RC-Specific Evaluation of CSTT Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE 2005 2010 RC-Specific Evaluation of CSTT Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen (Eds.) Evaluation Panel: Humanities

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE 2005 2010 RC-Specific Evaluation of CSTT Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen (Eds.) University of Helsinki Administrative Publications 80/73 Evaluations

Publisher: University of Helsinki Editors: Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen Title: International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral Training at the University of Helsinki 2005 2010 : RC-Specific Evaluation of CSTT Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions Type of publication: Evaluations Summary: Researcher Community (RC) was a new concept of the participating unit in the evaluation. Participation in the evaluation was voluntary and the RCs had to choose one of the five characteristic categories to participate. Evaluation of the Researcher Community was based on the answers to the evaluation questions. In addition a list of publications and other activities were provided by the TUHAT system. The CWTS/Leiden University conducted analyses for 80 RCs and the Helsinki University Library for 66 RCs. Panellists, 49 and two special experts in five panels evaluated all the evaluation material as a whole and discussed the feedback for RC-specific reports in the panel meetings in Helsinki. The main part of this report is consisted of the feedback which is published as such in the report. Chapters in the report: 1. Background for the evaluation 2. Evaluation feedback for the Researcher Community 3. List of publications 4. List of activities 5. Bibliometric analyses The level of the RCs success can be concluded from the written feedback together with the numeric evaluation of four evaluation questions and the category fitness. More conclusions of the success can be drawn based on the University-level report. RC-specific information: Main scientific field of research: Humanities Participation category: 1. Research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field RC s responsible person: Aejmelaeus, Anneli RC-specific keywords: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Septuagint, Qumran, Dead Sea scrolls, Early Judaism, prophecy, Israel's history, ancient manuscripts, paleography, textual transmission, textual criticism, redaction criticism, authoritative Scripture, translation technique Keywords: Research Evaluation, Meta-evaluation, Doctoral Training, Bibliometric Analyses, Researcher Community Series title and number: University of Helsinki, Administrative Publications 80/73, Evaluations ISSN: 1795-5513 (Online) Total number of pages: 82 Additional information: Cover graphics: Päivi Talonpoika-Ukkonen Enquiries: seppo.o.saari@helsinki.fi ISBN: 978-952-10-7493-6 (PDF) Language: English Internet address: http://www.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/aineisto/rc_evaluation 2012/hallinnon_julkaisuja_80_73_2012.pdf

Contents Panel members... 1 1 Introduction to the Evaluation... 5 1.1 RC-specific evaluation reports... 5 1.2 Aims and objectives in the evaluation... 5 1.3 Evaluation method... 5 1.4 Implementation of the external evaluation... 6 1.5 Evaluation material... 7 1.6 Evaluation questions and material... 8 1.7 Evaluation criteria... 10 1.8 Timetable of the evaluation... 13 1.9 Evaluation feedback consensus of the entire panel... 13 2 Evaluation feedback... 15 2.1 Focus and quality of the RC s research... 15 2.2 Practises and quality of doctoral training... 16 2.3 The societal impact of research and doctoral training... 16 2.4 International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility... 16 2.5 Operational conditions... 17 2.6 Leadership and management in the researcher community... 17 2.7 External competitive funding of the RC... 17 2.8 The RC s strategic action plan for 2011 2013... 18 2.9 Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8)... 18 2.10 Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material... 18 2.11 How the UH s focus areas are presented in the RC s research... 18 2.12 RC-specific main recommendations... 19 2.13 RC-specific conclusions... 19 2.14 Preliminary findings in the Panel-specific feedback... 19 3 Appendices... 21

Foreword The evaluation of research and doctoral training is being carried out in the years 2010 2012 and will end in 2012. The steering group appointed by the Rector in January 2010 set the conditions for participating in the evaluation and prepared the Terms of Reference to present the evaluation procedure and criteria. The publications and other scientific activities included in the evaluation covered the years 2005 2010. The participating unit in the evaluation was defined as a Researcher Community (RC). To obtain a critical mass with university-level impact, the number of members was set to range from 20 to 120. The RCs were required to contain researchers in all stages of their research career, from doctoral students to principal investigators (PIs). All in all, 136 Researcher Communities participated in this voluntary evaluation, 5857 persons in total, of whom 1131 were principal investigators. PIs were allowed to participate in two communities in certain cases, and 72 of them used this opportunity and participated in two RCs. This evaluation enabled researchers to define RCs from the bottom up and across disciplines. The aim of the evaluation was not to assess individual performance but a community with shared aims and researcher-training activities. The RCs were able to choose among five different categories that characterised the status and main aims of their research. The steering group considered the process of applying to participate in the evaluation to be important, which lead to the establishment of these categories. In addition, providing a service for the RCs to enable them to benchmark their research at the global level was a main goal of the evaluation. The data for the evaluation consisted of the RCs answers to evaluation questions on supplied e-forms and a compilation extracted from the TUHAT Research Information System (RIS) on 12 April 2011. The compilation covered scientific and other publications as well as certain areas of scientific activities. During the process, the RCs were asked to check the list of publications and other scientific activities and make corrections if needed. These TUHAT compilations are public and available on the evaluation project sites of each RC in the TUHAT-RIS. In addition to the e-form and TUHAT compilation, University of Leiden (CWTS) carried out bibliometric analyses from the articles included in the Web of Science (WoS). This was done on University and RC levels. In cases where the publication forums of the RC were clearly not represented by the WoS data, the Library of the University of Helsinki conducted a separate analysis of the publications. This was done for 66 RCs representing the humanities and social sciences. The evaluation office also carried out an enquiry targeted to the supervisors and PhD candidates about the organisation of doctoral studies at the University of Helsinki. This and other documents describing the University and the Finnish higher education system were provided to the panellists. The panel feedback for each RC is unique and presented as an entity. The first collective evaluation reports available for the whole panel were prepared in July August 2011. The reports were accessible to all panel members via the electronic evaluation platform in August. Scoring from 1 to 5 was used to complement written feedback in association with evaluation questions 1 4 (scientific focus and quality, doctoral training, societal impact, cooperation) and in addition to the category evaluating the fitness for participation in the evaluation. Panellists used the international level as a point of comparison in the evaluation. Scoring was not expected to go along with a preset deviation. Each of the draft reports were discussed and dealt with by the panel in meetings in Helsinki (from 11 September to 13 September or from 18 September to 20 September 2011). In these meetings the panels also examined the deviations among the scores and finalised the draft reports together. The current RC-specific report deals shortly with the background of the evaluation and the terms of participation. The main evaluation feedback is provided in the evaluation report, organised according to the evaluation questions. The original material provided by the RCs for the panellists has been attached to these documents.

On behalf of the evaluation steering group and office, I sincerely wish to thank you warmly for your participation in this evaluation. The effort you made in submitting the data to TUHAT-RIS is gratefully acknowledged by the University. We wish that you find this panel feedback useful in many ways. The bibliometric profiles may open a new view on your publication forums and provide a perspective for discussion on your choice of forums. We especially hope that this evaluation report will help you in setting the future goals of your research. Johanna Björkroth Vice-Rector Chair of the Steering Group of the Evaluation Steering Group of the evaluation Steering group, nominated by the Rector of the University, was responsible for the planning of the evaluation and its implementation having altogether 22 meetings between February 2010 and March 2012. They all represent the University of Helsinki. Chair Vice-Rector, professor Johanna Björkroth Vice-Chair Professor Marja Airaksinen Chief Information Specialist, Dr Maria Forsman Professor Arto Mustajoki University Lecturer, Dr Kirsi Pyhältö Director of Strategic Planning and Development, Dr Ossi Tuomi Doctoral candidate, MSocSc Jussi Vauhkonen

Panel members CHAIR Professor Wim van den Doel Contemporary history, history of European relations with the world beyond Europe Leiden University, the Netherlands VICE-CHAIR Professor Kerstin Jonasson Romance languages, linguistics Uppsala University, Sweden Professor Regina Bendix European ethnology, scientific history of ethnography, folklore University of Göttingen, Germany Professor Paul Cobley History, American studies, communication, semiotics London Metropolitan University, Great Britain Professor Troels Engberg-Pedersen 1 Theology, early Christian thought, ancient philosophy University of Copenhagen, Denmark Professor Erhard Hinrichs Linguistics, language technology, infrastructures Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany Professor Jutta Scherrer Intellectual and cultural history of Russia, history of ideologies L'École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS), France Professor Klaus Tanner 2 Theology, ethics University of Heidelberg, Germany Professor Pauline von Bonsdorff Aesthetics, art education University of Jyväskylä, Finland The panel, independently, evaluated all the submitted material and was responsible for the feedback of the RC-specific reports. The panel members were asked to confirm whether they had any conflict of interests with the RCs. If this was the case, the panel members disqualified themselves in discussion and report writing. Added expertise to the evaluation was contributed by the members from the other panels. Experts from the Other Panels Professor Caitlin Buck, from the Panel of Natural Sciences Professor Allen Ketcham, from the Panel of Social Sciences Professor Erno Lehtinen, from the Panel of Social Sciences Professor Jan van Leeuwen, from the Panel of Natural Sciences 1 Professor Engberg-Pedersen contributed in the report writing although was not able to take part in the meetings in Helsinki. 2 Professor Tanner was involved in the discussions in Helsinki, but not in the pre-work and writing of the reports. 1

EVALUATION OFFICE Dr Seppo Saari, Doc., Senior Adviser in Evaluation, was responsible for the entire evaluation, its planning and implementation and acted as an Editor-in-chief of the reports. Dr Eeva Sievi, Doc., Adviser, was responsible for the registration and evaluation material compilations for the panellists. She worked in the evaluation office from August 2010 to July 2011. MSocSc Paula Ranne, Planning Officer, was responsible for organising the panel meetings and all the other practical issues like agreements and fees and editing a part the RC-specific reports. She worked in the evaluation office from March 2011 to January 2012. Mr Antti Moilanen, Project Secretary, was responsible for editing the reports. He worked in the evaluation office from January 2012 to April 2012. TUHAT OFFICE Provision of the publication and other scientific activity data Mrs Aija Kaitera, Project Manager of TUHAT-RIS served the project ex officio providing the evaluation project with the updated information from TUHAT-RIS. The TUHAT office assisted in mapping the publications with CWTS/University of Leiden. MA Liisa Ekebom, Assisting Officer, served in TUHAT-RIS updating the publications for the evaluation. She also assisted the UH/Library analyses. BA Liisa Jäppinen, Assisting Officer, served in TUHAT-RIS updating the publications for the evaluation. HELSINKI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Provision of the publication analyses Dr Maria Forsman, Chief Information Specialist in the Helsinki University Library, managed with her 10 colleagues the bibliometric analyses in humanities, social sciences and in other fields of sciences where CWTS analyses were not applicable. 2

Acronyms and abbreviations applied in the report External competitive funding AF Academy of Finland TEKES - Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation EU - European Union ERC - European Research Council International and national foundations FP7/6 etc. /Framework Programmes/Funding of European Commission Evaluation marks Outstanding (5) Excellent (4) Very Good (3) Good (2) Sufficient (1) Abbreviations of Bibliometric Indicators P - Number of publications TCS Total number of citations MCS - Number of citations per publication, excluding self-citations PNC - Percentage of uncited publications MNCS - Field-normalized number of citations per publication MNJS - Field-normalized average journal impact THCP10 - Field-normalized proportion highly cited publications (top 10%) INT_COV - Internal coverage, the average amount of references covered by the WoS WoS Thomson Reuters Web of Science Databases Participation category Category 1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. Category 2. The research of the participating community is of high quality, but the community in its present composition has yet to achieve strong international recognition or a clear break-through. Category 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation. Category 4. The research of the participating community represents an innovative opening. Category 5. The research of the participating community has a highly significant societal impact. Research focus areas of the University of Helsinki Focus area 1: The basic structure, materials and natural resources of the physical world Focus area 2: The basic structure of life Focus area 3: The changing environment clean water Focus area 4: The thinking and learning human being Focus area 5: Welfare and safety Focus area 6: Clinical research Focus area 7: Precise reasoning Focus area 8: Language and culture Focus area 9: Social justice Focus area 10: Globalisation and social change 3

4

1 Introduction to the Evaluation 1.1 RC-specific evaluation reports The participants in the evaluation of research and doctoral training were Researcher Communities (hereafter referred to as the RC). The RC refers to the group of researchers who registered together in the evaluation of their research and doctoral training. Preconditions in forming RCs were stated in the Guidelines for the Participating Researcher Communities. The RCs defined themselves whether their compositions should be considered well-established or new. It is essential to emphasise that the evaluation combines both meta-evaluation 3 and traditional research assessment exercise and its focus is both on the research outcomes and procedures associated with research and doctoral training. The approach to the evaluation is enhancement-led where selfevaluation constituted the main information. The answers to the evaluation questions formed together with the information of publications and other scientific activities an entity that was to be reviewed as a whole. The present evaluation recognizes and justifies the diversity of research practices and publication traditions. Traditional Research Assessment Exercises do not necessarily value high quality research with low volumes or research distinct from mainstream research. It is challenging to expose the diversity of research to fair comparison. To understand the essence of different research practices and to do justice to their diversity was one of the main challenges of the present evaluation method. Understanding the divergent starting points of the RCs demanded sensitivity from the evaluators. 1.2 Aims and objectives in the evaluation The aims of the evaluation are as follows: to improve the level of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki and to raise their international profile in accordance with the University s strategic policies. The improvement of doctoral training should be compared to the University s policy. 4 to enhance the research conducted at the University by taking into account the diversity, originality, multidisciplinary nature, success and field-specificity, to recognize the conditions and prerequisites under which excellent, original and high-impact research is carried out, to offer the academic community the opportunity to receive topical and versatile international peer feedback, to better recognize the University s research potential. to exploit the University s TUHAT research information system to enable transparency of publishing activities and in the production of reliable, comparable data. 1.3 Evaluation method The evaluation can be considered as an enhancement-led evaluation. Instead of ranking, the main aim is to provide useful information for the enhancement of research and doctoral training of the participating RCs. The comparison should take into account each field of science and acknowledge their special character. 3 The panellists did not read research reports or abstracts but instead, they evaluated answers to the evaluation questions, tables and compilations of publications, other scientific activities, bibliometrics or comparable analyses. 4 Policies on doctoral degrees and other postgraduate degrees at the University of Helsinki. 5

The comparison produced information about the present status and factors that have lead to success. Also challenges in the operations and outcomes were recognized. The evaluation approach has been designed to recognize better the significance and specific nature of researcher communities and research areas in the multidisciplinary top-level university. Furthermore, one of the aims of the evaluation is to bring to light those evaluation aspects that differ from the prevalent ones. Thus the views of various fields of research can be described and research arising from various starting points understood better. The doctoral training is integrated into the evaluation as a natural component related to research. Operational processes of doctoral training are being examined in the evaluation. Five stages of the evaluation method were: 1. Registration Stage 1 2. Self-evaluation Stage 2 3. TUHAT 5 compilations on publications and other scientific activities 6 4. External evaluation 5. Public reporting 1.4 Implementation of the external evaluation Five Evaluation Panels Five evaluation panels consisted of independent, renowned and highly respected experts. The main domains of the panels are: 1. biological, agricultural and veterinary sciences 2. medicine, biomedicine and health sciences 3. natural sciences 4. humanities 5. social sciences The University invited 10 renowned scientists to act as chairs or vice-chairs of the five panels based on the suggestions of faculties and independent institutes. Besides leading the work of the panel, an additional role of the chairs was to discuss with other panel chairs in order to adopt a broadly similar approach. The panel chairs and vice-chairs had a pre-meeting on 27 May 2011 in Amsterdam. The panel compositions were nominated by the Rector of the University 27 April 2011. The participating RCs suggested the panel members. The total number of panel members was 50. The reason for a smaller number of panellists as compared to the previous evaluations was the character of the evaluation as a meta-evaluation. The panellists did not read research reports or abstracts but instead, they evaluated answers to the evaluation questions, tables and compilations of publications, other scientific activities, bibliometrics and comparable analyses. The panel meetings were held in Helsinki: On 11 13 September 2011: (1) biological, agricultural and veterinary sciences, (2) medicine, biomedicine and health sciences and (3) natural sciences. On 18 20 September 2011: (4) humanities and (5) social sciences. 5 TUHAT (acronym) of Research Information System (RIS) of the University of Helsinki 6 Supervision of thesis, prizes and awards, editorial work and peer reviews, participation in committees, boards and networks and public appearances. 6

1.5 Evaluation material The main material in the evaluation was the RCs self-evaluations that were qualitative in character and allowed the RCs to choose what was important to mention or emphasise and what was left unmentioned. The present evaluation is exceptional at least in the Finnish context because it is based on both the evaluation documentation (self-evaluation questions, publications and other scientific activities) and the bibliometric reports. All documents were delivered to the panellists for examination. Traditional bibliometrics can be reasonably done mainly in medicine, biosciences and natural sciences when using the Web of Science database, for example. Bibliometrics, provided by CWTS/The Centre for Science and Technology Studies, University of Leiden, cover only the publications that include WoS identification in the TUHAT-RIS. Traditional bibliometrics are seldom relevant in humanities and social sciences because the international comparable databases do not store every type of high quality research publications, such as books and monographs and scientific journals in other languages than English. The Helsinki University Library has done analysis to the RCs, if their publications were not well represented in the Web of Science databases (RCs should have at least 50 publications and internal coverage of publications more than 40%) it meant 58 RCs. The bibliometric material for the evaluation panels was available in June 2011. The RCspecific bibliometric reports are attached at the end of each report. The panels were provided with the evaluation material and all other necessary background information, such as the basic information about the University of Helsinki and the Finnish higher education system. Evaluation material 1. Registration documents of the RCs for the background information 2. Self evaluation material answers to the evaluation questions 3. Publications and other scientific activities based on the TUHAT RIS: 3.1. statistics of publications 3.2. list of publications 3.3. statistics of other scientific activities 3.4. list of other scientific activities 4. Bibliometrics and comparable analyses: 4.1. Analyses of publications based on the verification of TUHAT-RIS publications with the Web of Science publications (CWTS/University of Leiden) 4.2. Publication statistics analysed by the Helsinki University Library - mainly for humanities and social sciences 5. University level survey on doctoral training (August 2011) 6. University level analysis on publications 2005 2010 (August 2011) provided by CWTS/University of Leiden Background material University of Helsinki - Basic information about the University of the Helsinki - The structure of doctoral training at the University of Helsinki - Previous evaluations of research at the University of Helsinki links to the reports: 1998 and 2005 The Finnish Universities/Research Institutes - Finnish University system - Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - The State and Quality of Scientific Research in Finland. Publication of the Academy of Finland 9/09. The evaluation panels were provided also with other relevant material on request before the meetings in Helsinki. 7

1.6 Evaluation questions and material The participating RCs answered the following evaluation questions which are presented according to the evaluation form. In addition, TUHAT RIS was used to provide the additional material as explained. For giving the feedback to the RCs, the panellists received the evaluation feedback form constructed in line with the evaluation questions: 1. Focus and quality of the RC s research Description of - the RC s research focus. - the quality of the RC s research (incl. key research questions and results) - the scientific significance of the RC s research in the research field(s) Identification of the ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC s research The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC s publications, analysis of the RC s publications data (provided by University of Leiden and the Helsinki University Library) A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 2. Practises and quality of doctoral training Organising of the doctoral training in the RC. Description of the RC s principles for: - recruitment and selection of doctoral candidates - supervision of doctoral candidates - collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral programmes - good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training - assuring of good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development. The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC s other scientific activities/supervision of doctoral dissertations A written feedback from the aspects of: processes and good practices related to leadership and management Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 3. The societal impact of research and doctoral training Description on how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public, private and/or 3rd sector). Identification of the ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC s research and doctoral training. The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC s other scientific activities. A written feedback from the aspects of: societal impact, national and international collaboration, innovativeness Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 8

4. International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility Description of - the RC s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities - how the RC has promoted researcher mobility Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development. A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, national and international collaboration Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 5. Operational conditions Description of the operational conditions in the RC s research environment (e.g. research infrastructure, balance between research and teaching duties). Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development. A written feedback from the aspects of: processes and good practices related to leadership and management Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations 6. Leadership and management in the researcher community Description of - the execution and processes of leadership in the RC - how the management-related responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC - how the leadership- and management-related processes support - high quality research - collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC the RC s research focus - strengthening of the RC s know-how Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes 7. External competitive funding of the RC The RCs were asked to provide information of such external competitive funding, where: - the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and - the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki On the e-form the RCs were asked to provide: 1) The relevant funding source(s) from a given list (Academy of Finland/Research Council, TEKES/The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, EU, ERC, foundations, other national funding organisations, other international funding organisations), and 2)The total sum of funding which the organisation in question had decided to allocate to the RCs members during 1.1.2005 31.12.2010. Competitive funding reported in the text is also to be considered when evaluating this point. A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness, future significance Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations 8. The RC s strategic action plan for 2011 2013 RC s description of their future perspectives in relation to research and doctoral training. A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal Impact, processes and good practices related to leadership and management, national and international collaboration, innovativeness, future significance Strengths Areas of development 9

