FSD1128 Juvenile Delinquency in Finland 1995 Codebook FINNISH SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA ARCHIVE
c Finnish Social Science Data Archive, 2001 The bibliographic citation for this codebook: Juvenile Delinquency in Finland 1995, [codebook]. Tampere : Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor], 2014. This codebook has been generated from the version 1.0 (20.6.2001) of the data. Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. Finnish Social Science Data Archive FIN-33014 University of Tampere FSD User Services: asiakaspalvelu.fsd@uta.fi +358 40 190 1442 Aila Data Service Portal: https://services.fsd.uta.fi/ Finnish Social Science Data Archive http://www.fsd.uta.fi/en/ Typeset by L A TEX $ Koodikirjoitin.py v28 @ 2015-06-05 13:20:11.880000 $
To the reader This codebook is part of the data FSD1128 archived at the FSD (Finnish Social Science Data Archive). The source must be acknowledged in any publication based wholly or in part on the data. The bibliographic citation may be in the form required by the publication, or in the form suggested by the archive. The bibliographic citation suggested by the archive: Aromaa, Kauko & Kivivuori, Janne: Juvenile Delinquency in Finland 1995 [computer file]. FSD1128, version 1.0 (2001-06-20). Helsinki: National Research Institute of Legal Policy [producer], 1995. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor], 2001. The depositor and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the secondary use of the data. The archive must be informed of all publications where the data have been used. The beginning of the codebook contains information on data content, structure and collection, and includes a list of publications where the data have been used. The second part of the codebook contains information on variables: question texts, response options, and frequencies. The third part contains indexes. Variable distributions presented in this codebook have been generated from the SPSS files. Distribution tables present variable values, frequencies (n), frequency percents (%), and valid percents (v. %) which take into account missing data. All distributions are unweighted. If the data contain weight variables, these will be found at the end of the variables list. In some cases frequency distributions have been substituted by descriptive statistics. Distributions may contain missing data. The note "System missing (SYSMIS)" refers to missing observations (e.g. a respondent has not answered all questions) whereas "Missing (User missing)" refers to data the user has defined as missing. For example, the user may decide to code answer alternatives don t want to say or can t say ) as missing data. This codebook has been produced automatically with Python, L A TEXand dvipdfm software. Source files include data description files in DDI format, and SPSS files.
Contents 1 Study description 1 1.1 Titles....................................... 1 1.2 Subject description................................ 1 1.3 Structure and collection of the data........................ 3 1.4 Use of data.................................... 4 2 Variables 7 3 Indexes 97 3.1 Variables in the order of occurrence....................... 97 3.2 Variables in alphabetical order.......................... 104 A naire in Finnish 111 i
Chapter 1 Study description 1.1 Titles Title of the study: Juvenile Delinquency in Finland 1995 Title of the study in Finnish: Nuorisorikollisuus 1995 Alternative title: The Finnish Self-Report Delinquency Study 1995 This codebook has been generated from the version 1.0 (20.6.2001) of the data. Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. 1.2 Subject description Other material naire: pdf file in Finnish Authoring entity Aromaa, Kauko (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) Kivivuori, Janne (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) Copyright statement for the data According to an agreement between FSD and the depositor Depositor Aromaa, Kauko (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) Kivivuori, Janne (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) 1
1. Study description Date of deposit 22.5.2001 Keywords adolescents; crime; criminal damage; drug abuse; juvenile delinquency; offences; punishment; shoplifting; theft; violence; youth Topic Classification Classification by FSD vocabulary: criminology; science of law; sociology; youth studies Classification by CESSDA vocabulary: crime; youth Series description The data belong to the series: Juvenile Delinquency in Finland The National Research Institute of Legal Policy launched a long-term research project in spring 1995 to study young people s criminal and forbidden activities. In these surveys, information has been gathered with the self-report method: the participants, 9th grade students from different parts of Finland, have answered anonymously to questions about their own criminal or forbidden activities. The survey series is also known under the name of the Finnish Self-Report Delinquency Study (FSRD). Abstract The survey studied the extent, frequency, and nature of self-reported offending among young Finns. The main topics were truancy, running away from home, fare evasion, driving without a license, doing graffiti, vandalism at school, vandalism outside school, stealing from a store or a kiosk, stealing from school, stealing from home, buying stolen goods, bullying, taking part in fighting, beating up somebody, abuse of mild drugs, use of pills, and drunken driving. The respondents were asked whether they had ever been involved in any of these activities and if so, whether the police had been notified if the activities were illegal. In addition, the respondents were asked when they had started the activity in question and whether they had been involved in it during the past year. If the respondents answered in the affirmative, they were asked if they had been alone or with somebody at the moment, and whether they had been caught. The respondents were also asked topic-related questions like what they stole from a store or what was the reason for bullying. In the survey, all respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with statements relating young people and offending, and what kind of punishments should be used. Among others, the following topics were dealt with: mitigating punishment due to circumstances, normalcy of 2
