the Joutseno reception centre. For the duration of the asylum interview and investigation, the asylum seeker is accommodated in a transit reception centre. The term transit reception centre refers to a reception centre or part thereof where a person seeking international protection is accommodated for the asylum investigation and interview or otherwise for a short period of time. The transit reception centres are selected by the Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service. After the completion of the asylum investigation and interview, the applicant is accommodated in a reception centre for the duration of the processing the transit reception centres have an accommodation status report available, on the basis of which asylum seekers are divided among reception centres. The Finnish Immigration Service has agreed with reception centres on the maximum number of beds, which constitutes the capacity of each reception centre. The number of clients within the scope of reception activities is influenced by the number of new asylum seekers and the time it takes for a person who has been issued with a residence permit to move to a municipality (this period often becomes prolonged in the case of quota refugees, for instance). The capacity of the Finnish reception activities was put to the test in 2008, when the number of asylum seekers arriving in the country was nearly three times as high as the accommodation capacity (2008: 4,035 asylum seekers for 1,603 beds). In 2009, the increase in the number of asylum seekers continued (5,988 new applications); however, the number of beds could be increased to 4,741 by acquiring temporary accommodation, for instance at private hotels and campsites. The strategic aim of reception activities is to move from institutionalised activities to activities based on accommodation in

5 flats to an increasing extent in future, in which case the number of beds can be flexibly increased, when necessary, by signing new tenancy agreements or, on the other hand, decreased by terminating agreements with a month s notice, in response to the number of asylum seekers. The starting point is that all asylum seekers are provided with reception services. According to the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, a person who has been issued a residence permit on the basis of an application for international protection and a beneficiary of temporary protection who has been issued a continuous residence permit may be provided with reception services for a reasonable period of time. Reception activities are regulated by the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, according to which reception services include accommodation, reception allowance and pocket money, social services, health care services, interpretation and translation services as well as employment and education activities. In addition, meals can be arranged as part of reception services (this influences the amount of the reception allowance).

6 Section 1 Different types of Reception Facilities and different Actors This section of the Synthesis Report will address the organisation of reception facilities in different (Member) States. An overview will be provided of the different types of accommodation facilities, and different actors involved in the provision of reception facilities. The Reception Conditions Directive (Directive 2003/9/EC, Article 13) and the Commission s proposal for the recast Reception Conditions Directive (Article 17) stipulate that Member States shall ensure availability of material reception conditions to applicants for international protection. Housing constitutes an essential, if not the primary, element of reception conditions. Provision of accommodation can be provided in a variety of possible manners. Directive 2003/9/EC (Article 14) makes broad reference to: a) accommodation premises for applicants who lodged their application at the border; b) accommodation centres which guarantee an adequate standard of living; c) private houses, flats, hotels or other premises adapted for housing applicants for international protection. Consequently, (Member) States have established different types of reception facilities, such as, collective/ communal reception facilities, individual housing (private houses, flats or hotels arranged and paid for by the State), or, some also offer the applicant financial compensation which covers housing expenses. This Section aims to provide an overview of the different types of reception facilities (Member) States have in place. It will also provide an overview on the number of facilities as well as their capacity. With regard to the organisation, this Section will furthermore address the different actors involved in the provision of reception facilities to applicants for international protection, specifying which authorities carry financial and executive responsibility and whether third parties are involved, such as for example, NGOs or other actors of civil society. Q1. Please indicate in Table 1 below what type of reception facilities exist in your (Member) State. In case your (Member) State offers a different type of facility which is not listed in the table below, please include and describe this by adding additional rows to the table below. Please also indicate how many of these facilities exist and indicate what their capacity is and how many applicants were accommodated in these facilities per year starting from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012. Should your (Member) State not be able to provide the maximum capacity, please provide a brief explanation for this and specify the actual number of applicants accommodated in a certain type of facility on an annual basis for the period 2008-2012.