Other remarks Recommendations 9. Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8) The RC s fitness to the chosen participation category A written feedback evaluating the RC s fitness to the chosen participation category Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 10. Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material Comments on the compilation of evaluation material 11. How the UH s focus areas are presented in the RC s research? Comments if applicable 12. RC-specific main recommendations based on the previous questions 1 11 13. RC-specific conclusions 1.7 Evaluation criteria The panellists were expected to give evaluative and analytical feedback to each evaluation question according to their aspects in order to describe and justify the quality of the submitted material. In addition, the evaluation feedback was asked to be pointed out the level of the performance according to the following classifications: outstanding (5) excellent (4) very good (3) good (2) sufficient (1) Evaluation according to the criteria was to be made with thorough consideration of the entire evaluation material of the RC in question. Finally, in questions 1-4 and 9, the panellists were expected to classify their written feedback into one of the provided levels (the levels included respective descriptions, criteria ). Some panels used decimals in marks. The descriptive level was interpreted according to the integers and not rounding up the decimals by the editors. Description of criteria levels Question 1 FOCUS AND QUALITY OF THE RC S RESEARCH Classification: Criteria (level of procedures and results) Outstanding quality of procedures and results (5) Outstandingly strong research, also from international perspective. Attracts great international interest with a wide impact, including publications in leading journals and/or monographs published by leading international publishing houses. The research has world leading qualities. The research focus, key research questions scientific significance, societal impact and innovativeness are of outstanding quality. In cases where the research is of a national character and, in the judgement of the evaluators, should remain so, the concepts of international attention or international impact etc. in the grading criteria above may be replaced by international comparability. 10

Operations and procedures are of outstanding quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of outstanding quality. Excellent quality of procedures and results (4) Research of excellent quality. Typically published with great impact, also internationally. Without doubt, the research has a leading position in its field in Finland. Operations and procedures are of excellent quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of excellent quality. Very good quality of procedures and results (3) The research is of such very good quality that it attracts wide national and international attention. Operations and procedures are of very good quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of very good quality. Good quality of procedures and results (2) Good research attracting mainly national attention but possessing international potential, extraordinarily high relevance may motivate good research. Operations and procedures are of good quality, shared occasionally in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of good quality. Sufficient quality of procedures and results (1) In some cases the research is insufficient and reports do not gain wide circulation or do not have national or international attention. Research activities should be revised. Operations and procedures are of sufficient quality, shared occasionally in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to some extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of sufficient quality. Question 2 DOCTORAL TRAINING Question 3 SOCIETAL IMPACT Question 4 COLLABORATION Classification: Criteria (level of procedures and results) Outstanding quality of procedures and results (5) Procedures are of outstanding quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of outstanding quality. The procedures and results are regularly evaluated and the feedback has an effect on the planning. Excellent quality of procedures and results (4) Procedures are of excellent quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of excellent quality. The procedures and outcomes are evaluated and the feedback has an effect on the planning. Very good quality of procedures and results (3) Procedures are of very good quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and 11

management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of very good quality. Good quality of procedures and results (2) Procedures are of good quality, shared occasionally in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of good quality. Sufficient quality of procedures and results (1) Procedures are of sufficient quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to some extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of sufficient quality. Question 9 CATEGORY Participation category fitness for the category chosen The choice and justification for the chosen category below should be reflected in the RC s responses to the evaluation questions 1 8. 1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. 2. The research of the participating community is of high quality, but the community in its present composition has yet to achieve strong international recognition or a clear break-through. 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation. The research is of high quality and has great significance and impact in its field. However, the generally used research evaluation methods do not necessarily shed sufficient light on the merits of the research. 4. The research of the participating community represents an innovative opening. A new opening can be an innovative combination of research fields, or it can be proven to have a special social, national or international demand or other significance. Even if the researcher community in its present composition has yet to obtain proof of international success, its members can produce convincing evidence of the high level of their previous research. 5. The research of the participating community has a highly significant societal impact. The participating researcher community is able to justify the high social significance of its research. The research may relate to national legislation, media visibility or participation in social debate, or other activities promoting social development and human welfare. In addition to having societal impact, the research must be of a high standard. An example of outstanding fitness for category choice (5) 7 The RC s representation and argumentation for the chosen category were convincing. The RC recognized its real capacity and apparent outcomes in a wider context to the research communities. The specific character of the RC was well-recognized and well stated in the responses. The RC fitted optimally for the category. Outstanding (5) Excellent (4) Very good (3) Good (2) Sufficient (1) The above-mentioned definition of outstanding was only an example in order to assist the panellists in the positioning of the classification. There was no exact definition for the category fitness. 7 The panels discussed the category fitness and made the final conclusions of the interpretation of it. 12

1.8 Timetable of the evaluation The main timetable of the evaluation: 1. Registration November 2010 2. Submission of self-evaluation materials January February 2011 3. External peer review May September 2011 4. Published reports March April 2012 - University level public report - RC specific reports The entire evaluation was implemented during the university s strategy period 2010 2012. The preliminary results were available for the planning of the following strategy period in late autumn 2011. The evaluation reports will be published in March/April 2012. More detailed time schedule is published in the University report. 1.9 Evaluation feedback consensus of the entire panel The panellists evaluated all the RC-specific material before the meetings in Helsinki and mailed the draft reports to the evaluation office. The latest interim versions were on-line available to all the panellists on the Wiki-sites. In September 2011, in Helsinki the panels discussed the material, revised the first draft reports and decided the final numeric evaluation. After the meetings in Helsinki, the panels continued working and finalised the reports before the end of November 2011. The final RC-specific reports are the consensus of the entire panel. The evaluation reports were written by the panels independently. During the editing process, the evaluation office requested some clarifications from the panels when necessary. The tone and style in the reports were not harmonized in the editing process. All the reports follow the original texts written by the panels as far as it was possible. The original evaluation material of the RCs, provided for the panellists is attached at the end of the report. It is essential to notice that the exported lists of publications and other scientific activities depend how the data was stored in the TUHAT-RIS by the RCs. 13

14

2 Evaluation feedback 2.1 Focus and quality of the RC s research Description of the RC s research focus the quality of the RC s research (incl. key research questions and results) the scientific significance of the RC s research in the research field(s) Identification of the ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC s research ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness This RC investigates the composition and development of the sacred texts in early Judaism: their writing, copying and editing, their rewriting, actualizing and commenting as well as their interpretation, translation, and authorization. The various project groups within the RC approach these texts and the processes of their emergence from different perspectives and with different methodologies, focusing on different parts of the corpus of sacred texts and on different phases of their development: the Hebrew Scriptures (investigation of their emergence, transmission and development, changes made by the scribes, and the process of scripturalization) the Qumran texts (paleographical reconstruction and interpretation of the fragmentary manuscripts, investigation of the nature of the Qumran movement and its continuities and discontinuities with the sacred traditions) the Septuagint (textual criticism of the Hebrew and the Greek texts as well as the daughter versions of the Septuagint, translation-technical research on the Septuagint and its daughter versions, preparation of a critical edition of the Septuagint) the historiography of Israel (confronting the texts with the results of archaeological research and the recent advances in Assyriology) prophetic texts (interpretation of the texts in the context of the broader phenomenon of Ancient Eastern Mediterranean prophecy). There is a broad variety of expertise in the RC, including mastering of a number of ancient languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, Akkadian, Syriac, Ethiopic, Greek, Latin, Coptic). (Stage 1 pp. 1-2) Strengths The present RC is a development from an earlier Centre of Excellence (1995-2005) at the Faculty of Theology. The RC has managed to maintain its general excellence and there is no doubt that together with the New Testament RC, this RC belongs at the forefront of European university departments in the field. It goes without saying, therefore, that the RC is highly visible internationally, not only in Europe, but also in the USA. In addition, the many activities manage to bring many international scholars to Helsinki. Areas of development The focus of the RC s research could be further strengthened by increasing the coherence of the unit and links between the various lines of investigation covered by the RC. However, since this is a quotation from the self-evaluation done by the RC itself (Stage 2 p. 3), it can hardly be counted against it. It remains the case, however, that although one can see a certain Finnish profile in this RC, any attempts to enhance the synergy between the various individual projects within the RC must be welcomed. Numeric evaluation: 4.5 (Excellent) 15

2.2 Practises and quality of doctoral training Organising of the doctoral training in the RC. Description of the RC s principles for: recruitment and selection of doctoral candidates supervision of doctoral candidates collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral programmes good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training assuring of good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development. Additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC s other scientific activities/supervision of doctoral dissertations ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management The practices and quality of the doctoral training programme are very well described in the self-evaluation (Stage 2 pp. 3-6). The doctoral training is fundamentally that of the Faculty of Theology, which is renowned for its quality, and the Finnish Graduate School of Theology. One particularly notices the extent to which the RC is able to further the international dimension of the doctoral training. The self-evaluation lists three challenges that constantly need to be monitored: 1) Further international development of the doctoral training programme, 2) The constant need to help doctoral students finish their dissertation in time, 3) The need to include co-supervision so as not to overload supervisors. Numeric evaluation: 5 (Outstanding) 2.3 The societal impact of research and doctoral training Description on how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public, private and/or 3rd sector). Identification of the ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC s research and doctoral training. Additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC s other scientific activities. ASPECTS: Societal impact, national and international collaboration, innovativeness The RC engages strongly, if somewhat unevenly, in publishing and mediatizing its research results. Perhaps the track record has not been quite at the expected level (e.g. with regard to scientific monographs) during the period of 2005-2010. However, a fairly large number of dissertations appear to be coming up for publication very soon. Numeric evaluation: 4 (Excellent) 2.4 International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility Description of the RC s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities how the RC has promoted researcher mobility Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development. ASPECTS: Scientific quality, national and international collaboration 16

In this respect the RC does exceedingly well, which of course also lies behind its general level of excellency. There is extensive cooperation with other universities both in Europe and the USA, and the members of the RC are generally very mobile. Numeric evaluation: 5 (Outstanding) 2.5 Operational conditions Description of the operational conditions in the RC s research environment (e.g. research infrastructure, balance between research and teaching duties). Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development. ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management The RC has been excellently funded from external sources. There is a major challenge, how-ever, which is to find time for research for the leading members of the RC due to a heavy teaching load. Additional teaching by docents in Old Testament studies would be very welcome, but so far the Finnish university system has not made that possible. 2.6 Leadership and management in the researcher community Description of the execution and processes of leadership in the RC how the management-related responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC how the leadership- and management-related processes support high quality research collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC the RC s research focus strengthening of the RC s know-how Identification of the RC s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management The leading members of the RC form a steering group that is responsible for the leadership and management of the RC, while also coordinating their own research groups. It appears that there is a quite democratic leadership structure, which also appears to be functioning well. There is a general awareness that it is of vital importance that each member of the RC knows of the current research in each sector of the RC and of the common goals of the RC. Among the challenges are the fact that there are by now no organizational structures at the level of the department of Biblical studies and the issue of time management for the leading members of the RC. 2.7 External competitive funding of the RC The RCs were asked to provide information of such external competitive funding, where: the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005 31.12.2010, and the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki On the e-form the RCs were asked to provide: 1) The relevant funding source(s) from a given list (Academy of Finland/Research Council, TEKES/The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, EU, ERC, foundations, other national funding organisations, other international funding organizations), and 17

2) The total sum of funding which the organisation in question had decided to allocate to the RCs members during 1.1.2005 31.12.2010. Competitive funding reported in the text is also to be considered when evaluating this point. ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness and future significance The RC has done exceedingly well in terms of attracting funding from the Academy of Finland and very noticeably the ERC. In addition, it has been able to secure funding from other national foundations. Here the RC lies at the top in the group of other comparable RCs. 2.8 The RC s strategic action plan for 2011 2013 RC s description of their future perspectives in relation to research and doctoral training. ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal Impact, processes and good practices related to leadership and management, national and international collaboration, innovativeness, future significance There are clear plans for (a) seeking additional funding after 2012, (b) applying for the status of a Centre of Excellence if such become available, (c) and possibly for extending the scientific base of the RC by cooperating with suitable partners like the New Testament, Assyriology, Semitic Languages, Religious Studies and Classical Languages. All in all this RC is made up at its top level by scholars who are highly experienced in organizing and running an RC. 2.9 Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8) The RC s fitness to the chosen participation category. Category 1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. The RC places itself in participation category no. 1, and for good reason. In comparison with what is being done in other places within the field in Europe and the USA, the panel must rate this RC at top level. Numeric evaluation: 4.5 (Excellent) 2.10 Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material The self-evaluation was compiled through contributions from all leading members of the RC. The PhD students were apparently not involved. 2.11 How the UH s focus areas are presented in the RC s research Focus area 8: Language and culture The RC s research represents UH focus area no. 8: Language and culture. 18

2.12 RC-specific main recommendations The main recommendation must be that the RC should make a concerted effort to bring all the individual research projects and researchers together in as much of a unit as is feasible. 2.13 RC-specific conclusions This is a RC at the front of current research in its fields. One hopes that it will get the opportunity to continue its important work, either as a Centre of Excellence (if that becomes available) or through further external funding. 2.14 Preliminary findings in the Panel-specific feedback As so often in the most research efficient RCs, the need for sabbaticals for leading members of the RC is articulated very forcefully. 19

20

3 Appendices A. Original evaluation material a. Registration material Stage 1 b. Answers to evaluation questions Stage 2 c. List of publications d. List of other scientific activities B. Bibliometric analyses a. Analysis provided by CWTS/University of Leiden b. Analysis provided by Helsinki University Library (66 RCs) 21

International evaluation of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki 2005-2010 RC-SPECIFIC MATERIAL FOR THE PEER REVIEW NAME OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions (CSTT) LEADER OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: Professor Anneli Aejmelaeus, Faculty of Theology RC-SPECIFIC MATERIAL FOR THE PEER REVIEW: Material submitted by the RC at stages 1 and 2 of the evaluation - STAGE 1 material: RC s registration form (incl. list of RC participants in an excel table) - STAGE 2 material: RC s answers to evaluation questions TUHAT compilations of the RC members publications 1.1.2005-31.12.2010 TUHAT compilations of the RC members other scientific activities 1.1.2005-31.12.2010 UH Library analysis of publications data 1.1.2005-31.12.2010 results of UH Library analysis will be available by the end of June 2011 NB! Since Web of Science(WoS)-based bibliometrics does not provide representative results for most RCs representing humanities, social sciences and computer sciences, the publications of these RCs will be analyzed by the UH Library (results available by the end of June, 2011)

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 1 MATERIAL (registration form) 1 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Name: Aejmelaeus, Anneli E-mail: anneli.aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Phone: +358 9 191 24003 Affiliation: Faculty of Theology Street address: Aleksanterinkatu 7 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTICIPATING RESEARCHER COMMUNITY (RC) Name of the participating RC (max. 30 characters): Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions Acronym for the participating RC (max. 10 characters): CSTT Description of the operational basis in 2005-2010 (eg. research collaboration, joint doctoral training activities) on which the RC was formed (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The RC has both joint doctoral training and intensive research collaboration. The doctoral training is characterized by multilevel seminar work with interdisciplinary and international aspects: (1) Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Doctoral Seminar gathers all the doctoral students and their supervisors in the field to discuss papers given by the participants, based on their dissertation work on a broad variety of themes; (2) Project Groups (Qumran, Septuagint, Archaeology, Changes in Scripture) give an opportunity to discuss more specific methodological questions among doctoral candidates and researchers working on closely related topics; (3) The Finnish Graduate School of Theology offers an educational framework and interdisciplinary forum within theology, which enhances exchange of ideas and experiences as well as communication of research results among a broader circle of doctoral candidates; (4) international cooperation in doctoral training takes place with OTSEM (www.otsem.info/cms; incl. 13 Northern European universities and schools of theology) and with the Institute for Jewish Studies, University of Vienna; (5) participation of doctoral candidates in international networks, workshops, and conferences: Nordic Network in Qumran Studies (www.nnqs.org), Workshop on Textual Criticism of Samuel-Kings (www.helsinki.fi/teol/pro/lxx/about/co-operation.html), Kinneret Regional Project (www.kinneret-excavations.org/), Meetings of the SBL (www.sbl-site.org) and the IOSOT/IOSCS/IOQS. The RC is gathered around mutual interest in the religious literature of early Judaism, texts that eventually became part of the Hebrew Bible as well as texts that remained outside, texts included in the Septuagint and texts of the Qumran movement. The various research projects included in the RC approach these texts from different angles and with different methodologies, and thus complement each other in an ideal way. Research cooperation between the project groups included in the RC takes place in symposia that are arranged once or twice a year on topics related to Change of Sacred Texts and Traditions. The list of participants regularly includes international cooperation partners. 1

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 1 MATERIAL (registration form) 3 SCIENTIFIC FIELDS OF THE RC Main scientific field of the RC s research: humanities RC's scientific subfield 1: Theology RC's scientific subfield 2: History RC's scientific subfield 3: Archaeology RC's scientific subfield 4: Classics Other, if not in the list: Semitic languages and cultures Translation science 4 RC'S PARTICIPATION CATEGORY Participation category: 1. Research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field Justification for the selected participation category (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The RC is partly to be seen as continuation of the Centre of Excellence of the Academy of Finland on Formation of Early Jewish and Christian Ideology (2000 05) in which all the PIs and some postdoc members participated in one way or another. After the Center of Excellence period, several smaller project groups included in this RC have been granted funding by the Academy of Finland ( Conflicting Identities: Social and Religious Identities in Light of the Qumran Material from the Judaean Desert, Sollamo 2008 10; Textual Criticism of the Septuagint, Aejmelaeus 2009 12) and by the European Science Foundation ( Birth and Transmission of a Holy Tradition, EURYI Award, Pakkala 2007 12). In addition to the project funding mentioned above, personal research funding has been granted in the form of fellowships at Institutes for Advanced Studies to: Nissinen 2008 09 at Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, Jokiranta 2007 10 at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Aejmelaeus 2004 06 at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. In the previous evaluation of the University of Helsinki 2005, the Department of Biblical Studies was recognized as having international excellence and belonging to the leading European departments in the field. Since then the work has been carried on according to the recommendations of the Assessment Panel. All the PIs in the RC are internationally recognized scholars the senior members belonging to the leading scholars in their fields who are engaged in international research cooperation, regularly take part in scholarly conferences, and publish the results of their research in international series and journals. 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE RC'S RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING Public description of the RC's research and doctoral training (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The RC investigates the composition and development of sacred texts in early Judaism: their writing, copying and editing, their rewriting, actualizing and commenting as well as their interpretation, translation, and authorization. These texts are typically tradition literature that has had a long history of transmission by 2

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 1 MATERIAL (registration form) manuscripts, often preceded by oral traditions. Changes in texts thus often presuppose changes in the traditions behind them, and these again need to be traced back by all possible methods, from the philological to the archaeological. The various project groups within the RC approach the sacred texts and the processes of their emergence from different perspectives and with different methodologies, focusing on different parts of the corpus of sacred texts and on different phases of their development: - Hebrew Scriptures (investigation of their emergence, transmission and development, changes made by the scribes, and the process of scripturalization) - Qumran texts (paleographical reconstruction and interpretation of the fragmentary manuscripts, investigation of the nature of the Qumran movement and its continuities and discontinuities with the sacred traditions) - Septuagint (textual criticism of the Hebrew and the Greek texts as well as the daughter versions of the Septuagint, translation-technical research on the Septuagint and its daughter versions, preparation of a critical edition of the Septuagint) - Historiography of Israel (confronting the texts with the results of archaeological research and the recent advances in Assyriology) - Prophetic texts (interpretation of the texts in the context of the broader phenomenon of Ancient Eastern Mediterranean prophecy) There is a broad variety of expertise in the RC, including mastering of a number of ancient languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, Akkadian, Syriac, Ethiopic, Greek, Latin, Coptic). There is also a great deal of mutual support and synergy in the RC. As for the doctoral training, the RC forms an ideal environment for doctoral candidates, both domestic and international, who are welcome to take part in all the activities of the RC and have all the expertise of the RC at their disposal. Significance of the RC's research and doctoral training for the University of Helsinki (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The area of research represented by the RC is clearly one of those where Helsinki is a byword for excellence. It is rare among comparable institutes around the world to find among their researchers such a wide variety of expertise in the areas of the Hebrew Bible, the Septuagint, and the Qumran discoveries, three major areas in the study of the religious literature of early Judaism. The good reputation and international visibility of the University of Helsinki was further enhanced if possible through the meeting of the triennial conference of the International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament in Helsinki 2010, hosted for the first time by Finnish scholars, with Raija Sollamo as the President of the Conference and Jutta Jokiranta as the Secretary. The RC includes a number of excellent doctoral candidates whose dissertation projects promise to keep up the high standards of the University of Helsinki also in the future. Keywords: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Septuagint, Qumran, Dead Sea scrolls, Early Judaism, prophecy, Israel's history, ancient manuscripts, paleography, textual transmission, textual criticism, redaction criticism, authoritative Scripture, translation technique 3

