The PROGRAM NURSING SCIENCE, PREVENTIVE Theory and Research, 6 ECTS Time and place: Lectures 14.9 15.9.2011 Seminars 17.11 18.11.2011 University of Eastern Finland, Department of Nursing Science, Kuopio Course leader: Professor Anna-Maija Pietilä, PhD University of Eastern Finland Teachers: Purpose: Professor Anna-Maija Pietilä, PhD Docent Arja Häggman-Laitila, PhD National and international experts 1. To critically analyze conceptual frameworks, especially salutogenic approach, and methodological basis and ethics concerning preventive nursing science. 2. Deepen understanding of the development and evaluation of models for preventive nursing science. 3. Deepen understanding of the evaluation of health promotion. Credits: Learning methods: 6 ECTS Dialogical methods, seminars and lectures Writing scientific essays Outcomes and evaluation: After the course students should: 1. be able to apply theoretical and methodological basis of preventive nursing science in future studies. 2. be able to recognize critical aspects of development and evaluation of health promotion. 3. be able to conduct effectively preventive and promotive nursing interventions. Students evaluate the course according to the evaluation form of the Finnish Post-Graduate School in Nursing Science web-page. Contact person: Registration: Coordinator Heli Virtanen, email heli.virtanen (at) utu.fi, tel. +358 2 333 8455 From 15 th June to 15 th August, 2011via www-page form: forms/index.html Note: There is no limit for participation number.
COURSE OUTLINE Wednesday 14 th September 2011 10-18 Nursing Science, Preventive Conceptual Basis and Ethics Teachers: Professor Anna-Maija Pietilä Docent Arja Häggman-Laitila Professor Alessandro Stievano Post doc researcher Mari Kangasniemi Doctoral student Arja Halkoaho Thursday 15 th September 2011 8.30-16 Nursing Science, Preventive Methodological Basis, Development and Evaluation of Models Teachers: Professor Anna-Maija Pietilä Docent Arja Häggman-Laitila Professor Alessandro Stievano Post doc researcher Sari Laanterä Doctoral student Riitta Turjamaa Seminars 17 th November 10-18 and 18 th November 8.30 15
INSTRUCTIONS AND ORIENTATION FOR THE LEARNING PROCESS The course is based on dialogical methods. 1) Scientific work before lectures Please, write an essay based on your research process. You can focus on the following themes: 1) Conceptual basis and health promotion issues 2) Methodological basis and ethics 3) Development and evaluation of models for preventive nursing science. The length of this essay is 5-7 pages. Please send it to the course leader in print by 7 th September 2011. 2) The instructions for another essay will be provided during the lectures 14-15 th September. Please send this scientific essay to the course leader in print by 11 th November 2011. These papers will be discussed during the seminars. The mailing address for the papers: Professori Anna-Maija Pietilä Itä-Suomen yliopisto Hoitotieteen laitos PL1627 70211 Kuopio
LITERATURE Salutogenic Model, Health Promotion and Methodological basis on nursing science 1. Antonovsky A. 1987. Unraveling the Mystery of Health. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. 2. Antonovsky A. 1996. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International 11(1), 11 18. 3. Eriksson M & Lindström B. 2005. Validity of Antonovsky s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59, 460-466. 4. Eriksson M & Lindström B. 2008. A salutogenic interpretation of the Ottawa Charter. Health Promotion International 23(2), 190 199. 5. Eriksson M. 2007. Unravelling the mystery of salutogenesis. The evidence base of the salutogenic research as measured by Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale. Folkhälsan Research Centre. Health Promotion Research Programme. Research Report 1. 6. Lindström B, Eriksson M. 2010. The hitchhiker s guide to salutogenesis: salutogenic pathways to health promotion. IUHPE. 7. Eriksson K, Isola A, Kyngäs H, Leino-Kilpi H, Lindström UÅ, Paavilainen E, Pietilä A-M, Salanterä S, Vehviläinen- Julkunen K & Åstedt-Kurki P. 2008. Hoitotiede. WSOY, oppimateriaalit Oy, Helsinki. 8. Hoitotiede 6 /2008. 9. Honkanen, H. 2008. Perheen riskiolot neuvolatyön kontekstissa. Näkökulmana mielenterveyden edistäminen. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 160, Kuopio. 10. Häggman-Laitila A & Pietilä A-M. 2007. Perceived benefit on family health of small groups for families with children. Public Health Nursing 24 (3), 205-216. 11. Löfman P, Pietilä A-M & Häggman-Laitila A. 2007. A self-evaluation and peer review - an example of action research in promoting self-determination of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16 (3a), 84-94. 12. Mittelmark MB. 2008. Shaping the future of health promotion: priorities for action. Health promotion International 23(1), 98 102. 13. Mittelmark MB. 2008. Setting an ethical agenda for health promotion. Health Promotion International 23(1), 78 84.