7 Table 1 Different types of Reception Facilities Type of accommodation Does this type of facility exist in your Member State? If so, how many of these facilities existed at the end of 2012? Specify the maximum number of applicants the facilities could accommodate Number of applicants accommodated in such facilities per year during 2008-2012 Collective initial/transit reception centres Collective open reception centres 1 Special reception centres or facilities for vulnerable groups (e.g. victims of torture or specific vulnerable female applicants) Special separate reception centres for unaccompanied minors Yes. At first, a new asylum seeker is accommodated in a transit reception centre. The asylum seeker lives in these transit reception centres until the police and the Finnish Immigration Service have carried out the asylum interview and investigation. The transit reception centres are the Helsinki, Turku, Oulu and Joutseno reception centres. Yes. These centres are based on accommodation in flats (flatbased centres), or clients live in rented flats. 4 Helsinki: 200+200+40 (detention) Turku: 150 Oulu: 260 Joutseno: 300 2 (state owned), 6 Municipality owned centres, The Finnish Red Cross held 10 centres for asylum seekers. A total of 18 in 2012. N/A 1,916 2008: 800 2009: 2400 2010: 2650 2011: 2700 2012: 2700 No. N/A N/A N/A Yes. Group homes and supported living units. 7 Group homes: 21 Supported living units: 40 NB! Tthose in individually arranged accommodation not included -ca 1000 applicants per year. UAMs also not included.

8 Private houses or flats: arranged and paid for by competent authorities Private hotels: arranged and paid for by competent authorities Individually arranged accommodation such as houses, flats, hotels and/or possibilities of staying with friends and/or family 2 Other premises for the purpose of accommodating applicants for international protection which are arranged and paid for by the competent authorities Yes. The reception centre pays for accommodation. Yes. This accommodation possibility is available, if necessary, when there are many applicants. Yes. The applicant him-/ herself arranges this accommodation. Yes. The detention unit of the Metsälä reception centre. In cases involving child welfare aspects, accommodation can be acquired from child welfare facilities. In cases involving trafficking in human beings, special accommodation can be acquired taking safety aspects into account. Other than this, the Joutseno reception centre is responsible for the accommodation of persons admitted to the National Assistance System for Victims of Trafficking in Human Beings. 281 1,438 1,502 (2008) 3,424 (2009) 2,867 (2010) 2,296 (2011) 2,468 (2012) 0 N/A Roughly speaking, there were approximately 500 beds in this arrangement in 2008 2012. Approximately 1,000. No maximum number has been set for this type of accommodation, and it is not supported with public funds. 40 40 N/A All alleged victims of human trafficking cases are attended to, there are no quotas. Approximately 1,000 persons per year. 40 applicants per year in Metsälä detention unit. 90-100 alleged victims of human trafficking accommodated in Joutseno reception centre.

9 Q2. Which authority(ies) carry financial responsibility over the reception facilities? State authorities -> Yes Local authorities / regional governments -> Only over costs related to education provided to children at the basic education age; the state pays compensation for these on the basis of actual expenses. External service provider such as NGOs, actors from the private sector or any other kind of third party involvement? -> No, the Finnish Red Cross maintains a reception centre, the operations of which are financed by the state. The state compensates for costs incurred by activities referred to in the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection within the limits of the state budget. The Finnish Immigration Service pays the establishment and maintenance costs of a reception and organising centre as well as compensation to service providers for organising reception services. Expenses are compensated for the period during which the alien is entitled to reception services according to Sections 12 and 14 of the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection. The Finnish Immigration Service pays compensation to a service provider for assisting a victim of trafficking in human beings who has no municipality of residence in Finland in the sense of the Municipality of Residence Act (201/1994). Private accommodation is not supported financially, and permission for it is only granted via application. Q3. Which authorities carry executive responsibility 3 over the facilities: State authorities -> Yes. The Finnish Immigration Service steers reception activities in Finland. Local authorities / regional government -> No External service provider such as NGOs, actors from the private sector or any other kind of third party involvement? -> No Q4. In case reception facilities are run by local authorities/regional governments or with the involvement of an external service provider (e.g. NGOs or actors from civil society), please indicate whether the reception facilities are centrally coordinated (i.e. does one single authority still carry overall responsibility for the reception of applicants for international protection?) The steering and planning of practical reception activities: the Finnish Immigration Service. The establishment and closing of reception centres: the Ministry of the Interior makes the decision on the basis of a proposal from the Finnish Immigration Service.