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 1 MATERIAL (registration form) 6 QUALITY OF RC'S RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING Justified estimate of the quality of the RC's research and doctoral training at national and international level during 2005-2010 (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): In the previous evaluations, the Department of Biblical Studies, which the RC is part of, has received the highest notes. Senior and postdoc members of the RC have been granted competed funding for their research in form of Academy project funding, EURYI funding, and personal fellowships. The doctoral candidates of the RC have been granted scholarships by various foundations. The members of the RC are visible in international connections, frequently taking part in and giving highquality presentations at scholarly conferences, being invited as keynote speakers, having responsibility in the leadership of international organizations, in advisory boards of institutes and projects and in editorial boards of journals and series, and as editors of publication series. The senior members are also active in the mainly invisible work of writing reviews and evaluations on dissertations, research project applications as well as on candidates for professorships and other positions both in Finland and abroad. The scholarly publications by the members of the RC appear in international languages (mainly English) in international series, conference volumes and journals. All the doctoral theses are today published in English and increasingly in international series, which is encouraged. On the other hand, dissemination of the research results also takes place in Finnish publications directed to a wider audience as well as to students. All this speaks for the high quality of the RC's research and doctoral training and shows that the RC is keeping up the high standards of its predecessors. Comments on how the RC's scientific productivity and doctoral training should be evaluated (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): In the field of biblical studies, the impact and importance of publications cannot be evaluated exclusively by (1) peer-reviewed journal articles, but a broader spectrum of publication media needs to be taken into account, such as (2) monographs, especially in international series, and (3) articles in edited volumes and compilations, especially invited contributions published in international series (conference proceedings, lexica, and other collected volumes). The publishing strategy of the RC is to produce high-quality publications in the most highly esteemed media. The most central publishers for this area of study are: BRILL, Eerdmans, Eisenbrauns, Peeters, T & T Clark, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Walter de Gruyter. The publication of doctoral dissertations in these publishing houses is a sign of the high quality of the doctoral candidates as well as of the effectiveness of the doctoral training. The evaluation of the scientific productivity of the RC should include all international activities, such as mobility (working at foreign universities, student and teacher exchange, invitation of visiting scholars, organization of symposia), international conference presentations (by junior and senior members) as well as research cooperations and networks. 4

LIST OF RC MEMBERS NAME OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions RC-LEADER A. Aejmelaeus Category 1 PI-status Last name First name (TUHAT, 29.11.2010) Title of research and teaching personnel Affiliation 1 Aejmelaeus Anneli x Professor Faculty of Theology 2 Jokiranta Jutta x University Lecturer Faculty of Theology 3 Nissinen Martti x Professor Faculty of Theology 4 Pakkala Juha x University Researcher, University Lecturer Faculty of Theology 5 Sollamo Raija x Professor Faculty of Theology 6 Latvus Kari x University Lecturer Faculty of Theology 7 von Weissenberg Hanne Postdoctoral Researcher Faculty of Theology 8 Voitila Anssi University Researcher Faculty of Theology 9 Saukkonen Juhana Postdoctoral Researcher Faculty of Theology 10 Alanne Merja Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 11 Borchardt Francis Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 12 Kauhanen Tuukka Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 13 Kilkkinen Hanna Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 14 Liljeström Marketta Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 15 Pajunen Mika Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 16 Perttilä Elina Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 17 Saarelainen Katri Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 18 Seppänen Christian Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 19 Tenhunen Katri Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 20 Tervanotko Hanna Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 21 Tynjä Tuula Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 22 Uusimäki Elisa Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 23 Valkama Kirsi Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology 24 Vanonen Hanna Doctoral candidate Faculty of Theology

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION Name of the RC s responsible person: Aejmelaeus, Anneli E-mail of the RC s responsible person: anneli.aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Name and acronym of the participating RC: Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions, CSTT The RC s research represents the following key focus area of UH: 8. Kieli ja kulttuuri Language and culture Comments for selecting/not selecting the key focus area: The RC covers multiple aspects of the key focus area Language and Culture. Its very topic Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions is essentially focused on religious identities and their changes and interfaces in the multicultural historical environment of the ancient Eastern Mediterranean. Language and culture are effectively combined in the two intertwining research strands of the RC, textual history and history of religion. While the members of the RC specialized in textual history have an emphasis on language, especially from the point of view of translation and transformation of textual traditions, other members with an ancient Near Eastern and archaeological approach are concerned with cultural history, specifically from the point of view of religion. All senior members of the RC were affiliated with the Center of Excellence Formation of Early Jewish and Christian Ideology (1995 2005). 1 FOCUS AND QUALITY OF RC'S RESEARCH (MAX. 8800 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of the RC s research focus, the quality of the RC s research (incl. key research questions and results) and the scientific significance of the RC s research for the research field(s). The focus of the RC is on the Hebrew Bible and the textual and cultural changes it reflects. The RC has the advantage of including first-class expertise in several research lines that are crucial for the current international discussion around the processes of writing, editing, actualizing, and interpreting sacred traditions and the emergence of authoritative scripture in the late Second Temple period. As a result, there is a great deal of synergy and fruitful cooperation between the project groups included. The HEBREW BIBLE (HB) is naturally a central point of reference for most of the research done by the RC. The editorial activity of the scribes that led to the formulation and fixing of the Masoretic Text is approached by the EURYI project of Dr. Juha Pakkala The Birth and Transmission of a Holy Tradition from the angle of literary development. Access to an early form of the Hebrew text is gained through the Septuagint by application of a translation-technical approach. Research of the earliest manuscript evidence of the HB from Qumran reveals insights into the actual practice of the scribes and the pluriformity of the text around the turn of the era. Dr. Hanne von Weissenberg s research into the canonical processes in the late Second Temple period employs the Qumran material: biblical manuscripts, rewritten scripture, and explicit interpretation of authoritative texts. Varying from book to book, the Masoretic Text is being discovered as a highly developed text type that often reveals theological motives behind its editorial changes. The QUMRAN texts have not only revolutionized our understanding of the emergence of the HB in the Second Temple period but revealed an enormous collection of other contemporary literature. The Academy project on Qumran focuses on central documents of the Qumran movement that provide firsthand evidence of the movement s legal interpretations, end-time visions, and rewriting of scriptures. 1

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL These texts show how emerging authoritative traditions were being transmitted, selected, and reused, and how sometimes what was later to become authoritative is here irrelevant or absent. Dr. Jutta Jokiranta has given special attention to conceptualizing and questioning the notions sectarian and sect and investigating the identity construction within the movement. The project has done profound work with the physical manuscripts, by producing new editions of some of the texts and by employing the method of material reconstruction of scrolls, based on the shape and texture of the remaining fragments (Pajunen). Besides the textual remains, Khirbet Qumran and its archaeology are important, although in many ways contested, parts of the study of the movement. In a situation where only few of the archaeological remains are published, every piece of reliable data is essential. Dr. Juhana Saukkonen participates in the publication of the archaeological artefacts discovered at Qumran in cooperation with Jean-Baptiste Humbert (École Biblique, Jerusalem). The Academy project on Textual Criticism of the SEPTUAGINT is connected with the international editorial assignment concerning the first fully critical edition of the Septuagint of the First Book of Samuel (Göttingen Academy). The editor and director of the project is Prof. Anneli Aejmelaeus, one of the leading Septuagint scholars today, especially in the area of textual criticism and the use of the Septuagint in tracing the development of the Hebrew source text. Her research on the Books of Samuel has shown that the final canonization of the Hebrew text was preceded by a revision, which is not reflected in the original Greek text but only in its secondary corrections by early Jewish and Christian scholars. The research carried out in the project deals with manuscripts and text-types of the Greek and the Hebrew text as well as textual traditions of the Coptic, Syriac, Latin, and Ethiopic translations, with one finished dissertation (Kauhanen) and three approaching their final stage. The key to the evaluation of translations in textual criticism is the translation-technical approach, which Helsinki has long been famous for. Translation-technical study of syntactic features of Septuagint Greek has been conducted by several members of the group (Sollamo, Aejmelaeus, Voitila, Seppänen) and one dissertation will also soon appear in this area (Tenhunen). Investigation into the Apocrypha, not included in the HB, is conducted by Dr. Anssi Voitila, and a dissertation is in the process of being examined (Borchardt). The archaeological project group confronts texts with results of ARCHAEOLOGY, a central source for the history of Israel and an essential reflection point for texts, which is also the common thread of the RC s investigations. The backbone of the group is the internationally recognized archaeological excavation at Kinneret, a joint project with the universities of Bern, Leiden, and Mainz. Many scholars of the RC have been actively involved in the excavations: Juha Pakkala as co-director, Kirsi Valkama as field co-director, Martti Nissinen as area supervisor. The scientific significance is very high, as archaeological study is increasingly central for biblical studies. The four doctoral dissertations deal with different aspects of the religion and history of ancient Israel reflected in the material culture, directly or indirectly connected with the excavations. Dr. Raz Kletter, a leading Israeli archaeologist, is now a docent of the Faculty and provides invaluable know-how and supervision on the topmost level. Prof. Martti Nissinen s main research line is history of religion, especially PROPHECY, that is, transmission of allegedly divine messages by non-technical means. Traditionally understood as a biblical and Jewish-Christian concept, the prophetic practice is not confined to biblically rooted cultures but formed an essential, at times prominent, part of ancient Near Eastern divination. Due to his pioneering work in the study of ancient Near Eastern prophecy, Nissinen is known internationally as a leading expert of this field. He is currently working on an extensive study on prophecy as an ancient Eastern Mediterranean phenomenon, comprising Akkadian, Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew sources. A further religio-historical aspect covered by Nissinen s research, partially overlaping with the prophecy project and likewise internationally acknowledged, is gender in ancient Eastern Mediterranean religion. These studies focus on love lyrics, the divine-human sexual metaphor and its background in the ancient idea of sacred marriage, as well as gender roles in the ancient world. 2

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL The research carried through by the RC has a very good visibility among the international scientific community and its high standards are acknowledged. In proof of this, Nissinen is presented among the 50 most innovative Bible scholars of all times (in Thomas Staubli, ed., Wer knackt den Code: Meilensteine der Bibelforschung, 2009). All the members of the RC, including the doctoral candidates, are active in producing publications. Of the total number of refereed scientific articles 13% was written by the doctoral candidates, 7% by postdocs, and 80% by the PIs. Of all the various types of publications, altogether nearly 300 pieces, those produced by the doctoral candidates and postdocs cover 35%. The great majority of the scientific publications of the RC is published in international languages, predominantly in international, highly esteemed journals and series. Even doctoral theses are today increasingly published in international series with acknowledged publishers. Ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC s research. The focus of the RC s research could be further strengthened by increasing the coherence of the unit and links between the various lines of investigation covered by the RC. There is already a great deal of exchange between the project groups included in the RC but it could be intensified by regular research seminars for all levels from postgraduate students to senior researchers. Increased coherence and intensified cooperation can be expected to enhance quality of research. Particularly in the area of archaeology, the high quality can be secured by increasing research periods abroad in leading universities of the field. A further challenge is the streamlining of career development for talented young researchers in order to keep them in academia. On the other hand, those with permanent positions are overburdened with responsibilities other than research. Regular sabbaticals would be absolutely necessary. This would also give junior researchers the opportunity to act as substitute teachers and to gain pedagogical experience. 2 PRACTISES AND QUALITY OF DOCTORAL TRAINING (MAX. 8800 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) How is doctoral training organised in the RC? Description of the RC s principles for recruitment and selection of doctoral candidates, supervision of doctoral candidates, collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral programmes, good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training, and assuring good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates. The framework for the doctoral training of the RC is provided by the Faculty of Theology, hence the RC follows the Faculty s policies and practices, benefits from its resources, and participates in the crossdisciplinary cooperation in doctoral training provided by the Faculty and the Finnish Graduate School of Theology. RECRUITEMENT AND SELECTION OF DOCTORAL CANDIDATES Doctoral candidates are carefully selected from applicants with a Master level university degree from Finnish or foreign universities. The Faculty examines the quality of the completed degree. Special emphasis is given to the Master's thesis, its content, scope, and quality. In addition, the applicants submit a 15-page research proposal and a study plan, which are first evaluated by professors in the candidate s respective field, and finally by the Research Committee of the Faculty. SUPERVISION The doctoral candidates of the RC are supervised by one or two of the senior members of the RC; in addition, external supervisors may be used, especially if the dissertation topic so requires; this is the case, for instance, with topics related to archaeology. In some cases, the co-supervisor comes from abroad, or is one of the postdoc members of the RC. Principal modes of supervision are (1) regular 3

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL individual consultations between the doctoral candidate and the supervisor(s); (2) subject-specific and interdisciplinary seminars organized by the RC or one of its partners (see below); these occasions also enable peer-based mentoring. The Faculty of Theology encourages the doctoral candidates and supervisors to sign a document indicating their mutual rights and responsibilities. DOCTORAL TRAINING The doctoral training of the RC aims at the following: 1) Supporting the dissertation work of the doctoral students by means of individual and peer-based supervision. The dissertation is considered the most significant part of the candidates occupation. 2) Providing the doctoral candidates with opportunities to acquire teaching experience and pedagogical training. This is organized in close cooperation with the Faculty. The candidates employed by the Faculty are obliged to use 5% of their working time for teaching. 3) Facilitating and providing opportunities to acquire international experience. The students are actively encouraged to participate and present papers in international conferences and workshops, to apply funding for study periods abroad, preferably in institutions with which the RC collaborates, and to publish with internationally acknowledged academic publisher 4) Teaching transferrable skills in cooperation with the Faculty and the Graduate School. 5) Assisting in finding external funding, domestic and foreign, as the capacity of the Faculty in employing doctoral students is very limited. 6) Encouraging the students to participate in the activities of the academic social environment together with the personnel and other students. The principal forms of doctoral training are the following: 1) the RC s own doctoral seminars in which the doctoral students papers are discussed and which are attended by all supervisors and doctoral students; 2) seminars and other activities of the project groups, including participation in international cooperation (e.g. Kinneret excavations, Workshop on Textual Criticism of Samuel Kings); 3) training courses organized by the Faculty of Theology, including interdisciplinary seminars and training in transferrable skills; 4) annual symposia organized by the Finnish Graduate School of Theology, attended by doctoral students of theology and their supervisors; the symposia consist of lectures of an international keynote speaker and Finnish professors of theology, workshops, and the students papers; 5) seminars organized by international networks with an emphasis on doctoral education (Nordic Networks, OTSEM). COLLABORATION As the RC is part of the structure of the Faculty of Theology, the Faculty is its closest collaboration partner which provides the RC with basic resources and awards the students with doctoral degrees. The community of biblical scholars at the Faculty, comprising also the New Testament scholars, works closely together, not only in terms of teaching but also in terms of research. Other Finnish academic institutions with which the RC cooperates include the Faculty of Theology at Åbo Akademi, with which the RC has an annual seminar (together with Uppsala University), and, to a lesser extent, the Department of Theology at the University of Eastern Finland. 4

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL The students and supervisors are actively engaged in the activities of the Finnish Graduate School of Theology, Martti Nissinen being its director since 2009. The Graduate School is a network organisation of University of Helsinki, University of Eastern Finland, and Åbo Akademi. The Graduate School, funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture, promotes interdisciplinary and international research within theology and neighbouring disciplines. Most doctoral students participate in the Graduate School s activities as self-funded members; one or two students of the RC may have a member status in the Graduate School, which means full-time employment. The RC also cooperates with the multidisciplinary Graduate School of Meaning, Language and Changing Cultures at the University of Helsinki. Raija Sollamo is a member of its steering group, and two of the doctoral students belong to this network. The international collaboration of the RC is extensive, often based on personal networks. In doctoral training, the most significant international partners are: 1) OTSEM (Old Testament Studies: Epistemologies and Methodologies). This network is designed for doctoral training in OT studies and has annual conferences in which the students present their papers responded by senior scholars from institutions other than their own. The OTSEM network comprises all institutions with a doctoral program in OT studies in the five Nordic countries, plus the universities of Göttingen and Oxford. 2) The Faculty of Theology is currently developing a cooperation program with Emory University (Decatur, GA, USA), including student and teacher exchange and joint doctoral seminars. One doctoral student from Emory will visit Helsinki in 2012 and will be member of the RC. 3) The Kinneret Regional Project, excavating Tel Kinrot and Horvat Kur in Israel, provides the archaeologically oriented students with excavation experience and, upon agreement, source material. Several members of the RC have participated in this project, Pakkala as one of its co-leaders. 4) Nordic Network in Qumran Studies offered doctoral students in Qumran studies an opportunity to meet annually and to work with the manuscripts in the archives of the Israel Antiquities Authorities. 5) Seminars/doctoral courses together with the University of Vienna take place every second year (see below). 6) University of Manchester cooperates on both postgraduate and postdoctoral level with the research training of junior scholars. CAREER PERSPECTIVES According to a recent study (TEOTAR 2006), the number of doctors of theology in Finland is not high enough to meet the needs of the society; this means that doctors of theology, including those trained by the RC, normally have no major difficulties in finding employment. The principal employers of theologians are the Lutheran Church of Finland and the school system, but theologians can be found in many roles and professions even in other institutions. The RC has been successful in attracting external funding, which enables some of its junior members to pursue academic careers. RC s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development. The strengths of the RC are the scholarly quality and international appreciation of its PIs; a welldeveloped training program; a most advantageous research environment; success in acquiring external funding; and a spirited atmosphere in the Helsinki community of biblical scholars. The major challenges include the following: 5

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL 1) The training program needs to be steadily improved. The development of an International Training Program in Old Testament Doctoral Studies is currently in preparation by the senior scholars of the RC. 2) The time used for a doctoral degree is still too long and can seldom be accomplished in the ideal schedule of four years. This often corresponds with funding, or rather, lack thereof, and therefore, the RC attempts to find new sources of funding, domestic and international. 3) The time and resources of the supervisors are limited, due to other obligations. No significant improvements are likely to take place in this respect. Supervision capacity can be increased, e.g., by appointing co-supervisors and laying more emphasis on peer-level tutoring. 3 SOCIETAL IMPACT OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public, private and/or 3rd sector). The members of the RC act as experts in matters concerning Biblical texts, Qumran discoveries, or questions of Judaism and Christianity, both ancient and modern. Above all the senior members, but also the junior ones, have been interviewed for newspapers, radio and TV. Virtually all members of the RC are in one way or another involved in dissemination of scientific knowledge to a wider audience. There is a great demand for public lectures on topics related to Biblical studies, often current themes concerning religion and sexuality, fundamentalism, blessing of registered same-sex partnership, etc. Similar themes are dealt with in the numerous newspaper and magazine articles written by the members of the RC. The societal impact of the RC is most often visible within the Lutheran Church of Finland (CoF), and other religious institutions and organizations. Members of the RC have served as theological experts in various committees: Committee for the Translation of the Apocrypha (chaired by Sollamo), Committee for Church and Judaism (von Weissenberg), Committee of the Church Research Institute (Jokiranta), Committee for Follow-up of Diaconal Education (Latvus), and in ecumenical dialogue groups (e.g. Tervanotko in the Third European Ecumenical Assembly and the World Council of Churches, Aejmelaeus in the Lutheran-Reformed Joint Commission). The research project Poverty and Care (Latvus and von Weissenberg) has been financially supported by the Church Research Institute. The junior members teach courses organized by the CoF and designed for continuous ministerial training both on central and on diocese level, and courses of the Diaconia Polytechnic directed to deacons, youth workers etc. Several of the members of the RC are engaged in various tasks in their churches, preaching in radio devotionals, in Sunday services, and giving Bible lectures etc. Some are elected council members in the General Synod of the CoF or in their local parishes. The members of the RC are active in academic and non-academic organizations. There are three members of the Finnish Academy of Sciences and Letter in the RC (Aejmelaeus as Secretary of the Theology Group, Nissinen, Sollamo), and one member of the Academy Club for Young Scientists (von Weissenberg). Nissinen is bestowed with major responsibilities as the President of the Board of the Finnish Near-Eastern Institute in Damascus, Syria. Most of the members of the RC are members of the SBL, taking part in different activities of the Society, e.g. Liljeström in the SBL Forum Advisory Board. Tervanotko has been engaged in the Lutheran Christian Student Movement. Most of the RC members are active in the Finnish Exegetical Society (Board Members: Nissinen, Jokiranta, Tynjä, Valkama). The PIs of the RC function as peer-reviewers of papers and monographs to be published in international as well as national journals and monograph series. They are frequently asked by international and national foundations, universities, and other funding agents to give confidential assessments of applications for research funding. The PIs also participate in grading committees and give evaluations on 6

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL doctoral theses. The professors in the RC have given expert statements on applicants to professorships or in cases of tenure promotion. Ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC s research and doctoral training. Both senior and junior members of the RC are already actively engaged outside the academia, and have several important positions in both religious and non-religious organisations. Among biblical scholars, it is traditionally acknowledged to be part of an academic career to participate in discussions that take place in the public domain and concern questions in which experts of the Bible have something relevant to contribute. An example for this was the annual Exegetical Day on the topic The Bible of the Poor, organized by the Finnish Exegetical Society on Febr. 10, 2011. There is no need to increase the amount of these activities, but it is imperative to be on the alert to find new areas in which the societal impact of the RC could be needed. It is important to keep in touch with different groups in the CoF as well as the Finnish society. In the present day world, expertise on the dynamics of religious movements, the role of religion, past and present, as well as questions of the Bible and morality seems to be on demand more than ever. 4 INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL (INCL. INTERSECTORAL) RESEARCH COLLABORATION AND RESEARCHER MOBILITY (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of the RC s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities and how the RC has promoted researcher mobility. The RC has an excellent network of international research partnerships, visible on both institutional and personal levels: 1) INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS of the projects included in the RC. PAKKALA organizes annual symposia on Transmission of Holy Traditions with Prof. Chr. Levin, Dr. R. Müller (Munich), and Dr. U. Nõmmik (Tartu). AEJMELAEUS has founded The Workshop on Textual Criticism of Samuel Kings for coordination of the editorial work and regular cooperation with other editors of the Göttingen Academy series Prof. J. Trebolle, Prof. P. Torijano (Madrid), and Dr. Ph. Hugo; this project also cooperates with The Hexapla Project led by Prof. P. Gentry (Louisville, KY) and Dr. A. Salvesen (Oxford). SOLLAMO cooperates on material reconstruction of the scrolls with Prof. A. Steudel and Prof. R.G. Kratz (Göttingen), and organizes biannual interdisciplinary seminars with Prof. A. Lange and Prof. B. Palme (Vienna); other partners include Prof. E. Schuller (McMaster) and Prof. G. Brooke (Manchester). Cooperation with the Nordic Network in Qumran Studies has continued, e.g. in the production of a Qumran text book in four Scandinavian languages and a volume of collected essays. NISSINEN is a member of the Edinburgh Prophecy Network. The responsibilities of the Kinneret Regional Project are shared between the Universities of Bern, Helsinki, Leiden, and Mainz. 2) RESEARCHER MOBILITY. The PIs and postdocs have an outstanding record of invited lectures and keynote speeches in numerous academic institutions and of research fellowships in the Universities of Manchester, Munich, Yale, Emory, and Cambridge, at Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, and Israel Antiquities Authorities. Aejmelaeus served as Professor at the Univ. of Göttingen. The doctoral candidates have learned that research visits abroad are an essential part of their research training: ca. 70% of them spend at least one term at a foreign institution during their doctoral studies. 3) INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION PROJECTS: the Göttingen Septuagint edition (Aejmelaeus), re-edition of DJD V (Jokiranta & Pajunen), the Kinneret reports (Pakkala & Valkama). The RC members are in Editorial boards of numerous journals (e.g. Dead Sea Discoveries, Journal of Biblical Literature) and series (e.g. SBL Writings from the Ancient World, Ancient Near Eastern Monographs, De Septuaginta Investigationes), and have (co)edited several international volumes. 7