14. Sirviö K. 2006. Lapsiperheiden osallisuus terveyden edistämisessä - mukanaolosta vastuunottoon. Asiakastilanteiden arviointia sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon työntekijöiden ja perheiden näkökulmasta. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 132. 15. Wilhelmsson S & Lindberg M. 2007. Prevention and health promotion and evidence-based fields of nursing - A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice 13, 254 265. 16. Kirk S. 2007. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44(7), 1250-60. 17. Sandelowski M. 2008. Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 64(1), 104-10. 18. Whittemore R. 2005. Combining evidence in nursing research: Methods and implications. Nursing Research 54(1), 56-62. 19. Whittemore R, Knafl K. 2005. The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52(5), 546-53. Early Intervention and Health Promotion 1. Häggman-Laitila A. 2002. Varhainen tuki perheen terveyttä edistämässä analyysi perhetyön vaikuttavuudesta. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauslehti 39 (3), 192-207. 2. Pirskanen M, Pietilä A-M, Halonen P & Laukkanen E. 2006. School health nurses and substance use among adolescents towards individual identification and early intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 20, 439, 439-447. 3. Pirskanen M, Laukkanen E & Pietilä A-M. 2007. A formative evaluation to develop a school health nursing early intervention model for adolescent substance use. Public Health Nursing 24 (3), 256-264. 4. Pirskanen M. 2007. Nuorten päihteettömyyden edistäminen. Varhaisen puuttumisen malli koulu- ja opiskeluterveydenhuoltoon. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 140. 5. Pietilä A-M. & Häggman-Laitila A. 2002. Kohti terveyttä edistävän hoitotyön vaikuttavuuden arviointia: empiirinen esimerkki perheinterventioista. Hoitotyön vuosikirja 2003. 6. Häggman-Laitila A., Pietilä A-M., Haapakorva A. & Saastamoinen H-M. 2003. Moniammatillinen projektityö perhetyön kehittämisessä. Hallinnon tutkimus 22 (3), 212-226.