1.3. Structure and collection of the data illegal activities in puberty, causes of criminality, and the seriousness of petty theft as a crime. Furthermore, the respondents were asked whether they would do some or any of the following forbidden things in the future: truancy, fare evasion, petty theft, theft, mild assault and battery, use of a soft drug. The respondents were also asked whether it in their mind was normal that young people break the rules set by their parents, the rules of the school, or break the law. In the survey, the respondents were also asked about the severity of various punishments (house arrest, imprisonment, fine) in a situation where a young person had broken the law. Background variables included location of school, the respondent s gender, age, employment, whether R likes going to school, how many times R had had to repeat a year in school, professions of the parents and their current employment situation, interpersonal relationships in the family, use of money, household composition, leisure time activities, whether R had a boyfriend/girlfriend, alcohol use, and smoking. 1.3 Structure and collection of the data Country: Finland Geographic coverage: Finland Unit of analysis: Individual Universe: 9th grade students (generally aged 15-16) of Finnish-speaking municipal comprehensive schools Collection date: April 1995 May 1995 Data collector: National Research Institute of Legal Policy (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) Data producer: (National Research Institute of Legal Policy) Mode of data collection: Guided questionnaire. A self-report method has been used in the survey. Type of research instrument: Structured questionnaire Time period covered: 1995 Time method of the data collection: Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section Response rate: 89% Number of variables and cases: The data contain 218 variables and 1195 cases. Sampling procedure: Two schools from the metropolitan area of Helsinki, one school from Espoo and one from Vantaa were picked to the sample. From Southern Finland, Middle Finland and Northern Finland, one school from an urban, a densely populated municipality and a rural municipality were picked to the sample. 3
1. Study description 1.4 Use of data Data appraisal Responses to open-ended questions which have not been classified are missing from the data. Related publications Kivivuori, Janne (1995). Nuorten rikollinen ja kielletty toiminta 1995. Nuorisorikollisuuden seurantahankkeen ensimmäisen vuoden tuloksia ja kokemuksia. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja; 129. Kivivuori, Janne (1999). Nuorten rikoskäyttäytyminen 1995-1998. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja; 161. Kivivuori, Janne & Karvonen, Sakari & Rimpelä, Matti (2001). Nuorten rikoskäyttäytymisen yleisyys kyselyjen valossa. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen tutkimustiedonantoja; 54. Kivivuori, Janne & Salmi, Venla (2005). Nuorten rikoskäyttäytyminen 1995-2004: teemana sosiaalinen pääoma. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja; 214. Nuoret rikosten tekijöinä ja uhreina (2002). Toim. Janne Kivivuori. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja; 188. Nuorten rikoskäyttäytyminen ja uhrikokemukset: Nuorisorikollisuuskyselyiden tuloksia 1995-2008 (2009). Toim. Salmi, Venla. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen tutkimuksia; 246. Salmi, Venla (2008). Nuorten rikoskäyttäytyminen 1995-2008 [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen verkkokatsauksia; 9/2008. http://www.optula.om.fi/1247667029769 [viitattu 9.7.2013]. Updated list of publications in the study description at http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/fsd1128/ Location of the data collection Finnish Social Science Data Archive Weighting There are no weight variables in the data. 4
1.4. Use of data Special Permissions Users of the data shall send the Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy a copy of all reports, articles, other publications or unpublished theses based on or using the data. The copies shall be sent to the mail address: Department of Social Research, Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, Janne Kivivuori, P.O. Box 10, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, FINLAND. Restrictions The dataset is available for research and for Master s, licentiate and doctoral theses. 5
Chapter 2 Variables [FSD_NO] FSD study number FSD study number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1195 minimum 1128.00 maximum 1128.00 mean 1128.00 standard deviation 0.00 [FSD_VR] FSD edition number FSD edition number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1195 minimum 1.00 maximum 1.00 mean 1.00 standard deviation 0.00 7
2. Variables [FSD_PRO] FSD processing level Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, filter variables, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. A (see codebook) 1 B (see codebook) 2 0 0.0 0.0 C (data hasn t been checked at FSD) 3 0 0.0 0.0 [FSD_ID] FSD case id FSD case id Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1195 minimum 1.00 maximum 1195.00 mean 598.00 standard deviation 345.11 [Q1] Case number Case number Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1195 (continued on next page) 8
Q4 (cont. from previous page) statistic value minimum 1.00 maximum 1195.00 mean 597.92 standard deviation 345.04 [Q2] Type of municipality Type of municipality Urban municipality 1 619 51.8 51.8 Densely populated municipality 2 382 32.0 32.0 Rural municipality 3 194 16.2 16.2 [Q3] Province Province The metropolitan area: Helsinki, Espoo or Vantaa 1 341 28.5 28.5 Southern Finland 2 296 24.8 24.8 Central Finland 3 288 24.1 24.1 Northern Finland 4 270 22.6 22.6 [Q4] School School 9
2. Variables The metropolitan area (Helsinki) 1 91 7.6 7.6 The metropolitan area (Helsinki) 2 70 5.9 5.9 The metropolitan area (Espoo) 3 104 8.7 8.7 The metropolitan area (Vantaa) 4 76 6.4 6.4 Southern Finland (urban municipalities) 13 78 6.5 6.5 Southern Finland (rural municipalities) 15 124 10.4 10.4 Southern Finland (densely populated municipalities) 18 94 7.9 7.9 Central Finland (urban municipalities) 21 98 8.2 8.2 Central Finland (rural municipalities) 29 53 4.4 4.4 Central Finland (densely populated municipalities) 36 137 11.5 11.5 Northern Finland (densely populated municipalities) 40 151 12.6 12.6 Northern Finland (urban municipalities) 42 102 8.5 8.5 Northern Finland (rural municipalities) 45 17 1.4 1.4 [Q6] Gender Gender female 1 566 47.4 47.4 male 2 627 52.5 52.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [Q7] Age Age Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1187 (continued on next page) 10