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL 4) CONFERENCES attended regularly are the International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament and its joint organizations: IOSCS, IOMS, IOQS, IOTS (N.B. Helsinki 2010) and the Society of Biblical Literature Annual and International Meetings. As steering committee chairs/members the PIs are responsible for several SBL program units. The members also attend numerous international, topically more focused symposia and workshops. 5) HOSTED VISITS. The RC demonstrates its international cooperation also by inviting leading scholars in the field both as guest speakers and research fellows (not yet mentioned above: Eugene Ulrich/Notre Dame; Kristin De Troyer/St Andrews; Sarianna Metso/Toronto; Charlotte Hempel/Birmingham; David J. A. Clines/Sheffield; Lester Grabbe/Hull). Many of them participate in the mentoring of the junior scholars. RC s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development. The 20th congress of the IOSOT 2010 that gathered 500 OT scholars in Helsinki demonstrated the strength of the RC in international contacts and further increased its visibility. Sollamo was the President of the IOSOT, Jokiranta was the Congress Secretary, and most members of the RC were engaged in the organization. The doctoral students are brought up in an international environment and participate in all activities. For international cooperation in doctoral training, see section 2. Rather than increasing visits abroad, the challenge is to raise funding in order to organize more research cooperation based in Finland, to invite research fellows and to attract doctoral candidates from abroad to Helsinki. The RC aims to strengthen its ties to Finnish networks (e.g. Gender and Religion). The project Explaining Early Jewish and Christian Movements and the new NordForsk Network Socio-Cognitive Perspectives (Prof. P. Luomanen) widen the scope of cooperation to New Testament and religious studies, which along with Assyriology and Semitic Studies are the RC s natural partners. 5 OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of the operational conditions in the RC s research environment (e.g. research infrastructure, balance between research and teaching duties). During the first two years of the evaluation period, most of the members of the present RC, together with their New Testament colleagues, participated in the Centre of Excellence Formation of Early Jewish and Christian Ideology funded by the Academy of Finland and directed by Prof. Heikki Räisänen. Of that funding, 184000 was allocated to members of the present RC. Parallel to the Centre of Excellence, Aejmelaeus, who was a research fellow of the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies (2002-2006), had been granted funding by the Academy of Finland for her Septuagint project 2004-06. The part used during 2005-06 amounted to 180000. Furthermore, Jokiranta was also a research fellow of the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies (2007-2010), and was granted 132000 for her Qumran project by the University of Helsinki 2010. Considering the research grants reported in section 7 (in addition to those mentioned above), the RC has been very successful in acquiring competitive funding and this has affected its operational conditions favourably. In addition to the budget funding of the Department of Biblical Studies (shared with the New Testament scholars), which has secured the basic infrastructure as well as made available the necessary number of offices, the RC has had external funding with which it has been able to finance 8

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL the activities connected with its international relations as well as the work of some of the doctoral candidates. The faculty of the Department of Biblical Studies has a fairly heavy teaching load. It needs to provide courses in two languages, both Hebrew and Greek, for virtually all students of theology (ca. 150/year). In order to be able to offer all the obligatory lecture courses, proseminars, and graduate seminars, the entire teaching faculty needs to take a full load of teaching, with the exception of those who have additional administrative duties on the Faculty level. Of the members of the present RC, Nissinen is the director of the Finnish Graduate School of Theology and as a superior in charge of all the doctoral candidates employed by the Faculty, and has for these reasons reduced teaching responsibilities. Thus, additional teaching by docents in Old Testament studies would be very welcome, but Dr. Raz Kletter is the only active docent for the time being. Due to the regulations of the EURYI funding, Dr. Pakkala is not allowed to take part in teaching, and this also applies to those employed in his project. For all those PIs who belong to the faculty of the department, the main problem is finding time for their own research. The department has introduced a practice of leaving one seven-week period a year free from teaching for each teacher, but this does not reduce the teaching duty, which needs to be fulfilled during the other periods. This is only a first-aid that helps to organize the work a little better. A regular sabbatical for the professors and lecturers is a desideratum without which it will not be possible on the long run to keep up the high quality of research and the high standards of doctoral training. This is all the more urgent, since senior PIs have otherwise hardly any opportunity to research periods. RC s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development. The PIs of the RC have been successful in acquiring external funding. They have talented young reseachers in the making around them. They have sufficient facilities and functioning infrastructure. The cooperation within the department and with the international partners is fruitful and promising. The main challenge, however, is the time: due to the heavy teaching and administrative load, all the PIs have difficulty in finding enough time for their research. The working time for university teachers comprises officially 1600 h/year, but those active in research and teaching mostly work overtime. On the long run, this is of course liable to endanger their health. It is also obvious that innovativeness and cooperation suffer from heavy work-loads and tight schedules. A regular sabbatical for professors and lecturers is absolutely necessary. If external project funding is the only way to finance longer research periods for senior researchers, this will have a negative effect on the funding available for the younger generation of scholars. 6 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of the execution and processes of leadership in the RC, how the management-related responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC and how the leadership- and management-related processes support high quality research, collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC, the RC s research focus and strengthening of the RC s know-how. The PIs of the RC form a steering group responsible for the leadership and management of the RC, with Prof. Anneli Aejmelaeus as the chair. The PIs coordinate their own research groups. They work in close contact with one another and organize joint sessions for all research groups and doctoral students. The leadership in research and related activities is controlled by the PIs, while administrative duties (logistics, information, CIT issues, etc.) are taken care of by the junior members of the RC, who are 9

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL encouraged also to take on responsibility for organizing events or editing publications in cooperation with the PIs. The PIs have the responsibility for the management of the funding of their own projects, and for continuous application of new research funding from external sources. The senior members support the application of doctoral and postdoctoral funding for the individual projects of the junior members, advicing them as they write their research proposals, and writing references. The PIs coordinate the RC s application strategy. Although the RC has clear leadership with the steering group, its fairly small size allows for a light administrative organization and democratic structures, enhancing innovativeness and creativity. It also increases the flow of information between all members of the RC. Invitations of international cooperation partners are openly announced, and guest lectures and other activities are attended by all members of the RC. The willingness to cooperate and the good working atmosphere clearly support the high quality of research and create a favourable environment for doctoral students and postdocs. Constant cooperation between the projects and the PIs strengthens the common research focus. It is acknowledged that it is of vital importance that each member of the RC is aware of the current research and the common goals of the RC. Providing space and time for dialogue between all the members will inspire them to find new aims for future research. The closeness of the coordinate research projects creates additional value for each of them as well as for the focus and quality of research of the RC. The openness of communication and close collaboration enable the junior members to learn from the example of the seniors, both in research skills and substance matter. Vice versa, the junior members at times import new skills as well as research questions and methods. The reciprocity between seniors and juniors promotes the growth of the junior members into a full membership of the academic community. This provides them with the self-confidence they need to finish their doctoral degrees. The activities of the RC take place within the structure and under the administration of the Faculty of Theology. Those members of the RC who are employed by the University of Helsinki have a superior appointed by the Faculty. The superior does not supervise the research and teaching of the RC but is consulted in occupational issues such as salary, yearly working plans, and work-related well-being. RC s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes. The professors in the RC have long experience of leadership and management both in university administration and in research projects. Prof. Sollamo has performed the duties of the head of the Department of Biblical Studies, the Dean of the Faculty of Theology, and the Vice-rector of the University. Prof. Aejmelaeus has served as the Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Göttingen University for one-year period and eight years as the director of the Septuagint Institute in Göttingen. Prof. Nissinen has administrative experience from being the leader of the Finnish Graduate School of Theology. One of the challenges for the RC is the recent rearrangements in the organization of the University of Helsinki which have resulted in changes in the leadership relations. In fact, there are no organizational structures on the level of the department of Biblical studies. Thus, the leadership is based on the personal responsibility of individual scholars. Another challenge for academic leadership is time management. The issue has been taken seriously, and there is an obvious demand for mentoring. 10

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL 7 EXTERNAL COMPETITIVE FUNDING OF THE RC Listing of the RCs external competitive funding, where: - the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and - the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki Academy of Finland (AF) - total amount of funding (in euros) AF has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: 1300000 Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES) - total amount of funding (in euros) TEKES has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: European Union (EU) - total amount of funding (in euros) EU has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: European Research Council (ERC) - total amount of funding (in euros) ERC has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: 1100000 International and national foundations names of international and national foundations which have decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros). - names of the foundations: Suomen Kulttuurirahasto - total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned foundations: 80000 Other international funding - names of other international funding organizations which have decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros). - names of the funding organizations: Princeton Institute for Advanced Study - total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned funding organizations: 10000 Other national funding (incl. EVO funding and Ministry of Education and Culture funded doctoral programme positions) - names of other national funding organizations which have decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros). - names of the funding organizations: Graduate School of Theology - Helsingin yliopiston tiedesäätiö - Suomalainen konkordialiitto - Niilo Helander säätiö - Suomen Kulttuurirahasto - Emil Aaltosen säätiö - Kirkon tutkimuskeskus - Helsingin sanomain 100-vuotissäätiö - Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin säätiö - Eino Jutikkalan säätiö - Jenny ja Antti Wihurin säätiö - total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned funding organizations: 580000 11

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL 8 RC S STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR 2011 2013 (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES) Description of the RC s future perspectives in respect to research and doctoral training. The RC is in a fruitful phase of research and cooperation, both within the own department and with international partners, and will continue along the lines sketched above at least until 2013. It needs to pay attention to the dissemination of its results to a wider audience as well as to reflecting on the methodological and theological significance of the new insights gained through its research. This period will be intensive in publications: several, if not all of the doctoral candidates of the RC will finish their theses. The strategic action plan of the RC has already been touched upon in the sections dealing with the challenges felt by the present RC. As for funding, further applications need to be made, as the two major projects are running out 2012. If there will be an announcement of a Centre of Excellence Program, this RC would certainly like to propose a research plan for it. For the time being, it is difficult to say whether the RC would find it fruitful to continue with the present concept of cooperation or rather to look for more partners (from New Testamant, Assyriology, Semitic languages, Religious Studies, or Classical languages) and for wider research perspectives. The period 2011-13 will help to clarify this and prepare for a possible proposal. The period ahead of us will mean intensive development of the doctoral training. The RC wishes to create an attractive international doctoral training course, in order to draw doctoral candidates from other countries to Helsinki. The senior members of the RC will cooperate in designing a teaching course, with elements of workshop and coached reading, in those areas of scholarship where the know-how of the RC is strong. 9 SHORT DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE RC MEMBERS HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE COMPILATION OF THE STAGE 2 MATERIALS (MAX. 1100 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES). The compilation of the material for stage 2 of the evaluation has been coordinated by the responsible person Anneli Aejmelaeus. The descriptions of the various lines of investigation for section 1 were written by the planning team (Nissinen, Jokiranta, von Weissenberg, Pakkala, Sollamo, Aejmelaeus) and collected by Aejmelaeus. The text for the key focus areas and for section 2 was written by Nissinen. The information for section 3 as well as for section 7 was collected by Aejmelaeus. The information for section 4 was collected by Jokiranta who also wrote the basic text for this section. The basic text for section 6 was written by Sollamo. The sections 5 and 8 were formulated by Aejmelaeus on the basis of the discussions of the planning team. The final text for all sections was formulated and edited by Aejmelaeus and von Weissenberg. 12

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 1 Analysis of publications - Associated person is one of Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi, Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi, Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi, Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi, Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi, Kari Latvus, kari.latvus@helsinki.fi, Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi, Anssi Voitila, anssi.voitila@helsinki.fi, Juhana Markus Saukkonen, Juhana.Saukkonen@helsinki.fi, Merja Alanne, Francis Borchardt, Tuukka Kauhanen, tuukka.kauhanen@helsinki.fi, Hanna Piritta Kilkkinen, hanna.kilkkinen@helsinki.fi, Marketta Liljeström, Marketta.Liljestrom@helsinki.fi, Mika Pajunen, mika.s.pajunen@helsinki.fi, Elina Perttilä, Elina.Perttila@helsinki.fi, Katri Saarelainen, Christian Seppänen, Katri Tenhunen, Hanna Tervanotko, hanna.tervanotko@helsinki.fi, Tuula Tynjä, Tuula.Tynja@helsinki.fi, Kirsi Valkama, kirsi.valkama@helsinki.fi, kvalkama@mappi.helsinki.fi, Hanna Vanonen, hanna.vanonen@helsinki.fi Publication year Publication type 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Count 2005-2010 A1 Refereed journal article 2 6 8 3 6 6 31 A2 Review in scientific journal 1 1 2 4 A3 Contribution to book/other compilations (refereed) 12 12 4 22 21 20 91 A4 Article in conference publication (refereed) 2 2 1 1 6 B1 Unrefereed journal article 2 4 8 2 4 9 29 B2 Contribution to book/other compilations (non-refereed) 1 1 5 7 B3 Unrefereed article in conference proceedings 3 1 4 C1 Published scientific monograph 1 1 1 1 1 5 C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal 3 3 6 D1 Article in professional journal 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 D2 Article in professional hand or guide book or in a professional data system, or text book material 6 1 21 1 29 D5 Text book or professional handbook or guidebook or dictionary 2 3 3 1 9 E1 Popular article, newspaper article 3 10 10 6 3 32 E1 Popular contribution to book/other compilations 1 1 1 3 2 8 E2 Popular monograph 1 1 2 1

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 2 Listing of publications A1 Refereed journal article 2005 Latvus, K 2005, 'Diakonian viran alkuperän uudelleen arviointia', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 2, pp. 80-97. Nissinen, M 2005, 'How prophecy became literature', SJOT : Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament., vol 19, no. 2, pp. 153-172. 2006 Latvus, K 2006, 'Jumala kriisissä', Sielunhoidon aikakauskirja, vol 19, pp. 192-243. Lönnqvist, M, Nissinen, M 2006, 'Archaeological surveys of Jebel Bishri: the preliminary report of the Finnish mission to Syria, 2000-2004', Kaskal, vol 3, pp. 203-240. Nissinen, M 2006, 'Die Heilige Hochzeit und das Hohelied ', Lectio Difficilior, vol (2006), no. 1. Pakkala, J, Valkama, K, Tynjä, T 2006, 'Kinneretin kaivaukset vuosina 2001-2005', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 111, no. 4, pp. 323-344. Pakkala, J 2006, 'The original indipendence of the Ezra story in Ezra 7-10 and Neh 8', Biblische Notizen : aktuelle Beiträge zur Exegese der Bibel und ihrer Welt., vol 2006, no. 129, pp. 17-24. Pakkala, J 2006, 'Zedekiah's fate and the dynastic succession', Journal of Biblical Literature, vol 125, no. 3, pp. 443-452. 2007 Aejmelaeus, A 2007, 'Lost in reconstruction?: on Hebrew and Greek reconstruction in 2 Sam 24', International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies. Bulletin, vol 40, pp. 89-106. Kauhanen, T 2007, 'traces of the proto-lucianic text', International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies. Bulletin, vol 40, pp. 75-87. Latvus, K 2007, 'Diakonia viran raamattuperustelu: Diakonian uudistuminen 1800-luvulla ja nykyisin', Anno Domini : diakoniatieteen vuosikirja, pp. 81-93. Liljeström, M 2007, 'Looking for fragments of the Syrohexapla: the Song of Hannah in Barberiniani Orientali 2 as a test case', International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies. Bulletin, vol 40, pp. 49-61. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Laulujen laulu ja pyhä avioliitto: rakkautta yli rajojen', Kulttuurintutkimus, vol 24, no. 2, pp. 39-49. Pakkala, J 2007, 'The Monotheism of the Deuteronomistic History', SJOT : Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament., vol 21, no. 2, pp. 159-178. Pakkala, J 2007, 'Onko kuningas Daavidin palatsi löytynyt?: arkeologian, ideologian ja politiikan tiiviit yhteydet Jerusalemissa', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 112, no. 4, pp. 291-301. Pakkala, J 2007, 'Esra-kertomuksen historiallinen merkitys', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 112, no. 1, pp. 3-10. 2008 Latvus, K 2008, 'The Paradigm Challenged: New Analysis of the Origin of diakonia ', Studia Theologica, vol 62, no. 2, pp. 142-157. Pakkala, J, Valkama, K 2008, 'Kinneretin kaivaukset vuonna 2007', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 113, no. 3, pp. 195-208. Pakkala, J 2008, 'Jeroboam without Bulls', Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol 120, no. 4, pp. 501 525. 2009 Jokiranta, J 2009, 'An experiment on idem identity in the Qumran movement', Dead Sea Discoveries, vol 16, no. 3, pp. 309-329. Kauhanen, T 2009, 'Irenaeus and the text of 1 Samuel', Vetus Testamentum, vol 59, no. 3, pp. 415-428. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Historiallinen raamatuntutkimus ja kriittinen historiantutkimus', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 114, no. 6, pp. 559-568. Pakkala, J 2009, 'The Date of the Earliest Edition of Deuteronomy', Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol 121, no. 3, pp. 388 401. Pakkala, J, Münger, S, Zangenberg, J 2009, 'Tel Kinrot, Kinneret Regional Project: Preliminary Report', Hadashot Arkheologiyot, vol 121. Pakkala, J 2009, 'Uusia arkeologisia löytöjä Raamatun maista: Raamattu, arkeologia ja media', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, pp. 241-248. 2

CSTT/Aejmelaeus 2010 INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Latvus, K 2010, 'Diakonatet i ljuset av senaste tidens bibelforskning: Missförstånd och sann kärlek', Tro & Liv, vol 69, no. 2/2010, pp. 4-12. Latvus, K 2010, 'Diaconal ministry in the light of reception and re-interpretation of Acts 6: Did John Calvin create social-caritative ministry of diaconia?', Diaconia. The Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice, vol 1, no. 1, pp. 82-102. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Are There Homosexuals in Mesopotamian Literature?', American Oriental Society. Journal, vol 130, no. 1, pp. 73-77. Pakkala, J 2010, 'What Do We Know about Geshur?', SJOT : Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament., vol 24, no. 2, pp. 155-173. Saarelainen, K, Covello-Paran, K, Kletter, R 2010, 'Beautiful from All Sides: Twice Molded Figurines of the Southern Levant', Levant, vol 42, no. 1, pp. 17-29. Voitila, A 2010, 'Is Ben Sira Opposing Apocalyptic Teaching in Sir 3:21-24?', Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol 122, no. 2, pp. 234-248. A2 Review in scientific journal 2005 Latvus, K 2005, 'Diakoniatieteen vuosikirjat Anno Domini 2001-2004', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 2, no. 1, pp. 38-42. 2007 Latvus, K 2007, 'Diakoniatieteen tila: Anno Domino 2005-2006', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 4, no. 1, pp. 68-71. 2010 Sollamo, R 2010, 'Apokryfikirjojen uusi suomennos: Kirkkojen, kulttuurin ja tieteen intressien kohtaaminen', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 115, no. 1, pp. 71-77. Sollamo, R 2010, 'Vanhan testamentin tutkijoiden kansainvälinen kongressi Helsingissä 1.-6.8.2010', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 115, no. 5/2010, pp. 493-494. A3 Contribution to book/other compilations (refereed) 2005 Aejmelaeus, A 2005, 'Nebuchadnezzar, my servant: redaction history and textual development in Jer 27', Interpreting translation. studies on the LXX and Ezekiel in honour of Johan Lust., Leuven : Peeters, pp. 1-18. Aejmelaeus, A 2005, 'The suffering servant: Isaiah 53 as an intertext of the New Testament', Lux humana, Lux aeterna, Suomen eksegeettisen seuran julkaisuja, Finnish Exegetical Society Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Helsinki, Göttingen, pp. 475-494. Aejmelaeus, A 2005, 'Septuagintan kääntäjien jäljillä', Ihmistieteet tänään, Gaudeamus Helsingin yliopiston tutkijakollegium, Helsinki, pp. 273-295. Jokiranta, J 2005, 'Raamattu ja sen anti', Uskonnonopetus uudella vuosituhannella, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 249-279. Jokiranta, J 2005, 'Pesharim: a mirror of self-understanding', Reading the present in the Qumran library, Society of Biblical Literature symposium series, vol. 30, Society of Biblical Literature cop., Atlanta, GA, pp. 23-34. Latvus, K 2005, 'Diakonian koulutuksen murros', in J Kivekäs (ed.), Käytännöllinen teologia - teoriaa vai käytäntöä?. STKS:n symposiumissa marraskuussa 2004 pidetyt esitelmät., vol. 245, Suomalaisen teologisen kirjallisuusseuran julkaisuja [Suomalaisen teologisen kirjallisuusseuran vuosikirja; 2005], no. 245, Suomalainen teologinen kirjallisuusseura, Helsinki, pp. 96-99. Latvus, K 2005, 'Decolonizing Yahweh: A Postcolonial Reading of 2 Kings 24-25', in R Sugirtharajah (ed.), The Postcolonial Biblical Reader, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 186-192. Latvus, K, Hyväri, S, Maunuksela, AM 2005, 'Exposure-menetelmä diakoniatyössä', in J Karjalainen, S Hänninen, T Lahti (eds), Toinen tieto. Kirjoituksia huono-osaisuuden tunnistamisesta., Stakes, Helsinki, pp. 136-150. Nissinen, M 2005, 'Miten profetiasta tuli kirjallisuutta? ', in S Dhima (ed.), Kirkko taide viestintä. Markku Heikkilän juhlakirja., Suomen kirkkohistoriallisen seuran toimituksia, vol. 197, Suomen kirkkohistoriallinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 313-328. Nissinen, M 2005, 'Miten profetiasta tuli kirjallisuutta?', Kirkko, taide, viestintä, Suomen kirkkohistoriallisen seuran toimituksia, Suomen kirkkohistoriallinen seura ; Tiedekirja [jakaja],, Helsinki, pp. 313-328. Pakkala, J, Zangenberg, J, Munger, S 2005, 'Excavations on the Sea Galilee - the 2004 season of the German-Finnish-Swiss expedition to Tel Kinrot', Jahrbuch des Deutschen Evangelischen Instituts fur Altertumswissenschaft des Heiligen Landes, Flacius-Verlag, Furth/Bay, pp. 187-191. 3