7. Häggman-Laitila A., Pietilä A-M., Friis L. & Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. 2003. Video home training as a method in supporting family life control. Journal of Clinical Nursing 12, 93-106. 8. Häggman-Laitila A. 2003. Early support needs of Finnish families with small children. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41 (6), 1-12. 9. Häggman-Laitila A. & Euramaa K-I. 2003. Finnish Families Need for Special Support as Evaluated by Public Health Nurses Working in Maternity and Child Welfare Clinics. Public Health Nursing 20 (4), 328-338. 10. Saastamoinen H-M., Pietilä A-M., Häggman-Laitila A. & Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. 2004. Perhetyöntekijöiden kokemuksia moniammatillisesta tiimi- ja verkostotyöstä. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauslehti 12 (2), 127-136. 11. Häggman-Laitila A. 2005. Families Experiences of Support Provided by Resource-Oriented Family Professionals in Finland. Journal of Family Nursing 11 (3), 195-224. 12. Häggman-Laitila A. & Pietilä A-M. 2006. Evaluation of the effectiveness of nursing: an empirical example of ways to promote family health. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku 4 (13), 43-47. 13. Häggman-Laitila A. & Pietilä A-M. 2007. Perceived Benefits on Family Health of Small Groups for Families with Children. Public Health Nursing 24 (3), 205-216. 14. Häggman-Laitila A. & Pietilä A-M. 2005. Perheen terveyden psykososiaalisia ulottuvuuksia. Kirjallisuuskatsaus lasten, nuorten ja perheen terveydestä. Nuorisotutkimus 4 (23), 42-50. 15. Hokkanen H., Häggman-Laitila A. & Eriksson E. 2006. Kotona asuvien iäkkäiden ihmisten voimavarat ja niiden tukeminen katsaus tutkimuskirjallisuuteen. Gerontologia 1, 12-21. 16. Häggman-Laitila A. & Pietilä A-M. 2007. Lapsiperheiden terveyttä edistävä tuki ja sen lähtökohdat: Katsaus kehittämiskohteisiin ja jatkotutkimusaiheisiin. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauskirja 44 (1), 47-62. 17. Pietilä A-M., Matero H., Kankkunen P. & Häggman-Laitila A. 2008. Koherenssin tunne ja siihen yhteydessä olevat tekijät: systemaattinen katsaus pitkäaikaissairauksia käsittävään kirjallisuuteen. Tutkiva Hoitotyö 6(2), 4 10. 18. Pietilä A-M, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Haaranen A & Länsimies-Antikainen H. (toim.) 2006. Näkökulmia preventiivisen hoitotieteen tutkimukseen. Kuopion yliopiston selvityksiä E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 38. 231 s.
Evaluation of Health Promotion 1. Häggman-Laitila A & Pietilä A-M. 2009. Preventive psychosocietal support groups parents criteria for good quality. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2. Tanninen H-M, Häggman-Laitila A & Pietilä A-M. 2009. Resource-enhancing psychosocial support in family situation: needs and benefits from family members own perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(10), 2150-2160. 3. Häggman-Laitila A, Pietilä A-M & Seppänen R. 2010. Benefits of video home training on families health and interaction: evaluation based on follow up visits. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19 (23&24), 3504-3515. 4. Häggman-Laitila A, Tanninen H-M & Pietilä A-M. Effectiveness of resourse-enhancing family-oriented intervention. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19 (17-18), 2500-2510. 5. Spencer B, Broesskamp-Stone U, Ruckstuhl B, Ackermann G, Spoerri A & Cloetta B. 2007. Modelling the results of health activities in Switzerland: development of the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention. Health Promotion International 23(1), 86 -. 6. Jurg M, Meij J, van der Wal M & Koelen M. 2008. Using health promotion outcomes in formative evaluation studies to predict success factors in interventions: an application to an intervention for promoting physical activity in Dutch children (JUMP-in). Health Promotion International 23( 3), 231-. 7. Eeve J & Peerbhoy D. 2007. Evaluating the evaluation: Understanding the utility and limitations of evaluation as a tool for organizational learning. Health Education Journal 66(2), 120-131. 8. Jackson N, Waters E. 2005. Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promotion International 20(4), 367-. 9. Springett, J. Appropriate approaches to the evaluation of health promotion. Critical Public Health 11(2), 10. Bodstein, R. 2007. The complexity of the discussion of effectiveness and evidence in health promotion practices. Promotion & Education, Supplement (1), 16-20. 11. Whitelaw S, Martin C, Kerr A & Wimbush E. 2006. An evaluation of the Health Promoting Health Service Framework: the implementation of a settings based approach within the NHS in Scotland. Health Promotion International 12. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P & Shiell A. 2002. Criterian for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemial Community Health 56, 119-127.