Q10 (cont. from previous page) statistic value minimum 15.00 maximum 19.00 mean 15.37 standard deviation 0.52 [Q8] Works in addition to going to school? Works in addition to going to school? no 1 1036 86.7 87.2 yes, about hours per week 2 152 12.7 12.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.6 [Q9] Working hours per week Working hours per week Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 142 minimum 1.00 maximum 40.00 mean 7.02 standard deviation 7.05 [Q10] Likes going to school? Likes going to school? 11
2. Variables always 1 49 4.1 4.1 generally 2 636 53.2 53.4 sometimes 3 397 33.2 33.3 never 4 110 9.2 9.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [Q11] Is being diligent important? Is being diligent important? no 1 165 13.8 13.9 yes 2 1024 85.7 86.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 6 0.5 [Q12] Has had to repeat a year at school? Has had to repeat a year at school? no 1 1170 97.9 98.0 yes, how many times? 2 24 2.0 2.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q13] Number of repeated years Number of repeated years 12
Q15 Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 23 minimum 1.00 maximum 5.00 mean 1.39 standard deviation 0.99 [Q14] Does father work? Does father work? yes 1 943 78.9 79.3 no, unemployed 2 106 8.9 8.9 no, retired 3 64 5.4 5.4 no, deceased 4 31 2.6 2.6 no, student 5 11 0.9 0.9 other, what? 6 34 2.8 2.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 6 0.5 [Q15] Father s occupation Father s occupation self-employed 1 98 8.2 8.2 entrepreneur with more than four employees 2 9 0.8 0.8 upper level salaried employee 3 284 23.8 23.8 lower level salaried employee 4 146 12.2 12.2 worker 5 415 34.7 34.7 student 6 0 0.0 0.0 (continued on next page) 13
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) farmer 7 85 7.1 7.1 SES unknown 9 158 13.2 13.2 [Q16] Does mother work? Does mother work? yes 1 884 74.0 74.2 no, unemployed 2 125 10.5 10.5 no, retired 3 25 2.1 2.1 no, deceased 4 10 0.8 0.8 no, student 5 38 3.2 3.2 no, housewife 6 85 7.1 7.1 other, what? 7 25 2.1 2.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [Q17] Mother s occupation Mother s occupation self-employed 1 53 4.4 4.4 entrepreneur with more than four employees 2 6 0.5 0.5 upper level salaried employee 3 174 14.6 14.6 lower level salaried employee 4 541 45.3 45.3 worker 5 202 16.9 16.9 student 6 1 0.1 0.1 farmer or farmer s wife 7 53 4.4 4.4 (continued on next page) 14
Q20 (cont. from previous page) SES unknown 9 165 13.8 13.8 [Q18] Gets on well with father? Gets on well with father? always 1 394 33.0 34.1 generally 2 635 53.1 54.9 sometimes 3 106 8.9 9.2 never 4 22 1.8 1.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 38 3.2 [Q19] Gets on well with mother? Gets on well with mother? always 1 397 33.2 33.5 generally 2 721 60.3 60.8 sometimes 3 63 5.3 5.3 never 4 5 0.4 0.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 9 0.8 [Q20] Does father know which friends spends spare time with? Does father know which friends spends spare time with? 15
2. Variables no 1 423 35.4 37.1 yes 2 717 60.0 62.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 55 4.6 [Q21] Does mother know which friends spends spare time with? Does mother know which friends spends spare time with? no 1 237 19.8 20.4 yes 2 923 77.2 79.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 35 2.9 [Q22] Members of the household Members of the household father + mother 1 170 14.2 14.5 father + mother + siblings 2 718 60.1 61.2 single parent mother + siblings 3 109 9.1 9.3 single parent father + siblings 4 27 2.3 2.3 single parent mother 5 57 4.8 4.9 single parent father 6 18 1.5 1.5 other family type 7 75 6.3 6.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 21 1.8 16
Q25 [Q23] How much money spends in a week? How much money spends in a week? Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 1151 minimum 0.00 maximum 1500.00 mean 63.81 standard deviation 95.55 [Q24] Participation in supervised activities Participation in supervised activities no 1 600 50.2 50.5 yes, hours per week 2 587 49.1 49.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 8 0.7 [Q25] Supervised activity hours per week Supervised activity hours per week Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 582 minimum 1.00 maximum 50.00 (continued on next page) 17
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) statistic value mean 5.29 standard deviation 4.39 [Q26] Girlfriend/boyfriend Girlfriend/boyfriend yes 1 274 22.9 23.1 no 2 914 76.5 76.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 7 0.6 [Q28] Use of alcohol Use of alcohol at least once a week 1 98 8.2 8.3 1-2 times a month 2 393 32.9 33.1 less often than once a month 3 449 37.6 37.9 never 4 246 20.6 20.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 9 0.8 [Q29] Has ever been drunk? Has ever been drunk? 18
Q32 never 1 333 27.9 28.0 yes, in the past year about times 2 858 71.8 72.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 4 0.3 [Q30] Number of times drunk in a year Number of times drunk in a year Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 794 minimum 0.00 maximum 200.00 mean 12.21 standard deviation 17.18 [Q31] Smoking Smoking at least once a week 1 338 28.3 28.4 1-2 times a month 2 59 4.9 5.0 less often than once a month 3 127 10.6 10.7 never 4 665 55.6 55.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 6 0.5 [Q32] Truancy Truancy 19
2. Variables no 0 414 34.6 34.8 yes 1 777 65.0 65.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 4 0.3 [Q33] When began (truancy) When began (truancy) this year 1 66 5.5 8.5 in 1994 2 188 15.7 24.2 in 1993 or earlier 3 522 43.7 67.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 419 35.1 [Q34] Truancy (in the past year) Truancy (in the past year) no 0 205 17.2 26.5 yes 1 210 17.6 27.1 2 109 9.1 14.1 3 46 3.8 5.9 4 27 2.3 3.5 5 63 5.3 8.1 6 6 0.5 0.8 7 5 0.4 0.6 8 6 0.5 0.8 10 43 3.6 5.6 (continued on next page) 20
Q37 (cont. from previous page) 12 1 0.1 0.1 15 10 0.8 1.3 17 1 0.1 0.1 20 16 1.3 2.1 25 8 0.7 1.0 30 5 0.4 0.6 40 1 0.1 0.1 50 5 0.4 0.6 60 1 0.1 0.1 100 4 0.3 0.5 110 1 0.1 0.1 200 1 0.1 0.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 421 35.2 [Q35] Number of days truant Number of days truant Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 557 minimum 0.00 maximum 365.00 mean 2.10 standard deviation 15.65 [Q37] Number of participants (truancy) Number of participants (truancy) one (the respondent alone) 1 330 27.6 59.4 (continued on next page) 21