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Sollamo, R 2005, 'An example of consistency: interpretation by the translator of the Greek Genesis in rendering the Hebrew semipreposition LFNJ', Lux humana, Lux aeterna, Suomen eksegeettisen seuran julkaisuja, Finnish Exegetical Society Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Helsinki ; Göttingen, pp. 3-12. 2006 Aejmelaeus, A 2006, 'Von Sprache zur Theologie: methodologische Überlegungen zur Theologie der Septuaginta', The Septuagint and messianism, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium, vol. 195, Peeters, Leuven, pp. 21-48. Aejmelaeus, A 2006, 'Faith, hope and interpretation: a lexical and syntactical study of the semantic field of hope in the Greek Psalter', Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, and the Septuagint presented to Eugene Ulrich, Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, vol. 101, Brill, Leiden, pp. 360-376. Jokiranta, J 2006, 'Qumran - the prototypical teacher in the Qumran Pesharim: a social-identity approach', Ancient Israel, Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 254-263. Nissinen, M 2006, 'Ruumiillinen ihminen Vanhassa testamentissa', in M Ahola, M Antikainen, P Salmesvuori (eds), Taivaallista seksiä. Kristinusko ja seksuaalisuus., Tammi, Helsinki, pp. 15-30. Nissinen, M 2006, 'Elemente sekundärer Religionserfahrung im nachexilischen Juda?', Primäre und sekundäre Religion als Kategorie der Religionsgeschichte des Alten Testaments, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 364, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 159-167. Nissinen, M 2006, 'The dubious image of prophecy', Prophets, prophecy, and prophetic texts in Second Temple Judaism, Library of Hebrew Bible. Old Testament studies, vol. 427, T&T Clark cop., New York, pp. 26-41. Pakkala, J 2006, 'Der literar- und religionsgeschichtliche Ort von Dtn 13', in JC Gertz, D Prechel, K Schmid, M Witte (eds), Die deuteronomistischen Geschichtswerke. Redaktions- und religionsgeschichtliche Perspektiven zur "Deuteronomismus" - Diskussion in Tora und Vorderen Propheten., Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Fur Die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, no. 365, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. Pakkala, J 2006, 'Die Entwicklung der Gotteskonzeptionen in den deuteronomistischen Redaktionen von polytheistischen zu monotheistischen', in JC Gertz, D Prechel, K Schmid, M Witte (eds), Die deuteronomistischen Geschichtswerke. Redaktions- und religionsgeschichtliche Perspektiven zur "Deuteronomismus" - Diskussion in Tora und Vorderen Propheten., Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Fur Die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, no. 365, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. Sollamo, R 2006, 'Messianism and the 'branch of David': Isaiah 11,1-5 and Genesis 49,8-12', The Septuagint and messianism, Peeters 2006 k Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium ; 195, Leuven, pp. 357-370. Sollamo, R 2006, 'Vanhan testamentin apokryfikirjojen uusi suomennos', Signum unitatis - ykseyden merkki. piispa Juha Pihkalan juhlakirja., Tampereen hiippakunnan vuosikirja, vol. 2007, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 79-87. Sollamo, R 2006, 'The creation of angels and natural phenomena intertwined in the Book of Jubilees (4QJUBa)', Biblical traditions in transmission, Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, vol. 111, Brill, Leiden, pp. 273-290. Valkama, K 2006, 'Syvälle Galilean historiaan: suomalaiset Kinneretin kaivauksilla', Kuningasajalta. kirjoituksia Salomosta ja rautakauden piirtokirjoituksista., Suomen eksegeettisen seuran julkaisuja, vol. 90, Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 215-231. 2007 Jokiranta, J, Wassen, C 2007, 'Groups in tension: sectarianism in the Damascus Document and the Community Rule', Sectarianism in early Judaism, Equinox, London, pp. 205-245. Jokiranta, J 2007, 'Social identity in the Qumran movement: the case of the penal code', Explaining Christian origins and early Judaism, Biblical interpretation series, vol. 89, Brill, Leiden, pp. 277-298. Latvus, K 2007, 'The Bible in British Urban Theology: An Analysis by a Finnish Companion: An Analysis by a Finnish Companion', in G West (ed.), Reading Other-wise. Socially Engaged Biblical Scholars Reading with Their Local Communities., Semeia Studies, no. 62, Society of Biblical Literature cop., Atlanta, pp. 133-140. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Sapatti on ihmistä varten', Homoseksuaalisuus Raamatussa ja kirkon opetuksessa, Kirkon tutkimuskeskus, Tampere, pp. 43-54. 2008 Aejmelaeus, A 2008, 'Hannah's Psalm: text, composition and redaction', Houses full of all good things. essays in memory of Timo Veijola., vol. 95, Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, vol. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society, Helsinki, pp. 354-376. Aejmelaeus, A 2008, 'A kingdom at stake: reconstructing the old Greek - deconstructing the Textus receptus', Scripture in transition. essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea scrolls in honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, vol. 126, Brill, Leiden, pp. 353-366. Jokiranta, J, Voitila, A 2008, 'Preface', Scripture in transition. essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea scrolls in honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, vol. 126, Brill, Leiden, pp. xi-xxiv. 4

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Latvus, K 2008, 'The Poor in the Hebrew Bible: Constructing Biblical Theology between the Contexts', in J Pakkala, M Nissinen (eds), Houses Full of All Good Things. Essays in Memory of Timo Veijola., vol. 95, Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, no. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Helsinki - Göttingen, pp. 640-655. Nissinen, MH 2008, 'From Holy War to Holy Peace: Biblical Alternatives to Belligerent Rhetoric ', in RCARW (ed.), Isaiah s Vision of Peace in Biblical and Modern International Relations: Swords into Plowshares, Culture and Religion in International Relations, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181 97. Nissinen, MH 2008, 'Transmitting divine mysteries: the prophetic role of wisdom teachers in the Dead Sea scrolls', Scripture in transition. essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea scrolls in honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, vol. 126, Brill, Leiden, pp. 513-533. Nissinen, M 2008, 'Das Problem der Prophetenschüler', in J Pakkala, M Nissinen (eds), Houses full of all good things. essays in memory of Timo Veijola., Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, vol. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society, Helsinki, pp.?- 353. Nissinen, M 2008, 'Song of Songs and sacred marriage', Sacred marriages. the divine-human sexual metaphor from Sumer to early Christianity., Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN, pp. 173-218. Pajunen, M 2008, 'Qumranic Psalm 91: A Structural Analysis', in A Voitila, J Jokiranta (eds), Scripture in Transition. Essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, no. 126, Brill, Leiden, pp. 591-605. Pakkala, J 2008, 'The Disunity of Ezra-Nehemiah', in P Reditt, M Boda (eds), The (Dis)unity of Ezra-Nehemiah, Old Testament Monograph Series, Sheffield Phoenix Press, Sheffield, pp. 200-215. Pakkala, J 2008, 'The Nomistic Roots of Judaism', in J Pakkala, M Nissinen (eds), Houses Full of All Good Things. Essays in Memory of Timo Veijola., Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, no. 95, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Helsinki/Göttingen, pp. 251-268. Pakkala, J 2008, 'Gedaliah s Murder in 2Kgs 25:25 and Jer 41:1-3', in A Voitila, J Jokiranta (eds), Scripture in Transition. Essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Seas Scrills in Horour of Raija Sollamo, Brill, Leiden, pp. 401-411. Perttilä, E 2008, 'How to Read the Greek Text behind the Sahidic Coptic', in J Jokiranta, A Voitila (eds), Scripture in Transition. Essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, no. 126, Brill, Leiden. Saukkonen, JM 2008, 'Dwellers at Qumran: Reflections on Their Literacy, Social Status, and Identity', in A Voitila, J Jokiranta (eds), Scripture in Transition. Essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, no. 126, Brill, pp. 615 628. Saukkonen, JM 2008, 'A Few Inkwells, Many Hands: Were There Scribes at Qumran?', in J Pakkala, M Nissinen (eds), Houses Full of All Good Things. Essays in Memory of Timo Veijola., Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, no. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society / Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Helsinki / Göttingen, pp. 538 553. Sollamo, R 2008, 'Characteristics of the old Greek translation of Deuteronomy in rendering lifne', in EBHABLMV (ed.), Florilegium Lovaniense. studies in Septuagint and textual criticism in honour of Florentino Garcia Martinez., Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium, vol. 224, Peeters, Leuven, pp. 427-436. Sollamo, R 2008, 'Panegyric on Redaction Criticism', in EBJPAMN (ed.), Houses full of all good things. essays in memory of Timo Veijola., Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, vol. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society,, Helsinki, pp. 684-696. Sollamo, R 2008, 'Apokryfikirjat osana Toisen temppelin ajan rikasta juutalaista kirjallisuutta', Urhea Judit, viisas Sirak. johdatus Vanhan testamentin apokryfikirjoihin., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 21-34. Sollamo, R 2008, 'Translation technique as a method', Translating a translation. the LXX and its modern translations in the context of early Judaism., Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium, vol. 213, Peeters, Leuven, pp. 35-41. Tenhunen, K 2008, 'The Renderings of the Hebrew Preposition le in Predicate Expressions Denoting Transition and Becoming Something in LXX Genesis and Exodus', in A Voitila, J Jokiranta (eds), Scripture in Transition. Essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of Raija Sollamo., Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, no. 126, Brill, Leiden, pp. 1-16. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Deuteronomy at Qumran and in 4QMMT', in J Pakkala, M Nissinen (eds), Houses Full of All Good Things. essays in memory of Timo Veijola., Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, no. 95, Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 520-537. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Canon and Identity at Qumran: An Overview and Challenges for Future Research', in A Voitila, J Jokiranta (eds), Scripture in Transition, Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, no. 126, Brill, Leiden ; Boston, pp. 629-640. 2009 Aejmelaeus, A 2009, 'Textkritik: I. Alttestamentlich', in O Wischmeyer (ed.), Lexikon der Bibelhermeneutik, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 589-590. 5

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Aejmelaeus, A 2009, 'Septuaginta: I. Alttestamentlich', in O Wischmeyer (ed.), Lexikon der Bibelhermeneutik, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 545-546. Borchardt, F 2009, 'Concepts of Scripture in 1Maccabees', in CA Evans, HD Zacharias (eds), Jewish and Christian Scripture as Artifact and Canon, Studies in Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity, no. 14, T & T Clark, Edinburgh, pp. 24-41. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Sects, Sectarians', in KD Sakenfield (ed.), The New Interpreter s Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 5 (S-Z), Abingdon Press, Nashville, pp. 151-152. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Learning from Sectarian Responses: Windows on Qumran Sects and Emerging Christian Sects', in EBFGM (ed.), Echoes from the caves. Qumran and the New Testament., Studies on the texts of the desert of Judah, Brill, Leiden, pp. 177-207. Latvus, K 2009, 'Diakonämbätet - en ny tolkning av dess ursprung', in P Kummel-Myrskog, B Sarelin, S Ekstrand (eds), Där nöden är störst, Publikationer utgivna av Evangelisk-lutherska Kyrkan i Finland, pp. 81-101. Nissinen, MH 2009, 'Pesharim as Divination: Qumran Exegesis, Omen Interpretation and Literary Prophecy ', in KDT&AL (ed.), The Contribution of the Dead Sea Scrolls to the Understanding of Biblical and Extra-Biblical Prophecy, Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology, no. 52, Peeters, pp. 43 60. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Ashurbanipal ', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 2, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1002-1003. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Assyria 7. Assyria and the Bible ', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 2, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1086-1091. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Assyria 1. Assyria in the Bible ', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 2, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1071. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Wisdom as mediatrix in Sirach 24: Ben Sira, love lyrics, and prophecy', in EBMLSSARM (ed.), Of god(s), trees, kings, and scholars. Neo-Assyrian and related studies in honour of Simo Parpola., Studia Orientalia, vol. 106, Finnish Oriental Society, Helsinki, pp. 377-390. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Reflections on the "historical-critical" method: historical criticism and critical historicism', in EBJMLAKHR (ed.), Method matters. essays on the interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in honor of David L. Petersen., Society of Biblical Literature resources for biblical study, vol. 56, Society of Biblical Literature, cop., Atlanta, pp. 479-504. Nissinen, M, Schipper, BU 2009, 'Apocalypses and apocalypticism: I. Ancient Near East', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 2, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 318-322. Nissinen, M 2009, 'The historical dilemma of prophetic studies', in EBHMBARGK (ed.), Prophecy in the book of Jeremiah, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 388, Walter de Gruyter, cop., Berlin, pp. 103-120. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Introduction: prophecy, iconography, and beyond', in EBMNACEC (ed.), Images and prophecy in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean, Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, vol. 233, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp. 7-14. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Adrammelech (Person) ', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 1, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 442. Nissinen, M 2009, 'Adrammelech (Deity) ', in [BHK.ICWDCA. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception 1, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 442. Nissinen, M, Münger, S 2009, 'Down the river: a shrine model from Tel Kinrot in its context', in E Kaptijn, LP Petit (eds), A timeless vale. archaeological and related essays on the Jordan Valley in honour of Gerrit van der Kooij on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday., Archaeological studies, vol. 19, Leiden University Press,, Leiden, pp. 129-144. Saukkonen, JM 2009, 'Selection, Election, and Rejection: Interpretation of Genesis in 4Q252', in A Klostergard Petersen, T Elgvin, C Wassen, H von Weissenberg, M Winninge (eds), Northern Lights on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Proceedings of the Nordic Qumran Network 2003 2006., Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, no. 80, Brill, pp. 63-81. Sollamo, R 2009, 'Qumranin tekstit ja Vanha testamentti', in TJJ (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa. Qumranin tekstit avautuvat., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 321-333. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'New Readings in 4QMMT', in A Kloestergaard-Petersen, T Elgvin, C Wassen, MW, H von Weissenberg (eds), Northern Lights on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Proceedings of the Nordic Qumran Network 2003-2006., Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, no. 80, Brill, Leiden, pp. 217-221. 2010 Aejmelaeus, A 2010, 'Wisdom Meets Prophecy: The Theme of Boasting and Paul s Quotation of Hannah s Psalm', Weisheit und Schöpfung. Festschrift für James Loader zum 65. Geburtstag., Wiener Alttestamentliche Studien, vol. 7, Peter Lang. Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Sectarianism', in JJ Collins, DC Harlow (eds), The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, pp. 1209-1211. 6

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Sociological Approaches to Qumran Sectarianism', in TH Lim, JJ Collins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 200-231. Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Social-Scientific Approaches to the Dead Sea Scrolls', in M Grossman (ed.), Rediscovering the Dead Sea Scrolls. An Assessment of Old and New Approaches and Methods., Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, pp. 246-263. Latvus, K 2010, 'Reading Hagar in Contexts: From Exegesis to Inter-contextual Analysis ', in A Brenner, A Lee, G Yee (eds), Genesis, texts@contexts, Fortress Press, Minneapolis, pp. 247-274. Lönnqvist, M, Törmä, M, Nuñez, M, Okkonen, J, Whiting, MS, Riihiaho, H, Nissinen, M 2010, 'Desertification and Ethnoarchaeology: Studying Hazards in the Nomadic Environment of Jebel Bishri in Syria', in P Matthiae, F Pinnock, L Nigro, N Marchetti (eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, May 5th-10th 2008, "Sapienza" - Università di Roma. Near Eastern Archaeology in the Past, Present, and Future: Heritage and Identity., vol. 1, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. Nissinen, MH 2010, 'Prophecy and Omen Divination: Two Sides of the Same Coin', in AA (ed.), Divination and Interpretation of Signs in the Ancient World, Oriental Institute Seminars, no. 6, The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 341 51. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Comparing Prophetic Sources: Principles and a Test Case', in J Day (ed.), Prophecy and Prophets in Ancient Israel. Proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar., T&T Clark cop., New York, pp. 3-24. Nissinen, M 2010, 'The Exiled Gods of Babylon in Neo-Assyrian Prophecy', in E Ben Zvi, C Levin (eds), The Concept of Exile in Ancient Israel and its Historical Contexts, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 404, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 27-38. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Biblical Prophecy from a Near Eastern Perspective: The Cases of Kingship and Divine Possession', in AL (ed.), Congress Volume Ljubljana 2007, Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, no. 133, Brill, Leiden, pp. 441 468. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Jumalattaret ja jumalallinen rakkaus Vanhan testamentin maailmassa', in K Valkama (ed.), Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta. Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin., vol. 100, Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 107-119. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Miten uskonto sai rajat?: Monoteismin ja juutalaisuuden synty', in K Valkama (ed.), Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta. Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin., Suomen eksegeettisen seuran julkaisuja, vol. 100, Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 322-336. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Prophetic Madness: Prophecy and Ecstasy in the Ancient Near East and in Greece', in KL Noll, B Schramm (eds), Raising Up a Faithful Exegete. Essays in Honor of Richard D. Nelson., Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Ind., pp. 3-29. Pakkala, J 2010, 'Why the Cult Reforms in Judah Probably Did not Happen', in RG Kratz, H Spieckermann (eds), One God One Cult One Nation. Archaeological and Biblical Perspectives., Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fu r die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, no. 405, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. Valkama, K 2010, 'Esipuhe', in K Valkama (ed.), Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta. Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin., Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 1-2. Valkama, K 2010, 'Johdanto', in K Valkama (ed.), Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta. Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin., Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 3-17. Valkama, K 2010, 'What Do Archaeological Remains Reveal of the Settlements in Judah during the Mid-Sixth Century B.C.E.?', in E Ben Zvi, C Levin (eds), The Concept of Exile in Ancient Israel and its Contexts, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 18-38. Valkama, K 2010, 'Perheen uskonto arkeologian näkökulmasta', in K Valkama (ed.), Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta. Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin., vol. 100, Suomen Eksegeettisen Seuran julkaisuja, no. 100, Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Helsinki, pp. 202-223. Weissenberg von, HM 2010, 'The Centrality of the Temple in 4QMMT', in C Hempel (ed.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Texts and Context, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, no. 90, Brill, Leiden, pp. 293-305. Weissenberg von, HM 2010, '4QMMT', in JJ Collins, DC Harlow (eds), The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids. A4 Article in conference publication (refereed) 2006 Aejmelaeus, A 2006, 'David's return to Ziklag: a problem of textual history in 1 Samuel 30:1', in XII Congress of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, Leiden, 2004, pp. 95-104 Septuagint and Cognate Studies, vol. 54. Sollamo, R 2006, 'The place of the enclitic personal pronouns in the old Greek Psalter', in XII Congress of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, Leiden, 2004, pp. 153-160. 2008 7