13. Tannahill A. 2008. Beyond evidence to ethics: a decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement. Health Promotion International 23(4), 380-. 14. Bauer G, Davies J & Pelikan J. 2006. The EUHPID Health Development Model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promotion International 21(2), 153-159. 15. Braunack-Mayer A & Louise J. 2008. The ethics of Community Development: tensions in health promotion theory and practice. Promotion & Education 15(3), 5-8. 16. Poland B, Krupa G & McCall D. 2009. Settings for health promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promotion Practice 10(4), 505-516. 17. Johnson B, Scott-Sheldon L & Carey M. 2010. Meta-synthesis of health behavior change meta-analyses. American Journal of Public Health 100(11), 2193-2198. 18. McDonnell S, Yassin A, Brown W, Perry H & Thacker S. 2007. Measuring health program effectiveness in the field an assessment tool. Prehospital & Disaster Medicine 22(5), 396-405. 19. Molleman G, Peters L, Hosman C & Kok G. 2005. Implementation of a quality assurance instrument (Preffi 1.0) to improve the effectiveness of health promotion in The Netherlands. Health Education Research 20(4), 410-422. 20. Jolley G, Lawless A & Hurley C. 2008. Framework and tools for planning and evaluating community participation, collaborative partnership and equity in health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 19(2), 152-157. 21. Sogoric S, Middleton J, Lang S, Ivankovic D & Kern J. 2005. A naturalistic inquiry on the impact of interventions aiming to improve health and the quality of life in the community. Social Science & Medicine 60(1), 153-164. 22. O Connor-Fleming M, Parker E, Higgins H & Gould T. 2006. A framework for evaluating health promotion programs. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 17(1), 61-66. Ethical Issues in Health Research 1. Leino-Kilpi H. 2004. We need more nursing ethics research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 345-346. 2. Pietilä A-M & Länsimies-Antikainen H. (toim.) 2008. Etiikkaa monitieteisesti. Pohdintaa ja kysymyksiä. Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja F. Yliopistotiedot 45.
3. Pietilä A-M, Länsimies-Antikainen H, Halkoaho A & Vähäkangas K. 2008. Terveyden edistämisen tutkimuksen eettinen ja menetelmällinen perusta. Hoitotiede, 20 (6), 304-313. 4. Hoitotiede, 6, 2008 (Supplementtinumero, Etiikka ja metodologia). 5. Länsimies-Antikainen H, Laitinen T, Rauramaa R & Pietilä A-M. 2010. Evaluation of informed consent in health research: a questionnaire survey. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 56-64. 6. Länsimies-Antikainen H, Pietilä A-M, Kiviniemi V, Rauramaa R &. Laitinen T. 2010. Evaluation of the participant's comprehension of information received in an exercise and diet intervention trial: DR s EXTRA study. Gerontology, 56, 291-297. 7. Länsimies-Antikainen H, Pietilä A-M, Laitinen T, Kiviniemi V & Rauramaa R. 2010. Is informed consent related to success in diet and exercise intervention as evaluated at 12 months? DR s EXTRA study. BMC Medical Ethics, 11(9). 8. Halkoaho A, Pietilä A-M, Dumez, Van Damme K, Heinonen S & Vähäkangas K. 2010. Ethical aspects of human placental perfusion: Interview of the mothers donating placenta. Placenta, 31, 686-690. 9. Halkoaho A, Vähäkangas K, Häggman-Laitila A & Pietilä A-M. 2011. Views of midwives on participation in placental perfusion studies: interview of ethical aspects. Midwifery, doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.003. 10. Halkoaho A, Pietilä A-M & Vähäkangas K. 2011. Ethical Aspects in Placental Perfusion Studies: Views of the Researchers. Placenta, DOI: 10.1016/j.palcenta.2011.04.006. 11. Kangasniemi M, Halkoaho A, Länsimies-Antikainen H & Pietilä A-M. Duties of a patient. A metasynthesis. Nursing Ethics. In press.