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) two 2 73 6.1 13.1 three 3 71 5.9 12.8 four 4 37 3.1 6.7 five or more 5 45 3.8 8.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 639 53.5 [Q38] Got caught? (truancy) Got caught? (truancy) no 1 419 35.1 75.5 yes 2 136 11.4 24.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 640 53.6 [Q39] Running away Running away no 0 1029 86.1 86.3 yes 1 164 13.7 13.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [Q40] When began (running away) When began (running away) 22
Q42 this year 1 23 1.9 14.0 in 1994 2 78 6.5 47.6 in 1993 or earlier 3 63 5.3 38.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 1031 86.3 [Q41] Running away (in the past year) Running away (in the past year) no 0 48 4.0 29.3 yes, times during the past year 1 59 4.9 36.0 2 31 2.6 18.9 3 9 0.8 5.5 4 1 0.1 0.6 5 5 0.4 3.0 6 1 0.1 0.6 7 1 0.1 0.6 10 4 0.3 2.4 20 2 0.2 1.2 30 3 0.3 1.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1031 86.3 [Q42] Number of nights away (running away) Number of nights away (running away) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 114 (continued on next page) 23
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) statistic value minimum 1.00 maximum 31.00 mean 1.94 standard deviation 3.07 [Q44] Number of participants (running away) Number of participants (running away) one (the respondent alone) 1 8 0.7 7.5 two 2 17 1.4 16.0 three 3 23 1.9 21.7 four 4 20 1.7 18.9 five or more 5 38 3.2 35.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1089 91.1 [Q45] Got caught? (running away) Got caught? (running away) no 1 106 8.9 92.2 yes 2 9 0.8 7.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1080 90.4 [Q46] Using public transport without paying Using public transport without paying 24
Q48 no 0 654 54.7 54.8 yes 1 539 45.1 45.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [Q47] When began (using public transport without paying) When began (using public transport without paying) this year 1 45 3.8 8.4 in 1994 2 135 11.3 25.2 in 1993 or earlier 3 355 29.7 66.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 660 55.2 [Q48] Using public transport without paying (in the past year) Using public transport without paying (in the past year) no 0 148 12.4 27.6 yes, times during the past year 1 139 11.6 25.9 2 61 5.1 11.4 3 28 2.3 5.2 4 16 1.3 3.0 5 27 2.3 5.0 6 5 0.4 0.9 7 4 0.3 0.7 8 2 0.2 0.4 9 1 0.1 0.2 (continued on next page) 25
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) 10 31 2.6 5.8 12 1 0.1 0.2 15 9 0.8 1.7 20 21 1.8 3.9 25 3 0.3 0.6 27 1 0.1 0.2 30 10 0.8 1.9 40 5 0.4 0.9 50 3 0.3 0.6 60 2 0.2 0.4 70 1 0.1 0.2 90 2 0.2 0.4 100 11 0.9 2.0 101 1 0.1 0.2 120 1 0.1 0.2 140 1 0.1 0.2 150 1 0.1 0.2 300 2 0.2 0.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 658 55.1 [Q49] Fare prize (using public transport without paying) Fare prize (using public transport without paying) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 377 minimum 0.00 maximum 290.00 mean 10.78 standard deviation 25.29 [Q51] Number of participants (using public transport without paying) Number of participants (using public transport without paying) 26
Q53 one (the respondent alone) 1 124 10.4 33.3 two 2 76 6.4 20.4 three 3 74 6.2 19.9 four 4 37 3.1 9.9 five or more 5 61 5.1 16.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 823 68.9 [Q52] Did it happen on the way to school? (using public transport without paying) Did it happen on the way to school? (using public transport without paying) no 1 312 26.1 82.5 yes 2 66 5.5 17.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 817 68.4 [Q53] Got caught? (using public transport without paying) Got caught? (using public transport without paying) no 1 372 31.1 96.1 yes 2 15 1.3 3.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 808 67.6 27
2. Variables [Q54] Driving without a licence Driving without a licence no 0 587 49.1 49.2 yes 1 606 50.7 50.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [Q55] When began (driving without a licence) When began (driving without a licence) this year 1 53 4.4 8.8 in 1994 2 155 13.0 25.7 in 1993 or earlier 3 395 33.1 65.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 592 49.5 [Q56] Was the police notified? (driving without a licence) Was the police notified? (driving without a licence) no 1 536 44.9 89.0 yes 2 37 3.1 6.1 don t know 3 29 2.4 4.8 (continued on next page) 28
Q57 (cont. from previous page) System missing (SYSMIS). 593 49.6 [Q57] Driving without a licence (in the past year) Driving without a licence (in the past year) no 0 181 15.1 30.1 yes, times during the past year 1 67 5.6 11.1 2 145 12.1 24.1 3 38 3.2 6.3 4 13 1.1 2.2 5 40 3.3 6.7 6 4 0.3 0.7 7 1 0.1 0.2 8 4 0.3 0.7 10 46 3.8 7.7 12 1 0.1 0.2 13 3 0.3 0.5 15 6 0.5 1.0 17 1 0.1 0.2 20 15 1.3 2.5 25 2 0.2 0.3 30 5 0.4 0.8 40 1 0.1 0.2 45 1 0.1 0.2 50 11 0.9 1.8 75 1 0.1 0.2 90 1 0.1 0.2 100 7 0.6 1.2 110 1 0.1 0.2 200 3 0.3 0.5 360 1 0.1 0.2 500 1 0.1 0.2 999 1 0.1 0.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 594 49.7 (continued on next page) 29
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [Q59] Number of participants (driving without a licence) Number of participants (driving without a licence) one (the respondent alone) 1 101 8.5 25.3 two 2 99 8.3 24.8 three 3 89 7.4 22.3 four 4 62 5.2 15.5 five or more 5 48 4.0 12.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 796 66.6 [Q60] Got caught? (driving without a licence) Got caught? (driving without a licence) no 1 391 32.7 94.2 yes 2 24 2.0 5.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 780 65.3 [Q61] Graffiti Graffiti 30
Q64 no 0 797 66.7 66.9 yes 1 395 33.1 33.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 3 0.3 [Q62] When began (doing graffiti) When began (doing graffiti) this year 1 30 2.5 7.6 in 1994 2 105 8.8 26.6 in 1993 or earlier 3 259 21.7 65.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 801 67.0 [Q63] Was the police notified? (doing graffiti) Was the police notified? (doing graffiti) no 1 375 31.4 95.2 yes 2 7 0.6 1.8 don t know 3 12 1.0 3.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 801 67.0 [Q64] Doing graffiti (in the past year) Doing graffiti (in the past year) 31
2. Variables no 0 165 13.8 42.0 yes, times during the past year 1 48 4.0 12.2 2 78 6.5 19.8 3 26 2.2 6.6 4 5 0.4 1.3 5 29 2.4 7.4 6 4 0.3 1.0 7 1 0.1 0.3 8 2 0.2 0.5 10 13 1.1 3.3 15 3 0.3 0.8 20 10 0.8 2.5 25 1 0.1 0.3 50 2 0.2 0.5 80 1 0.1 0.3 300 1 0.1 0.3 500 1 0.1 0.3 999 3 0.3 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 802 67.1 [Q66] When? (doing graffiti) When? (doing graffiti) on the way to school 1 22 1.8 10.9 during the lesson 2 27 2.3 13.4 at school during the break 3 34 2.8 16.8 on weeknight 4 37 3.1 18.3 at week-end 5 49 4.1 24.3 during vacation 6 33 2.8 16.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 993 83.1 [Q67] Number of participants (doing graffiti) Number of participants (doing graffiti) 32