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Jokiranta, J 2008, 'Social identity approach: identity-constructing elements in the Psalms Pesher', in Defining identities: we, you, and the other in the Dead Sea Scrolls : proceedings of the fifth meeting of the IOQS in Groningen, pp. 85-110. Sollamo, R 2008, 'Translation technique and translation studies: the problem of translation universals', in XIII Congress of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies: Ljubljana, 2007, pp. 339-351. 2009 Jokiranta, J, Wassen, C 2009, 'A brotherhood at Qumran?: metaphorical familial language in the Dead Sea scrolls', in Northern lights on the Dead Sea scrolls: proceedings of the Nordic Qumran Network 2003-2006 / edited by Anders Klostergaard Petersen... [et al.], pp. 173-203. 2010 Aejmelaeus, A 2010, 'Hannah s Psalm in 4QSam a', in Archaeology of the Books of Samuel: the entangling of the textual and literary history, pp. 23-37 Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, vol. 132. B1 Unrefereed journal article 2005 Sollamo, R 2005, 'Timo Veijola in memoriam', Society of Biblical Literature. Sollamo, R 2005, 'Timo Veijola im memoriam', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 110, no. 4, pp. 290-291. 2006 Latvus, K 2006, '[Book Review]', Review of Biblical Literature, vol 8, pp. 53-54. Latvus, K 2006, 'Book review: Crenshaw, James L., Defending God: Biblical Responses to the Problem of Evil', Review of Biblical Literature. Sollamo, R 2006, 'Käännöstekniikan kiehtova kielipeli', Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. Vuosikirja, vol 2006, pp. 87-91. Valkama, K, Teppo, S 2006, 'Kullan kimallusta ja raudan kalsketta: metallien käyttö muinaisessa Lähi-idässä', Tekniikan Waiheita, vol 24, no. 4, pp. 5-19. 2007 Alanne, M, Valkama, K 2007, 'Kirja-arvostelu', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 112, no. 2, pp. 178-179. Jokiranta, J 2007, 'Book review: The Dead Sea Scrolls and the New Testament / George J. Brooke. - Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005', Trinity Seminary review., vol 28, no. 2, pp. 140-141. Jokiranta, J 2007, 'Book review: The Self as symbolic space: constructing identity and community at Qumran / Carol A. Newsom. - Leiden: Brill, 2004.', Dead Sea Discoveries, vol 14, no. 2, pp. 270-275. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Kirja-arvostelu', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 112, no. 1, pp. 76-79. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Miten uskonto sai rajat?: Monoteismin ja juutalaisuuden synty', Tieteessä tapahtuu, vol 2007, no. 3, pp. 12-18. Valkama, K 2007, 'Naisten arkielämän puitteet rautakauden Palestiinassa', Kulttuurintutkimus, vol 24, no. 2, pp. 27-38. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Osaako köyhä lukea Raamattua oikein?', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 2007, no. 2, pp. 160-165. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Kirja-arvostelu: Introduction to the Hebrew Bible', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 2007, no. 2, pp. 186-187. 2008 Jokiranta, J 2008, 'Book review: The Dead Sea Scrolls: what have we learned 50 years on? / Eileen M. Schuller. - London: SCM Press, 2006', Journal for the Study of Judaism, vol 39, no. 3, pp. 441-442. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Review: Reading the Present in the Qumran Library: The Perception of the Contemporary by Means of Scriptural Interpretation', Journal for the Study of Judaism, vol 39, no. 3, pp. 401-404. 2009 Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Book review: The social role of liturgy in the religion of the Qumran community / Russell C. D. Arnold. - Leiden : Brill, 2006', Dead Sea Discoveries, vol 16, no. 2, pp. 275-295. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Book Review: Holy Anger: Jacob, Job, Jesus / Lytta Basset. - Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.', Review of Biblical Literature. Latvus, K 2009, 'Diakonian virka uusimman raamatuntutkimuksen valossa: väärinkäsityksiä ja tosi rakkautta', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 2009, no. 1, pp. 36-46. 8

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Sollamo, R 2009, 'Transformations in the Septuagint: Towards an Interaction of Septuagint Studies and Translation Studies. By Theo A. W. van der Louw.(Contribution to Biblical Exegesis & Theology 47). Leuven, Paris and Dudley: Peeters, 2007. Review.', Journal for the Study of Judaism, vol 40, no. 1, pp. 122-123. 2010 Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Book review: The Self-Understanding of the Dead Sea Scrolls Community: An Eternal Planting, A House of Holiness / Paul Swarup. - New York: T&T Clark, 2006 ', Dead Sea Discoveries, vol 17, no. 2, pp. 234 236. Latvus, K 2010, 'Tuunattu Raamattu köyhyydestä', Diakonian tutkimus, vol 2010, no. 2, pp. 170-171. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Fra profeti til profetbog', Bibliana, vol 11, no. 1, pp. 13-15. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Hvad er profeti', Bibliana, vol 11, no. 1, pp. 6-7. Sollamo, R 2010, 'Book Review: Hebrew Bible, Greek Bible, and Qumran: Collected Essays/ Emanuel Tov. - Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008', Journal of Jewish Studies, vol 61, no. 1, pp. 151-152. Tervanotko, H 2010, 'Book review: Aarre Saviastioissa: Qumranin tekstit avautuvat. ed. Jutta Jokiranta', Suomen Kirkkohistoriallisen Seuran Vuosikirja, vol 2010. Tervanotko, H 2010, 'Book review: Sidnie White Crawford, Rewriting Scriptures in Second Temple Times', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 115, no. 2, pp. 181-182. Vanonen, H 2010, 'Kirja-arvio: Conquering the World War Scroll (1QM) Reconsidered. (by Brian Schultz, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2009.)', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 115 (2010), no. 3, pp. 281-282. Weissenberg von, HM 2010, 'Review: From 4QMMT to Resurrection: Mélanges qumraniens en hommage à Émile Puech', Journal of Jewish Studies, vol 61. B2 Contribution to book/other compilations (non-refereed) 2005 Nissinen, M 2005, 'Tappaako uskonto?: pyhän sodan retoriikka ennen ja nyt', in M Pesonen, H Westermarck (eds), Nautinnollisen elämän valinnat, Studia generalia, Helsingin yliopiston vapaan sivistystyön toimikunta, Helsinki, pp. 109-121. 2008 Nissinen, M, Uro, R 2008, 'Sacred marriages or the divine-human sexual metaphor: introducing the project', in M Nissinen, R Uro (eds), Sacred marriages. the divine-human sexual metaphor from Sumer to early Christianity., Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN, pp. 1-6. 2009 Sollamo, R 2009, 'Betydningen af Dödehavsrullerne for forskningen i Den Hebraiske Bibel', in B Eirnaes (ed.), Dödehavsrullerne. Indhold, historie og betydning., Anis, pp. 295-305. Sollamo, R 2009, 'Dödehavsrullenes betydning for forskningen på Den Hebraiske bibel', in Å Justnes (ed.), Dödehavsrullene. Deres innhold, historie og betydning., Høyskoleforlaget,, pp. 357-369. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Qumran og Bibelen', in B Ejrnaes (ed.), Dødehavsrullerne: Indhold, historie og betydning, Anis, Kobenhavn. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Qumranin Raamattu', in J Jokiranta (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa. Qumranin tekstit avautuvat., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 137-147. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Qumran og Bibelen', in Å Justnes (ed.), in Dødehavsrullene: Deres innhold, historie og betydning, HøyskoleForlaget / Norwegian Academic Press. B3 Unrefereed article in conference proceedings 2009 Pajunen, M 2009, The Function of 11QPsApª as a Ritual,. Tervanotko, H 2009, "The Hope of the Enemy has Perished" The Figure of Miriam in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Figure of Miriam in the Dead Sea Scrolls,. Tervanotko, H 2009, Miriam s Mistake: Numbers 12 Renarrated in Demetrius the Chronographer, 4Q377 (Apocryphon Pentateuch B), Legum Allegoriae and the Pentateuchal Targumim,. 2010 9

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Tervanotko, H 2010, 'Miriam Misbehaving?: The Figure of Miriam in 4Q377 in Light of Ancient Jewish Literature', in The Dead Sea Scrolls In Context: Integrating the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Study of Ancient Texts, Languages, and Cultures, Vetus Testamentum. Supplements, no. 140. C1 Published scientific monograph 2005 Hyväri, S, Latvus, K 2005, Paikallisia teologioita Espoossa, Diakonia-ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja. A, Tutkimuksia, no. 11, Diakonia-ammattikorkeakoulu, Helsinki. 2007 Aejmelaeus, A 2007, On the trail of the Septuagint translators: collected essays, Contributions to biblical exegesis & theology, no. 50, Rev. and expanded ed edn, Peeters, Leuven. 2008 Hakola, R, Pakkala, J 2008, Kristinuskon ja juutalaisuuden juuret: arkeologian näkökulmia, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. 2009 Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 4QMMT Reevaluating the Text, the Function, and the Meaning of the Epilogue, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, no. 82, Brill, Leiden. 2010 Weissenberg von, HM, Latvus, K, Häkkinen, S 2010, Köyhien Raamattu, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal 2008 Nissinen, M, Uro, R (eds) 2008, Sacred marriages: the divine-human sexual metaphor from Sumer to early Christianity, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN. Pakkala, J, Nissinen, M (eds) 2008, Houses full of all good things: essays in memory of Timo Veijola, Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society, no. 95, Finnish Exegetical Society, Helsinki. Voitila, A, Jokiranta, J (eds) 2008, Scripture in transition: essays on Septuagint, Hebrew Bible, and Dead Sea scrolls in honour of Raija Sollamo, Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism, no. v. 126, Brill, Leiden. 2009 Jokiranta, J (ed.) 2009, Aarre saviastioissa: Qumranin tekstit avautuvat, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. Nissinen, M (ed.) 2009, Images and prophecy in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean, Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, no. Bd. 233, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. Weissenberg von, H, Klostergaard-Petersen, A, Elgvin, T, Wassen, C, Winninge, M, Ehrensvärd, M (eds) 2009, Northern lights on the Dead Sea scrolls: proceedings of the Nordic Qumran Network 2003-2006, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah, no. 80, Brill, Leiden. D1 Article in professional journal 2005 Aejmelaeus, A 2005, 'Kristinusko ja juutalaisten pyhät kirjoitukset', Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. Vuosikirja, vol 2005, pp. 55-64. 2006 Latvus, K 2006, 'Raamattu ei pane köyhiä kyykkyyn', Diakonian tutkimus, pp. 86-87. Latvus, K 2006, 'Raamatun linjat köyhyydestä', Diakonian tutkimus, pp. 169-170. 2007 Latvus, K 2007, 'Diakonian tarkastelua järjen valossa', Diakonian tutkimus, no. 2, pp. 174-178. Latvus, K 2007, 'Onko diakonia-termi erehdys?', Diakonian tutkimus, pp. 78-79. 2008 10

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Latvus, K 2008, 'Kirja-arvostelu: Kaksi kirjaa köyhyydestä: Latinalaisen Amerikan vapautuksen teologiaa ja suomalaisten köyhien kokemuksia: G. Gutierrez, A Theology of Liberation. History. Politics, and Salvation; A-M.Isola, M.Larivaara, J.Mikkonen (toim), Arkipäivän kokemuksia köyhyydestä', Diakonian tutkimus, pp. 99-101. 2009 Latvus, K 2009, 'Kristillisen auttamisen historia perinteisen tulkinnan mukaan: Gottfried Hammann, Die Geschichte der christlichen Diakonie; Review/Kirja-arvostelu', Diakonian tutkimus, pp. 64-65. 2010 Weissenberg von, HM, Hukari, A 2010, 'Outoina ja muukalaisina-kontekstuaalisen teologian etsimistä', Crux, vol 2010, no. 12, pp. 20-21. D2 Article in professional hand or guide book or in a professional data system, or text book material 2007 Latvus, K 2007, 'Diakonian teologia - auttamisen teologia', in K Latvus, A Elenius (eds), Auttamisen teologia, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 271-282. Latvus, K, Elenius, A 2007, 'Auttaminen, diakonia ja teologia', in K Latvus, A Elenius (eds), Auttamisen teologia, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 11-33. Latvus, K 2007, 'Auttajan viran alkuperän uusi tulkinta', in K Latvus, A Elenius (eds), Auttamisen teologia, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 52-82. Liljeström, M 2007, '"Minä katkaisen käsivartesi": Raamatun kääntämisen haasteista', Teologia.fi-verkkojulkaisu. Seppänen, C 2007, 'Millainen on ensimmäinen raamatunkäännös', Teologia.fi. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Osaako köyhä lukea Raamattua oikein?', in A Lauha (ed.), teologia.fi. 2008 Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Vanhan testamentin kaanonin synty', in P Luomanen, A Marjanen, K Latvus, J Jokiranta, HVW (eds), EMO. Eksegetiikan menetelmien oppimisympäristö.. 2009 Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Tekstene sett ut fra en sosialvitenskapelig synsvinkel', in Å Justnes (ed.), Dødehavsrullene: Deres innhold, historie og betydning, HøyskoleForlaget / Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand, pp. 103-114. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Qumranin liikkeen jäsenyys', in J Jokiranta (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 175-193. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Sosiaalitieteiden näkökulma teksteihin', in J Jokiranta (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 95-105. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Medlemskab', in B Ejrnæs (ed.), Dødehavsrullerne. Indhold, Historie og Betydning, Anis, København, pp. 161-178. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Medlemskap', in Å Justnes (ed.), Dødehavsrullene: Deres innhold, historie og betydning, HøyskoleForlaget / Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand, pp. 191-211. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Qumranin kirjasto: omaa vai yhteistä? ', in J Jokiranta (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa, Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 107-117. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Teksterna set ud fra en socialvidenskabelig synsvinkel', in B Ejrnæs (ed.), Dødehavsrullerne. Indhold, Historie og Betydning, Anis, København, pp. 87-97. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Forbindelsen mellem skriftrullerne og Qumranbevægelsen', in B Ejrnæs (ed.), Dødehavsrullerne. Indhold, Historie og Betydning, Anis, København, pp. 98-106. Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Forbindelsen mellom skriftrullene og Qumran-bevegelsen', in Å Justnes (ed.), Dødehavsrullene: Deres innhold, historie og betydning, HøyskoleForlaget / Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand, pp. 117-127. Liljeström, M 2009, 'Vanha testamentti syyriaksi', in J Jokiranta, H von Weissenberg, K Latvus, P Luomanen (eds), EMO. Eksegetiikan menetelmien oppimisympäristö.. Pajunen, M 2009, 'Kirjakäärön materiaalinen rekonstruktio', in J Jokiranta, H von Weissenberg, K Latvus, P Luomanen (eds), EMO : Eksegetiikan menetelmien oppimisympäristö. Saukkonen, JM 2009, 'Qumranin raunioiden arkeologiaa', in JJ (ed.), Aarre saviastioissa. Qumranin tekstit avautuvat., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 157-172. Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Naiset Qumranin teksteissä', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. 11

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Mitä tarkoitetaan kun kysytään onko jokin teksti qumranilainen?', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumraverkkojulkaisu. Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Raamatullinen vai ei?: 4Q365 Kopio Penteukista vaiko uudelleen kirjoitetusta Pentateukista ', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Vanonen, H 2009, 'Qumran ja Uusi testamentti', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Vanonen, H 2009, 'Apokalyptiikka Qumranin teksteissä', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Vanonen, H, Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Qumranin tekstilöydöt ja niiden maailma Johdanto', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumranverkkojulkaisu. Vanonen, H, Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Qumranin käsikirjoitukset Uusi ikkuna antiikin maailmaan', in P Luomanen, J Jokiranta, K Latvus, H von Weissenberg (eds), EMO-verkkojulkaisu. Weissenberg von, HM, Tervanotko, H 2009, 'Mitä tarkoitetaan kun kysytään, onko jokin teksti "qumranilainen"?', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Qumranin tekstit ja niiden maailma.. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Qumranin kirjasto', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Qumranin tekstit ja niiden maailma.. 2010 Vanonen, H 2010, 'Qumranin liikkeen omat tekstit', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. D5 Text book or professional handbook or guidebook or dictionary 2005 Jämsä, J, Ketola, K, Nissinen, M, Sama'neh, M, Vappula, K 2005, Uusi arkki, vol. 1, Uskonto ja Raamattu, Edita, Helsinki. Nissinen, M, Jämsä, J, Nokelainen, M, Vappula, K, Vuorio-Hellman, I 2005, Kirkkohistorian ja kirkkotiedon arkki, Edita, Helsinki. 2007 Aejmelaeus, A 2007, Täyttä hepreaa: Johdatus Vanhan testamentin hepreaan, 4., korjattu laitos edn, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. Latvus, K, Elenius, A (eds) 2007, Auttamisen teologia, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. Nissinen, M, Jämsä, J, Nokelainen, M, Nuorteva, J, Vappula, K, Vuorio-Hellman, I 2007, Kirkkohistorian ja kirkkotiedon Arkki, 8.-10. edn, Edita. 2009 Harviainen, T, Sollamo, R 2009, Raamatun heprean lukemisto, 2. uud. laitos edn, Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press, Helsinki. Luomanen, P, Jokiranta, J, Latvus, K, Marjanen, A, Weissenberg von, HM (eds) 2009, EMO: Eksegetiikan menetelmien oppimisympäristö, Department of Biblical Studies, UH. Weissenberg von, HM (ed.) 2009, Qumran-verkkojulkaisu: Qumranin tekstilöydöt ja niiden maailma,. 2010 Valkama, K, Pesonen, A 2010, Arkielämä Raamatun aikaan: Juudan kylistä roomalaisiin kaupunkeihin, Kirjapaja. E1 Popular article, newspaper article 2006 Aejmelaeus, A 2006, 'Ei suvaitsevaisuutta vaan keskinäistä kunnioitusta', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 111, no. 2, pp. 201-203. Nissinen, M 2006, 'Arkeologia ja identiteetti Israelissa', Synsygus, vol 2006, no. 2, pp. 16-18. Weissenberg von, HM 2006, 'Luottamus: Minieksegeesi psalmista 90:1-2', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 2006, no. 11-12, pp. 32. 2007 Nissinen, M 2007, 'Musiikin pyhä hurmio', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 5. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Viimeinen tuomio ja Joonan merkki', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 6. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Teurastuksen loppu', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 4. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Ei muuta jumalaa', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 3. 12

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Nissinen, M 2007, 'Mitä tämä on?', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 2. Nissinen, M 2007, 'Profeetta Hanna', Pyhäkoululehti, vol 119, no. 1. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Miten Raamattua tulkitaan oikein?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2007, no. 12, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Miksi verta saa syödä?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2007, no. 19, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Olivatko Paavali ja Pietari riidoissa keskenään?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2007, no. 22, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2007, 'Miten kirkko suhtautuu kuvakieltoon?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2007, no. 10, pp. 19. 2008 Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Miten kirkko suhtautuu itsemurhan tehneeseen ihmiseen?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 3, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Keitä ovat Uuden testamentin Mariat?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 8, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Mitä ovat apokryfikirjat?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 4, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Jättikö Jumala juutalaiset osattomiksi pelastuksesta?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 21, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Miksi Jeesus kiroaa viikunapuun?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 14, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Miksi kirkko vaikenee Raamatun versioista?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 19, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Mitä Jobin kirja antaa?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 17, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Oliko Jeesus Qumranin yhteisön jäsen?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 11, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Miksi Raamattu kehottaa olemaan hyvä pahoille?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 13, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2008, 'Mitä Jeesukselle tapahtui?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2008, no. 6, pp. 15. 2009 Aejmelaeus, A 2009, 'Tarpeellista, mahdollista ja erittäin ajankohtaista!', Teologinen Aikakauskirja, vol 114, no. 5, pp. 493-497. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Opastaako Raamattu eläinten kohtelussa?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2009, no. 3, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Ovatko filistealaiset ja palestiinalaiset sukua?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2009, no. 5, pp. 19. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Onko vuoden 1992 raamatunkäännös väärennös?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2009, no. 9, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Mistä pääsiäisen nimi tulee?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2009, no. 7, pp. 15. Weissenberg von, HM 2009, 'Miksi Vanha testamentti on väkivaltainen?', Tampereen kirkkosanomat, vol 2009, no. 11, pp. 19. 2010 Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Muukalaiset Qumranin liikkeessä', Gladiolus, no. 4. Jokiranta, J 2010, 'Miten Raamattu syntyi?', Elämään. Weissenberg von, HM 2010, 'Kirkkomme niin sanottu raamattukriisi', Aamulehti. E1 Popular contribution to book/other compilations 2006 Nissinen, M 2006, 'Juottovasikka ja valkoviinit', in S Häkkinen (ed.), Viisi leipää ja kaksi kalaa. savolaispojan eväät : piispa Wille Riekkinen 60 vuotta 2006., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 31-38. 2007 Nissinen, M 2007, 'Rakkaus saa tilaa, kun riittämätön kohtaa armon', in S Korpela (ed.), Mikä ihmeen armo?. Toivesaarnoja tavalliselle etsijälle ja epäilijälle - tuomaalle!., Kirjapaja, Helsinki, pp. 21-29. 2008 Jokiranta, J 2008, 'Mitä tekemistä Jeesuksella oli essealaisten ja qumranilaisten kanssa?: Vastaus Kysy Jeesuksesta osioon Usko, toivo, rakkaus verkkosivustolla', Helsingin seurakuntayhtymä, Suomen Pipliaseura. 2009 Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Qumranin liike', in H von Weissenberg (ed.), Qumran-verkkojulkaisu. Qumranin tekstilöydöt ja niiden maailma.. 13

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010 Jokiranta, J 2009, 'Pääsisinkö jäseneksi Qumranin liikkeeseen?', in A Lauha (ed.), Teologia.fi. Verkkojulkaisu.. Lehtipuu, O, Nissinen, M 2009, 'Hakemistot: Raamatun perussanasto, Henkilöt, Paikat, kansat kielet, Raamatun kirjat', Koko Pyhä Raamattu, Kirjapaja. 2010 Nissinen, M 2010, 'Även en savolaxare blir "bara glad"', Värmlands nation 350 år och lite mer därtill. En jubileumsskrift., Nationen och hembygden, vol. 18, Värmlands Nation i Uppsala, Karlstad. Nissinen, M 2010, 'Ajan aallot', in J Kokkonen (ed.), Pitkän miehen rikas elämä. Martti Ruutu 1910 2005., Savotar, vol. 12, Savolainen Osakunta, Helsinki, pp. 95-99. E2 Popular monograph 2009 Kaimio, M, Sollamo, R, Harviainen, T, Kiilunen, J, Nyström, A, Räntilä, KM, Mattila, T, Hyvönen, VA, Luoto, V 2009, Vanhan testamentin apokryfikirjat, Kirjapaja, Helsinki. 2010 Jokiranta, J 2010, Vanha testamentti, Tätä on kristinusko, vol. 4, Perussanoma, Kauniainen. 14