10 Q5. In case reception facilities are run by local authorities/regional governments or with involvement of an external service provider (e.g. NGOs or actors from civil society), how is their involvement regulated? Have any formal coordination mechanisms between the different actors been signed (for example cooperation agreements stipulating the division of competences)? According to the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, reception centre activities in Finland are carried out by municipalities and organisations with which the Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service has signed an agreement on the arrangement of these activities. In addition, the state has two reception centres: the Joutseno reception centre and the Oulu reception centre. The National Assistance System for Victims of Trafficking in Human Beings (IHKA) has been centralised to the Joutseno reception centre.

11 Section 2 Take up of Reception Facilities: Factors determining access to the different types of facilities This Section of the Synthesis Report aims to investigate which categories of applicants for international protection are entitled to reception facilities (standard or specific) and whether, on specific occasions/for specific reasons, authorities exclude such entitled applicants from reception facilities. It will map the competent authorities who decide on the allocation of applicants to (different) reception facilities, and will more specifically, provide an overview on what factors influence the allocation to accommodation. Such factors may, for example, relate to the capacity of centres, existence of a dispersal mechanism (for purposes of burden-sharing as to evenly distribute the costs throughout the country), the stage/type of procedure, profile of the applicant, duration of proceedings or any other factors. It will also be investigated whether Member States take into account the specific needs of vulnerable groups of applicants when deciding on allocation. Q6. Please provide a short overview of which applicants for international protection are entitled to reception facilities provided by the State. Please complete Table 2 below: Reception services are provided to persons seeking international protection and beneficiaries of temporary protection. The starting point is that all asylum seekers are provided with reception services. According to the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, a person who has been issued a residence permit on the basis of an application for international protection and a beneficiary of temporary protection who has been issued a continuous residence permit may be provided with reception services for a reasonable period of time. An alien who has received reception services is provided with reception services after the refusal of a residence permit or the discontinuation of temporary protection until s/he has left the country. However, a citizen of a European Union Member State or Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland who seeks international protection is provided with reception services only until s/ he has been informed of the Finnish Immigration Service s negative decision on his/her application for international protection. A citizen of a European Union Member State or Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland who has been informed of the Finnish Immigration Service s negative decision on international protection and who consents to leave the country under supervision or consents to the expulsion decision being enforced before 30 days have passed from the decision being served may be provided with reception services until his/her departure from the country (however, for a maximum of 7 days). The director of the reception centre may decide that such a person will be provided with reception services

12 for a reasonable period of time on special personal grounds. Table 2 Categories of applicants entitled to reception facilities Different categories of applicants depending on type/stage of procedure Entitled to reception facilities (Yes/No) Are these applicants entitled to standard or specific reception facilities 4? Applicants under Dublin II 5 Yes. Standard. Applicants in admissibility Yes. Standard. procedures 6 Applicants subject to accelerated Yes. Standard. procedures Vulnerable groups of applicants (with specific psychological/medical assistance needs) Yes. Standard. Special services are arranged when necessary. Unaccompanied minors awaiting decision for international protection Unaccompanied minors who have exhausted the procedure for international protection and are awaiting return Applicants who have lodged an appeal procedure Applicants who have lodged a subsequent application Applicants who have received a positive decision on their international protection application 8 Applicants who have exhausted the procedure for international protection and who are awaiting return Other (e.g. applicants from other EU Member States, families with children with an irregular migrant status, applicants from safe third countries of origin etc. Please specify) Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes, for a reasonable period of time. Yes, until the person is returned. Yes. Standard, special services when necessary. Health care services offered to children are of the same level as those offered to aliens residing permanently in the country. Standard, special services when necessary. Standard. Standard. Standard, special services when necessary. Standard. Standard. Q7. From the aforementioned categories of applicants who are entitled to reception, can any be excluded from reception facilities for particular reasons (e.g. because the applicant has sufficient financial means, or because the applicant has misbehaved in a reception facility, or any other reasons)? With regard to these situations, there are no sanctions imposed by legislation. According to the reception authorities, they have found it difficult to handle situations in which clients have intentionally or unintentionally destroyed property of a reception centre, for instance. The Finnish Immigration Service is currently preparing resident guidelines for its clients.