Q70 one (the respondent alone) 1 73 6.1 33.2 two 2 29 2.4 13.2 three 3 43 3.6 19.5 four 4 31 2.6 14.1 five or more 5 44 3.7 20.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 975 81.6 [Q68] Got caught? (doing graffiti) Got caught? (doing graffiti) no 1 221 18.5 97.4 yes 2 6 0.5 2.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 968 81.0 [Q69] Vandalism at school Vandalism at school no 0 872 73.0 73.0 yes 1 322 26.9 27.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q70] When began (vandalism at school) When began (vandalism at school) 33
2. Variables this year 1 25 2.1 7.8 in 1994 2 60 5.0 18.8 in 1993 or earlier 3 235 19.7 73.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 875 73.2 [Q71] Was the police notified? (vandalism at school) Was the police notified? (vandalism at school) no 1 301 25.2 93.8 yes 2 3 0.3 0.9 don t know 3 17 1.4 5.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 874 73.1 [Q72] Vandalism at school (in the past year) Vandalism at school (in the past year) no 0 141 11.8 44.2 yes, times during the past year 1 33 2.8 10.3 2 82 6.9 25.7 3 14 1.2 4.4 4 5 0.4 1.6 5 16 1.3 5.0 6 1 0.1 0.3 7 2 0.2 0.6 8 2 0.2 0.6 (continued on next page) 34
Q75 (cont. from previous page) 10 12 1.0 3.8 15 2 0.2 0.6 20 1 0.1 0.3 25 1 0.1 0.3 30 1 0.1 0.3 50 1 0.1 0.3 70 1 0.1 0.3 100 2 0.2 0.6 200 1 0.1 0.3 700 1 0.1 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 876 73.3 [Q74] Value of vandalised object (vandalism at school) Value of vandalised object (vandalism at school) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 116 minimum 0.00 maximum 20000.00 mean 575.72 standard deviation 2162.19 [Q75] Number of participants (vandalism at school) Number of participants (vandalism at school) one (the respondent alone) 1 86 7.2 52.4 two 2 18 1.5 11.0 (continued on next page) 35
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) three 3 21 1.8 12.8 four 4 15 1.3 9.1 five or more 5 24 2.0 14.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 1031 86.3 [Q76] Got caught? (vandalism at school) Got caught? (vandalism at school) no 1 148 12.4 87.1 yes 2 22 1.8 12.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 1025 85.8 [Q77] Vandalism Vandalism no 0 747 62.5 62.6 yes 1 447 37.4 37.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q78] When began (vandalism) When began (vandalism) 36
Q80 this year 1 37 3.1 8.3 in 1994 2 74 6.2 16.7 in 1993 or earlier 3 333 27.9 75.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 751 62.8 [Q79] Was the police notified? (vandalism) Was the police notified? (vandalism) no 1 365 30.5 83.0 yes 2 36 3.0 8.2 don t know 3 39 3.3 8.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 755 63.2 [Q80] Vandalism (in the past year) Vandalism (in the past year) no 0 204 17.1 46.2 yes, times during the past year 1 111 9.3 25.1 2 56 4.7 12.7 3 21 1.8 4.8 4 12 1.0 2.7 5 18 1.5 4.1 6 1 0.1 0.2 8 1 0.1 0.2 9 1 0.1 0.2 (continued on next page) 37
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) 10 11 0.9 2.5 12 1 0.1 0.2 20 2 0.2 0.5 30 1 0.1 0.2 50 1 0.1 0.2 100 1 0.1 0.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 753 63.0 [Q81] Vandalised object (vandalism) Vandalised object (vandalism) bus shelter 1 10 0.8 6.0 bus or train seat 2 7 0.6 4.2 bicycle 3 28 2.3 16.9 other, what? 4 52 4.4 31.3 streetlight(s) 5 24 2.0 14.5 window 6 26 2.2 15.7 trees, plants, flowers 7 19 1.6 11.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 1029 86.1 [Q82] Value of vandalised object (vandalism) Value of vandalised object (vandalism) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 154 minimum 0.00 (continued on next page) 38
Q84 (cont. from previous page) statistic value maximum 99999.00 mean 2826.08 standard deviation 13912.70 [Q83] When? (vandalism) When? (vandalism) on the way to school 1 12 1.0 6.0 on weeknight 2 37 3.1 18.4 at week-end 3 111 9.3 55.2 during vacation 4 41 3.4 20.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 994 83.2 [Q84] Owner of the vandalised object (vandalism) Owner of the vandalised object (vandalism) city or municipality 1 67 5.6 33.8 state railways 2 7 0.6 3.5 other transport company 3 6 0.5 3.0 other, who? 4 41 3.4 20.7 teacher 5 3 0.3 1.5 stranger 6 40 3.3 20.2 don t know 7 34 2.8 17.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 997 83.4 39
2. Variables [Q85] Number of participants (vandalism) Number of participants (vandalism) one (the respondent alone) 1 47 3.9 21.3 two 2 43 3.6 19.5 three 3 42 3.5 19.0 four 4 34 2.8 15.4 five or more 5 55 4.6 24.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 974 81.5 [Q86] Got caught? (vandalism) Got caught? (vandalism) no 1 198 16.6 85.3 yes 2 34 2.8 14.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 963 80.6 [Q87] Shoplifting (meaning here stealing from a shop or a kiosque) Shoplifting (meaning here stealing from a shop or a kiosque) no 0 495 41.4 41.5 (continued on next page) 40
Q90 (cont. from previous page) yes 1 699 58.5 58.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q88] When began (shoplifting) When began (shoplifting) this year 1 29 2.4 4.2 in 1994 2 90 7.5 12.9 in 1993 or earlier 3 578 48.4 82.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 498 41.7 [Q89] Was the police notified? (shoplifting) Was the police notified? (shoplifting) no 1 575 48.1 82.4 yes 2 84 7.0 12.0 don t know 3 39 3.3 5.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 497 41.6 [Q90] Was it a phase of life? (shoplifting) Was it a phase of life? (shoplifting) 41
2. Variables no 1 381 31.9 54.6 yes 2 317 26.5 45.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 497 41.6 [Q91] Age during this phase? (shoplifting) Age during this phase? (shoplifting) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 315 minimum 7.00 maximum 15.00 mean 12.52 standard deviation 1.84 [Q92] Duration of phase in weeks (shoplifting) Duration of phase in weeks (shoplifting) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 298 minimum 0.00 maximum 312.00 mean 30.08 standard deviation 36.10 [Q93] Number of thefts during this phase (shoplifting) Number of thefts during this phase (shoplifting) 42
Q95 Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 210 minimum 1.00 maximum 999.00 mean 69.69 standard deviation 168.56 [Q94] Shoplifting (in the past year) Shoplifting (in the past year) no 0 492 41.2 70.9 yes, times during the past year 1 87 7.3 12.5 2 45 3.8 6.5 3 14 1.2 2.0 4 7 0.6 1.0 5 12 1.0 1.7 6 2 0.2 0.3 7 2 0.2 0.3 10 13 1.1 1.9 15 2 0.2 0.3 20 7 0.6 1.0 30 1 0.1 0.1 35 1 0.1 0.1 40 1 0.1 0.1 50 3 0.3 0.4 60 3 0.3 0.4 100 1 0.1 0.1 150 1 0.1 0.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 501 41.9 [Q95] Stole from where? (shoplifting) Stole from where? (shoplifting) 43