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 1 Analysis of activities 2005-2010 - Associated person is one of Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi, Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi, Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi, Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi, Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi, Kari Latvus, kari.latvus@helsinki.fi, Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi, Anssi Voitila, anssi.voitila@helsinki.fi, Juhana Markus Saukkonen, Juhana.Saukkonen@helsinki.fi, Merja Alanne, Francis Borchardt, Tuukka Kauhanen, tuukka.kauhanen@helsinki.fi, Hanna Piritta Kilkkinen, hanna.kilkkinen@helsinki.fi, Marketta Liljeström, Marketta.Liljestrom@helsinki.fi, Mika Pajunen, mika.s.pajunen@helsinki.fi, Elina Perttilä, Elina.Perttila@helsinki.fi, Katri Saarelainen, Christian Seppänen, Katri Tenhunen, Hanna Tervanotko, hanna.tervanotko@helsinki.fi, Tuula Tynjä, Tuula.Tynja@helsinki.fi, Kirsi Valkama, kirsi.valkama@helsinki.fi, kvalkama@mappi.helsinki.fi, Hanna Vanonen, hanna.vanonen@helsinki.fi Activity type Count Supervisor or co-supervisor of doctoral thesis 29 Prizes and awards 5 Editor of research journal 11 Editor of research anthology/collection/conference proceedings 2 Peer review of manuscripts 3 Editor of communication journal 1 Editor of series 4 Assessment of candidates for academic posts 5 Membership or other role in review committee 2 Membership or other role in research network 12 Membership or other role in national/international committee, council, board 51 Membership or other role in public Finnish or international organization 34 Membership or other role of body in private company/organisation 6 Other tasks of an expert in private sector 2 Participation in interview for written media 159 Participation in radio programme 14 Participation in TV programme 3 1

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 2 Listing of activities 2005-2010 Supervisor or co-supervisor of doctoral thesis Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Supervision of Dissertation/Elina Perttilä, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2002, Finland Supervision of Dissertation/Tuukka Kauhanen, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2005, Finland Supervision of Dissertation/Marketta Liljeström, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2006, Finland Supervision of Dissertation/Raimund Wirth, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2006, Germany Supervision of Dissertation/Christian Seppänen, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2007, Finland Supervision of Dissertation/Elisa Uusimäki, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 2009, Finland Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi Co-supervision of doctoral dissertation, Jutta Jokiranta, 2009, Finland Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2008, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2010, Finland Thesis supervision, Martti Nissinen, 2010, United States Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi Thesis supervision: Hanna Kilkkinen, Juha Pakkala, 01.08.2004, Finland Thesis supervision: Joanna Töyräänvuori, Juha Pakkala, 01.01.2010, Finland Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Supervision of doctoral thesis/hanne von Weissenberg, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.1998 30.04.2006, Finland Supervision of doctoral thesis/jutta Jokiranta, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.1998 17.12.2005, Finland Supervision of doctoral thesis/juhana Saukkonen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.1999 10.05.2005, Finland Supervision of doctoral thesis/katri Tenhunen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2000 Supervision of doctoral thesis/maria Kela, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2004 15.12.2007, Finland Supervision of doctoral thesis/francis Borchardt, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 30.11.2010, United States Supervision of doctoral thesis/hanna Vanonen, Raija Sollamo, 01.08.2007 Supervision of doctoral thesis/mika S. Pajunen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 Supervision of doctoral thesis, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2008 31.12.2011 Kari Latvus, kari.latvus@helsinki.fi Supervision of doctoral thesis, Kari Latvus, 2008 Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Väitöskirjan toinen ohjaaja (& prof. Anneli Aejmelaeus), Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2009 2

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Prizes and awards Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi Gunning Lecturer honorarium, Jutta Jokiranta, 10.2007, United Kingdom Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Kunniajäsen, Raija Sollamo, 2002 2011, Finland Kunniajäsen, Raija Sollamo, 2003 2011, Finland Jäsen, Raija Sollamo, 2006 2011, Finland Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Member of the Academy Club for Young Scientists, Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2010 2011 Editor of research journal Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.2001 31.12.2012, Denmark De Septuaginta Investigationes/ Monograph series, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.2007 31.12.2017, Germany Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Journal of Biblical Literature, Martti Nissinen, 2003 2009, United States Teologinen Aikakauskirja/Teologisk Tidskrift, Martti Nissinen, 2004, Finland Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Martti Nissinen, 2005, Denmark Sacra Scripta, Martti Nissinen, 2006, Romania Welt des Orients, Martti Nissinen, 2008, Germany Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, Martti Nissinen, 2009, Germany Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Teologinen aikakauskirja, toimituskunnan jäsen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.1999, Finland Kari Latvus, kari.latvus@helsinki.fi Diakonian Tutkimus - Journal for the study of diaconia, Kari Latvus, 2004, Finland Diaconia. Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice, Kari Latvus, 2010, Germany Editor of research anthology/collection/conference proceedings Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Changes in Scripture, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2010 Kirsi Valkama, kirsi.valkama@helsinki.fi, kvalkama@mappi.helsinki.fi Israelin uskonto ennen juutalaisuutta: Näkökulmia pronssi- ja rautakauden Palestiinan uskontoihin, Kirsi Valkama, 2010 Peer review of manuscripts Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Bulletin of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.2003 States Vetus Testamentum, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.2010 31.12.2010, United States Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Teologinen aikakauskirja, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.1999, Finland 31.12.2006, United 3

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Editor of communication journal Kari Latvus, kari.latvus@helsinki.fi The Door To The Study Of Diaconia, Kari Latvus, 2010 Editor of series Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception, Martti Nissinen, 2003 2011, Germany Themes in Biblical Narrative, Martti Nissinen, 2007, Netherlands Ancient Near Eastern Monographs/Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente, Martti Nissinen, 2008 SBL Writings from the Ancient World, Martti Nissinen, 2009, United States, United States Assessment of candidates for academic posts Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Assessment of Candidates/Professorship for Semitic Studies, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 11.11.2009, Finland Assessment of candidates/eurias Fellowships, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 12.11.2010 Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Assessment of a Candidate for a Research Grant, Martti Nissinen, 04.03.2010, Israel Assessment of a Candidate for a Tenure Track Position, Martti Nissinen, 11.03.2010, United States Seemiläisten kielten ja kulttuurien professorin virantäyttötyöryhmä, Martti Nissinen, 21.05.2010 Membership or other role in review committee Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi Expert Opinion of Project Application, Jutta Jokiranta, 2010 Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi, Belgium Väitöskirjan arvosanatoimikunta, Martti Nissinen, 16.10.2010, Finland Membership or other role in research network Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi OTSEM Board, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2010 Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi OTSEM membership, Juha Pakkala, 2005 31.12.2010, Norway 2010, Norway Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi 19.08.2010, Finland Sihteeri ja jäsen pohjoismaisessa Qumran-tutkimuksen verkostossa (Nordic Network in Qumran Studies, NNQS), Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2003 2007 Francis Borchardt Society of Biblical Literature, Member, Francis Borchardt, 2005 Nordic Network for Old Testament Studies: Epistemologies and Methods, Member, Francis Borchardt, 2006 Mika Pajunen, mika.s.pajunen@helsinki.fi Member of the NNQS, Mika Pajunen, 2003 2007 Secretary of the NNQS, Mika Pajunen, 2006 2007 IOQS membership, Mika Pajunen, 2007 Member of OTSEM, Mika Pajunen, 2007 SBL membership, Mika Pajunen, 2009 4

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Hanna Tervanotko, hanna.tervanotko@helsinki.fi Memberof the Nordic Network in Qumran Studies, Hanna Tervanotko, 2003 2007 Member in an interdisciplinary network of women in theological research, Hanna Tervanotko, 2007, Belgium Membership or other role in national/international committee, council, board Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Academia Scientiarum Fennica/Member, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 1992, Finland International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies/ Board member, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.1997 States Academy of Finland / Expert, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Evangelisch-Theologische Fakultät, Universität Wien/ Scientific Advisory Board, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 04.05.2006 Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi 31.12.2006, United 04.05.2012, Austria Admission Committee for Religious Education Program, Faculty of Theology, Committee member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2002 2005, Finland Nordic Network in Qumran Studies, Member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2003 2007 Theological Faculty Library Advisory Board, Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2003 2006, Finland The Executive Group of the Department of Biblical Studies, UH, Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2004 2009, Finland Conflicting Identities: Social and Religious Identities in Light of the Qumran Material from the Judaean Desert, Advisory Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2008 2010, Finland The Church Research Institute, Committee member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2008 Dead Sea Discoveries, Editorial Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2009, Finland, Netherlands Admission Committee for Religious Education Program, Faculty of Theology, Committee member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2010 Language Center, UH, Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2010 2014, Finland, Finland NordForsk Network Socio-Cognitive Perspectives on Early Judaism and Early Christianity, Member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2010 2013 Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Martti Nissinen, 15.02.1993, Finland Society of Biblical Literature, Prophetic Texts and their Ancient Contexts, Martti Nissinen, 01.12.1999 Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Martti Nissinen, 15.02.2001 15.02.2007, Finland Society of Biblical Literature, Intl. Meetings Program Unit for Prophecy, Martti Nissinen, 01.08.2002 SBL Hebrew Scriptures and Cognate Literature Section, Martti Nissinen, 01.12.2004 Teologinen Julkaisuseura, Martti Nissinen, 01.03.2004 17.02.2011 OTSEM (Nordic-German Network of Old Testament Studies), Martti Nissinen, 01.09.2005 SBL Prophetic Texts and their Ancient Contexts Group, Martti Nissinen, 01.12.2006 Valtakunnallinen teologian tutkijakoulu, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2006 Helsingin yliopiston tieteellinen neuvosto, Martti Nissinen, 01.09.2007 Nils Klim Prize Academic Committee, Martti Nissinen, 2008 Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi, Norway, Finland Apokryfikirjojen käännöskomitean puheenjohtaja, Raija Sollamo, 01.09.1999 Toimituskunnan jäsen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2000 Yhdistyksen puheenjohtaja, Raija Sollamo, 04.2002 31.12.2010, Finland 13.04.2011, Finland 31.12.2008, Finland, United States, United States 31.12.2006, Finland Pohjoismaisen tutkimusverkoston johtoryhmän jäsen, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2003 31.12.2007 International Society for Septuagint and Cognate Studies (IOSCS), Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 Nordic Network of Qumran Studies, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, United States 31.07.2007, United States 31.12.2005, United States 5

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Säätiön hallituksen puheenjohtaja, Raija Sollamo, 01.09.2005 30.09.2007 The Nordic Network of Qumran Studies, Pohjoismainen järjestö, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006 International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 Nordic Network of Qumran Studies, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland Precidency of an International Research Organization, Raija Sollamo, 20.07.2007 06.08.2010 International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament (IOSOT), Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2008 Asiantuntija, Raija Sollamo, 30.03.2010 Asiantuntijatehtävä, Raija Sollamo, 01.03.2010 Asiantuntijatehtävä, Raija Sollamo, 05.03.2010 15.04.2010, Belgium 15.04.2010, France 15.04.2010, Belgium Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Jäsen Kirkko ja juutalaisuus-työryhmässä 2008-2010, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2008 2011 Juhana Markus Saukkonen, Juhana.Saukkonen@helsinki.fi Suomen Eksegeettinen Seura, Juhana Markus Saukkonen, 16.02.2006 Marketta Liljeström, Marketta.Liljestrom@helsinki.fi Member of the SBL Forum Advisory Board, Marketta Liljeström, 2007 2009 Tiedekuntaneuvoston jäsen, Marketta Liljeström, 2010 Christian Seppänen 31.12.2006, Finland 31.12.2007, Netherlands 31.12.2008, Netherlands Raamattu eksegetiikan ja systemaattisen teologian leikkauspisteessä -symposium, Member of Organizing Committee, Christian Seppänen, 02.04.2008 IOSOT 2010, Member of Organizing Committee, Christian Seppänen, 01.08.2010 06.08.2010 Hanna Tervanotko, hanna.tervanotko@helsinki.fi Member in a women's network for theological study, Hanna Tervanotko, 2005 Member of a network of women in science, Hanna Tervanotko, 2007 Member of the Student Advisory Group, Hanna Tervanotko, 2007 2008 Tuula Tynjä, Tuula.Tynja@helsinki.fi Suomen Eksegeettinen Seura, Tuula Tynjä, 01.01.2007, Belgium 31.12.2007, Finland Kirsi Valkama, kirsi.valkama@helsinki.fi, kvalkama@mappi.helsinki.fi Finnish Exegetical Society: Board member, Kirsi Valkama, 02.2006, Finland 2007, Hungary Membership or other role in public Finnish or international organization Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi Finnish Exegetical Society, Board member, Jutta Jokiranta, 2003 2006, Finland Finnish Exegetical Society, Vice-chairperson in the Board, Jutta Jokiranta, 2006, Finland Enoch Seminar, Jutta Jokiranta, 2007, United States Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Suomen Lähi-idän instituutin ystävät, Martti Nissinen, 1994 2010, Finland Helsingin yliopiston Teologisen tiedekunnan promootiotoimikunta, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2004 31.05.2005, Finland Helsingin yliopiston Teologisen tiedekunnan tiedekuntaneuvosto, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2004 31.12.2006, Finland Valtakunnallinen teologian tutkijakoulu, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2005 31.07.2009, Finland Helsingin yliopiston Teologisen tiedekunnan tiedekuntaneuvosto, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2007 01.01.2009, Finland Helsingin yliopiston tieteellinen neuvosto, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2007 31.07.2008, Finland Savolainen Osakunta, Martti Nissinen, 2008, Finland 6

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, Martti Nissinen, 2009, Finland Foundation for the Finnish Institute in the Middle East, Martti Nissinen, 2010, Finland Helsingin yliopiston Teologisen tiedekunnan promootiotoimikunta, Martti Nissinen, 01.09.2010 31.05.2011, Finland Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Fulbright Center, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Suomalainen Konkordia-liitto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Suomen evl. Kirkon asettama Apokryfikirjojen käännöskomitea, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Vetenskapsstiftelsen för kvinnor - Naisten tiedesäätiö, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland Apokryfikirjojen käännöskomitea, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland Naisten tiedesäätiö - Vetenskapsstiftelsen för kvinnor, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland Suomalainen Konkordia-liitto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland Suomen kulttuurirahasto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland The Fulbright Center for Finnish-American Academic Exchanges, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland Fulbright Center, Raija Sollamo, 01.09.2007 30.09.2007, Finland Suomalainen Konkordia-liitto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland Suomen Kulttuurirahaston hallintoneuvosto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland Vetenskapsstiftelsen för kvinnor - Naisten Tiedesäätiö, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland Suomalainen Konkordia-liitto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland Suomen kulttuurirahaston hallintoneuvosto, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Urban Faith Project (Tampereen, Manchesterin ja Strängnesin hiippakunnat), Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2007 2008 Apokryfikirjojen toimituskunta, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 01.2008 01.2009 Tampereen hiippakunnan raamattutiedon pastoraalikurssien kouluttaja, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2008 Juhana Markus Saukkonen, Juhana.Saukkonen@helsinki.fi Secretary and board member, Juhana Markus Saukkonen, 2004 2006, Finland Francis Borchardt International Society for the Study of Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature, Member, Francis Borchardt, 2008 Membership or other role of body in private company/organisation Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Suomen Jerusalemin-instituutin ystävät ry, Martti Nissinen, 01.1995 02.2010, Finland Tapiolan kamarikuoro, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2000 31.12.2007, United States Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Hallintoneuvoston jäsenyys kulttuuria ja tiedettä tukevassa organisaatiossa, Raija Sollamo, 2004 Hallituksen puheenjohtaja (President), Raija Sollamo, 01.07.2009 30.06.2010, Finland Chair of the Board, Raija Sollamo, 2010 2012, Finland Kirsi Valkama, kirsi.valkama@helsinki.fi, kvalkama@mappi.helsinki.fi Suomen Eksegeettinen Seura, Kirsi Valkama, 01.09.2005 11.02.2010, Israel 2011, Finland 7

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Other tasks of an expert in private sector Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung/ assessment of applications, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 1996, Germany The Finnish Academy of Sciences and Letters/Invited lecture, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 14.02.2005, Finland Participation in interview for written media Anneli Aejmelaeus, Anneli.Aejmelaeus@helsinki.fi Kirkkopäivät, Oulu, Anneli Aejmelaeus, 27.05.2005, Germany Jutta Jokiranta, Jutta.Jokiranta@helsinki.fi Kaanonin tuolla puolen, Jutta Jokiranta, 2010, Finland Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Akateemisen kirjakaupan kohtaamispaikka, Martti Nissinen, 22.09.2000 Bibliodramaohjaajien neuvottelupäivät, Martti Nissinen, 09.09.2000 Helsingin srk.yhymän katekismuskeskustelut, Martti Nissinen, 04.10.2000 Herännäisopiskelijoiden Petäjävapriikin akatemia, Martti Nissinen, 22.10.2000 Kirkko ja kaupunki 17/2000, Martti Nissinen, 03.05.2000 Kirkko ja kaupunki 36/2000, Martti Nissinen, 27.09.2000 Malmin rovastikunnan pappien piiri, Martti Nissinen, 18.10.2000 Malmin srk:n katekismusluentosarja, Martti Nissinen, 20.09.2000 Norssin yläaste, paneelikeskustelu, Martti Nissinen, 28.03.2000 Riemuvuoden luentosarja, Kemi, Martti Nissinen, 15.03.2000 Sipoon srk:n katekismusluentosarja, Martti Nissinen, 21.09.2000 Sveitsin suomalaisten riemuvuoden seminaari, Martti Nissinen, 27.10.2000 Tiedekeskus Heurekan luentosarja, Martti Nissinen, 08.04.2000 Vuosaaren srk, Martti Nissinen, 25.03.2000 Edita Oy, Uskonnonopettajien koulutustilaisuus, Martti Nissinen, 03.04.2001 Erkki Niinivaara -seura, Martti Nissinen, 12.05.2001 Etsijä 1/01, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2001 Helsingin Diakonissalaitos, historiaopintopiiri, Martti Nissinen, 07.02.2001 Helsingin Diakonissalaitos, katekismusluento, Martti Nissinen, 25.01.2001 Helsingin kirjamessut, Martti Nissinen, 25.10.2001 Hämeen Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 04.02.2001 Ikäihmisten yliopisto, Martti Nissinen, 13.02.2001 Janakkalan srk, katekismusluento, Martti Nissinen, 29.01.2001 Kotimaa, Martti Nissinen, 23.02.2001 Kotokulma, Martti Nissinen, 14.02.2001 Kymin srk, raamattuluentosarja, Martti Nissinen, 25.10.2001 Munkkiniemen srk, työntekijöiden visiopäivä, Martti Nissinen, 04.01.2001 Riihimäen Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 04.02.2001 Sana, Martti Nissinen, 22.03.2001 Sipoon suom. srk, luentotilaisuus, Martti Nissinen, 26.04.2001 Helsigin kaupunkilähetyksen pääsiäisristeily, Martti Nissinen, 02.04.2002 8

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Helsingin Kaupunkilähetyksen pääsiäisristeily, Martti Nissinen, 04.04.2002 Helsingin Kaupunkilähetyksen pääsiäisristeily, Martti Nissinen, 31.03.2002 Helsingin hiippakunnan apupapit, Martti Nissinen, 08.04.2002 Helsingin kaupunkilähetyksen pääsiäisristeily, Martti Nissinen, 01.04.2002 Helsingin kaupunkilähetyksen pääsiäisristeily, Martti Nissinen, 03.04.2002 Helsingin seuratupa, Martti Nissinen, 22.09.2002 Kirkkopalvelut, Kuvataiteilijoiden retriiti, Heponiemen hiljaisuuden keskus, Martti Nissinen, 16.09.2002 Kirkon ihmisoikeusasiain neuvottelukunnan seminaari, Martti Nissinen, 26.09.2002 Kristillinen kulttuuriliitto, Martti Nissinen, 11.04.2002 Society of Biblical Literature, International Meeting, Martti Nissinen, 20.07.2002 Suomen Eksegeettinen Seura, Martti Nissinen, 21.02.2002 Espoon uskonnonopettajien kerho, Martti Nissinen, 15.10.2003 Helsingin Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 17.01.2003 Helsingin Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 15.09.2003 Helsingin kirkkopäivät, Martti Nissinen, 24.05.2003 Helsingin seuratupa, Martti Nissinen, 07.12.2003 Heränneiden ylioppilaskodin 75-vuotisjuhla, Martti Nissinen, 15.11.2003 Kirkko ja Koti, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2003 Kirkko ja kaupunki, Martti Nissinen, 08.10.2003 Kyyhkynen, Martti Nissinen, 01.02.2003 Männistön seurakunta, Martti Nissinen, 19.10.2003 Sota ja väkivalta Raamatun maailmassa -luennot, Martti Nissinen, 29.10.2003 Suomen Eksegeettisen seuran Qumran-paneeli, Martti Nissinen, 24.01.2003 Suomen Kuvalehti, Martti Nissinen, 19.12.2003 Suomen eksegeettinen seura, Martti Nissinen, 06.03.2003 Ylen ykkönen, Martti Nissinen, 05.10.2003 Ylen ykkönen, Eeva Luotosen Viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 15.04.2003 Ylioppilainen kristillinen yhdistys, Martti Nissinen, 20.02.2003 Aholansaari, Rippikoulun jatkokurssi, Martti Nissinen, 24.09.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Haastattelu Tulva, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Haastattelu YleQ, Martti Nissinen, 18.05.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Helsingin seurakuntayhtymä, Armo-tapahtuma, Martti Nissinen, 15.10.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Helsingin seurakuntayhtymä, työntekijöiden kolultustapahtuma, Martti Nissinen, 06.09.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Helsingin yliopisto, Studia Generalia, Martti Nissinen, 03.03.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Juankosken seurakunta, Martti Nissinen, 28.02.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Kansan Raamattuseuran opiskelijatyö, Martti Nissinen, 15.04.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Kouvolan Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Kouvolan kansalaisopisto, Martti Nissinen, 03.11.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Opiskelijoiden lähetysliitto, Martti Nissinen, 04.02.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Suomen Lähi-idän instituutin ystävät, koulutusmatka Syyriaan, Martti Nissinen, 01.04.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Sveitsin suomalaisten vuosiseminaari, Martti Nissinen, 28.10.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom 9