13 Persons seeking international protection, beneficiaries of temporary protection and victims of trafficking in human beings who have no municipality of residence in Finland in the sense of the Municipality of Residence Act are granted a reception allowance in order to ensure means of support necessary for human dignity and to promote independent coping with everyday life if they are in need of support and cannot secure means of support by gainful employment, other income and assets, maintenance from a person liable to provide maintenance to these persons or otherwise. The income and assets of the applicant of reception allowance and his/her family are taken into account when granting reception allowance in the manner decreed by the Social Assistance Act (1412/1997). Furthermore, if the asylum seeker works, this is taken into account in connection with the application for/granting of a reception allowance. If a client has moved away from a reception centre without providing an account of private accommodation when demanded to do so or if s/he lives in private accommodation in a flat of which s/he does not provide required up-to-date accounts (however, his/her whereabouts are known and s/he has been contacted), his/her reception services will be suspended. In addition, an entry is made in the client register with regard to the matter. In this case, the client is still registered at the reception centre. If no more information is received of the client s whereabouts after this and s/he cannot be contacted any more, s/he will be registered as missing. Q8. a) Does your (Member) State carry out an assessment of vulnerability which could result in assignment to special reception facilities for vulnerable groups of applicants? Yes. According to the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection, special needs arising from the vulnerable position of a person seeking international protection, a beneficiary of temporary protection and a victim of trafficking in human beings, such as the age or physical and psychological state, must be taken into account when applying the Act (Section 6). All persons employed in reception activities conduct assessments (social workers of a reception centre, nurses, and health care personnel providing care for clients). The Reception Unit trains health care personnel, among other things, to identify asylum seekers who are in a vulnerable position. Q8. b) If yes, please indicate whether the assessment of vulnerability is: Obligatory and laid down in law Victims of trafficking in human beings and children are mentioned separately in law. Standard practice Yes. Optional No. Q9. Which authority/(ies) carry responsibility for deciding on the allocation of applicants for international protection to different reception facilities? Briefly indicate the responsible authority(ies).

14 In Finland, the body responsible for the practical steering of reception is the Finnish Immigration Service. The Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service is in charge of steering the practical activities in the reception of asylum seekers. This includes, for instance, the steering of the accommodation of asylum seekers. For the duration of the asylum interview and investigation, the asylum seeker is accommodated in a transit reception centre. The term transit reception centre refers to a reception centre or part thereof where a person seeking international protection is accommodated for the asylum investigation and interview or otherwise for a short period of time. The transit reception centres are selected by the Reception Unit of the Finnish Immigration Service. After the completion of the asylum investigation and interview, the applicant is accommodated in a reception centre for the duration of the processing. Transit reception centres and reception centres where applicants are accommodated for the duration of the processing are tasked with organising reception services for the applicant. As part of the reception services, such a reception centre is responsible for any costs if the applicant moves to another reception centre. Q10. How do these authorities allocate applicants to different types of reception facilities? Please state whether one of the scenarios below, or a combination thereof, are applicable to your (Member) State and briefly describe: Capacity; YES Your (Member) State assigns applicants for international protection according to capacity, e.g. your (Member) State monitors occupancy rate of each reception centre and assigns applicants accordingly. The transit reception centres have an accommodation status report available, on the basis of which asylum seekers are divided among reception centres that will accommodate them for the duration of the processing. Dispersal Mechanism; YES Your (Member) State applies a dispersal scheme which defines how many applicants each reception centre at national/regional/local level ought to receive (either in percentages or based on a specific quota). The Finnish Immigration Service has agreed with reception centres on the maximum number of beds. Type of asylum procedure; YES Your (Member) State takes into account the type of asylum procedure and assigns applicants accordingly to a specific reception facility. For example, one or more of the below is applicable to your (Member) State: Applicants who fall under the Dublin II Regulation are accommodated in specific reception facilities; The goal is that persons in the Dublin II procedures would remain in transit reception centres until their transfer as per the Dublin II Regulation. Applicants subject to accelerated procedures are assigned to specific reception facilities; Etc.