2. Variables from a grocery 1 73 6.1 39.7 from a kiosk/stall 2 26 2.2 14.1 from a department store 3 54 4.5 29.3 other shop 4 31 2.6 16.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1011 84.6 [Q96] When? (shoplifting) When? (shoplifting) on the way to or from school 1 25 2.1 13.4 during the break 2 24 2.0 12.9 during the lesson 3 6 0.5 3.2 at week-end 4 31 2.6 16.7 other time 5 100 8.4 53.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1009 84.4 [Q97] Stole what? (shoplifting) Stole what? (shoplifting) sweets 1 66 5.5 35.9 food 2 3 0.3 1.6 cigarettes 3 14 1.2 7.6 alcohol 4 8 0.7 4.3 make-up 5 24 2.0 13.0 trinkets/jewellery 6 1 0.1 0.5 (continued on next page) 44
Q99 (cont. from previous page) clothes 7 21 1.8 11.4 hobby/recreation equipment 8 5 0.4 2.7 electronics 9 2 0.2 1.1 journals 10 6 0.5 3.3 recordings (cd, cassette etc.) 11 5 0.4 2.7 other 12 15 1.3 8.2 sweets and cigarettes 13 9 0.8 4.9 make-up and records, cassettes 14 1 0.1 0.5 sweets and records, cassettes 15 2 0.2 1.1 clothes and make-up 16 1 0.1 0.5 cigarettes and alcohol 17 1 0.1 0.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 1011 84.6 [Q98] Value of the stolen object (shoplifting) Value of the stolen object (shoplifting) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 190 minimum 1.00 maximum 1600.00 mean 88.20 standard deviation 196.97 [Q99] Number of participants (shoplifting) Number of participants (shoplifting) one (the respondent alone) 1 75 6.3 38.1 (continued on next page) 45
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) two 2 51 4.3 25.9 three 3 46 3.8 23.4 four 4 14 1.2 7.1 five or more 5 11 0.9 5.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 998 83.5 [Q100] Got caught? (shoplifting) Got caught? (shoplifting) no 1 186 15.6 93.0 yes 2 14 1.2 7.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 995 83.3 [Q101] Stealing from school Stealing from school no 0 515 43.1 43.3 yes 1 675 56.5 56.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 5 0.4 [Q102] When began (stealing from school) When began (stealing from school) 46
Q104 this year 1 52 4.4 7.7 in 1994 2 120 10.0 17.9 in 1993 or earlier 3 499 41.8 74.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 524 43.8 [Q103] Was the police notified? (stealing from school) Was the police notified? (stealing from school) no 1 659 55.1 98.2 yes 2 2 0.2 0.3 don t know 3 10 0.8 1.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 524 43.8 [Q104] Stealing from school (in the past year) Stealing from school (in the past year) no 0 279 23.3 41.6 yes, times during the past year 1 158 13.2 23.5 2 105 8.8 15.6 3 47 3.9 7.0 4 11 0.9 1.6 5 27 2.3 4.0 6 3 0.3 0.4 7 3 0.3 0.4 8 3 0.3 0.4 (continued on next page) 47
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) 10 21 1.8 3.1 12 2 0.2 0.3 13 2 0.2 0.3 15 2 0.2 0.3 20 8 0.7 1.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 524 43.8 [Q105] Stole what? (stealing from school) Stole what? (stealing from school) pens, erasers etc. 1 184 15.4 48.5 stationery (exercise books) 2 81 6.8 21.4 journals, books 3 6 0.5 1.6 money 4 0 0.0 0.0 other 5 38 3.2 10.0 sports equipment 6 2 0.2 0.5 pens, erasers etc. and stationery (exercise books) 7 63 5.3 16.6 pens, erasers etc. and journals, books 8 2 0.2 0.5 stationery (exercise books) and journals, books 9 3 0.3 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 816 68.3 [Q106] Value of stolen object? (stealing from school) Value of stolen object? (stealing from school) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 356 (continued on next page) 48
Q108 (cont. from previous page) statistic value minimum 0.00 maximum 15000.00 mean 71.15 standard deviation 795.22 [Q107] Owner of stolen object? (stealing from school) Owner of stolen object? (stealing from school) school 1 343 28.7 91.0 another pupil 2 3 0.3 0.8 teacher 3 22 1.8 5.8 stranger 4 6 0.5 1.6 someone else, who? 5 3 0.3 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 818 68.5 [Q108] Number of participants (stealing from school) Number of participants (stealing from school) one (the respondent alone) 1 225 18.8 61.0 two 2 39 3.3 10.6 three 3 43 3.6 11.7 four 4 28 2.3 7.6 five or more 5 34 2.8 9.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 826 69.1 49
2. Variables [Q109] Got caught? (stealing from school) Got caught? (stealing from school) no 1 387 32.4 99.2 yes 2 3 0.3 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 805 67.4 [Q110] Stealing from home Stealing from home no 0 758 63.4 63.6 yes 1 433 36.2 36.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 4 0.3 [Q111] When began (stealing from home) When began (stealing from home) this year 1 38 3.2 8.8 in 1994 2 54 4.5 12.5 in 1993 or earlier 3 340 28.5 78.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 763 63.8 50
Q113 [Q112] Was the police notified? (stealing from home) Was the police notified? (stealing from home) no 1 430 36.0 99.5 yes 2 0 0.0 0.0 don t know 3 2 0.2 0.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 763 63.8 [Q113] Stealing from home (in the past year) Stealing from home (in the past year) no 0 176 14.7 40.7 yes, times during the past year 1 42 3.5 9.7 2 110 9.2 25.5 3 26 2.2 6.0 4 5 0.4 1.2 5 30 2.5 6.9 7 1 0.1 0.2 8 3 0.3 0.7 9 1 0.1 0.2 10 20 1.7 4.6 12 1 0.1 0.2 15 1 0.1 0.2 18 1 0.1 0.2 20 5 0.4 1.2 25 1 0.1 0.2 30 3 0.3 0.7 50 5 0.4 1.2 52 1 0.1 0.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 763 63.8 (continued on next page) 51
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) [Q114] Stole what? (stealing from home) Stole what? (stealing from home) money 1 155 13.0 61.5 cigarettes 2 28 2.3 11.1 alcohol 3 26 2.2 10.3 sweets 4 8 0.7 3.2 food 5 0 0.0 0.0 something else 6 9 0.8 3.6 money and cigarettes 8 10 0.8 4.0 money and alcohol 9 5 0.4 2.0 money, cigarettes and alcohol 10 4 0.3 1.6 money and food 11 1 0.1 0.4 cigarettes and alcohol 12 2 0.2 0.8 money and sweets 13 2 0.2 0.8 money and TV 14 2 0.2 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 943 78.9 [Q115] Value of the stolen object (stealing from home) Value of the stolen object (stealing from home) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 240 minimum 1.00 maximum 5000.00 (continued on next page) 52