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Lehti: Ankkuri: Ruotsin kirkon suomenkielisen työn lehti 2/2006, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2006 Tilaisuus: Espoon tuomiokirkkosrk:n teologiapiiri, Martti Nissinen, 23.10.2006 Tilaisuus: Helsingin seurakuntayhtymän erityisdiakonia, Martti Nissinen, 06.02.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Tilaisuus: Kuopion Männistön ja Alavan seurakuntien luentosarja, Martti Nissinen, 03.09.2006 Tilaisuus: Studia generalia Vanajaveden opisto, Hämeenlinna, Martti Nissinen, 02.03.2006 Tilaisuus: Tukholman suomalainen seurakunta, Martti Nissinen, 22.02.2006 Tilaisuus: Uskonnonopettajien talvipäivät, Martti Nissinen, 28.01.2006 Kirkon parisuhdelakiseminaari, Martti Nissinen, 15.01.2007 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, United States Kuopion Palvelevan puhelimen päivystäjien koulutus, Valamon luostari, Martti Nissinen, 10.03.2007 Kuopion Palvelevan puhelimen päivystäjien koulutus, Valamon luostari, Martti Nissinen, 10.03.2007 Kuopion Palvelevan puhelimen päivystäjien koulutus, Valamon luostari, Martti Nissinen, 11.03.2007 Körttiopiskelijoiden talvipäivät, Helsinki, Martti Nissinen, 03.02.2007 31.12.2011, United States Palvelevan puhelimen valtakunnalliset neuvottelupäivät, Joensuu, Martti Nissinen, 29.09.2007 Pihlajamäen kirkko, Martti Nissinen, 30.09.2007 Savolaiset seniorit, Helsinki, Martti Nissinen, 09.12.2007 31.12.2011, United States Sexpo ry:n seksuaaliterapiakoulutus, Martti Nissinen, 22.03.2007 YLE1 Enkelit-sarja, Martti Nissinen, 23.02.2007 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States YLE1: Eeva Luotosen viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 03.07.2007 YLE1: Eeva Luotosen viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 10.07.2007 YLE1: Eeva Luotosen viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 17.07.2007 YLE1: Eeva Luotosen viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 24.07.2007 Ylioppilaiden Kristillinen Yhdistys, Martti Nissinen, 22.02.2007 Esse, Martti Nissinen, 11.11.2010, Finland Helsingin Sanomat, Martti Nissinen, 30.10.2010, Finland Iltalehti, Martti Nissinen, 25.10.2010, Finland Keskisuomalainen, Martti Nissinen, 27.10.2010, Finland Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi Lehti: Apropos, Juha Pakkala, 01.08.2006 Lehti: Kotimaa, Juha Pakkala, 18.08.2006 Lehti: Sana, Juha Pakkala, 01.09.2006 Lehti: Yliopistolehti, Juha Pakkala, 01.08.2006 Lehti: Yliopistolehti, Juha Pakkala, 01.08.2006 Suomen Akatemian Apropos lehden haastattelu, Juha Pakkala, 01.01.2007 EABS Lissabon, Juha Pakkala, 05.08.2008 SBL Annual, Boston, Juha Pakkala, 24.11.2008 SBL Annual, Boston, USA, Juha Pakkala, 25.11.2008 Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi 31.12.2011, Germany 31.12.2011, Germany 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, Germany 31.12.2011, Switzerland HY:n Aikuiskoulutuskeskuksen kurssilla "Tulevaisuuden johtajat", Raija Sollamo, 04.05.2000 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, Sweden 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States 31.12.2011, United States Helsingin kaupungin kulttuurivuoteen liittyneen Ecce homo -näyttelyn avajaiset, Raija Sollamo, 17.06.2000 Hiippakuntauutiset 1/2000 s.4-6, Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2000 Ikäihmisten yliopisto Helsinki/Tampere Foibe, Vantaa ja (uusinta) Koulutuskeskus Tavastia Hämeenlinna, Raija Sollamo, 02.02.2000 10

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Tiedenaisia näyttely, Raija Sollamo, 08.05.2000 Turun sotaveteraanit, Turun upseerikerho, Raija Sollamo, 20.10.2000 Turun suomenkielinen kansanopisto, Raija Sollamo, 09.11.2000 Vaasan kulttuurifoorum "Tieteen hinta?" Tilaisuudesta laajahkot selostukset 22.10.2000 sekä Pohjalaisessa että Ilkassa, Raija Sollamo, 21.10.2000 Vantaan akateemiset naiset, Myyrmäen kirkko, Raija Sollamo, 04.05.2000 Heurekassa tapahtuu: Kymmenen käskyä - kymmenen puheenvuoroa, Raija Sollamo, 11.06.2001 Lotta Svärd 80 vuotta ja talvisodan alkamisen muistotilaisuus, Raija Sollamo, 30.11.2001 Onnipuu-reliefin paljastaminen ja Metsätieteiden talon vihkiminen, Raija Sollamo, 30.11.2001 Rotaryklub, Finlandia-talo, Raija Sollamo, 31.05.2001 Seurakuntien talousforum, Raija Sollamo, 13.02.2001 Tulevaisuudetn johtajat -seminaari, Raija Sollamo, 04.04.2001 Työhyvinvoinnin suunta -seminaario Finlandia-talossa, Raija Sollamo, 06.09.2001 Vääksyn yhteiskoulun 75-vuotisjuhla, Raija Sollamo, 13.10.2001 Yliopistojen johdon ja opetusministeriön seminaari, Oulu, Raija Sollamo, 12.11.2001 Suomen akateemisten naisten syysseminaari, Raija Sollamo, 20.10.2002 Kirkkopäivät, Raija Sollamo, 23.05.2003 Kunnallisvirkamiesliiton koulutustilaisuus Finlandia-talossa, Raija Sollamo, 17.05.2003 Tapaseuran Hyvien tapojen päivän seminaari Kotikasvatus kunniaan (Helsingin yliopistolla), Raija Sollamo, 20.09.2003 31.12.2011, Finland Vårt KTF - Arbetsglädje (Kunnallisvirkamiesliiton ruotsinkielinen koulutustilaisuus Vaasassa), Raija Sollamo, 11.10.2003 31.12.2011, Finland Suomen Lottaperinneliiton juhla, Hämeenlinna, Raija Sollamo, 26.09.2004 Asikkala-seuran joululounas Hotelli Haagassa, Raija Sollamo, 03.12.2005 Helsingin Sanomat, Raija Sollamo, 24.08.2005 Kotimaa n:o 34, Raija Sollamo, 26.08.2005 Muuttuva työsuojelukulttuuri - kansainvälinen työturvallisuuspäivä. Työturvallisuuskeskus 35 vuotta., Raija Sollamo, 28.04.2005 Padasjoen reserviläisjärjestöjen tiedote 2/05., Raija Sollamo, 27.04.2005 Paratiisi-retriitti, Raija Sollamo, 15.09.2005 Pohjan työväenopisto - Pojo arbetarinstitut, Raija Sollamo, 20.10.2005 Päijät-Hämeen Maanpuolustus- ja Kansallisen veteraanipäivän juhla, Raija Sollamo, 27.04.2005 Työyhteisöviesti huhtikuu 2/2005, 29-31., Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2005 Vantaan kaupungin henkilökunnan koulutustilaisuus, Raija Sollamo, 16.11.2005 Yle-teema T-club, Raija Sollamo, 10.11.2005 Myyrmäen rotaryt, viikkokokous, Raija Sollamo, 21.08.2006 Vantaan Lauri, Rantasalmen sanomat jne., Raija Sollamo, 01.01.2006 Vantaankosken seurakunnan seurakuntailta, Raija Sollamo, 29.11.2006 Helsingin Lions Clubien koulutustilaisuus, Raija Sollamo, 08.05.2007 Itsenäisyysjuhla Kivimäen koulun vanhemmille, Raija Sollamo, 04.12.2007 Lasten itsenäisyysjuhla Kivimäen koululla., Raija Sollamo, 05.12.2007 Women and Religion. Suomen Unifemin järjestämä tapahtuma 15.11.2007 13-16 Kansallismusen auditorio, Raija Sollamo, 15.11.2007 11

CSTT/Aejmelaeus INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010 Yleisöluentosarja Vanhusten palvelutalo Foibessa Vantaalla, Raija Sollamo, 23.11.2007 Naiset ja uskonto -seminaari, järj. kirkon naistyön toimikunta ja NNKY, Raija Sollamo, 05.10.2008 Vantaan Aikuisopiston luentosarja, Raija Sollamo, 07.03.2008 Vantaankosken martat, Raija Sollamo, 19.11.2008 Eläketeologien kokous, Raija Sollamo, 17.09.2009 Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Haastattelu: Juudas on evankeliuminsa sankari, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2006 Haastattelu: Suurin syntinen, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2009 Mika Pajunen, mika.s.pajunen@helsinki.fi Ikäihmisten yliopisto Foibe, Vantaa, Mika Pajunen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2011, Germany Participation in radio programme Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi Haastattelu Radio Ylen ykkönen, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Haastattelu Radio Ylen ykkönen, Martti Nissinen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Haastattelu Toivon tuottajien pääsiäisradio, Martti Nissinen, 22.03.2005 31.12.2011, United Kingdom Radio-ohjelma: Eeva Luotosen viisasten kerho, Martti Nissinen, 05.12.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Radio-ohjelma: Kuka kukin on kirjallisuudessa, Martti Nissinen, 27.04.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Radio-ohjelma: Kuka kukin on kirjallisuudessa, Martti Nissinen, 15.03.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Radio-ohjelma: Kuka kukin on kirjallisuudessa, Martti Nissinen, 15.03.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Radio-ohjelma: Kuka kukin on kirjallisuudessa, Martti Nissinen, 11.01.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden Horisontti, Martti Nissinen, 14.11.2010, Finland Juha Pakkala, Juha.Pakkala@helsinki.fi Radiohaastattelu: YLE Ylen aikainen, Juha Pakkala, 03.08.2006 Radiohaastattelu: YLE Ylen aikainen, Juha Pakkala, 09.08.2006 Yleisradion haastattelu Kinnretin kaivauksista, Juha Pakkala, 01.01.2007 31.12.2011, Switzerland Raija Sollamo, Raija.Sollamo@helsinki.fi Toivontuottajien pääsiäisradio, Raija Sollamo, 17.03.2005 Hanne M Weissenberg von, Hanne.vonWeissenberg@helsinki.fi Arjen teologiaa kaupunkilaisittain, Hanne M Weissenberg von, 2006 2007 Participation in TV programme Martti Nissinen, martti.nissinen@helsinki.fi TV-ohjelma: Aamu-TV /Luonto lähellä, Martti Nissinen, 10.04.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden TV-ohjelma: Ruotsin TV:n suomenkieliset uutiset, Martti Nissinen, 22.02.2006 31.12.2011, Sweden TV 1: K-rappu, Martti Nissinen, 11.09.2007 31.12.2011, United States 12

Appendix B.b. Maria Forsman, Chief Information Specialist, DSocSc Helsinki University Library 7.7.2011 The bibliometric analyses by Helsinki University Library (HULib) Background: The bibliometric analyses especially citation analyses have raised a lot of discussion and critics among researchers in social sciences and humanities. Researchers view that bibliometric analyses are often unfair to these fields of sciences because they do not give a good enough picture of the publishing. Citation databases Web of Science and Scopus cover only weakly the main publications in these fields. Also, in humanities and social sciences monograph is still the main form of publishing, and it does not include in these article databases. At the University of Helsinki, the above mentioned concerns have been taken into account in the evaluation. The Evaluation Office has ordered analyses from the Helsinki University Library (HULib) for the participating researcher communities that are weakly represented in Web of Science. The database for the HULib analyses is TUHAT (https://tuhat.halvi.helsinki.fi/portal/en/) including all the publications that the researchers have considered important. Based on this data, information specialists at HULib have carried out the following analyses: 1) Number of authors/publication/year as a table; a pie of authors/publication in the period 2005-2010; 2) Language of publication/year; a pie of language of publication in the period 2005-2010; 3) Articles/journal/year; journals have been compared by ISSN with the Norwegian, Australian and ERIH (2007-2008) journal ranking lists; number of articles in ranked journals; 4) Publisher/monograph type (according to TUHAT database); monographs have been compared with the Norwegian publisher ranking list. According to this, it has been counted how many monographs are published by a leading scientific publisher (2) or a scientific publisher (1). 5) Conference publications (from TUHAT database) especially in computer sciences; compared with the Australian conference ranking list. Where relevant, some additional analyses and notes concerning the publication culture of a scientific field have been added. Overall, these analyses complement the other evaluation material and lists of the publications of the participating researcher communities. If the publications of the RCs were less than 50 or/and the internal coverage less than 40 percentage, the WoS analyses were considered not reliable. These RCs were 58 altogether. In addition, both Leiden and Library analyses were done to the RCs if WoS analyses covered less than 40 per cent of the peer review (A+C) publications of the RC. These RCs were 8 altogether. The appendix includes the analyses of the RC under discussion.

Analysis of publications by Helsinki University Library 66 RCs altogether Biological, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Luukkanen, Olavi VITRI Valsta, Lauri SUVALUE Natural Sciences Abrahamsson, Pekka SOFTSYS Kangasharju, Jussi NODES Ukkonen, Esko ALKO Väänänen, Jouko HLG Humanities Aejmelaeus, Anneli CSTT Anttonen, Pertti CMVG Dunderberg, Ismo FC Havu, Eva CoCoLaC Heikkilä, Markku RCSP Heinämaa, Sara SHC Henriksson, Markku CITA Janhunen, Juha LDHFTA Kajava Mika, AMNE Klippi, Anu Interaction Knuuttila, Simo PPMP Koskenniemi, Kimmo BAULT Lauha, Aila CECH Lavento, Mika ARCH-HU Lukkarinen, Ville AHCI Lyytikäinen, Pirjo GLW Mauranen, Anna LFP Meinander, Henrik HIST Nevalainen, Terttu VARIENG Pettersson, Bo ILLC Pulkkinen, Tuija Gender Studies Pyrhönen, Heta ART Ruokanen, Miikka RELDIAL Saarinen, Risto RELSOC Sandu, Gabriel LMPS Tarasti, Eero MusSig Vehmas-Lehto, Inkeri TraST Östman, Jan-Ola LMS Social Sciences Airaksinen, Timo PPH Engeström, Yrjö CRADLE Granberg, Leo - TRANSRURBAN Haila, Anne Sociopolis Hautamäki, Jarkko CEA Heinonen, Visa KUMU Helén, Ilpo STS Hukkinen, Janne GENU Jallinoja, Riitta SBII Kaartinen, Timo SCA Kettunen, Pauli - NordSoc Kivinen, Markku FCREES Koponen, Juhani DEVERELE Koskenniemi, Martti ECI Kultti, Klaus EAT Lahelma, Elina KUFE Lanne, Markku TSEM Lavonen, Jari RCMSER Lehtonen, Risto SocStats Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari EdPsychHE Nieminen, Hannu MECOL Nuotio, Kimmo Law Nyman, Göte METEORI Ollikainen, Markku ENFIFO Pirttilä-Backman, Anna-Maija DYNASOBIC Rahkonen, Keijo CulCap Roos, J P HELPS Simola, Hannu SOCE-DGI Sulkunen, Pekka PosPus Sumelius, John AG ECON Vaattovaara, Mari STRUTSI Vainio, Martti SigMe The next appendix includes the analyses of the RC under discussion.

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI 29.6.2011 PJK 19.4.2012 EH PUBLICATION DATA 2005-2010 RC/CSTT/Aejmelaeus Category 1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. Number of authors in publications/year No. of authors 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Grand Total 1 17 27 39 40 67 44 234 2 1 2 4 7 8 2 24 3 2 1 1 2 6 5 2 1 3 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 9 1 1 Grand Total 22 30 44 47 79 49 271 The publications have mostly only one author (86 %). 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 1 2 3 5 6 7 9

% of au in publications 2005-2010 3 au 2 % 7 au 1 % 2 au 9 % 5 au 1 % 9 au 0 % 6 au 1 % 1 au 86 % Language of publication / Year Language 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Grand Total Finnish fi_fi 14 13 31 15 34 20 127 English en_gb 8 12 13 31 32 25 121 German de_de 5 1 2 8 Danish da_dk 5 2 7 Norwegian no_no 5 5 Swedish sv_se 1 2 3 Grand Total 22 30 44 47 79 49 271 The commonest language is Finnish (47 %), as English (45 %) in the second place.

Language of Publications 2005-2010 de_de 3 % da_dk 2 % no_no 2 % sv_se 1 % fi_fi 47 % en_gb 45 % Journal / Year / Total Grand Total 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Journal Tampereen kirkkosanomat 4 10 5 19 Teologinen Aikakauskirja 1 2 5 1 3 4 16 Diakonian tutkimus 2 2 4 1 2 1 12 Pyhäkoululehti 1 6 7 Dead Sea Discoveries 1 2 1 4 International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies. Bulletin 3 3 Journal for the Study of Judaism 2 1 3 Review of Biblical Literature 2 1 3 SJOT : Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament. 1 1 1 3 Bibliana 2 2 Journal of Jewish Studies 2 2 Kulttuurintutkimus 2 2 Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. Vuosikirja 1 1 2 Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 1 1 2 Aamulehti 1 1 American Oriental Society. Journal 1 1 Anno Domini : diakoniatieteen vuosikirja 1 1 Biblische Notizen : aktuelle Beiträge zur Exegese der Bibel und 1 1

ihrer Welt. Crux 1 1 Diaconia. The Journal for the Study of Christian Social Practice 1 1 Elämään 1 1 Gladiolus 1 1 Hadashot Arkheologiyot 1 1 Journal of Biblical Literature 1 1 Kaskal 1 1 Lectio Difficilior 1 1 Levant 1 1 Sielunhoidon aikakauskirja 1 1 Society of Biblical Literature 1 1 Studia Theologica 1 1 Suomen Kirkkohistoriallisen Seuran Vuosikirja 1 1 Synsygus : Suomen uskonnonopettajain liiton jäsenkirje. 1 1 Tekniikan Waiheita 1 1 Tieteessä tapahtuu 1 1 Trinity Seminary review. 1 1 Tro & Liv 1 1 Vetus Testamentum 1 1 Grand Total 6 15 29 15 17 21 103 Journal ranking (Norway, Australia, ERIH) Journals Grand Total Norway ERIH Gender Studies (2007) ERIH Classical Studies (2007) ERIH Archaeology (2007) Australia ERIH History_2007 Theology (2007) ERIH Literature (2008) ERIH Linguistics (2007) Teologinen Aikakauskirja 16 B B Diakonian tutkimus 12 C Dead Sea Discoveries 4 1 A B International Organization for 3 1 B B Septuagint and Cognate Studies. Bulletin Journal for the Study of Judaism 3 2 C B A SJOT : Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament. 3 1 A B Journal of Jewish Studies 2 2 A* C A Kulttuurintutkimus 2 C C Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 2 2 A* A American Oriental Society. Journal 1 1 A* A ERIH Religious Studies and

Biblische Notizen : aktuelle Beiträge zur Exegese der Bibel und ihrer Welt. 1 C Diaconia. The Journal for the Study of 1 1 Christian Social Practice Journal of Biblical Literature 1 2 A* B Lectio Difficilior 1 1 Levant 1 A A Studia Theologica 1 2 A B Suomen Kirkkohistoriallisen Seuran Vuosikirja 1 C C Vetus Testamentum 1 2 A* A Amount of ranked articles (Norway) Norway Journal articles Level 2 10 Level 1 13 Amount of ranked articles (Australian) Australia Journal articles Level A* 7 Level A 9 Level B 19 Level C 16 Book publishers Publisher ranking (based on Norwegian ranking list) 2 = leading scientific 1 =scientific no = non-scientific or not ranked C1 Published scientific monograph (5) C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal (6) D5 Text book or professional handbook or guidebook or dictionary (8) E2 Popular monograph (2) 5 books of 21 have been published by a high ranked leading scientific publisher, 4 by a ranked scientific publisher.

Publisher c1_scientific_monograph c2_edited_book_compila tion_conferenceproceedi ngs_special d5_textbook_profession al_handbook Kirjapaja 2 1 3 1 7 no BRILL 1 2 3 2 Edita 3 3 1 University of Helsinki, Department of Biblical Studies 1 1 no Diaconia University of Applied Sciences (Diak) 1 1 no Eisenbrauns 1 1 no Finnish Exegetical Society 1 1 no Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press 1 1 1 Peeters 1 1 2 Perussanoma 1 1 no Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1 1 2 Grand Total 5 6 8 2 21 e2_popular_monograph Grand Total Publisher ranking

University of Helsinki Administrative Publications 80/73 Evaluations ISBN 978-952-10-7493-6 (PDF) ISSN 1795-5513 (Online) Internet address: http://www.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/aineisto/rc_evaluation2012/hallinnon_julkaisuja_80_73_2012.pdf