15 Stage of asylum procedure; Your (Member) State takes into account the stage of the asylum procedure and assigns applicants accordingly to a specific facility. For example, one or more of the below is applicable to your Member State: Applicants during the admissibility procedure - when a (multiple) application is assessed for admissibility or when a Dublin examination is carried out are temporarily placed in specific initial/transit reception facilities; Applicants who are awaiting a first instance decision are placed in specific reception facilities; Applicants who have lodged an appeal procedure are transferred to specific reception facilities; Failed/rejected applicants for international protection are transferred to specific reception facilities. No, except for applicants in the Dublin II process. For involuntary return of applicants who have received a negative decision on their asylum application, the applicants can be relocated to the Metsälä detention unit, if it is obvious that the applicant would disappear before the return flight or it is otherwise necessary to ensure return. Profile of the asylum applicant; Your (Member) State takes into account the profile of the applicant for international protection (e.g. special needs 9, nationality, or specific motives underpinning the application) and assigns applicants accordingly to a specific reception facility. No. Duration of the asylum procedure; Your (Member) State moves applicants for international protection from one facility to another after a certain time period has elapsed. Yes, in the first stage applicants are accommodated in a transit reception centre from where they are relocated to a reception centre for the duration of the remainder of the processing. There is no time limit imposed for this relocation. Other criteria (e.g. family composition)? Disciplinary transfers (the premise is that one transfer must suffice); transfers aiming at ensuring family unity in accordance with the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection. Q11. Is the process for assignment of applicants to different reception facilities: a) Laid down in legislation No b) Outlined in soft law/guidelines No c) Not outlined in official documents, but there is a standard practice in place Yes.

16 Q12. Provided there is sufficient capacity, does your (Member) State offer the applicant a choice for reception facility/location? Asylum seekers cannot choose the centre where they will be accommodated. Q13. a) Does your (Member) State provide for a possibility to relocate applicants for international protection to different reception facilities after initial assignment to a reception centre? Yes such reasons could include the following, for instance: culture-related reasons, health, violent behaviour due to which certain groups must be separated, other personal reasons. Section 16 of the Finnish Act on the Reception of Persons Seeking International Protection: an applicant can be relocated to another reception centre if it is necessary for the applicant him-/herself, the operations of the reception centre or the processing of an application for international protection. Transfer to another reception centre cannot be processed without consent given by the police. Accommodation must be arranged so that the members of a family can live together. The reception centre is responsible for the accommodation and the relocation. Before a decision on relocation is made, the person to be relocated must be heard. When making a decision on the relocation of an unaccompanied minor, the representative of the child must also be heard. Q13. b) If yes, which of the below criteria are applied, or a combination thereof, for relocation to a different reception centre: Capacity/bed management issues -> Yes Change in family profile (e.g. birth of a child) -> Yes Medical or special need reasons -> Yes Incidents at centres which may require transfer to alternative accommodation >Yes Time limits (procedural-driven) ->Yes Programme for voluntary return to the country of origin -> No (however, in some cases it is possible for an applicant participating in a programme for voluntary return to move to another reception centre to wait for the return journey if the distance to the airport is unreasonably long, for instance.)