Q117 (cont. from previous page) statistic value mean 93.91 standard deviation 391.37 [Q116] Owner of the stolen object? (stealing from home) Owner of the stolen object? (stealing from home) parents 1 101 8.5 41.2 father 2 55 4.6 22.4 mother 3 64 5.4 26.1 sister or brother 4 17 1.4 6.9 someone else, who? 5 8 0.7 3.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 950 79.5 [Q117] Number of participants (stealing from home) Number of participants (stealing from home) one (the respondent alone) 1 244 20.4 95.3 two 2 6 0.5 2.3 three 3 4 0.3 1.6 four 4 1 0.1 0.4 five or more 5 1 0.1 0.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 939 78.6 53
2. Variables [Q118] Got caught? (stealing from home) Got caught? (stealing from home) no 1 207 17.3 81.5 yes 2 47 3.9 18.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 941 78.7 [Q119] Buying stolen goods Buying stolen goods no 0 966 80.8 81.2 yes 1 223 18.7 18.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 6 0.5 [Q120] When began (buying stolen goods) When began (buying stolen goods) this year 1 34 2.8 15.4 in 1994 2 78 6.5 35.3 in 1993 or earlier 3 109 9.1 49.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 974 81.5 54
Q123 [Q121] Was the police notified? (buying stolen goods) Was the police notified? (buying stolen goods) no 1 214 17.9 96.8 yes 2 4 0.3 1.8 don t know 3 3 0.3 1.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 974 81.5 [Q122] Buying stolen goods (in the past year) Buying stolen goods (in the past year) no 0 98 8.2 44.5 yes, times during the past year 1 65 5.4 29.5 2 30 2.5 13.6 3 8 0.7 3.6 4 3 0.3 1.4 5 6 0.5 2.7 10 6 0.5 2.7 15 1 0.1 0.5 17 1 0.1 0.5 20 2 0.2 0.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 975 81.6 [Q123] Bought what? (buying stolen goods) Bought what? (buying stolen goods) 55
2. Variables sweets 1 5 0.4 4.2 food 2 1 0.1 0.8 cigarettes 3 31 2.6 25.8 alcohol 4 6 0.5 5.0 make-up 5 1 0.1 0.8 trinkets/jewellery 6 0 0.0 0.0 clothes 7 22 1.8 18.3 hobby/recreation equipment 8 3 0.3 2.5 electronics 9 11 0.9 9.2 bicycle 10 4 0.3 3.3 moped or moped parts 11 11 0.9 9.2 records, cassettes 12 8 0.7 6.7 other 13 12 1.0 10.0 sweets and alcohol 14 1 0.1 0.8 cigarettes and sweets 15 0 0.0 0.0 clothes and cigarettes 16 1 0.1 0.8 cigarettes and alcohol 17 2 0.2 1.7 alcohol and drugs 18 1 0.1 0.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1075 90.0 [Q124] Paid how much? (buying stolen goods) Paid how much? (buying stolen goods) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 113 minimum 0.00 maximum 1500.00 mean 96.12 standard deviation 221.62 [Q125] The real value of the stolen object (buying stolen goods) The real value of the stolen object (buying stolen goods) Descriptive statistics 56
Q128 statistic value number of valid cases 115 minimum 2.00 maximum 5000.00 mean 493.24 standard deviation 998.74 [Q126] Number of participants (buying stolen goods) Number of participants (buying stolen goods) one (the respondent alone) 1 86 7.2 73.5 two 2 8 0.7 6.8 three 3 6 0.5 5.1 four 4 9 0.8 7.7 five or more 5 8 0.7 6.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 1078 90.2 [Q127] Got caught? (buying stolen goods) Got caught? (buying stolen goods) no 1 118 9.9 95.9 yes 2 5 0.4 4.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 1072 89.7 [Q128] Bullying at school Bullying at school 57
2. Variables no 0 504 42.2 42.4 yes 1 686 57.4 57.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 5 0.4 [Q129] When began (bullying at school) When began (bullying at school) this year 1 35 2.9 5.1 in 1994 2 71 5.9 10.4 in 1993 or earlier 3 578 48.4 84.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 511 42.8 [Q130] Bullying at school (in the past year) Bullying at school (in the past year) no 0 392 32.8 57.2 yes, times during the past year 1 35 2.9 5.1 2 127 10.6 18.5 3 22 1.8 3.2 4 10 0.8 1.5 5 35 2.9 5.1 6 2 0.2 0.3 7 5 0.4 0.7 8 3 0.3 0.4 9 1 0.1 0.1 (continued on next page) 58
Q132 (cont. from previous page) 10 27 2.3 3.9 15 5 0.4 0.7 20 3 0.3 0.4 30 6 0.5 0.9 50 5 0.4 0.7 60 1 0.1 0.1 69 1 0.1 0.1 78 1 0.1 0.1 100 2 0.2 0.3 300 2 0.2 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 510 42.7 [Q131] Bullying method (bullying at school) Bullying method (bullying at school) mental (for example baiting, name-calling, discrimination) 1 216 18.1 75.0 physical 2 32 2.7 11.1 mental and physical 3 40 3.3 13.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 907 75.9 [Q132] Reason for bullying: overweight (bullying at school) Reason for bullying: overweight (bullying at school) no 0 244 20.4 83.8 (continued on next page) 59
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) yes 1 47 3.9 16.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q133] Physical disability (bullying at school) Physical disability (bullying at school) no 0 273 22.8 93.8 yes 1 18 1.5 6.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q134] Clothes (bullying at school) Clothes (bullying at school) no 0 235 19.7 80.8 yes 1 56 4.7 19.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q135] Good relationship with teachers (bullying at school) Good relationship with teachers (bullying at school) 60
Q138 no 0 251 21.0 86.3 yes 1 40 3.3 13.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q136] Way of speaking or speech defect (bullying at school) Way of speaking or speech defect (bullying at school) no 0 237 19.8 81.4 yes 1 54 4.5 18.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q137] Foreign origins (bullying at school) Foreign origins (bullying at school) no 0 275 23.0 94.5 yes 1 16 1.3 5.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q138] Religious views (bullying at school) Religious views (bullying at school) 61
2. Variables no 0 280 23.4 96.2 yes 1 11 0.9 3.8 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q139] Success at school (bullying at school) Success at school (bullying at school) no 0 259 21.7 89.0 yes 1 32 2.7 11.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q140] Political views (bullying at school) Political views (bullying at school) no 0 273 22.8 93.8 yes 1 18 1.5 6.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q141] Revenge (bullying at school) Revenge (bullying at school) 62
Q144 no 0 287 24.0 98.6 yes 1 4 0.3 1.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q142] Some other reason (bullying at school) Some other reason (bullying at school) no 0 106 8.9 36.4 yes 1 185 15.5 63.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 904 75.6 [Q143] Number of participants (bullying at school) Number of participants (bullying at school) one (the respondent alone) 1 74 6.2 28.0 two 2 25 2.1 9.5 three 3 54 4.5 20.5 four 4 53 4.4 20.1 five or more 5 58 4.9 22.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 931 77.9 [Q144] Got caught? (bullying at school) Got caught? (bullying at school) 63
2. Variables no 1 250 20.9 86.8 yes 2 38 3.2 13.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 907 75.9 [Q145] Caught how? (bullying at school) Caught how? (bullying at school) teacher witnessed the bullying 1 5 0.4 15.2 victim reported to a teacher 2 17 1.4 51.5 another pupil reported to a teacher 3 2 0.2 6.1 victim told his/her parents 4 4 0.3 12.1 another pupil told his/her parents 5 0 0.0 0.0 otherwise, how? 6 5 0.4 15.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 1162 97.2 [Q146] Received punishment? (bullying at school) Received punishment? (bullying at school) no 1 21 1.8 55.3 yes, the punishment was 2 17 1.4 44.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 1157 96.8 64
Q149 [Q147] Participation in a fight Participation in a fight no 0 877 73.4 73.5 yes 1 316 26.4 26.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 2 0.2 [Q148] When began (participation in a fight) When began (participation in a fight) this year 1 42 3.5 13.3 in 1994 2 107 9.0 34.0 in 1993 or earlier 3 166 13.9 52.7 System missing (SYSMIS). 880 73.6 [Q149] Was the police notified? (participation in a fight) Was the police notified? (participation in a fight) no 1 272 22.8 86.6 yes 2 25 2.1 8.0 don t know 3 17 1.4 5.4 (continued on next page) 65
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) System missing (SYSMIS). 881 73.7 [Q150] Participation in a fight (in the past year) Participation in a fight (in the past year) no 0 143 12.0 45.5 yes, times during the past year 1 99 8.3 31.5 2 38 3.2 12.1 3 14 1.2 4.5 4 2 0.2 0.6 5 5 0.4 1.6 6 1 0.1 0.3 7 2 0.2 0.6 8 2 0.2 0.6 9 1 0.1 0.3 10 6 0.5 1.9 20 1 0.1 0.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 881 73.7 [Q152] Caused damage? (participation in a fight) Caused damage? (participation in a fight) no 1 84 7.0 50.9 yes, to property 2 4 0.3 2.4 yes, to person(s) 3 57 4.8 34.5 (continued on next page) 66
Q155 (cont. from previous page) yes, to person(s) and property 4 20 1.7 12.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 1030 86.2 [Q153] Number of participants (participation in a fight) Number of participants (participation in a fight) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 151 minimum 0.00 maximum 99.00 mean 5.86 standard deviation 13.50 [Q154] Got caught? (participation in a fight) Got caught? (participation in a fight) no 1 152 12.7 92.1 yes 2 13 1.1 7.9 System missing (SYSMIS). 1030 86.2 [Q155] Assault (beating up somebody) Assault (beating up somebody) 67
2. Variables no 0 1015 84.9 85.0 yes 1 179 15.0 15.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q156] When began (assault) When began (assault) this year 1 24 2.0 13.4 in 1994 2 52 4.4 29.1 in 1993 or earlier 3 103 8.6 57.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 1016 85.0 [Q157] Was the police notified? (assault) Was the police notified? (assault) no 1 146 12.2 82.5 yes 2 20 1.7 11.3 don t know 3 11 0.9 6.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 1018 85.2 [Q158] Assault (in the past year) Assault (in the past year) 68
Q160 no 0 77 6.4 43.8 yes, times during the past year 1 65 5.4 36.9 2 19 1.6 10.8 3 7 0.6 4.0 4 1 0.1 0.6 7 1 0.1 0.6 8 3 0.3 1.7 10 1 0.1 0.6 20 1 0.1 0.6 30 1 0.1 0.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 1019 85.3 [Q159] Did the victim need treatment? (assault) Did the victim need treatment? (assault) no 1 58 4.9 60.4 yes, but first aid was sufficient 2 14 1.2 14.6 he/she received first aid and had a med. examination 3 9 0.8 9.4 later he/she needed hospital treatment 4 7 0.6 7.3 other, what? 5 8 0.7 8.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1099 92.0 [Q160] Who was the victim? (assault) Who was the victim? (assault) pupil at the same school 1 22 1.8 23.4 (continued on next page) 69
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) friend 2 19 1.6 20.2 teacher 3 1 0.1 1.1 stranger 4 30 2.5 31.9 someone else, who? 5 22 1.8 23.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 1101 92.1 [Q161] Number of participants (assault) Number of participants (assault) one (the respondent alone) 1 69 5.8 71.1 two 2 8 0.7 8.2 three 3 6 0.5 6.2 four 4 5 0.4 5.2 five or more 5 9 0.8 9.3 System missing (SYSMIS). 1098 91.9 [Q162] Got caught? (assault) Got caught? (assault) no 1 78 6.5 80.4 yes 2 19 1.6 19.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 1098 91.9 70
Q165 [Q163] Use of mild drugs (marihuana or hasis) Use of mild drugs (marihuana or hasis) no 0 1099 92.0 92.0 yes 1 95 7.9 8.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q164] When began (use of mild drugs) When began (use of mild drugs) this year 1 22 1.8 23.4 in 1994 2 48 4.0 51.1 in 1993 or earlier 3 24 2.0 25.5 System missing (SYSMIS). 1101 92.1 [Q165] Was the police notified? (use of mild drugs) Was the police notified? (use of mild drugs) no 1 86 7.2 91.5 yes 2 6 0.5 6.4 don t know 3 2 0.2 2.1 (continued on next page) 71
2. Variables (cont. from previous page) System missing (SYSMIS). 1101 92.1 [Q166] Use of mild drugs (in the past year) Use of mild drugs (in the past year) no 0 24 2.0 25.8 yes, times during the past year 1 37 3.1 39.8 2 12 1.0 12.9 3 5 0.4 5.4 5 4 0.3 4.3 7 1 0.1 1.1 10 2 0.2 2.2 11 1 0.1 1.1 15 1 0.1 1.1 17 1 0.1 1.1 20 2 0.2 2.2 30 2 0.2 2.2 999 1 0.1 1.1 System missing (SYSMIS). 1102 92.2 [Q167] How many doses smoked? (use of mild drugs) How many doses smoked? (use of mild drugs) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 61 minimum 1.00 (continued on next page) 72
Q170 (cont. from previous page) statistic value maximum 40.00 mean 2.52 standard deviation 5.08 [Q168] Paid how much? (use of mild drugs) Paid how much? (use of mild drugs) Descriptive statistics statistic value number of valid cases 58 minimum 0.00 maximum 700.00 mean 49.31 standard deviation 118.78 [Q169] Number of participants (use of mild drugs) Number of participants (use of mild drugs) one (the respondent alone) 1 6 0.5 9.2 two 2 4 0.3 6.2 three 3 14 1.2 21.5 four 4 12 1.0 18.5 five or more 5 29 2.4 44.6 System missing (SYSMIS). 1130 94.6 [Q170] Got caught? (use of mild drugs) Got caught? (use of mild drugs) 73
2. Variables no 1 65 5.4 97.0 yes 2 2 0.2 3.0 System missing (SYSMIS). 1128 94.4 [Q171] Misuse of prescribed drugs Misuse of prescribed drugs no 0 1024 85.7 85.8 yes 1 170 14.2 14.2 System missing (SYSMIS). 1 0.1 [Q172] When began (misuse of prescribed drugs) When began (misuse of prescribed drugs) this year 1 41 3.4 24.1 in 1994 2 79 6.6 46.5 in 1993 or earlier 3 50 4.2 29.4 System missing (SYSMIS). 1025 85.8 [Q173] Was the police notified? (misuse of prescribed drugs) Was the police notified? (misuse of prescribed drugs) 74